╌>

When Is A Movie Adaptation Better Than The Book

  
Via:  Buzz of the Orient  •  2 years ago  •  7 comments

By:   Nirbhay Kanoria

When Is A Movie Adaptation Better Than The Book
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group MOVIES & TV - CLASSIC to CURRENT

MOVIES & TV - CLASSIC to CURRENT


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



When Is A Movie Adaptation Better Than The Book

B ooks and movies get along like a horse and carriage. Whenever a good or commercially successful book is published, the chance of it being made into a movie is pretty high. But what does it take to make a successful movie adaptation? And more importantly, what does it take to make sure the movie is better than the book it’s adapted from? We asked some avid book lovers and movie watchers which movies they prefer to their book counterparts, analysed their answers, and have come up with six points for what makes for a great adaptation.

800





Filling The Plot Holes


Dare we say it, some books have gaping plot holes. They offend our sensibilities, and even if we love the story, we don’t completely buy into the book because the plot holes make the story inconsistent. It is probably for this reason that Anuya Jatakdar, co-founder of the YouTube channel  Books On Toast , as well as our very own content writer,  Prasanna Sawant , preferred the  screen adaptation  of  Stardust  to the book. The book was replete with plot holes which were annoying for a reader, and the movie just cleaned up the entire mess. On a side note, casting Robert De Niro was a stroke of genius, one that made a huge difference to how good the movie was!

Elevating The Story


Some books are lovely and tell complete stories but, at the same time, when they’re made into a film or T.V. show, the screenwriter gets the opportunity to elevate the story even further. So even though it may stray ever so slightly from the source material, the end product is actually superior as the story has been taken to the next level. Sci-fi,  graphic novel  and  comic book savant T. G. Shenoy , elaborated on this point for us by giving us four examples of movies that were better than the books they were based on for this reason-  Do Androids Dream Of Electric Sheep?  (on which the movie  Bladerunner  is based) 2001 A Space Odyssey Fight Club  and  The Princess Bride . These movies “ interpreted the books in their own original ways, introduced their own ideas, used the medium to elevate the stories and made them more engaging, entertaining and thought-provoking in such a way that they stay with you .”

Making The Movie A Visual Treat


Some books just beg to be made into movies. The descriptions in the book really add to the book and make it come to life, and when made into a movie, the stunning visuals only add to the charm of the story. Such was the case when  Life Of Pi  was adapted into a  movie . Bookstagrammer Gargi Biswas (or  Dorkwhoreads  as her Instagram handle goes) said that she preferred the movie to the book because it was a treat to the senses. We can see her point as it was indeed  beautifully shot . And the same can be said of many other movies that are based on books as well. Take  The Lord Of The Rings –  the books  just did not bring Tolkien’s imagination to life in the way the movies did. Even in Jurassic Park,  the book  did not capture that feeling of awe as successfully as the  movie  did when our protagonists first met the dinosaurs.










Converting A Good Story Into An Even More Interesting Storyline


This is tricky, especially when it comes to  biographies  and non-fiction, as they can be informative but dry. To a reader, it may be interesting to learn how a person’s life unfolded, but it may not be riveting or relatable.  However, a good screenwriter can take such a book and make it into a fantastic film. For one of our  favourite writers , and human rights lawyer and activist, Deya Bhattacharya, the  movie version  of  Into The Wild  was exactly that. She found the book written as a documentary of sorts, while the movie provided her with a more robust narrative of what happened to Chris McCandless. The same can be said for biographies or memoirs such as  Elegy For Iris The Diving Bell And The Butterfly , and  12 Years A Slave . The films were far more riveting because they added a certain drama to the story.

Creating Better Fleshed-Out Characters With More Depth


Just because a character is written a certain way in a book, it doesn’t mean their film counterpart can’t have more depth. Or that his or her storyline can’t take on a more interesting turn. We’ve seen this happen in two cases. Tej Haldule,  a writer  from Goa who reads everything- from  Ishiguro  to  Indian sci-fi  to  children’s books  pointed us towards  Shrek . Full disclosure- we didn’t even know  the movie  was based on a book! The film was actually better because the characters of Shrek, Donkey, Fiona, etc. were better fleshed out, making them more ‘real’. Incidentally, he also liked the plotline of the movie more because it transcended notions of conventional beauty, love and happy endings. Similarly, Prasanna spoke about the  screen adaptation  of  Forrest Gump  and how it was a far superior product primarily because the characters in the movie had more depth than their book counterparts, and Tom Hanks moved her in a way the book just couldn’t.

Making The Story More Believable


It may sound blasphemous but sometimes the film’s story can be more believable than the book’s. The way the events unfold in the movie can make us think that they can happen to us also. For  Hanshal Nautiyal , the movie,  The Shining  was way better than Stephen King’s  novel  simply because of this. He thought the movie’s move from the supernatural setup of the book to the horror generated from human nature was far more terrifying and believable. It gave him goosebumps, which the book failed to do. We saw a similar situation when  Calling Sehmat  was adapted into  Raazi . The movie was  far more believable  because of the way Sehmat achieved her goal in Pakistan by leaning on a network of other spies and informants, as opposed to the book where she is a one-woman army.










Over the years some books have been made into brilliant films-  To Kill A Mockingbird The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo  (the 2009 Swedish adaptation), and  The Great Gatsby  (the 2013 adaptation), to name just a few. Others have been awful, such as  The Girl On The Train Murder  On The Orient Express  (the 2017 adaptation), and  The Kite Runner . While it is not an easy task to adapt a complex novel into a movie, in the correct filmmaker’s hands, the results can be quite stupendous, and even better than the book. I, for one, am always looking forward to a  book adaptation , and can’t wait to see more of my favourite books brought to life on screen.


nirbhay-pic.jpg





As a young boy, Nirbhay had the annoying habit of waking up at 5 a.m. Since television was a big no-no, he had no choice but to read to entertain himself and that is how his love affair with books began. A true-blue Piscean, books paved the path to his fantasy worlds- worlds he’d often rather stay in. Nirbhay is the co-founder and publisher of The Curious Reader.









Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient    2 years ago

Comments are subject to the Movies group RED BOX RULES which can be accessed by clicking on this link -> or by clicking on the Movies group avatar at the top right of the article page above. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2  seeder  Buzz of the Orient    2 years ago

Although the opinions about whether or not a book is better than a movie adaptation of it range around 90% that the books are better, I am putting forward an argument for the 10%.  There are more reasons than stated by the author of the article as to why a movie can be considered better which range from the popularity of the actors to depending on which one a person first experiences, the book or the movie.  

I'm sure many have opinions about this, and all are welcome to join in and state them here. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
3  Perrie Halpern R.A.    2 years ago
It may sound blasphemous but sometimes the film’s story can be more believable than the book’s. The way the events unfold in the movie can make us think that they can happen to us also. For  Hanshal Nautiyal , the movie,  The Shining  was way better than Stephen King’s  novel  simply because of this.

Sorry but no. You picked the wrong novel. Misery was a better movie than a book.

Now interestingly, since we are talking about novels that are sci-fi-ish... The movie "The Arrival", was better than the book it was derived from, " Story of Your Life ", since the imagery had a huge impact on the storytelling.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
3.1  pat wilson  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @3    2 years ago
Misery was a better movie than a book

That was due to the caliber of the actors, James Caan (RIP) and Kathy Bates as the leads, they were awesome.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.1.1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  pat wilson @3.1    2 years ago

I didn't remember that the late James Caan was Kathy's victim, but once a person has seen Misery it's unlikely that they would ever forget Kathy Bates. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
3.2  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @3    2 years ago

But Perrie, anyone who saw The Shining could not possibly forget Jack Nicholson sticking his head in the hole in the door he chopped and shouting "Here's Johnny!!!".  Could you possibly get that from the book?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4  Hallux    2 years ago

Death in Venice ... Novella by Thomas Mann, film by Luchino Visconti. Though the novella is brilliant, the film is a fresco of sight and sound.

 
 

Who is online

Ronin2
Drinker of the Wry


590 visitors