╌>

Christian Shelter Forces Homeless Women to Give 10% to Megachurch

  

Category:  Religion & Ethics

Via:  hal-a-lujah  •  7 years ago  •  62 comments

Christian Shelter Forces Homeless Women to Give 10% to Megachurch

Source

A Christian women’s shelter in Alabama is forcing homeless residents to attend the largest megachurch in the state and, when they get a job, give that church 10 percent of their income.

This is exactly the opposite of how things should work. Churches and homeless shelters should be helping people, and not forcing them to give up what little money they do have, but that’s exactly what Jessie’s Place in downtown Birmingham is doing.

It’s one thing to require church attendance – it’s a Christian shelter so that isn’t a big surprise. But it’s quite another to tell a woman like Dana Johnson, who has been living at Jessie’s Place for about a month and wanted to attend her own church just a few blocks away, that she must attend a branch of Church of the Highlands.

First Presbyterian Church of Birmingham, where Johnson wanted to attend, is walking distance from the shelter. But instead of letting her go there, shelter leaders said she is required to go to their megachurch, according to AL.com.

For three consecutive Sundays, she and other residents boarded a van and attended worship services at the Woodlawn branch of the Church of the Highlands, Alabama’s largest church.

Jessie’s Place has responded to the allegations, saying the policy keeps women from lying about going to church. They also denied that the women are required to give money to that specific church, but Johnson called them out on that claim. She also pointed out that 10 percent of your income is a lot when you’re homeless.

When she got a job, Johnson, 47, said she was also told she was required to tithe, or donate 10 percent of her income. She was told to go to a bank, get a money order and make it payable to the Church of the Highlands, she said.

“Someone living in a shelter is not tithing big money,” Johnson said. But it is a significant amount to a homeless person, she said.

Johnson added that other Christian shelters have required her to attend that same megachurch, but they didn’t force homeless women to tithe. They also didn’t bus her far away from the shelter to go to a specific church despite the existence of more convenient and preferred ones.

This isn’t a legal issue — it’s a Christian group and they can make homeless women attend whichever church they see fit. But it certainly is an ethical issue, and I think it’s clear that what this shelter and megachurch are doing is morally wrong. It certainly doesn’t sounds like what Jesus would do.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Hal A. Lujah    7 years ago

The longer it takes you to save enough money to get back on your feet, the longer they can extort you.  It’s a pretty simple business model for a tax free business venture.  No ethics required.

 
 
 
Rex Block
Freshman Silent
1.3  Rex Block  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1    7 years ago

She can go to any church she wants to. It's not unusual for Christian run private shelter require that the resident attend services.

Here in Denver there is a shelter called Step 13 for drunks and druggies  that requires that the residents stay sober and work. They help them find jobs. The success rate of staying sober is high.

I resent having the the ugly elongated puffy face of some dude on the right margin as I type this. The Botox "face" is just as bad. Please clean up the ads Perrie

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
1.5  zuksam  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1    7 years ago
No ethics required

I have no problem with them charging 10% as rent since it's so cheap. If you make 500 bucks you pay fifty bucks rent or if you only make forty bucks you only pay four bucks rent. Anyone who thinks that is unreasonable must live rent free in their parents basement. I don't really like them forcing them to attend their church, that seems predatory to go after people at their most vulnerable. It's like having a Soup Kitchen but everyone must sit through Mass before they can eat. 10% for rent is fair as long as they don't get evicted if they have no money. If you got it give a little, if not that's OK.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Silent
1.6  mocowgirl  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @1    7 years ago
It’s a pretty simple business model for a tax free business venture.

Churches have been subsidized with taxpayer money ever since W. Bush's faith base initiative to the tune of billions of dollars a year.  This has continue under Obama and is probably continuing under Trump.

Our government has give public assistance money to churches and forced people to turn to churches for assistance. 

Of course, the churches are a tax free business venture and the taxpayers are subsidizing at a growing rate.

This last fear proved to be especially foresighted. It soon came to light that under Bush, promises of faith-based money were being dangled in front of religious communities in return for political support.

In 2002 and 2004, staffers from the White House faith-based office appeared at rallies alongside Republican candidates, implying to voters that the best way to get faith-based grants was to support the GOP.

Faith-based grants were also used to win over administration critics. TV preacher Pat Robertson was an early opponent of the initiative, asserting that churches would become dependent on government aid, which would become “like a narcotic.” Robertson stopped voicing these concerns, however, after his Operation Blessing charity was given a $1.5 million grant.

Payoffs such as this may have persuaded some opponents, but most Americans have remained wary of the faith-based approach. Public-opinion polls reflect widespread uneasiness over key aspects of the initiative. According to a 2008 Pew Research Center poll, 61 percent of Americans say groups that encourage religious conversion should not be eligible for public funding. A 2009 Pew poll found an overwhelming 74 percent say organizations that hire only people who share their religious beliefs should not receive government grants.

In a speech in Zanesville, Ohio, Obama said, “[I]f you get a federal grant, you can’t use that grant money to proselytize to the people you help and you can’t discriminate against them or against the people you hire on the basis of their religion.”

When the president rolled out his version of the faith-based initiative in February 2009, however, he left the old Bush executive orders in place. That means billions in federal funds are being disbursed without much-needed safeguards. Administration officials have indicated that discrimination claims will be looked at on a case-by-case basis, instead of being barred by government- wide action. In November 2010, Obama issued an executive order making a few changes to the faith-based initiative, but leaving the discriminatory hiring policy intact.

Americans who support civil rights and civil liberties are calling on Obama to keep his commitment.

 
 
 
mocowgirl
Professor Silent
1.6.1  mocowgirl  replied to  mocowgirl @1.6    7 years ago

Also in addition to the Faith Based Initiative....

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/08/22/you-give-religions-more-than-82-5-billion-a-year/?utm_term=.cd534c2d37fb

You give religions more than $82.5 billion a year

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2  Kavika     7 years ago

Unreal

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Kavika @2    7 years ago

Kavika, this is like conservatives wanting people who make 10,000 a year to pay income taxes.

People who need charity cannot afford to give 10 percent of their income to a religious group.

If they choose to, that would be one thing. making them do it or throwing them out if they dont is another thing entirely.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Kavika   replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    7 years ago
If they choose to, that would be one thing. making them do it or throwing them out if they dont is another thing entirely.

Exactly.

 
 
 
Rex Block
Freshman Silent
2.1.3  Rex Block  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    7 years ago
Kavika, this is like conservatives wanting people who make 10,000 a year to pay income taxes

Absolutely not true...try to come up with some proof or sources.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to    7 years ago
Either pay income taxes or stop being a drain on society by taking advantage of the Welfare state. Most of those people choose to make very little so they can suckle on the teat of government.

LOl.

Asking poor people who receive government benefits to pay income taxes is LITERALLY wanting to make poor people poorer.

Is that what your religion teaches you? To literally make poor people poorer?

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Quiet
2.1.6  Dean Moriarty  replied to    7 years ago

Yep I know a guy with six kids that only works part-time because he doesn't want to pay for his kids healthcare and lose his Obamacare subsidies.  He used to be an accountant. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.1.11  arkpdx  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    7 years ago

So she was able to live their rent free and have a roof over her head and food in her belly while she was not working and had no money is fine. Why is asking her to help pay for little to live there when she has some funds coming in so outrageous? Ten percent is not anywhere near what she will spend on housing in the economy. 

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
2.1.13  zuksam  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.11    7 years ago
Ten percent is not anywhere near what she will spend on housing in the economy.

The reason many people are homeless is because if they make minimum wage and have no dependents to help them qualify for assistance they can't afford a place of their own. Where I live a one bedroom apartment costs about a grand then you still need to pay electric, gas or oil, and food. And that's just the minimum to have a roof over your head, you still need a car to work and food shop because we have very little public transportation around here it only provides spotty time coverage of one route it can't be relied on accept by retired folks who can arrange their errands around the bus.

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Quiet
2.1.14  magnoliaave  replied to  zuksam @2.1.13    7 years ago

And, that is the reason why she should thank the church for food and shelter who are only asking for 10% of her salary.

I know that even 10% is tough when one is making so little.  But, none of us get a free ride, usually.  I am thinking that she should be proud to pay something toward her shelter rather than be a taker.  It becomes a way of life for some, you know.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
2.1.15  sandy-2021492  replied to  zuksam @2.1.13    7 years ago

I belong to a local service group.  Every month we have speakers from groups in the community.  This month's speaker was from a group like this one - churches that take in homeless families, help them with job searches, child care, finding affordable housing, furnishing their apartments, etc.  The disparity between what minimum wage will pay and what basic expenses can be is huge.  Add in things like child care, and the odd medical expense, and it can be hard to get on your feet, or stay there.  We also have no public transportation here - a car is a necessity for most.  We have little in the way of child care, and no local child care facilities accept government vouchers, so wages have to cover basic living expenses AND child care, if necessary.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
5  seeder  Hal A. Lujah    7 years ago

The ignorance from the usual right wingers here is stunning.

 
 
 
Rex Block
Freshman Silent
5.1  Rex Block  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5    7 years ago

How so.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
5.1.2  seeder  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Rex Block @5.1    7 years ago

The same people who want the government out of the business of charity, claiming private charity will pick up the slack, are all gung-ho about attaching unbelievably retarded conditions to receiving any help.  Basically, you believe forcing religion down the throats of atheists is intelligent and reasonable.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
5.1.4  arkpdx  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @5.1.2    7 years ago

, "you believe forcing religion down the throats of atheists is intelligent and reasonable."

So tell me, how many atheist groups are providing homelss shelters or food to the poor? How much have you donated to a shelter? No I am not talking about government programs paid for with tax money. I want to know about private atheist groups and programs. 

 
 
 
magnoliaave
Sophomore Quiet
6  magnoliaave    7 years ago

It's the word "tithe".  Most every church uses that as a means to offset expenses incurred during  the year.  A church member is not compelled to tithe, however.

The lady in question, however, is biting the hand that feeds her.  Most likely, she was told upfront that once she secured a paying job that she would be required to "tithe" 10% of her income.  That's not asking very much considering the expenses of keeping their doors open, food and a safe place to put her head down at night.  Their doors are open because of charitable donations.  She makes $100 a week and pays them $10.00.....pretty cheap.  Where else could she find this type of deal? 

In my church we can take in homeless and do, but not for weeks.  The members in the church pay for this.  How we offset the costs, also, is that some members offer to supply the dinners that are served. 

Perhaps, from reading the story, I didn't get all the facts, but that's how I see it.  IMO, rather than complaining she should be thankful. 

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
8  livefreeordie    7 years ago

The tithe was a requirement of the Law of Moses for the support of the Levitical priests who were not allowed to own land or businesses.
Many Christians and especially poorly taught pastors misapply this requirement to apply to Christians. But we are not under the Law of Moses. We are under the Law of Christ which is the Law of Grace.

Paul explains how giving operates under the New Covenant in his second letter to the church at Corinth. It is a giving solely from the heart and thus no amounts or percentages are specified. Nor is it compulsory

"But this I say: He who sows sparingly will also reap sparingly, and he who sows bountifully will also reap bountifully. So let each one give as he purposes in his heart, not grudgingly or of necessity; for God loves a cheerful giver. And God is able to make all grace abound toward you, that you, always having all sufficiency in all things, may have an abundance for every good work. As it is written: “He has dispersed abroad, He has given to the poor; His righteousness endures forever.” Now may He who supplies seed to the sower, and bread for food, supply and multiply the seed you have sown and increase the fruits of your righteousness, while you are enriched in everything for all liberality, which causes thanksgiving through us to God. For the administration of this service not only supplies the needs of the saints, but also is abounding through many thanksgivings to God, while, through the proof of this ministry, they glorify God for the obedience of your confession to the gospel of Christ, and for your liberal sharing with them and all men, and by their prayer for you, who long for you because of the exceeding grace of God in you. Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift!"
2 Corinthians 9:6-15

Rev Larry Robinson

Grace in Christ Ministries

 
 

Who is online




401 visitors