╌>

Democrat Fueled Unequal Treatment Under the Law Must Be Fought

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  3 years ago  •  27 comments

By:   Tim Hains

Democrat Fueled Unequal Treatment Under the Law Must Be Fought
There's a good chance the Chewbacca Guy will spend more time in jail for trespassing than Mohammad Anwar's killers will spend for murder. That's not an accident, this disproportionate treatment of crimes. If you’re an autocrat, the biggest threat isn’t people who commit actual violence. You can use that as your shock troops, and the people who run our country actually have. The biggest threat to you, if you’re an autocrat, is people who mock you, and don’t take you seriously, and sneer at...

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

The dual justice system in this nation is an outrage as shown below.  The bicoastal urban elites and their big tech social media, mainstream media, and democrat party allies are punishing dissent against them severely while allowing people allied with them to be used as their shock troops and get off easy if caught.  The article below is so right on.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Today is the three-month anniversary of January 6th. For those who aren’t good with dates or don’t have calendars, this is the day we pause to remember the White supremacist "QAnon insurrection" that came so very close to toppling our government and ending this democracy forever. You saw what happened. It was carried live on television, every gruesome moment.

A mob of older people from unfashionable zip codes somehow made it all the way to Washington, D.C., probably by bus. They wandered freely through the Capitol, like it was their building or something. They didn’t have guns, but a lot of them had extremely dangerous ideas. They talked about the Constitution, and something called "their rights." Some of them made openly seditious claims. They insisted, for example, that the last election was not entirely fair. The whole thing was terrifying. And then, as you’ve been told so often, they committed unspeakable violence. By the time thousands of soldiers arrived to restore order, an unarmed woman, an Air Force veteran, lay dead. To this day, that woman is the one completely verified casualty of the insurrection, the only person whose death we can say definitively was caused by specific events on January 6th. We know how she died.

The funny thing is, you almost never hear that woman’s name. Possibly that’s because she wasn’t a Democratic member of Congress, or even a Joe Biden voter. She was a protestor. Her name was Ashli Babbitt. She was 35.


We still don’t know who shot Ashli Babbitt, or why. No one will tell us. But then, when you’re fighting insurrectionists, you don’t have to explain yourself. You just hyperventilate about QAnon, and then you do whatever you want. When a group of sad, disenfranchised people who have been left out of the modern economy show up at your office, you don’t have to listen to their complaints, not for a second. Why would you? You thought listening to people’s complaints was democracy? No, these people threaten democracy. You can even shoot one of them, if you want, and get away with it. Killing people without explaining yourself is an established part of counterinsurgency. If you don’t believe it, check out what happened in the Second World War.

CHUCK SCHUMER, JAN. 6: President Franklin Roosevelt set aside December 7th, 1941, as a day that will live in infamy. Unfortunately, we can now add January 6th, 2021 to that very short list of dates in American history that will live forever in infamy.

January 6th was equivalent to Pearl Harbor, says Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Schumer has never really gotten appropriate credit for the grandeur of that statement, considering the fact that we entered the Second World War the day after Pearl Harbor. That war went on for four years. More than 400,000 Americans died. That was the cost of stopping fascism.

We don’t yet know the cost of stopping White supremacist QAnon insurrection, but you can be certain Chuck Schumer is prepared to have you pay whatever it costs. Joe Biden’s Justice Department is on the front lines of this new war.

Until late last month, a man called Michael Sherwin worked for the administration as a prosecutor in Washington. Sherwin bragged that his office rounded up about 400 people who were in or near the Capitol on Jan. 6. You may be wondering if 400 people really committed crimes that day. It depends how you define "crime." Here's Michael Sherwin's definition:

MICHAEL SHERWIN: After the 6th, we had an inauguration on the 20th. So I wanted to ensure, and our office wanted to ensure that there was shock and awe, that we could charge as many people as possible before the 20th. And it worked because we saw through media posts that people were afraid to come back to D.C. because they're like, "If we go there, we're gonna get charged." ... We wanted to take out those individuals that essentially were thumbing their noses at the public for what they did.

So now it’s clear. It wasn’t that 400 people broke actual laws. No, their crime, said the federal prosecutor, was "thumbing their noses at the public," meaning the Democratic Party. It wasn’t "insurrection." It was showing disrespect to Joe Biden and his enforcers like Michael Sherwin, and that can’t happen.

That’s why Michael Sherwin decided to use "shock and awe" — to teach them a permanent lesson about expressing their political opinions. As Sherwin explained, "the scope and scale of this investigation are really unprecedented, not only in FBI history but probably DOJ history."

And he may be right. How big and how serious is this investigation into those insurrectionists? So serious that the FBI has stopped investigating other crimes, and not minor crimes.

According to USA Today, "Investigators who typically work cases involving the trafficking of drugs, child pornography and sex have taken calls from rioter’s [sic] angry ex-wives and former girlfriends and employers turned tipsters."

So, in order to send a message to people with unacceptable political ideas in Washington, D.C., we’re not going after people who sell fentanyl, a drug that has killed more than 100,000 Americans, or child pornographers. They won’t be punished. So who are these people who are being perused in lieu of tracking down fentanyl dealers and child pornographers? Who’s experiencing the Biden administration's "shock and awe"?

Well, people like Anthony Alfred Griffith of Oklahoma. Griffith didn't throw fire bombs at a police car. He didn’t loot anything. He didn't torch a Wendy's. He did something far worse. According to KFOR-TV:

"Griffith walked into the U.S. Capitol building through the open doors on January 6, telling the agents he did not see any police officers as he entered the building. He then went into a nearby office where he 'interacted with some individuals' before exiting the building. However, he reentered the U.S. Capitol Building again a short time later, where he meandered through the hallways and took a few photos."

For that act of terrorism, Anthony Griffith faces seven years in prison. Prosecutor Michael Sherwin is fine with that. At one point in his interview with "60 Minutes," Sherwin was asked about bringing sedition charges against the people he arrests, the people who meandered. Sure, he replied. Why not?

SCOTT PELLEY: Sedition occurs when anyone opposes by force the authority of the United States, or by force hinders or delays the execution of any law of the United States ... Do you anticipate sedition charges against some of these suspects?

SHERWIN: I believe the facts do support those charges. And I think that, as we go forward, more facts will support that, Scott.

Meandering is sedition, says Michael Sherwin.

Just for reference, federal prosecutors aren’t supposed to reveal themselves as partisan lunatics on television. Sherwin’s comments were so grotesquely out of line that a federal judge appointed by Barack Obama, Amit Mehta, said he was considering issuing a gag order to make Michael Sherwin be quiet. The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals -- the most powerful appellate court in the country -- just ordered the DOJ to start distinguishing between actual criminals, and people who walked through open doors inside the Capitol building.

That ruling came after the DOJ tried to convince a judge that two defendants -- Lisa Eisenhart and her son, Eric Munchel - should face indefinite detention. Neither Lisa Eisenhart nor her son damaged any property at the Capitol or committed any violence. They just walked in to what we used to refer to as the People’s House.

And yet, somehow Joe Biden’s DOJ convinced a trial judge that Lisa Eisenhart was a "threat to our Republic," and that her son was a "would-be martyr." Keep in mind, these are people whose only crime was trespassing in the Capitol. We’re not endorsing that, but some perspective please.

It took a ruling from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to bring some perspective.

"Two individuals who did not engage in any violence and who were not involved in planning or coordinating the activities — seemingly would pose little threat," the appellate panel wrote. Yeah, seemingly.

But the judges still didn't release Eric Munchel or Lisa Eisenhart. That's how much power these prosecutors have. They can keep you in prison even when a three-judge appellate panel concludes there's no reason for you to be in prison.

That's probably why prosecutors still haven't, as of tonight, released a man called Jacob Chansely, otherwise known as the "Chewbacca Guy." Like Eric Munchel and Lisa Eisenhart, Jacob Chansely isn't accused of committing any act of violence. He's not accused of breaking any property. What exactly did he do? We can answer that question. Video shows him walking through the Senate chamber.

"Chewbacca Guy" is still in jail. He’ll be there indefinitely. Before you shrug that off, think about what that’s actually like. You don’t want to think about it.

A number of people arrested on Jan. 6 are still rotting in the D.C. municipal lockup, one of the foulest detention centers in the country. It's a truly repulsive, mismanaged place. Ask anyone from Washington, D.C. what they would do not to be thrown in the D.C. jail. It’s that bad. Some say they’ve been beaten, not surprisingly, by guards there. Lawyers for one, a man called Ryan Samsel, say he was beaten so badly, he has a skull fracture and is now blind in one eye.

How many Antifa rioters or BLM vandals can say that? Did they lose their eyesight from being beaten in jail? Well, as a group, they didn't spend much time in jail. Most were spring on bail immediately, which politicians like Kamala Harris helped them pay.

Last summer, for example, authorities released a terrorism suspect in Oklahoma called Eric Christopher Ruffin, after Black Lives Matter posted his $750,000 bond. According to authorities, Ruffin, "encouraged others to burn an Oklahoma County sheriff's van and an Oklahoma City bail bonds business May 30. The van was destroyed. CJ's Bail Bonds had $8,850 in damage from broken windows."

But Eric Christopher Ruffin went home, and he went home for one reason: Unlike the Chewbacca Guy, he didn't upset the people in charge. He didn't walk in their "sacred chamber" and talk about "liberty and rights." He just tried to vaporize some police vehicles, and that’s exactly what our political class wanted him to do. So he’s a hero, he’s fine. He hasn’t lost his eyesight getting a beating in jail.

This kind of thing, unequal treatment under the law, is on stark display across the country right now. We could spend an hour giving you examples, but here are a couple:

On Saturday, police say, a criminal released on "emergency coronavirus bail" stabbed an elderly Asian woman to death in Riverside, California.

The suspect, Darlene Montoya, was in jail for a serious crime -- she'd been accused of assault with a deadly weapon. But, is that really as serious as meandering through the Capitol building? No, of course not, it’s not "insurrection." So, Darlene Montoya got to walk out of jail and find someone else to hurt.

In December, a New York judge released a murder suspect named Jordon Benjamin, just in time for Benjamin to go out and allegedly stab a woman in the stomach. Jordon Benjamin then got out of jail again.

Meanwhile, in Detroit, a judge decided to release four felons who had been convicted of criminal sexual assault, and another 14 people who had committed assault. The judge claimed the coronavirus justified their release. According to prosecutors, one of those felons went out and raped three women at knifepoint.

Why haven’t you read this? No one covers any of this because it happens too often to notice.

Last month, however, one of these murders was caught on video. It was impossible to ignore. Two teenage girls -- one 15, and one 13 -- carjacked and killed a Pakistani immigrant driver called Mohammad Anwar. He has kids, and was just trying to work, trying to make a buck. As Mohammad Anwar lay dying on the sidewalk, one of the girls complained that the real crisis was she couldn’t find her cellphone.

You kill a guy who’s just trying to work, and then you can’t even be bothered to notice as he dies on the sidewalk because you’re worried about your phone. There’s a big problem with these girls. They’re young, for sure, but they did something awful.

They’re not being treated that way. They got a plea deal. According to news accounts, they'll be released as soon as they turn 21, if not earlier. There's a good chance the Chewbacca Guy will spend more time in jail for trespassing than Mohammad Anwar's killers will spend for murder. That's not an accident, this disproportionate treatment of crimes. If you’re an autocrat, the biggest threat isn’t people who commit actual violence. You can use that as your shock troops, and the people who run our country actually have.

The biggest threat to you, if you’re an autocrat, is people who mock you, and don’t take you seriously, and sneer at you. You want them in prison, and autocrats are doing just that.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    3 years ago

The first 15 minutes or so is the article above and its right on. 
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hoYPGwAca28

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    3 years ago
That ruling came after the DOJ tried to convince a judge that two defendants -- Lisa Eisenhart and her son, Eric Munchel - should face indefinite detention. Neither Lisa Eisenhart nor her son damaged any property at the Capitol or committed any violence. They just walked in to what we used to refer to as the People’s House.

And yet, somehow Joe Biden’s DOJ convinced a trial judge that Lisa Eisenhart was a "threat to our Republic," and that her son was a "would-be martyr." Keep in mind, these are people whose only crime was trespassing in the Capitol. We’re not endorsing that, but some perspective please.

It took a ruling from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to bring some perspective.

"Two individuals who did not engage in any violence and who were not involved in planning or coordinating the activities — seemingly would pose little threat," the appellate panel wrote. Yeah, seemingly.

But the judges still didn't release Eric Munchel or Lisa Eisenhart. That's how much power these prosecutors have. They can keep you in prison even when a three-judge appellate panel concludes there's no reason for you to be in prison.

That's probably why prosecutors still haven't, as of tonight, released a man called Jacob Chansely, otherwise known as the "Chewbacca Guy." Like Eric Munchel and Lisa Eisenhart, Jacob Chansely isn't accused of committing any act of violence. He's not accused of breaking any property. What exactly did he do? We can answer that question. Video shows him walking through the Senate chamber.

"Chewbacca Guy" is still in jail. He’ll be there indefinitely. Before you shrug that off, think about what that’s actually like. You don’t want to think about it.

A number of people arrested on Jan. 6 are still rotting in the D.C. municipal lockup, one of the foulest detention centers in the country. It's a truly repulsive, mismanaged place. Ask anyone from Washington, D.C. what they would do not to be thrown in the D.C. jail. It’s that bad. Some say they’ve been beaten, not surprisingly, by guards there. Lawyers for one, a man called Ryan Samsel, say he was beaten so badly, he has a skull fracture and is now blind in one eye.

How many Antifa rioters or BLM vandals can say that? Did they lose their eyesight from being beaten in jail? Well, as a group, they didn't spend much time in jail. Most were spring on bail immediately, which politicians like Kamala Harris helped them pay.

Last summer, for example, authorities released a terrorism suspect in Oklahoma called Eric Christopher Ruffin, after Black Lives Matter posted his $750,000 bond. According to authorities, Ruffin, "encouraged others to burn an Oklahoma County sheriff's van and an Oklahoma City bail bonds business May 30. The van was destroyed. CJ's Bail Bonds had $8,850 in damage from broken windows."

But Eric Christopher Ruffin went home, and he went home for one reason: Unlike the Chewbacca Guy, he didn't upset the people in charge. He didn't walk in their "sacred chamber" and talk about "liberty and rights." He just tried to vaporize some police vehicles, and that’s exactly what our political class wanted him to do. So he’s a hero, he’s fine. He hasn’t lost his eyesight getting a beating in jail.

This kind of thing, unequal treatment under the law, is on stark display across the country right now. We could spend an hour giving you examples,
https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/12703/tucker-carlson-democrat-fueled-unequal-treatment-under-the-law-must-be-fought#cm1551431
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    3 years ago

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=znYnF-5M3ZU

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2    3 years ago

There’s a non you tube video of this article at the source of the seeded link. 

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
2  Hallux    3 years ago

O'boy ... is Tucker going to interview Matt Gaetz again? I'll watch that!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Hallux @2    3 years ago

Tucker has lots of great guests on his show including those who totally disagree with him. Let’s keep this on the topic of the seed which Is the wildly disproportionate things done to non violent non vandal trespassers compared to those doing violence, vandalism and more in other situations including all the looting arson, vandalism, riots across the country before and since...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Hallux @2    3 years ago

justice system blind to democrat lawbreakers.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3  seeder  XXJefferson51    3 years ago

The way law is being enforced under the Biden regime is truly a model of hypocrisy and double standards.  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
3.1  MrFrost  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3    3 years ago

They pissed on the floors and wiped their own shit on the walls of the US Capitol...they do not deserve to be treated with kid gloves and they sure as fuck are not patriots. Carlson hasn't told the truth about anything, ever, no matter what it is. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    3 years ago

Those who actually did those things should be properly punished for doing so.  They should get the same consequences as those who did vandalism and property damage to businesses, churches, government buildings from May to present elsewhere around the country.  Those there who did not do that should not be punished for the actions of those who did.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4  Dismayed Patriot    3 years ago

"Waaaaaah! The insurrectionists who attacked our capital aren't being treated fair! Waaaaah!".

Give me a break, the way Ol' Butt Tuck Carlson describes it, claiming people from "unfashionable zip codes" "wandered freely through the Capitol" you'd think they were just innocent bystanders there on a Sunday tour and were viscously attacked by autocratic liberal and progressive Capital police.

This is such a worthless piece of shit seed defending insurrectionists and downplaying the seriousness of the attempted insurrection, the violence, the beating officers with flag polls, the use of bear spray in officers eyes, the smashing through doors and windows, breaking into offices, chanting "Hang Mike Pence", carrying around zip ties in expectation of taking congress men and women captive. He even downplays the death toll claiming only 2 deaths of protester's can be verified as if no one else was injured or killed. The rest is just a laundry list of whiny complaints claiming others just aren't being fair to conservatives which is pure horse shit. Both Tucker, the author and the seeder should be ashamed of themselves for printing this trash.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4    3 years ago

Most of those there are guilty of nothing more than trespassing.  No planning, no violence, no vandalism, and most stayed within the areas of the hallways behind the tourist rope lines.  These people need to be let go and the enforcement people need to concentrate on planners and those who did do violence or vandalism.  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5  Greg Jones    3 years ago

The  unarmed female protestor was murdered by one of cops...that story has gone strangely silent.

The cause of death of the cop outside is still undetermined.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
5.1  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @5    3 years ago
The  unarmed female protestor was murdered by one of cops...that story has gone strangely silent.

The cops were defending themselves. It was justified. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  MrFrost @5.1    3 years ago

Not in her case they weren’t.  
  

D.C. Medical Examiner’s Report Blows Huge Hole in Narrative About Capitol Riot Deaths

byKyle Beckerabout 2 hours ago

The Chief Medical Examiner for D.C. on Wednesday gave his determination on the causes of death involving those who died in the Capitol riot on January 6th.

Dr. Francisco Diaz, the Chief Medical Examiner, listed the causes of death as following:

Ashli Babbitt, 35, died from a gunshot wound to her left shoulder, her death has been ruled a ‘homicide’

Roseanne Boyland, 34, died of acute amphetamine intoxication, her death has been ruled ‘accidental’

Kevin Greeson, 55, died of hypertensive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, his death has been ruled ‘natural’

Benjamin Phillips, 50, died of hypertensive atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, his death has been ruled ‘natural’

The cause of death for Officer Brian Sicknick was not as open-and-shut a case as widespread media reports led many Americans to believe. The death of Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick is still unknown and under investigation.

Despite there being a federal murder investigation, there have been several impediments preventing the building of a murder case for what is apparently the only non-protester death related to the Capitol riot. In February, the New York Times had to correct a report that originally stated:

One Capitol Police officer, Brian D. Sicknick, was killed, and investigators are increasingly focused on whether chemical irritants were a factor in his death, according to a senior law enforcement official. The Capitol Police said in a statement that Officer Sicknick died from injuries sustained “while physically engaging with protesters.” Two officers involved in the response have died by suicide, the local police have said.

The Times’ “update” preceded by one day the acquittal of former President Donald Trump of the impeachment charge of “incitement of insurrection” at the Senate trial. CNN had earlier conceded that the narrative about Sicknick did not yet match the evidence on February 2nd — ten days before the Times’ story correction.

Officer Sicknick was given the high honor of being lain in state the Capitol rotunda; it was an honor denied to William “Billy” Evans, an 18-year veteran of the Capitol Police who was killed in a car crash by an African-American man wielding a knife on Friday.

Despite a nationwide FBI manhunt for those who participated in the January 6th uprising, it appears that no one was armed and the only person we know was killed was Ashli Babbitt. That we still don’t know the name of the officer who shot her on video is one of the inexplicable mysteries of the Capitol riot. It is also one that no one in the mainstream media seems intent on solving.

read more:

her death is now a homicide.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.1    3 years ago
In other times - every single one of those who 'Stormed the Capitol' 'It's a Revolution' WOULD HAVE BEEN SHOT DEAD AS TRAITORS!
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.2    3 years ago

That didn’t happen during the Kavanaugh hearings when mobs ran through the Capitol and banged on the doors to the Supreme Court.  Democrats didn’t mind the take over of the Wisconsin state Capitol either when Walker was governor.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.2    3 years ago

What other times? The images of hundreds or thousands of Americans gunned down on the steps of or inside our Capitol would have no doubt pleased the bi coastal progressive left elites of both parties 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.3    3 years ago

"That didn’t happen during the Kavanaugh hearings when mobs ran through the Capitol and banged on the doors to the Supreme Court.  Democrats didn’t mind the take over of the Wisconsin state Capitol either when Walker was governor."

Those weren't insurrections like 1/6/21 incited by and led on by trump.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.1.4    3 years ago

Hundreds of thousands?  What the fuck are you talking about?  I'm talking about the ones inside the Capitol and those who assaulted Capitol police officers.  Whoever was in the Capitol that day are lucky they didn't get shot as traitors.  And the ones who assaulted Capitol police officedrs.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @5.1.6    3 years ago

It was supposed to say hundreds or thousands...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @5    3 years ago

True.  All other deaths are of Trump supporters and one was accidental and two were natural causes.  

 
 
 
JumpDrive
Freshman Silent
6  JumpDrive    3 years ago
The biggest threat to you, if you’re an autocrat, is people who mock you, and don’t take you seriously, and sneer at...

Which is exactly what Obama did to Trump at a press dinner. Watch the video for Trump's reaction. He hated Obama for that humiliation, and simply wanted to destroy anything Obama did, even if that meant taking healthcare away from 20 million working class Americans. Thank God for McCain.

We still don’t know who shot Ashli Babbitt, or why.

Why would we expose a police officer and his family to retaliation by a group of people crazy enough to beat the Capitol Police, smash their way into the Capitol for the purpose of intimidating our representatives, stopping the Constitutional transfer of power, and installing an autocrat. As to why she was shot, see previous sentence.

Meandering is sedition, says Michael Sherwin.

Smashing through barriers, attacking in the Capitol Police, breaking into the seat of our government and intimidating our representatives is 'meandering'? When you help someone committing a crime we call that 'aiding and abetting'; you risk the same penalties at those committing the crime. These 'extras' made it possible to overrun the police. What happened to them is just natural selection at work. They are too fucking stupid to be allowed to 'meander'.

Lawyers for one, a man called Ryan Samsel, say he was beaten so badly, he has a skull fracture and is now blind in one eye.

So why would this possibly happen? Google reveals that Samsel is out on parole for an assault conviction in 2016. There's a warrant for another assault in 2019. There's this tiny possibility he's a violent piece of shit; he does have a MAGA hat on.

All of the examples of what happened to other criminals are irrelevant. The legal actions being taken against these people are exactly what should be happening considering their use of violence against our government to achieve their idiotic goal.

I'm going to stop here because Brandolini was right: "The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude larger than to produce it."

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JumpDrive @6    3 years ago

Those who planned and those who did violence and or did vandalism need to be punished for that.  To the same extent that those who did such acts elsewhere since May.  Those who simply got caught up in the moment and did nothing more than walk around in there should be charged with nothing more than trespassing, fined, and released.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2  Tessylo  replied to  JumpDrive @6    3 years ago
The biggest threat to you, if you’re an autocrat, is people who mock you, and don’t take you seriously, and sneer at...

Which is exactly what Obama did to Trump at a press dinner. Watch the video for Trump's reaction. He hated Obama for that humiliation, and simply wanted to destroy anything Obama did, even if that meant taking healthcare away from 20 million working class Americans. Thank God for McCain.

We still don’t know who shot Ashli Babbitt, or why.

Why would we expose a police officer and his family to retaliation by a group of people crazy enough to beat the Capitol Police, smash their way into the Capitol for the purpose of intimidating our representatives, stopping the Constitutional transfer of power, and installing an autocrat. As to why she was shot, see previous sentence.

Meandering is sedition, says Michael Sherwin.

Smashing through barriers, attacking in the Capitol Police, breaking into the seat of our government and intimidating our representatives is 'meandering'? When you help someone committing a crime we call that 'aiding and abetting'; you risk the same penalties at those committing the crime. These 'extras' made it possible to overrun the police. What happened to them is just natural selection at work. They are too fucking stupid to be allowed to 'meander'.

Lawyers for one, a man called Ryan Samsel, say he was beaten so badly, he has a skull fracture and is now blind in one eye.

So why would this possibly happen? Google reveals that Samsel is out on parole for an assault conviction in 2016. There's a warrant for another assault in 2019. There's this tiny possibility he's a violent piece of shit; he does have a MAGA hat on.

All of the examples of what happened to other criminals are irrelevant. The legal actions being taken against these people are exactly what should be happening considering their use of violence against our government to achieve their idiotic goal.

I'm going to stop here because Brandolini was right: "The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude larger than to produce it."

Anyone who speaks/spoke against the former occupant of the White House - their families and themselves - got/get death threats - from his supporters - one such prime example is Dr. Anthony Fauci.  

Those supporters and the one they supported/still support smear/ed Dr. Fauci with many slanderous and ignorant statements.   

"I'm going to stop here because Brandolini was right: "The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude larger than to produce it."

So true!  It's a waste of time after a certain point.  They're deaf, dumb, and blind to reality.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @6.2    3 years ago

Tucker was right about all that he said that’s seeded here.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.2.1    3 years ago

The abuse of people there who have been detained indefinitely in our jails and prisons is a growing national scandal.  

 
 

Who is online

Vic Eldred


52 visitors