╌>

Rep. Lauren Boebert to Newsmax: Fact Checkers Are 'Left's Thought Police'

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  2 years ago  •  24 comments

By:   Eric Mack

Rep. Lauren Boebert to Newsmax: Fact Checkers Are 'Left's Thought Police'
"It doesn't matter what side of the aisle you affiliate yourself with, you are affected by Big Tech censorship," she said. "We're living in a dystopian nightmare where unelected Big Tech companies serve as the ultimate arbiters of truth. So-called independent fact checkers are the left's thought police and they come after any conservatives who dared to question their narrative."

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana


The congresswoman is exactly right about what all fact checkers truly are.  The evidence is in, everyone has seen it.  Fact checkers are nothing more than the content control and censorship tool of the Democrat Party.  

T2017-HRR-Fact-checkers-dont-know-facts.jpg

fact-checkers-1.jpg?resize=600%2C429


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Rep. Lauren Boebert to Newsmax: Fact Checkers Are 'Left's Thought Police'


Democrats have managed to corner the market on Big Tech, speech, and thought, but it has become apparent to many more now and Republicans are going to expose it if they retake Congress in 2022, according to Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., on Newsmax.

Democrats and the government are colluding with Big Tech," Boebert told " Saturday Report ." "They are running the show for them. And remember when Jen Psaki said that the White House is working with Facebook to censor misinformation, and we're hearing that that's all opinion based."

Boebert was referring to Facebook being forced to admit in court that "fact-checkers" are opinions.

"Americans want the truth," Boebert told host Carl Higbie. "They need the truth. They deserve it. And one of the things that I'm looking forward to is when Republicans take back the majority is true investigations to get to the bottom of all of this and reveal that to the American people."

Ultimately Democrats should be concerned about Big Tech's taking sides, because they might eventually wind up on the other side of things, Boebert noted, lamenting, "Democrats are OK with a sitting president of the United States being censored – a duly elected sitting member of Congress being censored," pointing to former President Donald Trump and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga.

"It doesn't matter what side of the aisle you affiliate yourself with, you are affected by Big Tech censorship," she said. "We're living in a dystopian nightmare where unelected Big Tech companies serve as the ultimate arbiters of truth. So-called independent fact checkers are the left's thought police and they come after any conservatives who dared to question their narrative."

Boebert added the assault on facts has been amplified by the COVID-19 pandemic, saying, "we didn't have fact checkers until the truth started coming out."

"We were looking at these numbers at the very beginning, saying this is going to get very ugly if we don't start speaking the truth now and getting a hold of these unelected bureaucrats who are controlling our lives, ruining our businesses."

The first year of President Joe Biden's administration has been enlightening to the American people, Boebert concluded.

"Remember this is one-party rule for one year – if there is any good thing that came out of the 2020 election, it's the proof that Democrats' policies will fail our country, and we have to get involved to counter them," she said.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    2 years ago
Democrats and the government are colluding with Big Tech," Boebert told "Saturday Report." "They are running the show for them. And remember when Jen Psaki said that the White House is working with Facebook to censor misinformation, and we're hearing that that's all opinion based."

Boebert was referring to Facebook being forced to admit in court that "fact-checkers" are opinions.

"Americans want the truth," Boebert told host Carl Higbie. "They need the truth. They deserve it.
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    2 years ago

Similarities?

4fz5j4.jpg
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2  seeder  XXJefferson51    2 years ago
I am not a journalist and just a person who is interested in how media bias impacts politics. You will find zero claims of expertise on the website.
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2    2 years ago

Dave Van Zandt

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3  JBB    2 years ago

Used to be political parties pushed their most mentally challenged members into the back benches. Today's gop brings them up front to have them tell us incredible lies and spread gross disinformation...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @3    2 years ago

How's about one of the left's favorite Justices telling lies at SCOTUS?

Even the Washington Post gave her 4 Pinnochio's, and we all know how much that had to hurt!

Why aren't you telling her to follow the science?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.1  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1    2 years ago

Thank You! For illustrating my point so vividly!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @3.1.1    2 years ago

Actually, Sotomayor is not a member of the GOP.

So WTF do you think I "proved" to support your claim?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @3.1.1    2 years ago

What point was that again?  

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
3.2  GregTx  replied to  JBB @3    2 years ago

Says one of the sites biggest champions of this giant from the Democrat party....

original

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  GregTx @3.2    2 years ago

Ah, the maskless dancing kisser of many men in Florida woman…

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
3.2.2  GregTx  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.1    2 years ago

Hey, you gotta get what you can when you can. After all we've only got 9 years left till the end of the world.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  GregTx @3.2.2    2 years ago

Lol! jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif👍👏🥳

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.2.4  JBB  replied to  GregTx @3.2    2 years ago

original

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @3.2.4    2 years ago

Secular progressive politicians be a much better fit for the words of your meme.  But by all means do what the left does here and attack the source rather than discussing the content of what the source actually said.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @3    2 years ago

The thing is is that Rep. Boebert is exactly right about everything she said to NewsMax about all fact checkers in the interview reported on above.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @3    2 years ago

Here’s a different person for you: 

Facebook Claims Its Fact-Checks Are 'Opinion'

GetFile.aspx?guid=6afd0c92-7519-4400-97ae-5a12469a5b1a&SiteName=Newsmax&maxsidesize=600

Facebook insists its "fact-checks" are "opinion" and not based on facts, says a veteran reporter who sued the company.

John Stossel, a TV reporter for more than 50 years, recently sued Facebook, now known as Meta, for defamation. He said one of the social media giant's "fact-checkers," a group called Science Feedback, lied about him.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.4    2 years ago
He also said a Facebook fact-checker admitted that one of Stossel’s videos was red-flagged due to its "tone" — not because it contained false statements.

Stossel said Facebook's lawyers responded to him in court and claimed the company's "fact-checks" are merely "opinion" and therefore immune from defamation.

"Wait — Facebook's fact-checks are just 'opinion'?! I thought fact-checks are statements of fact,"
 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.4.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.4.1    2 years ago
https://www.newsmax.com/finance/companies/facebook-meta-fact-checkers-opinion/2021/12/14/id/1048577/
 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.4.3  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.4    2 years ago

original

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.4.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JBB @3.4.3    2 years ago

Elq79diXEAIZkfJ.jpg

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    2 years ago

Why in the world would anyone listen to Lauren Boebert about anything?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @4    2 years ago

Because she is exactly right about what she said regarding all media fact checkers without exception being biased tools of the democrat party to content control and censor conservative and christian thoughts, beliefs, and opinions.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  JohnRussell @4    2 years ago
Orwell Called Them Thought Police. Big Tech Calls Them Fact Checkers 

ORWELL CALLED THEM THOUGHT POLICE. BIG TECH CALLS THEM FACT CHECKERS 


 
 

Who is online

Tessylo
Gazoo
Thomas


57 visitors