╌>

James Cameron Admits 'Jack Might've Lived' If He Shared Door in 'Titanic' : But There's 'Variables'

  
Via:  Buzz of the Orient  •  last year  •  3 comments

By:   By Julia Moor

James Cameron Admits 'Jack Might've Lived' If He Shared Door in 'Titanic' : But There's 'Variables'
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group MOVIES & TV - CLASSIC to CURRENT

MOVIES & TV - CLASSIC to CURRENT


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


James Cameron Admits 'Jack Might've Lived' If He Shared Door in 'Titanic' : But There's 'Variables'

The director addresses the question in a first-look at the National Geographic special Titanic: 25 Years Later with James Cameron


800

PHOTO: NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC/SPENCER STONER

James Cameron  is giving fans an inside look at how the last few moments of Jack and Rose's romance could have gone following the sinking of the titular ship in  Titanic .


The 1997 film's director commissioned a scientific study to determine if there really was enough room for both Jack and Rose DeWitt Bukater (played by  Leonardo DiCaprio  and  Kate Winslet , respectively) to fit on the ever-debated floating door after the Titanic sank in the Oscar-winning blockbuster.


first-look  into the National Geographic special about the study,  Titanic: 25 Years Later with James Cameron , premiered on  Good Morning America  Tuesday.


. @GMA  FIRST LOOK:  @natgeo  special “Titanic: 25 Years Later with James Cameron” will settle the debate once and for all: could Jack have survived? @JimCameron @natgeotv   pic.twitter.com/OkKCXaEkvF
— Good Morning America (@GMA)  February 2, 2023

To find out — once and for all — whether Jack could have survived had he joined Rose on the floating piece of debris, Cameron and a team of scientists hired two stunt doubles to reenact four different scenarios.


At one point in the clip, both Jack and Rose are halfway on the piece of debris, but their lower halves are completely submerged in the freezing water, so it's likely neither would have survived in that position. In another position, they are both seated on the debris, and Jack is shaking violently from the cold. "He could've made it pretty long, like hours," Cameron said of the seated position.


It's only once they test the scenario when the two stunt people are as exhausted as they would've been in the real situation — like the moment where Rose is shoved underwater by another survivor before Jack swims over and punches her attacker. Once they both are seated on the floating debris, Rose offers Jack her life jacket, and he "stabilized."


"She got him to a place where, if we projected that out, he just might have made it until the lifeboat got there," Cameron said.

titanic-james-cameron-door-020223-2-cf6a665906044c5180373fc41e95ef61.jpg

PHOTO: NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC/SPENCER STONER

In the end, the film's writer-director seems satisfied with the conclusion that there will never really be a clear-cut answer to the question, but regardless, Jack acted out of pure love.


"Jack might've lived, but there's a lot of variables," Cameron said. "I think his thought process was, 'I'm not gonna do one thing that jeopardizes her.'"


In an interview with Postmedia ahead of the National Geographic special announcement,  Cameron said that Jack "needed to die."


"It's like  Romeo and Juliet . It's a movie about love and sacrifice and mortality. The love is measured by the sacrifice."


800

PHOTO:  20TH CENTURY FOX/PARAMOUNT/KOBAL/SHUTTERSTOCK

The special coincides with the 4K  restoration of  Titanic , which opens in theaters  Feb. 10 to celebrate the Academy Award winner's 25th anniversary,


PEOPLE is celebrating the film on its 25th anniversary with a  new  Titanic  special edition,  which includes a behind-the-scenes look at its making and legacy. In the issue, Cameron opened up about reuniting with Winslet for  Avatar: The Way of Water , as well as his ongoing obsession with the RMS Titanic.


"Yeah, I was a little bit obsessed there for a while," the director and writer told PEOPLE, adding, "I'm not going back out to the wreck. I've done my investigation. We are putting all our data together with some of the other experts . . . to do a definitive publication on the marine forensics of the wreck."


Titanic: 25 Years Later with James Cameron  premieres Sunday, Feb. 5, at 9 p.m. ET on National Geographic.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient    last year

All in all, I think Titanic was an amazing movie.  Since there was a predecessor, it is an example of a remake that was better than the original.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    last year
In the end, the film's writer-director seems satisfied with the conclusion that there will never really be a clear-cut answer to the question, but regardless, Jack acted out of pure love.

"Jack might've lived, but there's a lot of variables," Cameron said. "I think his thought process was, 'I'm not gonna do one thing that jeopardizes her.'"

It was a fiction movie, not a documentary. If the writers wanted Jack to jump on the floating door and do an Irish jig , they could have done that. 

Nice publicity for Titanic though, although I'm not sure it needs any. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

Not PURE fiction.  It fictionized an actual event.  The Titanic striking an iceberg and sinking isn't fiction. 

 
 

Who is online






76 visitors