╌>

Five Classic Movies That Were Box Office Flops

  
Via:  Buzz of the Orient  •  yesterday  •  5 comments

By:   Shawn Dwyer (LiveAbout)

Five Classic Movies That Were Box Office Flops
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group MOVIES & TV - CLASSIC to CURRENT

MOVIES & TV - CLASSIC to CURRENT


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Five Classic Movies That Were Box Office Flops

Sometimes it's hard to believe, but some of Hollywood's greatest classic movies were box office flops when they were first released. While they have more than made up for the loss through DVDs and repeated showings on television, there are several all-time greats that you would be surprised to learn were initially dismissed by critics and audiences. Here are five such classics.

01 of 05

The Wizard of Oz (1939)


GettyImages-121652979-5c71e4f5c9e77c000107b5d8.jpg

Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images

Yeah, this one caused me to scratch my head as well. How could one of the most beloved movies of all time be a box office flop? Truth be told, The Wizard of Oz did make money eventually—10 years after its initial release. But in 1939, MGM's musical fantasy barely broke even and wouldn't make a profit until the 1949 re-release put it firmly in the black. The Wizard of Oz piled on the profits with a re-release in 1955 and airings on television starting in 1956. It was one of the first movies released on video cassette by MGM in 1980, and by the time of its 70th anniversary Blu-ray release in 2009, The Wizard of Oz had made money hand over fist while living on as one of the greatest classic movies ever made.

02 of 05

Citizen Kane (1941)


GettyImages-473345622-5c71e5a546e0fb0001436232.jpg

Donaldson Collection/Getty Images

So why is the movie that tops most lists as the greatest film ever made also on this one? The answer would have to be newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst, who threatened and cajoled exhibitors while refusing to run ads in retaliation for director Orson Welles modeling Charles Foster Kane after him. Welles never confirmed that Hearst was the source for his character and even claimed that Kane was an amalgamation of different personalities. Still, the resemblance between Hearst and Kane was striking, which led the newspaper tycoon to wage a bitter personal battle to squash the film. Citizen Kane played well in some cities, but not others, and ultimately recorded a loss during its initial run. Making matters worse, the film lost out at the Academy Awards after nine nominations, with Welles and co-writer Herman J. Mankiewicz taking home a sole statue for Best Original Screenplay.

03 of 05

It's a Wonderful Life (1946)


GettyImages-527186178-5c71e660c9e77c0001ddcecb.jpg

Herbert Dorfman/Getty Images

Yes, the single most inspirational Christmas movie of all time was also a box office dud. In fact, the film—now an all-time classic that stars Jimmy Stewart in his most iconic role—opened to mixed reviews and had its release date moved up to December 1946 in order to make it eligible for the Academy Awards. While it did earn nominations for Best Picture, Best Director, and Best Actor, It's a Wonderful Life was drowned out by William Wyler's massively popular drama, The Best Years of Our Lives , which was widely praised by critics while winning seven Oscars. It's a Wonderful Life limped into wide release in January 1947 and had to wait decades before becoming a perennial holiday classic on television.

04 of 05

Cleopatra (1963)


GettyImages-154044290-5c71e765c9e77c0001be51f3.jpg


Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images

This massively turbulent production has long been the poster child for box office flops thanks to its infamously overblown budget brought about by outrageously expensive sets, production delays, and the ever-swelling salary of its star Elizabeth Taylor. The movie was originally budgeted at a modest $2 million but eventually ballooned to a whopping $44 million, making it then and now—when adjusted for inflation—the most expensive movie ever made. Adding insult to injury was the scandal ignited by Taylor's affair with costar Richard Burton, which compounded the bad publicity for the troubled production. Ironically, it earned over $26 million in the domestic box office and was the highest-grossing film of 1963, making Cleopatra the first-ever top earner to report a loss.

05 of 05

Blade Runner (1982)


GettyImages-110867956-5c71e834c9e77c00010d6c1a.jpg

Warner Bros./Getty Images

Ridley Scott's classic adaptation of Philip K. Dick's Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? was a dismal failure in its first box office release despite the enormous popularity of Harrison Ford, who by then was a star thanks to Star Wars (1977) and Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981). Maybe it was the dark, dystopian future world that served as its setting or its complex, almost impenetrable themes that turned audiences and critics away. Or perhaps its failure was due to the massive box office success of E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) or Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan (1982), both of which were released during the same month. No one will know for sure, but Blade Runner did manage to become a cult classic and eventually turned a profit thanks to numerous video, DVD, and Blu-ray releases.


Red Box Rules

Save that two members besides the Group Administrator have blanket approval to post and promote seeds and articles, all members of this group are welcome to post to the Group seeds, articles and comments provided that: 1) Promotion to the Front (Home) Page of seeds and articles must first be approved by the Group Administrator, and 2) Discussion of politics and/or religion will be limited to the plots and themes of the movies or TV movies and series themselves and any religious comments or proselytizing or commentary concerning current political circumstances not in reference to the movies or TV movies and series themselves will be deleted along with all CoC and ToS violations.  As well, anything posted that the administer of this group deems to be offensive or off topic will be deleted.  Videos and images that the administrator cannot open must be described in text or they will be deleted.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient    yesterday

Kind of hard to believe, isn't it.  

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2  Snuffy    yesterday

It's always interesting to go back and see movies that were box office flops having lost a lot of money yet turned into cult classics. 

Cleopatra was the movie that almost bankrupted 20th Century Fox as production and marketing costs exceeded $44 million which was a lot of money back in the days. Yeah, to us little folks that's still a lot of money but it's peanuts compared to today's production and marketing costs for movies. Hard to believe that John Carter is the biggest loser among box office flops after it grossed $284.1 million in worldwide box office receipts yet lost $255 million.

25 Biggest Box Office Bombs Of All Time

The amount of money tossed around by Hollywood is ridiculous. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Snuffy @2    18 hours ago

Remember to adjust for inflation, and that 44 million would be an astronomical amount today.  I'm surprised that John Carter did so poorly - maybe it had to do with the promotion or something.  I thought it was a pretty good movie.  I never saw Mulan but I know it was talked up a lot here, so that's a surprise as well. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Snuffy  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @2.1    16 hours ago

Yep, that $44 million would be worth today around $404 million. 

I was also surprised to see that John Carter did that poorly but I wonder if that has more to do with the "creative" bookkeeping that Hollywood uses. They do like to hide profit to reduce the money paid out for those who invest based on how well the movie will do or the actors who got for a piece of the profit rather than a fixed fee for their services. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
2.1.2  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.1    15 hours ago

I really know very little about the financial business of movie making.  I once invested in a movie, a Canadian one called The Silent Partner, starring Elliott Gould, Suzannah York, Christopher Plummer and Selena Gomez (was she ever sexy), when the Canadian government allowed us a tax shelter to encourage movie making, and I invested $26,000 Canadian to own 1% of the movie.  Although I did get the tax shelter benefit I made little else from it, especially since it was never properly promoted, and the producer took most of the profit to buy himself a big home in an exclusive area of Toronto. 

 
 

Who is online






420 visitors