╌>

Democrats’ new strategy for winning the White House: Threaten riots if they lose

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  6 years ago  •  78 comments

By:   Jonathan S. Tobin

Democrats’ new strategy for winning the White House: Threaten riots if they lose
But there is a problem with their fulminations about the evil orange man installing the ­authoritarian regime liberals have been warning us about ever since he started running for president. To wit: It’s all pure projection on their part. For all of their frightening predictions of what Trump might do if he loses, the one thing we ­already know is that it is the Democrats who will, as Clinton advised Biden, never concede defeat. Though some of Trump’s trolling of the media and the left is...

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

The democrat strategy of scorched earth rule or ruin is exposed for all to see. They are threatening mass riots bigger than before if we deprive them of getting their way. 


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Four years ago, Hillary Clinton supporters talked a lot about then-candidate ­Donald Trump refusing to concede a presidential election they were certain he would lose. As it happened, they had it ­exactly backward: Trump wound up winning, and Democrats and their media cheerleaders have spent most of their waking moments ever since then trying to invalidate that result. They used false charges about Russian “collusion” and any other conceivable means — fair or foul — to make the bad dream of 2016 go away.

That’s the key fact to keep in mind amid the drumbeat of ­obsessive mainstream commentary and analysis about what Trump will do when he loses in November .

The drumbeat has been getting louder. In recent weeks, multiple mainstream outlets have ­pondered the same old Trump-sore-loser scenario. They are certain the president will seek to delegitimize the ­results and use unconstitutional means to hold onto an office from which they are sure voters will evict him.

As he did in 2016, Trump has cast doubt on the integrity of the process by talking about possible election fraud.

Only this time, his concerns have some merit. A recent Post feature related a veteran Democratic operative’s confession about how easy it is to cheat, making it clear there is reason to worry. With so many ballots being mailed this fall because of the pandemic — and with so few safeguards put in place — chaos is likely as the count drags on for days, weeks and even months after Election Day.

That has led a host of liberal pundits to openly speculate about how to stop Trump from stealing the election. Their formulas for saving democracy from him include having “principled” Republicans undermine Trump from within the government, military intervention a k a a coup and, most importantly, mass protests.

They are sure the only way to ensure a peaceful transition of power is a landslide victory for Joe Biden by a margin that not even a real estate developer from Queens could challenge.

But there is a problem with their fulminations about the evil orange man installing the ­authoritarian regime liberals have been warning us about ever since he started running for president.

To wit: It’s all pure projection on their part.

For all of their frightening predictions of what Trump might do if he loses, the one thing we ­already know is that it is the Democrats who will, as Clinton advised Biden , never concede defeat. Though some of Trump’s trolling of the media and the left is interpreted as ­betraying his plans to overturn the results, Democrats have ­already shown us outright how they react to losing.

This time, Democrats won’t be relying on conspiracy theories or politicized investigations. Instead, they are counting on a strategy ­intended to scare Americans into voting for Biden — even if they have misgivings about handing over the government to a confused figurehead and his radical supporters.

After a summer of (ahem) “mostly peaceful” Black Lives Matter protests that unleashed violence and looting in American cities, most recently in Rochester, is there a shred of doubt in anyone’s mind that the same combination of elite liberals, criminal thugs and Antifa Marxists would be deployed to burn and destroy the moment it appears that Trump might be winning?

Behind all that high-minded talk from pompous columnists about virtuous patriots stopping Trump from cheating is a brazen threat. They’re saying in effect: The same forces that have wreaked havoc in the name of a false charge that America is an irredeemably racist nation may well inflict even worse damage in order to ensure that Trump’s re-election is thwarted.

That’s the subtext of the talk from Biden supporters about democracy. Their ace in the hole isn’t an accurate count of the votes but the certainty that America’s cities will burn ­unless the electorate bows to their demands.

Aided by the devastation from the pandemic, Biden may yet win without any help from mobs. If he does, Trump will likely bow to the verdict of the people and go home.

But in what is likely to be a close election in a deeply ­divided country — immersed in a culture war about a largely false charge of racism — the real threat to the process isn’t a presidential spoilsport. It’s a Democratic Party that is fully prepared to unleash ruin on the nation if it loses again.

Jonathan S. Tobin is editor in chief of JNS.org.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
3  Dulay    6 years ago

That's right! You've sussed out the plan.

There will be riots BUTT they won't be in Democratically run cities. We're choosing very carefully and pin pointing those red Trump enclaves, especially those in blue states. 

Say like Redding, CA. 

Better call Cottonwood for help...

BE AFRAID, BE VERY AFRAID! 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4  Paula Bartholomew    6 years ago

Exsqueeze me!  It is the Trump supporters who threatened civil war if Trump loses.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @4    6 years ago
It is the Trump supporters who threatened civil war if Trump loses.

You know you are going to have to provide a link to that don't you?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.2.1  cjcold  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2    6 years ago

Trump threatened it in 2016. Don't imagine he changed his mind.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  cjcold @4.2.1    6 years ago

And you really think I'm going to take your word for it.  Provide your proof.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.4  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.2    6 years ago

Why?

You posted a seed that doesn't have one iota of evidence/proof or links. 

Don't you think it's hypocritical to expect them from others? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.5  Dulay  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.3    6 years ago
And you really think I'm going to take your word for it.  Provide your proof.

How about proof that Trump said it? 

Donald Trump warned on Wednesday that his supporters would respond with “riots” if he fails to secure the nomination at July’s convention in Cleveland.

“I think you’d have riots,” Trump told CNN on Wednesday. “I think you’d have riots. I’m representing a tremendous many, many millions of people.”

“I think bad things would happen, I really do,” Trump said. “I believe that. I wouldn’t lead it but I think bad things would happen.”

Then there's a supporter:

“Riots aren’t necessarily a bad thing if it means it’s because it’s sitting there and fighting the fact that our establishment Republican party has gone corrupt and decided to ignore the voice of the people,” Trump supporter Scottie Neil Hughes told CNN Wednesday afternoon.

Later in the year:

Some Donald Trump Voters Warn of Revolution if Hillary Clinton Wins

Some worry that they will be forgotten, along with their concerns and frustrations. Others believe the nation may be headed for violent conflict.

Jared Halbrook, 25, of Green Bay, Wis., said that if Mr. Trump lost to Hillary Clinton, which he worried would happen through a stolen election, it could lead to “another Revolutionary War.”

“People are going to march on the capitols,” said Mr. Halbrook, who works at a call center. “They’re going to do whatever needs to be done to get her out of office, because she does not belong there.”

“If push comes to shove,” he added, and Mrs. Clinton “has to go by any means necessary, it will be done.”

There are plenty more, but you knew that before you asked. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dulay @4.2.5    6 years ago

I said proof.  That's not proof.  It's "I heard from a friend of a friend".

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.8  Dulay  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.2.6    6 years ago

Since some are too fucking lazy to do their own research, I'll just leave this here:

Trump on contested convention: "I think you'd have riots"

A la Woodward, there's audio of Trump's call into CNN.

And MORE:

“I think we’ll win before getting to the convention, but I can tell you, if we didn’t and if we’re 20 votes short or if we’re 100 short and we’re at 1,100 and somebody else is at 500 or 400, because we’re way ahead of everybody, I don’t think you can say that we don’t get it automatically,” Mr. Trump said. “I think it would be — I think you’d have riots. I think you’d have riots. I’m representing a tremendous, many, many millions of people.”

He added: “If you disenfranchise those people and you say, well I’m sorry but you’re 100 votes short, even though the next one is 500 votes short, I think you would have problems like you’ve never seen before. I think bad things would happen, I really do. I believe that. I wouldn’t lead it but I think bad things would happen.”

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.9  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.7    6 years ago

Except it isn't. 

BTFW, I'm STILL waiting for you to post one iota of evidence to support you seed. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
4.2.10  Kavika   replied to  Dulay @4.2.9    6 years ago
I'm STILL waiting for you to post one iota of evidence to support you seed. 

Don't hold your breath cuz it isn't coming.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.12  Dulay  replied to  Kavika @4.2.10    6 years ago

Oh I never do, especially when it comes to the seeder, who doesn't even try. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
4.2.13  arkpdx  replied to  Dulay @4.2.8    6 years ago

No proof given. The link you provided is talking about the nominating convention and not the election care to try again

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.14  Dulay  replied to  arkpdx @4.2.13    6 years ago

Pretty fucking hard to get elected if you don't win the nomination. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.16  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.15    6 years ago

You were the one who said that you helped elect Trump when you voted for him in the primary Xx. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.2.17  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dulay @4.2.8    6 years ago

Another "I heard from a friend of a friend".  Did you even play the video?  It had nothing to do with the election.  But then again if you watched it you would know that.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
4.2.19  Dulay  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.2.18    6 years ago

Not based on your own statements Xx. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
4.3  arkpdx  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @4    6 years ago

And it was the Hillary supporters who went out and ranted and rave and cried and screamed and rioted and refused to accept the results of the election. It was Hillary supporters that acted unamerican and almost started a civil war and they are still at it 4years later. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5  Jeremy Retired in NC    6 years ago
Democrats’ New Strategy For Winning The White House: Threaten Riots If They Lose

By the looks of it, they've already lost.

256

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.2  cjcold  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5    6 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  cjcold @5.2    6 years ago

Then prove me wrong.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    6 years ago

Was it just 4 years ago the Democrats and their parrots were claiming it was un-American not to accept election results?  My, how times flies...

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1  cjcold  replied to  Sean Treacy @6    6 years ago

Yep in 2016 Trump threatened to not accept the results if he lost.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1.1  cjcold  replied to  cjcold @6.1    6 years ago

Pretty sure that Trump will have to be dragged out of the White house screaming and kicking like the insane child he is.

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
7  The Magic 8 Ball    6 years ago

Democrats’ New Strategy For Winning The White House: Threaten Riots If They Lose

wait... 

so, we can re-elect trump AND put a boot up the lunatic lefts ass?

well then, I say game on, seriously, let's do this

just one more reason to vote trump2020 :)

 
 

Who is online


Krishna


97 visitors