╌>

GOP congresswoman calls Biden 'trafficker-in-chief,’ says lax border empowers human traffickers

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  3 years ago  •  42 comments

By:   Natalia Mittelstadt

GOP congresswoman calls Biden 'trafficker-in-chief,’ says lax border empowers human traffickers
"I call Biden the trafficker-in-chief," the Florida Republican told the John Solomon Reports podcast on Thursday. "He's not commander-in-chief, he's the trafficker-in-chief. And, you know, we've seen he's completing the trafficking cycle for the cartels.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana

Way to go congresswoman! I applaud your comments and their tone toward “let’s go Brandon” and his being a conspirator with the drug cartels and their human and drug trafficking and the effects it’s policy is having on the American people.  Biden is indeed the trafficker in chief. 


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



GOP congresswoman calls Biden 'trafficker-in-chief,’ says lax border empowers human traffickers


"This administration refuses to secure the border because, for them, it ties right into their agenda of dependency and control," the Florida Republican said.


Rep. Kat Cammack lashed President Biden Thursday for enabling human trafficking by empowered cartels with his lax approach to border security.

"I call Biden the trafficker-in-chief," the Florida Republican told the John Solomon Reports podcast on Thursday. "He's not commander-in-chief, he's the trafficker-in-chief. And, you know, we've seen he's completing the trafficking cycle for the cartels.

width="720" height="200">
"These cartels are making six grand on average per man, woman and child that they are trafficking across the border. They're not smuggling them across the border."
Illegal immigrants are unable to "afford a $6,000 price tag," she explained, "and so they'll scrounge up as much money as they possibly can, but then they have to end up working it off through the sex trade, through forced labor — all kinds of different ways that they're being manipulated and coerced and forced into this awful, awful practice, and it's just ... horrific."
Citing the number of single adults who have entered the country illegally  according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) numbers , Cammack estimated their total transportation costs billed to U.S. taxpayers.
"[Y]ou're looking [at] well over 1.2 million individuals, to the tune of almost 90 million of taxpayer dollars that has gone to pay for airline tickets and bus tickets for these individuals to go all over the country," she said.
Before being released into the U.S., illegal immigrants are given "a little piece of paper," she said, "that says, 'In five years, you need to show up for your court date.' Well, I think we all know that not many people, virtually zero, will actually show up for that court date."
Cammack offered a scathing interpretation of the Biden administration's relaxed border policy.
"[T]his administration refuses to secure the border because, for them, it ties right into their agenda of dependency and control," she said.
"[I]f they were not trying to hide anything, if they were completely confident that the American people were accepting and willing to take on over 1.2 million illegals, they would not be flying people around the country in the dead of night, trying to sneak them into the communities," said Cammack.
In addition to opening the country to human trafficking, violent criminals and drugs, the porous borders are overtaxing U.S. social welfare systems, Cammack argued, noting that "just in Florida alone, they're aging kids out of the foster care systems to make room and accommodations for unaccompanied illegal children to be placed in foster care systems."
"So we're forsaking American kids for illegals," she continued, "and then you see what is happening with this strain on our system — it's healthcare, it's education. We are already experiencing tremendous delays and strains across all of our communities, and this is only amplifying that."We 

Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    3 years ago
"[Y]ou're looking [at] well over 1.2 million individuals, to the tune of almost 90 million of taxpayer dollars that has gone to pay for airline tickets and bus tickets for these individuals to go all over the country," she said.

Before being released into the U.S., illegal immigrants are given "a little piece of paper," she said, "that says, 'In five years, you need to show up for your court date.' Well, I think we all know that not many people, virtually zero, will actually show up for that court date."

Cammack offered a scathing interpretation of the Biden administration's relaxed border policy.

"[T]his administration refuses to secure the border because, for them, it ties right into their agenda of dependency and control," she said.

"[I]f they were not trying to hide anything, if they were completely confident that the American people were accepting and willing to take on over 1.2 million illegals, they would not be flying people around the country in the dead of night, trying to sneak them into the communities," said Cammack.

In addition to opening the country to human trafficking, violent criminals and drugs, the porous borders are overtaxing U.S. social welfare systems, Cammack argued, noting that "just in Florida alone, they're aging kids out of the foster care systems to make room and accommodations for unaccompanied illegal children to be placed in foster care systems."

"So we're forsaking American kids for illegals,"

https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/14417/gop-congresswoman-calls-biden-trafficker-in-chief-says-lax-border-empowers-human-traffickers
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    3 years ago
images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSsqgf1e930KrtBJsL8pXdIX6udwZKRvNKb1m8YS_IdBjwh0zMTLPwSbRebIAZm_Aq_Kas&usqp=CAU
Bad Joe...Bad... - Imgflip
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.1    3 years ago

And he’s deliberately being a super spreader of covid across America with his border actions and allowing covid positive illegal aliens to settle in red states and communities in blue ones.  It’s his tool to keep it going so that he can keep mask and vaccine mandates going and rule along with blue governors and mayors by executive decree.  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ronin2  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    3 years ago
"a little piece of paper," she said, "that says, 'In five years, you need to show up for your court date.'

That little piece of paper will be the first thing that is lost. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ronin2 @1.2    3 years ago

Of course.  They will not show up and it will be up to the next GOP President to rebuild ICE and track them down and deport them.  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2  Greg Jones    3 years ago

She's absolutely right. The voters will seriously punish these mfer's

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Greg Jones @2    3 years ago

Of course the'll vote them out, but why did we have to go through this in the first place?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    3 years ago

Truthfully, Trump shot himself in the foot. The whole election was about Trump. Not the border, not foreign policy, not the economy, not law and order, and definitely not about reality. 

Biden won because he was not Trump. He ran his whole damn campaign on not being Trump. No one questioned him when he "misspoke"; which happened every time he opened his damn mouth. The media sure as hell didn't ask him any difficult questions on Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, China, Russia, or anything foreign policy related. They completely allowed him to stumble over every fact, name, and statistic warping them all so that whatever he speaking on was unintelligible. So long as he wasn't Trump he was golden.

Seems that simply "not being Trump" doesn't make someone qualified to be President. Who knew?/S

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    3 years ago

Because China brought us covid and democrats politicized it with the help of the msm and big tech social media as they all worked together in concert against America and unfortunately too many manipulated ballots bought it.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1.1    3 years ago

People will be begging for the Trump pre pandemic economy and will be willing to bring him back to MAGA again!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Greg Jones @2    3 years ago
Americans have had enough.
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2    3 years ago

Yes, we have had more than enough of the gop/gqp and republicans and all the alleged conservatives.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.1    3 years ago

His words of we the people and our resistance spoken to the AG of the United States to his face were and are spot on. The resistance to Biden’s tyranny is on!


 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3  Gsquared    3 years ago

There is no question that acute Biden Derangement Syndrome is being suffered by many reactionaries.  It's amazing how he lives rent free in their heads 24-7.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  Texan1211  replied to  Gsquared @3    3 years ago

There is no question whatsoever that the Biden/Harris Admin. has made a fucking mess of the border and seemingly have done SQUAT to "fix" a damn thing there. 

Hell, we'd be lucky if either of the fools even knows where the fuck the border  is without being told or personally led there.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1    3 years ago

There is no question that you are completely wrong and blowing smoke again. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Gsquared @3.1.1    3 years ago

Sorry, but I can't pretend that this Admin. is competently handling the border crisis.

But you feel free to keep pretending!

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.2    3 years ago

Yet, you pretend like the Republicans have an ounce of competence.   

Try again...  On second thought, don't.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @3.1.1    3 years ago

Really?  How is it that you think he’s wrong about that and why do you think so? 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Gsquared @3.1.3    3 years ago
Yet, you pretend like the Republicans have an ounce of competence.   

i sure wish the fuck you would attempt to debate my actual words instead of something you imagined I stated.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @3.1.3    3 years ago

We don’t have to fake or pretend our competence.  We have it and the elected democrats do not.  Their policies are proof of that.  Not one act Biden has done has been to the benefit of America or working and middle class Americans.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.7  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.5    3 years ago

I too wish the other side would debate what we say or the contents of the seeded article instead of going straight for an insult of the GOP person(s) in question and or us personally.  There’s plenty to debate about the border and immigration policy in a civil manner with a sense of comity.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.7    3 years ago
I too wish the other side would debate what we say or the contents of the seeded article instead of going straight for an insult of the GOP person(s) in question and or us personally.

if they had anything worthwhile to say, they would do so instead of resorting to low-grade cheap tactics.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.9  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.8    3 years ago

That seems to be the case.  Not one on the left on my most recent seeds has actually discussed the content of the seed and why they disagree with the content or what one of us have said related to my seeds.  It’s all personal attacks and put downs and questioning our various personal traits.  There is no attempt to discuss the actual topic.  I’m glad that you too noticed this.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.10  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.7    3 years ago
I too wish the other side would debate what we say or the contents of the seeded article

Xx, all you and yours have to do is follow the CBP link in the seeded article to utterly refute the BULLSHIT being spewed by the Congresswoman. 

I'll just address the CBP stats on the southwest border. 

Per the CBP, of the 1,956,519 CBP 'encounters' FY 2021, 618,986 were at PORTS OF ENTRY and inadmissible per Title 8. 

Per the CBP, FY 2021, another 1,040,220 were 'expelled' under Title 42. 

DEDUCT those denied admission under Title 8 and Title 42 and that leaves 635,045. 

THAT number coincides with the CBP's 'encounters' with unaccompanied minors and members of family units. 

NOW, unless the Congresswoman is claiming that the US government is transporting  unaccompanied minors and family units into the arms of sex traffickers in the US so they can pay off their 'debts', she is full of shit. 

You're welcome. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.11  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @3.1.10    3 years ago

And all the gotta ways who evaded capture into the interior of America who would never have entered America under Trumps border arrangements?  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.12  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.11    3 years ago

You're deflecting Xx. 

YOUR seed cited the CBP link.

YOUR seed stated that the Congresswoman's BULLSHIT is based on the data in that CBP link. 

THAT link PROVES that the Congresswoman is full of shit. 

DEAL with it. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.13  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @3.1.10    3 years ago

Most of the deported and deemed inadmissible happened between Oct. 1, 2020 and Jan 20, 2021.  From that date to September 30 everything changed.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.14  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.13    3 years ago
Most of the deported and deemed inadmissible happened between Oct. 1, 2020 and Jan 20, 2021.

PROVE IT Xx. 

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

That handy dandy CBP link also documents the number of 'enforcements' every month of FY 2021 and for those that want to prove to themselves that your comment is bullshit they can go to the 'CBC enforcement statistics' page and do the math.

My rough math comes up with about 280,000 expulsions between Oct. and Jan. Which means that even Trump let over 20,000 IN. The HORROR!

Your comment is an utter fail Xx. 

You got your wish. I hope you're happy with it...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.15  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @3.1.10    3 years ago

I was right.  The stats were from FY20 and 21 meaning from oct 1 2019 to Sept 30, 2021.  Most returns and inadmissibles were when Trump was President. 
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/nationwide-encounters

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.16  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.15    3 years ago

THAT is a lie Vic.

Or are you so uninformed that you don't know that the Federal government's year starts in October and ends in September. 

The data is as I stated. Get someone to do the math for you...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.17  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Dulay @3.1.16    3 years ago

I’m not Vic but I’ll take it as a compliment.  

Nationwide Encounters

Encounter data includes U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) Title 8 Apprehensions, Office of Field Operations (OFO) Title 8 Inadmissibles, and Title 42 Expulsions for fiscal years (FY) 2020 and 2021. Data is available for the Northern Land Border, Southwest Land Border, and Nationwide (i.e., air, land, and sea modes of transportation) encounters. 

On March 21, 2020 the President, in accordance with Title 42 of the United States Code Section 265, determined that by reason of existence of COVID-19 in Mexico and Canada, there is a serious danger of the further introduction of COVID-19 into the United States; that prohibition on the introduction of persons or property, in whole or in part, from Mexico and Canada is required in the interest of public health. Under this order, CBP is prohibiting the entry of certain persons who potentially pose a health risk, either by virtue of being subject to previously announced travel restrictions or because they unlawfully entered the country to bypass health screening measures. To help prevent the introduction of COVID-19 into border facilities and into the United States, persons subject to the order will not be held in congregate areas for processing and instead will immediately be expelled to their country of last transit. In the event a person cannot be returned to the country of last transit, CBP works with interagency partners to secure expulsion to the person’s country of origin and hold the person for the shortest time possible. This order does not apply to persons who should be excepted based on considerations of law enforcement, officer and public safety, humanitarian, or public health interests. Expulsions under Title 42 are not based on immigration status and are tracked separately from immigration enforcement actions, such as apprehension or inadmissibility, that are regularly reported by CBP.

Demographics for USBP and OFO include:

  • Accompanied Minors (AM)
  • Individuals in a Family Unit (FMUA)
  • Single Adults
  • Unaccompanied Children (UC) / Single Minors

From link in post 3.1.15

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
3.1.18  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.17    3 years ago
From link in post 3.1.15

Yet THAT link doesn't have the 'enforcement' data, does it Xx? 

You stated:

Most returns and inadmissibles were when Trump was President. 

So we need to see the 'enforcement' data. As I stated, THAT data is at this CDC page:

As 'our readers' can see for themselves, the numbers from Oct.- Jan. are less than a quarter of the total amount. 

Again, the data is as I stated. 

So WHY keep posting bullshit Xx? 

Wait! You know that 'most' has to be OVER 50% right Xx? 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @3    3 years ago

BDS is a term that applied to liberals from 2000-2008.  Bush Derangement Syndrome so it’s already taken.  Let’s go Brandon!  

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
3.2.1  Hallux  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2    3 years ago
BDS

BDS is a term popularised by arch conservative Charles Krauthammer who went on to disparage Trump as a threat to democracy.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Hallux @3.2.1    3 years ago

Most elected democrats have suffered from both BDS and TDS in their lives.  They are truly deranged.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

Democrats are human traffickers best friends. They are too busy attacking statues to worry about people  being trafficked across the border. 

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
4.1  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    3 years ago

A human trafficker's best friend is he /she who accepts the goods and uses them to cut the grass and clean the toilets on the 19th hole.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hallux @4.1    3 years ago

If the Democrats did their job, they wouldn't have that option would they? 

Woman are trafficked  as sex slaves. Democrats don't care. Until they do, woman will be trafficked. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.1    3 years ago

Children are being trafficked too.  It’s really sad the human suffering going on because of Biden’s border policy changes.  And there’s the massive increase of Fentanyl coming into America and the resulting increased overdose deaths on Biden’s hands.  

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
5  Paula Bartholomew    3 years ago

jrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @5    3 years ago

jrSmiley_123_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_90_smiley_image.gif

 
 

Who is online

Sparty On


56 visitors