╌>

How the mess in Congress shows why Democrats are right to be freaking out

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  5 years ago  •  13 comments

By:   New Jersey (MSN)

How the mess in Congress shows why Democrats are right to be freaking out
This week was supposed to be a quick -- and successful -- one for House Democrats. Get to Washington Monday night, pass the $3.5 trillion budget resolution and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and then head back home until after Labor Day.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

HAHAHAHAHA


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



This week was supposed to be a quick -- and successful -- one for House Democrats. Get to Washington Monday night, pass the $3.5 trillion budget resolution and the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and then head back home until after Labor Day.

© Samuel Corum/Getty Images WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 15: Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during a press conference at the U.S. Capitol on January 15, 2021 in Washington, DC. Speaker Pelosi discussed having a small inauguration for President-elect Joe Biden due to the coronavirus pandemic and the upcoming impeachment trial of President Donald Trump. (Photo by Samuel Corum/Getty Images)

What's that saying about the best laid plans again?

Instead of an orderly passage of two of Democrats' biggest priorities, however, the outlook looks far more rocky for Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Biden agenda. Like, much rockier.

Let's start small -- and then go global.

There has been a long-running disagreement between Pelosi and the moderate wing of the party in the House about the order that two pieces of legislation should move. Pelosi and her fellow liberals want the House to first vote to approve the $3.5 trillion budget resolution and then vote on the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill that came to the House after a bipartisan deal was worked out in the Senate.

Moderates -- led by New Jersey Rep. Josh Gottheimer -- want the order reversed. They want to get the $1.2 trillion transportation bill passed so that it can immediately get to President Joe Biden's desk and made into law. Only after the infrastructure bill passes do they want to move on to the $3.5 trillion budget resolution.

Video: Joe Biden is facing a crisis of competence (CNN)

Pelosi, whose legislative and political prowess is historically strong, misread this one. She clearly believed that Gottheimer and the nine other moderate Democrats who had joined him in calling for the infrastructure bill to precede the budget resolution would fold when the time came.

But on Monday night, Gottheimer and his fellow moderates hung together. And because Pelosi's majority is incredibly narrow, she couldn't proceed with her budget-resolution-first plan. Which forced her into conversations with Gottheimer about what he wanted -- and whether there was a compromise available. (In truth, these conversations should have happened weeks ago. Gottheimer's objections to the order of the bills Pelosi was proposing weren't new.)

The likelihood, of course, is that Pelosi finds a way to placate Gottheimer -- likely by scheduling a date certain for the infrastructure bill vote -- and they get the budget resolution passed before the week is out. (As of this writing, the Rules Committee appeared to be working on an agreement that would set September 27 for the start of the House debate over the infrastructure bill.)

Now, pan the camera out -- and look at what this all tells us about the current state of the Democratic Party.

The big thing the last 24 hours reveals is how little trust there is between moderates and liberals in the House. Liberals don't want to pass the infrastructure bill first because they think doing so would take away the carrot they need to keep moderates on board for the full $3.5 trillion in spending that they badly want. Moderates believe that if they give liberals that $3.5 trillion budget vote first, the $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan may never see the light of day, with liberals walking away once they've gotten what they want.

That lack of trust is corrosive to a party -- much less one clinging to its majority in the face of political winds that have begun to blow in their faces.

Which bring me to this: Democrats have to defend their narrow majority in roughly 15 months. The history of midterm elections in the first term of a president of your party are, um, dire. And that already bleak outlook is made worse -- far worse -- when the president's approval rating is below 50%, as Biden's is right now.

Moderates, who tend to represent swing districts that are at the top of Republicans' takeover list, feel the pressure created by the weight of history and Biden's recent poll slippage acutely. Which makes them less willing to just trust liberals -- who face far less electoral peril. And when the hard work of passing the specifics of a massive $3.5 trillion budget bill, those moderates are going to be even more skittish.

In short: This was supposed to be the easy part. That it wasn't speaks to the very rough road ahead for Democrats.

Continue ReadingShow full articles without "Continue Reading" button for {0} hours. Microsoft and partners may be compensated if you purchase something through recommended links in this article.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    5 years ago

Infighting CAN also be entertaining..............and hilarious.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1  Hallux  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    5 years ago

Morning Jim,

On Monday night Chris Cillizza didn't see Tuesday coming.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
2  Sparty On    5 years ago

Some Dems can see the writing on the wall and are starting to look for cover for the 2022 midterms

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6  Nerm_L    5 years ago

Welcome to Obamacare 2.0.  The 'social infrastructure' package doesn't just expand existing programs.  The debate is over creating new programs and, once again, expanding government's unfunded liabilities.  Obamacare gave financial institutions a blank check.  Who gets the blank check this time around?

Obamacare didn't even cause a little dip in medical inflation.  Medical costs are still rising and are still unaffordable.  Obamacare allowed the rich to become richer faster.  And the lies told to enact Obamacare didn't allay public concerns.  Democrats paid a price politically for self-indulgently protecting the interests of the rich.   The only thing Obamacare accomplished was to force everyone to buy health insurance (from stock trading financial institutions) or risk bankruptcy to medically treat a pimple.

Neo-liberalism doesn't work.  Supply-side economics doesn't work.  That's why neo-liberals must lie, cheat, and game the system.  Neo-liberal Democrats rely on double standard doublespeak; it worked so well for Bill Clinton.   And Nancy Pelosi is the neo-liberals' poster child of neo-liberals.  Pelosi is quite adept at double standard doublespeak to fog the minds of rational people.  The neo-liberal handouts touted by Democrats only serve one purpose; make the rich richer faster.

If people are required to spend the money that Democrats throw at them, then that money was never intended for the people.  The people are only being used to make the rich richer faster because that's where the money ends up.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7  Greg Jones    5 years ago

Don't forget the latest election steal.....

afb082421dAPR20210824024504.jpg

 
 

Who is online



174 visitors