╌>

Obama Betrayed Iranian People; Trump Stands with Them

  

Category:  World News

Via:  buzz-of-the-orient  •  6 years ago  •  9 comments

Obama Betrayed Iranian People; Trump Stands with Them


Obama Betrayed Iranian People; Trump Stands with Them





Washington did not offer support . The administration's dismissal not only enabled the mullahs brutally to crush the demonstrations with impunity; the mullahs were even rewarded with a deal that would enable them to have a legitimate nuclear weapons capability down the road, as well as billions of dollars.

Obama and the Iranian regime sold the world the idea that the nuclear agreement, appeasement policies towards the mullahs, and the lifting of UN sanctions would supposedly help the Iranian people and make the Iranian government a constructive player. All facts show, then as now, that the opposite took lace

People are suffering financially in oil-rich Iran (as they are in oil-rich Venezuela). Unemployment among the youth has reached a record-high of roughly 31%, while approximately 60% of the Iranian population is under 30 years of age. Many of the youth are highly educated and tech-savvy but they cannot find jobs. Those who are older cannot afford medicine, food or shelter. Inflation has been skyrocketing.

Suppression of freedoms, and human rights violations have escalated , according to Amnesty International and other human rights groups. The extra billions of dollars in revenue, thanks to the wretched nuclear agreement that should have been cancelled months ago, are going not into the pockets of the people, but into the pockets of the Revolutionary Guards, Syria's President Assad, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and other terrorist groups.

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani's proposed budget for 2018-2019 includes a significant increase for the military and ballistic-missile program while cutting subsidies for the poor.

US President Donald J. Trump, on the other hand, has been supporting and praising the bravery of the Iranian people, and publicly condemning any human rights violations committed by the Iranian regime against the people.

The Iranian regime, its agents and the mainstream leftist media is attempting to make readers and viewers believe that the US should be silent during this uprising.

How could a country based on freedom and civil rights be silent while other humans are being butchered because they desire that same freedom and those same rights? Is silence not a betrayal of justice, freedom and democracy? Is silence not a betrayal of the victims of Islamism, terrorism and violence, in the face of the acts being committed by the Iranian regime against innocent people in Iran and around the world? The Iranian regime is the top state sponsor of terrorism. It is ranked top in the world when it comes to executing people per capita. The regime, according to Amnesty International, is a leading executioner of children. As the regime continues to intensify its crackdown in the last few days, dozens of peaceful protesters have been shot dead .

As a long-time Iranian, I can tell you that the support of the US and President Trump is invaluable to the ordinary Iranians: they feel helpless and alone in the face of the monsters who have been oppressing them for so long.

On Persian social media outlets and apps such as Telegram, which is extremely popular among Iranians, people are cheering the US support. People are asking the US to support them in other ways as well, in addition to helping them bypass the internet-blocks and shut-downs that the Iranian regime recently implemented.

It is hypocritical and heartbreaking to see that the international community and the United Nations simply watch while peaceful protesters are being beaten and killed: no words of condemnation have been spoken. The dictators and despots who form the UN's majority are doubtless worried that that might be next.

Silence equals tolerance. Is this the message being sent to the protesters who are risking their lives to bring freedom not only to their nation but eventually to the entire world?

3036.jpg

Protesters on Valiasr Avenue in Tehran, Iran this week. (Image source: VOA)

If the Iranians succeed in changing this Islamist regime, it will bring down the highest state sponsor of terrorism, the leading regime in human rights violations, the top state sponsor of anti-Americanism and anti-Semitic propaganda. Iran, with its current regime, is a danger not just to its long-suffering people, but to everyone. These protesters, who are flooding the streets and demanding that their voices be heard, are committing acts of heroism that will be felt throughout the world and throughout history.

Dr. Majid Rafizadeh, is a business strategist and advisor, Harvard-educated scholar, political scientist, board member of Harvard International Review, and president of the International American Council on the Middle East. He is the author of " Peaceful Reformation in Iran's Islam ".


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient    6 years ago

The well-fed well-equipped financially supported Mullah's army, the Revolutionary Guard, will bring this protest to a halt. The European countries don't want to lose their big business deals with Iran, so they'll sit back and watch. What is Trump going to do anyway, bomb Tehran?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    6 years ago

Trump tweets criticism of 'brutal and corrupt' Iran regime

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

  • Trump was apparently referring to deals negotiated in the wake of the Iran nuclear agreement
  • The US State Department lists Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism

(CNN) President Donald Trump said Tuesday the US is watching the "brutal and corrupt Iranian regime" amid deadly protests in the country, continuing his public support for anti-government demonstrations.

"The people of Iran are finally acting against the brutal and corrupt Iranian regime," Trump   tweeted . "All of the money that President Obama so foolishly gave them went into terrorism and into their 'pockets.' The people have little food, big inflation and no human rights. The U.S. is watching!"
Trump was apparently referring to the Obama administration's unfreezing of certain Iranian assets and payment of a cash settlement related to a legal claim on those assets that was negotiated in the wake of the Iran nuclear deal. The money was Iranian money that had been frozen by the US following the revolution.
While there's no evidence to suggest Iran used that money directly to fund terrorism, the US State Department lists Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism. There is no evidence the money was used to enrich government officials.
Trump has voiced criticism of the Iranian regime since protests broke out in the country several days ago,   earning a rebuke   from Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, who said Monday the US President has no right to sympathize with Iran because he has called the Iranian people "terrorists," according to Iran's semi-official Tasnim News Agency.
On Sunday, state television broadcast Rouhani saying that Trump is "constantly creating problems" for Iranians, including with regard to visas and financial issues.
And on Tuesday, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei blamed Iran's "enemies" for stirring up unrest in the country, though he didn't mention Trump by name.
The leaders' tit-for-tat follows a weekend of escalating rhetoric in response to the protests and violence in Iran, with Trump warning Sunday that the United States is watching Tehran's treatment of protesters for human rights violations after anti-government protests turned deadly.
Iran's government on Saturday   warned its citizens against holding "illegal" public gatherings, following rare anti-government protests that spread to a number of cities.
The protests -- described as the largest public display of discontent since the 2009 Green Movement in Iran -- have emerged against a backdrop of rising food and gasoline prices.
 
 
 
Jonathan P
Sophomore Silent
3  Jonathan P    6 years ago

Iran is an oppressive regime religiously, economically and ideologically. They steal from their people so that they can foment instability and support terrorism throughout the region. They want to play in the modern economic world by doing business with democracies, while their main chant is "death to America". This is not lost on the people of Iran, who are not strangers to greater freedoms. And yes, the nuclear deal gave hundreds of billions of dollars to the mullahcracy, and nothing went to the people.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
3.2  Sparty On  replied to  Jonathan P @3    6 years ago

Yep, the are one of the, if not THE largest state sponsor of terrorism in the world.

Make no mistake about it.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
4  seeder  Buzz of the Orient    6 years ago

I have just read an article written by an Iranian scholar who has said that there are three factors that will determine what will affect the protest and determine its result.  The first is the number of persons protesting. Unless many more join, it will not succeed.  The second is whether there will be defections from the security forces and Revolutionary Guard, and if there are enough it will be a positive factor. The third is the number of executions that will be carried out by the ruling mullahs.  That could affect whether or not the protest becomes a revolution, and can cause either result - to encourage it or quell it, but that cannot be answered yet.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    6 years ago

So far, all Trump has really done is to express his support for the protestors on Twitter. I think that's a good thing, but I really wonder how much more than that he is prepared to do. Realistically, how much can we do that would actually influence the outcome? Like many, I would like to see a different government in Iran - preferably one that did not sponsor terrorism and was open about its nuclear activities. But wanting a thing and achieving it can be wildly different things. Anybody prepared to go to war over it?

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5.1  seeder  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Tacos! @5    6 years ago

At least he is providing moral support to the protesters, which is something Obama would not have done. If it gives them and the general public more impetus and resolve to force a change of government, it will be a good thing.  Personally, I think the protest will fail unless enough of the Republican Guard defect in favour of the protesters. 

 
 

Who is online



465 visitors