ESCONDIDO, CASpurred by an administration he believes to be guilty of numerous transgressions, self-described American patriot Kyle Mortensen, 47, is a vehement defender of ideas he seems to think are enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and principles that brave men have fought and died for solely in his head.
"Our very way of life is under siege," said Mortensen, whose understanding of the Constitution derives not from a close reading of the document but from talk-show pundits, books by television personalities, and the limitless expanse of his own colorful imagination. "It's time for true Americans to stand up and protect the values that make us who we are."
According to Mortensenan otherwise mild-mannered husband, father, and small-business ownerthe most serious threat to his fanciful version of the 222-year-old Constitution is the attempt by far-left "traitors" to strip it of its religious foundation.
"Right there in the preamble, the authors make their priorities clear: 'one nation under God,'" said Mortensen, attributing to the Constitution a line from the Pledge of Allegiance, which itself did not include any reference to a deity until 1954. "Well, there's a reason they put that right at the top."
"Men like Madison and Jefferson were moved by the ideals of Christianity, and wanted the United States to reflect those values as a Christian nation," continued Mortensen, referring to the "Father of the Constitution," James Madison, considered by many historians to be an atheist, and Thomas Jefferson, an Enlightenment-era thinker who rejected the divinity of Christ and was in France at the time the document was written. "The words on the page speak for themselves."
According to sources who have read the nation's charter, the U.S. Constitution and its 27 amendments do not contain the word "God" or "Christ."
Mortensen said his admiration for the loose assemblage of vague half-notions he calls the Constitution has only grown over time. He believes that each detail he has pulled from thin airfrom prohibitions on sodomy and flag-burning, to mandatory crackdowns on immigrants, to the right of citizens not to have their hard-earned income confiscated in the form of taxeshas contributed to making it the best framework for governance "since the Ten Commandments."
"And let's not forget that when the Constitution was ratified it brought freedom to every single American," Mortensen said.
Mortensen's passion for safeguarding the elaborate fantasy world in which his conception of the Constitution resides is greatly respected by his likeminded friends and relatives, many of whom have been known to repeat his unfounded assertions verbatim when angered. Still, some friends and family members remain critical.
"Dad's great, but listening to all that talk radio has put some weird ideas into his head," said daughter Samantha, a freshman at Reed College in Portland, OR. "He believes the Constitution allows the government to torture people and ban gay marriage, yet he doesn't even know that it guarantees universal health care."
Mortensen told reporters that he'll fight until the bitter end for what he roughly supposes the Constitution to be. He acknowledged, however, that it might already be too late to win the battle.
"The freedoms our Founding Fathers spilled their blood for are vanishing before our eyes," Mortensen said. "In under a year, a fascist, socialist regime has turned a proud democracy into a totalitarian state that will soon control every facet of American life."
"Don't just take my word for it," Mortensen added. "Try reading a newspaper or watching the news sometime."
... you had me there for a moment.
A simply salute to our resident NT Constitutional Lawyers/experts.
I have to say, withall sincerity, I am in awe of their ability to state, with conviction, their interpretation of the constitution.
Frighteningly close to reality!! I believe there are people on the right exactly like the one in this joke!
Very real Feronia.
Yes there are MM, and I saluted them for their unlimited knowledge of the constitution. And especially, their willingness to share their knowledge with all of the rest of the poor huddled masses that inhabit NT.
A JD from BumFuck University via correspondence course, is a qualification for a seat (or a whoopee cushion)on SCOTUS.
Has to be. And I have some suspicions as to who it is. Well, at least two or three choices.
Actually Max, I believe that he may well be a member of NT.
And very scary!
That it is Dowser.
Isn't that just wonderful Robert. Taking the bull by the horns, so to speak, since the wing nuts have done little but bitch and whine.
It is real JR. The comments and articles on NT, are proof that it's real..
That's true, and isn't it great. I love it Robert.
"yet he doesn't even know that it guarantees universal health care."
Truer words...I want something, therefore it is aconstitutionalright. Thatseems to sum up the level of constitutional literacy enjoyed by the greatmajorityof liberals. Whatever they feel has to be the correct answer.
And yet the Tea Party spouts this nonsense on a daily basis. Again, I'll defer to the ''constitutional experts'' on NT.
Well done Robert, I knew that I could count on you to show your true colors.
And all of it's true, I'm sure.
Without a doubt it is Grump.
For a while there, I was worried that this excellent article might have come from some unreliable source. But no! It isn't from Fox!
LOL, no it isn't Bob..
Oh, hell yeah I could 2blue.
Really? Not all assholes are situated between a pair of buttocks.
THE CONSERVATIVE "MIND" where complicated thoughts go to die (of loneliness). The most frightening of the many frightening aspects of America's Right-Wing, is that much of its base believes the bullshit it's fed is both accurate and ordained by God.
Ratification Dates and Votes
Each of the original thirteen states in the United States was invited to ratify the Constitution created in Philadelphia in 1787 . TheConstitution specified that nine ratifications would be sufficient to consider theConstitutionaccepted.
Some states ratified quickly, others had to hold several conventions to accept theConstitution though all eventually did. This page lists the votes of each state's conventions.
September 17, 1787: The Constitutional Convention adjourns.
September 28, 1787: The Congress agrees to send theConstitutionto the states for debate and ratification .
December 7, 1787: Delaware ratifies. Vote: 30 for, 0 against.
December 12, 1787: Pennsylvania ratifies. Vote: 46 for, 23 against.
December 18, 1787: New Jersey ratifies. Vote: 38 for, 0 against.
January 2, 1788: Georgia ratifies. Vote: 26 for, 0 against.
January 9, 1788: Connecticut ratifies. Vote: 128 for, 40 against.
February 6, 1788: Massachusetts ratifies. Vote: 187 for, 168 against.
March 24, 1788: Rhode Island popular referendum rejects. Vote: 237 for, 2708 against.
April 28, 1788: Maryland ratifies. Vote: 63 for, 11 against.
May 23, 1788: South Carolina ratifies. Vote: 149 for, 73 against.
June 21, 1788: New Hampshire ratifies. Vote: 57 for, 47 against. Minimum requirement forratificationmet.
June 25, 1788: Virginia ratifies. Vote: 89 for, 79 against.
July 26, 1788: New York ratifies. Vote: 30 for, 27 against.
August 2, 1788: North Carolina convention adjourns without ratifying by a vote of 185 in favor of adjournment, 84 opposed.
November 21, 1789: North Carolina ratifies. Vote: 194 for, 77 against.
May 29, 1790: Rhode Island ratifies. Vote: 34 for, 32 against.