‘This Is Amazing’: Don Jr. Triggers Leftists By Sharing A Photo Of Activist Who Reportedly Painted ‘Baby Lives Matter’ In Front of Planned Parenthood
By: Jennie Cotrinski
What a beautiful thought. Baby Lives Matter. I love it! Pro life people need to speak out more in the face of the pro abortion until after birth cancel culture. It’s great to point out that pre born babies are in fact human lives.
Donald Trump Jr. shared a post from Benny Johnson about a street in front of a Planned Parenthood painted with “BABY LIVES MATTER.”
Benny said, “This happened Salt Lake City overnight. The artist is pro-life. What a brave patriot. Who wants to see this happen all across America? I do.”
I do too, Benny. #MeToo
Tayler Hansen is the activist and patriot responsible for the painting. He posted a video outlining the reasons for his peaceful protest.
I’m making this video to raise awareness of one of the most egregious human rights violations that has not been properly addressed. In 2019, abortion was the leading cause of death worldwide. Almost 43 million children were denied the most basic right of all: life. Which is why I felt inclined to demonstrate a true peaceful protest.
Absolute perfection!
The “Silent Majority” must be silent no more! We must speak up and fight for our culture and fight for America. The other side certainly is not afraid to impose their will upon us and our children. It takes only a small number of brave and courageous people to inspire many others to boldness.
Tags
Who is online
195 visitors

It will be interesting to see the official response. Painting on streets, buildings, statues, and so on has been ok so far, if you agree with the message. But what if you don't? Is it vandalism again?
The painting on the streets has mostly been sanction by the cities and towns where they occurred.
This is nothing but trolling an organization and was not sanctioned.
Really weird the comparison trying to be made when there is no comparison at all.
Someone got a permit before writing in the street, on walls, or on statues? Or was it allowed to remain after the fact?
You don't have to agree with the message, but viewpoint discrimination by the government violates the First Amendment.
Your response just tells me you didn't hear a word I said. So no point in going any further.