╌>

Trump accuses Obama of treason for ‘spying’ on his 2016 campaign

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  7 years ago  •  77 comments

By:   Paul Bedard

Trump accuses Obama of treason for ‘spying’ on his 2016 campaign
“It turned out I was right. By the way,” Trump told Wead in excerpts provided to Secrets. “In fact, what I said was peanuts compared to what they did. They were spying on my campaign. They got caught and they said, ‘Oh we were not spying. It was actually an investigation.’ Can you imagine an administration investigating its political opponents?” said the president.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

Trump is right.  Obama betrayed America and committed treason in using national security methods and tools to spy on the domestic opposition.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



President Trump has ratcheted up his claim that the Obama White House spied on his 2016 campaign, charging in a new book that it was a “treasonous” act by the former Democratic president.

“What they did was treasonous, OK? It was treasonous,” he told author Doug Wead for his upcoming book, " Inside Trump's White House: The Real Story of His Presidency."

“The interesting thing out of all of this is that we caught them spying on the election. They were spying on my campaign. So you know? What is that all about?” said Trump.

“I have never ever said this, but truth is, they got caught spying. They were spying,” said Trump who then added, “Obama.”

[ Read more:   Trump presidency disrupts family, for good and not ]

In 2017, Trump tweeted that he felt the Obama White House “had my wires tapped” in Trump Tower. He later said he didn’t mean it literally but that he felt his campaign was being spied on.

Attorney General William Barr earlier this year said he was looking into whether “improper surveillance” may have occurred in 2016. " I think spying did occur, " he said.


?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmediadc.brightspotcdn


He has tasked a prosecutor to look into Obama officials and other officials who sparked the Russia collusion investigation into Trump after a report showed no collusion. New reports on that investigation described it as “criminal” in nature.

“It turned out I was right. By the way,” Trump told Wead in excerpts provided to Secrets. “In fact, what I said was peanuts compared to what they did. They were spying on my campaign. They got caught and they said, ‘Oh we were not spying. It was actually an investigation.’ Can you imagine an administration investigating its political opponents?” said the president.

In the book, Trump said that the Russia investigation undercut his presidency.

“Anybody else would be unable to function under the kind of pressure and distraction I had. They couldn’t get anything done. No other president should ever have to go through this. But understand, there was no collusion. They would have had to make something up,” he said.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    7 years ago

So? Trump lies! Trump is getting impeached...

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
2.2  SteevieGee  replied to  JBB @2    7 years ago

I've noticed that Trump has a tendency to accuse others of doing exactly what he himself is doing.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
2.2.1  bbl-1  replied to  SteevieGee @2.2    7 years ago

Yeah.  He is master deflectionist.  made up word because, well, you know.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.2.2  JBB  replied to  SteevieGee @2.2    7 years ago

Yeah! Me, also...

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.2.4  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.3    7 years ago

Merely putting the word "actually" in front of a big olde honking lie as you just did above does not make it any less of a big olde honking lie...

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3  Tacos!    7 years ago
Can you imagine an administration investigating its political opponents?” said the president

C'mon, in light of recent events, that's kind of funny.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
4  bbl-1    7 years ago

Apparently the only saving grace here is the never ending, adnauseam, reflection of soulless soul Trumpian click bait.

Hell, even Doug Wead is cashing in on the Trumpian phenom.  ( what ever that could possibly be )

Trump accuses.  End of story.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1  devangelical  replied to  bbl-1 @4    7 years ago

all hat, no cattle.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
4.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  devangelical @4.1    7 years ago

Done and done.  Well done.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
4.1.3  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.2    7 years ago

You've had one too many root beers !

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4.1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  bbl-1 @4.1.1    7 years ago

Not too well done I hope.  Burnt pork smells really bad.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
4.1.7  bbl-1  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1.2    7 years ago

And the charges against Obama would be-----------------for--------------?  ACA or the Lilly Ledbetter thing?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5  MrFrost    7 years ago

right041.png?resize=600%2C67&ssl=1https://i1.wp.com/mediabiasfactcheck.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/right041.png?resize=300%2C34&ssl=1 300w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" >

RIGHT BIAS

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy.   See all Right Bias sources.

 

  • Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks.

Detailed Report

Factual Reporting:   MIXED
Country:  USA
World Press Freedom Rank:   USA 48/180

History

Founded in 2005 , The Washington Examiner is an American political journalism website and weekly magazine based in Washington, D.C. that covers politics and policy in the United States and internationally. The current editor is Hugo Gordon. 

Funded by / Ownership

The Washington Examiner is owned by  Clarity Media Group , which is in turn owned by  Philip Anschutz,  who is  an American billionaire entrepreneur who describes himself as a “conservative Christian.” Anschutz is also the owner of the right leaning  Weekly Standard  and has donated millions of dollars to right leaning causes, including  anti-LGBT groups,  such as the  Family Research Council , which has been labeled a hate group. The Washington Examiner is funded through an advertising and subscription model.

Analysis / Bias

In review, the format and content of the Washington Examiner has been compared to   The Hill , albeit with a   right leaning tilt . They generally report political news as well as local Washington DC news stories. The Washington Examiner frequently utilizes loaded wording in sensationalized headlines such as:  Trump’s manic Monday amid the Kavanaugh storm . While the headlines may be sensational, the content of articles are written with less bias and tend to be properly sourced to credible media outlets. Editorially, the Washington Examiner is 100% right. It is virtually impossible to find a single editorial that offers some form of balance. Most editorials have anti-left loaded headlines such as this:  Obama, the Great Divider when in office, lacks the credibility to lecture America .

A   factual search   reveals several failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers.

Overall, we rate the Washington Examiner Right Biased based on editorial positions that almost exclusively favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to several failed fact checks. (7/18/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 7/26/2019)

Source:  

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
6  MrFrost    7 years ago

Trump Accuses Obama Of Treason For ‘Spying’ On His 2016 Campaign

Well, for starters, that never happened. Even trump's own FBI, NSA and CIA debunked this conspiracy theory a long time ago. 

Also...

trea·son
/ ˈtrēzən /
Learn to pronounce
noun
the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.
I think the author of the article should REALLY learn what "treason" means. 
Treason would be something like....betraying the USA by attempting to extort a foreign country to win an election. 

 
 
 
Steve Ott
Professor Silent
8  Steve Ott    7 years ago

Treason is defined as aiding the enemy. So if Obama committed treason, he aided an enemy of the country. Who then is the enemy of the country?

 
 

Who is online







220 visitors