Film Studies: Introduction to Classical Hollywood
By: Steven Ryder (intofilm-edu)
Film Studies: Introduction to Classical Hollywood
A syllabus-focused introduction to the era of American film between 1930-1960 identified as Classical Hollywood through the films available on Into Film+.
Casablanca © WARNER BROS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Below, we're exploring the era of American film between 1930 and 1960 that the WJEC/Eduqas Film Studies specification identifies as 'Classical Hollywood' (sometimes referred to as 'Old Hollywood'), before looking at a selection of films on the syllabus and some of the key characteristics that set them apart as Classical Hollywood cinema.
What is Classical Hollywood?
The American film industry is vast in scope but its epicentre lies in Los Angeles, California, specifically an area called Hollywood, where the five major film studios decided to plant their flags in the early twentieth century. For almost its entire history, film has been synonymous with Hollywood and although the landscape of the film industry has changed rapidly over the decades since film became a mainstream artform, Hollywood has remained the leader in budgets, box office and sheer popularity to this day.
There were five major Hollywood studios during the classical era, some of which are still at the top of the pyramid today: Paramount, Warner Brothers, 20th Century Fox, RKO and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM). The studios were funded, owned and operated by businessmen and they were all "vertically integrated". "Vertical integration" meant that the studios handled the production (the casting, writing, filming etc), the distribution (marketing, materials) and exhibition (owning the cinemas themselves) of the entire film industry. Stars were the most integral part to a film's success, due to the audience fascination with actors' on-screen personas and personal lives the biggest stars of this era largely ensured that films would make a profit at the box office. With production budgets being very tight during the war and post- war period in Hollywood, the total command over every aspect of a films production allowed studios to have an unprecedented level of power over spending that has not been seen since, at least in a business sense.
By highlighting some of the identifying features of Classical Hollywood films that rose from this economic situation, we can learn about how the film industry was operating at the time, how the art form of film was evolving and how societal/cultural notions of the time were shaping, or being shaped by, the films being made.
Casablanca
The earliest film from this period on the syllabus is Casablanca , produced in 1942, and directed by Michael Curtiz. Casablanca , which tells the story of a mysterious American expatriate who is reacquainted with his former lover in Morocco, performed considerably well, though not spectacularly, at the box office during its initial release yet has since become known as a definitive film of this era. With the war not yet won, Casablanca provided both escapism and patriotic entertainment for audiences but a chief aspect of Casablanca that makes it so instantly recognizable as a Classical Hollywood film is its approach to dialogue and story.
Since the breakthrough of sound technology in film during the late twenties, and its subsequent brisk evolution, Hollywood had been taking full advantage of this new aspect of the medium. By 1942, rapid-fire dialogue and voiceover had become the preferred way to communicate the plot for audiences and filmmakers so it's no surprise that Casablanca opens with a voiceover narrating the current global political climate over newsreel footage. In 30 seconds, in sets the scene before we are introduced to the film's characters who are given some of cinema's snappiest dialogue which, to this day, has remained iconic. Humphrey Bogart, whose star persona was built around him being a hard-boiled cynic with a secret heart of gold, casually delivers some of the most quoted lines of the Classical Hollywood period such as "here's looking at you, kid" and the iconic final line of dialogue of the film. With strong thematic beats regarding sacrifice and passion, Casablanca could be seen as the prototypical Classical Hollywood film that has also stood the test of time and continues to make modern audiences swoon.
Into Film+
Resource
Vertigo
In the intervening years, a number of Hollywood classics were released throughout the 1940s and 1950s including All About Eve , It's a Wonderful Life and Singin' in the Rain from notable directors such as Joseph L. Mankiewic, Frank Capra and Stanley Donen. By the late 1950s, the Classical Hollywood period was both in full-swing and nearing its end. This late period though, gave us a huge swathe of films that epitomize the style and substance of the era. One of these is Vertigo (1958) which, for many, is in the conversation for the best film of all time. A major reason it is seen as such a landmark moment in cinema, and one of the primary reasons it features is because, as per the WJEC/Eduqas syllabus, it "contains the perfect blend of auteur filmmaking (incorporating Hitchcock's 'signature' style and themes) and Classical Hollywood style".
In this case, "auteur filmmaking" refers to the theory that a film can be analyzed through the lens of its director who is considered the primary author of what we see on screen. Hitchcock's directing style was one of Classical Hollywood's most recognizable throughout his entire filmography: he championed innovative camera techniques and prioritized suspense and imagery above dialogue, yet his films still utilized the star personas of Hollywood's biggest actors, such as James Stewart and Janet Leigh, to both comply to and subvert audience expectations.
Hitchcock and Vertigo helped usher in a new era of Hollywood film being seen as an intellectual pursuit and not solely for the purpose of escapism and entertainment. His films were still gripping and accessible but with an underlying psychological aspect to them too. There is evidence of all of this during one of Vertigo 's most famous sequences in which the protagonist, private detective John Ferguson, follows a mysterious woman throughout the city of San Francisco and its naturally beautiful outskirts. The vibrant colour, surreal music and intoxicating camerawork create a very specific, scintillating atmosphere that influenced filmmaking for decades to come, and continues to do so.
Into Film+
Resource
Imitation of Life
The German-born director Douglas Sirk's film Imitation of Life (1959) is a late-period Classical Hollywood film and the last of his Hollywood career. Sirk specialized in melodrama, films typified by heightened theatricality, in both performance and set, and the prioritization of a highly emotional story over detailed characterization. These kinds of films were very popular at the box office ( Imitation of Life was the 6th highest grossing film of the year) and particularly appealed to female audiences, but came to be known, rather derisorily, by the male-dominated cinema space as "women's pictures". Imitation of Life uses these specific genre-stylings to tell an accessible story regarding social issues such as Black American identity and women's ambitions, following the lives of a white widow who dreams of stardom and the Black single mother who becomes her maid. Visually, the film stands out from other films of the Classical Hollywood era due to its lavish sets and outwardly bright and luxuriant colour palette, often used by Sirk to mirror or embellish the characters' emotional states.
The film is also quite different from the others on the syllabus due to its setting and locations mainly domestic spaces and recognizable, almost mundane, localities. This allowed Sirk to use the characters' environment as a means of expressing their mental states or social status, digging into the deeper themes of the film in ways that dialogue, voiceover or action could not. Imitation of Life also contrasts the aforementioned Classical Hollywood films in terms of performance: the exaggerated approach to acting of Lana Turner (Lora) and Juanita Moore (Annie), due to the film's melodramatic style, is not seen as much in contemporary cinema, giving learners the chance to analyze where else they may see this in the media that they consume today. The climatic final scene between Lora and Sarah Jane, Annie's daughter, is a particularly notable example of this.
Into Film+
Some Like It Hot
The final Classical Hollywood film on the Eduqas/WJEC syllabus that you can find on Into Film+ is the masterful comedy film Some Like It Hot (1959). With its slapstick elements, physical comedy and screwball dialogue, Some Like It Hot has stood the test of time whilst also being described as a "cine-literate" comedy, meaning it contains many allusions and references to other Hollywood genres, films and styles (such as noir, the gangster film and the musical). Following the story of two hapless musicians who decide that dressing up as women is the best way for them to escape the violent gangsters on their trail, the film delves into relationship dynamics and entangled identities, and subverts the traditional gendered roles audiences were used to seeing on-screen during this period. The witty, quickfire dialogue that defined much of the Classical Hollywood era is very much present here and although colour film was being widely used at the time (technicolor famously pops off the screen in the aforementioned Vertigo ), Billy Wilder opted to shoot the film in black and white, evoking a previous period of Classical Hollywood film despite the impending culmination of the era.
Billy Wilder, another director now considered an auteur who worked seamlessly within the Classical Hollywood studio setup on films such as Double Indemnity (1944), Sunset Boulevard (1950) and The Apartment (1960), cast Marilyn Monroe in the film, a cultural icon who appears here in arguably her most famous role as the hilariously named Sugar Kane. Sugar Kane's depiction in Some Like It Hot is a major reason why the film appears on the WJEC/Eduqas syllabus. Whilst the film and the characters certainly sexualise Monroe's character at the beginning of the film, from the way the camera highlights her body and overt sexuality through the use of close-ups and mise-en-scene, Wilder makes sure to show the audience that, through their own experience dressed as women, the two male leads come to sympathize with Sugar Kane and begin to question their roles in society as men.
Into Film+
Resource
What makes Classical Hollywood such an entertaining and valuable period of film, along with the huge stars, lavish sets and snappy dialogue, are the original and engrossing stories that still resonate with audiences of various age groups to this day.
AUTHOR
Steven Ryder, Curation Officer
Steven has an MA in Film Studies, Programming and Curation from the National Film and Television School. He has previously worked for various exhibitors around England and currently freelances as a film critic/podcaster.
Save that two members besides the Group Administrator have blanket approval to post and promote seeds and articles, all members of this group are welcome to post to the Group seeds, articles and comments provided that: 1) Promotion to the Front (Home) Page of seeds and articles must first be approved by the Group Administrator, and 2) Discussion of politics and/or religion will be limited to the plots and themes of the movies or TV movies and series themselves and any religious comments or proselytizing or commentary concerning current political circumstances not in reference to the movies or TV movies and series themselves will be deleted along with all CoC and ToS violations. As well, anything posted that the administer of this group deems to be offensive or off topic will be deleted. Videos and images that the administrator cannot open must be described in text or they will be deleted.
Tags
Who is online
227 visitors
I'm not surprised that Casablanca was the primary choice used by the author as an example of that 'Golden Age of Hollywood'.
I'm surprised The Wizard of Oz isn't on the list. There are many implications one can sus from 'the man behind the curtain' or the good girl that goes rouge and runs away from home.
As I usually (but did not this time) point out, lists such as these depend on an individual's personal taste, and everyone's personal taste is unique. Now, as is pointed out to us photographers in another seed posted on the Front (Home) Page, AI may be creating images in the future so my question is, will they script and create movies that differ? Will a robot win a screenwriting Oscar?
For now Union agreements have delegated AI to very small roles in for all aspects of work in Hollywood.
Good thing.
What I love about the "Classic Hollywood" Movies is they relied on the talents of the actors and the strength of the story, todays Hollywood relies too heavily on special effects and shock value, the era of great screen plays is over.
I disagree. I agree that the current Hollywood money makers are reliant on visual effects and jamming in as many subplots as they can, but this has been a thing since at least Star Wars came out in the 70's. They fund the art that often loses a studio money.
Check out these all out this year:
I won't get to see any of those for 3 years due to copyright compliance, because I don't go to movie theatres - was in one here only once in my life many years ago to see the final Hobbit movie in a 4D movie theatre, but I can do without getting punched in the back, jiggled in my seat and sprayed with mist in my face, and prefer to watch movies on my 4.5 foot TV screen while reclining on my couch. The one on your list I really want to see is A Complete Unknown.
I'm trying to talk my son into seeing the new Nosferatu movie at the theater when we go visit.
It has gotten very good ratings, so I'm excited to see it.
Otherwise I have a fantastic surround sound home movie setup and I like purchasing 4k bluray discs.
I just watched the IMDb videos you linked. Never had to post my age before, but that video didn't seem much scarier than the first one. Anyway, it seems to be a suitable movie for Christmas Day...NOT!!! LOL
Not only that, George, but the new directors must think they're being great creative "arteests" when the actors mumble and whip through their lines at the speed of sound, and when the scene is so fucking dark you can't see anything but a black screen. Those problems didn't happen back then. Back then Marlon Brando was criticized for mumbling, which was really unusual for an actor to do.
That has been a problem brought up on TV forums a lot. Some new TVs have a filmmaker color mode setting that is supposed to render the picture as it shows in theaters. Unfortunately for many TV watchers we don't live in completely black rooms so these super dark scenes are unwatchable for many.
Since there is an awareness of the problem I don't understand why they keep doing it.
They are cinema autures... they don't feel they need to accommodate the home viewer. To them it's all about the immersive theater experience. Some of their comments on the topic have been quite rude and condescending.
I'm sure you're right about that. As I've said a few times, I watch at least one movie a day that I haven't seen, pretty well all produced during the past couple of decades, and a lot of them are junk. However, now and then I see one I really like. In fact there is one the critics virtually destroyed and I can't get it out of my mind. It wasn't a Hollywood film. It was a Chinese one mostly in English.