╌>

PolitiFact | The DNC did not omit 'one nation under God' from the Pledge of Allegiance

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  4 years ago  •  31 comments

By:   politifact

PolitiFact | The DNC did not omit 'one nation under God' from the Pledge of Allegiance
PolitiFact is a fact-checking website that rates the accuracy of claims by elected officials and others on its Truth-O-Meter.

BEWARE OF FALSE NEWS!


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



bd7aba21a2e26c548ae4783e5a2f9380.jpg 4b85b9c5cd1004d271feec45856ee58b.jpg Peggy Hubbard stated on August 20, 2020 a Facebook post: "The DNC omitted 'one nation under God' from the Pledge of Allegiance." Rated Mostly False!

https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/fa9530dc


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    4 years ago

"Liar Liar - Pants On Fire"...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @1    4 years ago

From your own link;

  • Some caucuses omitted “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance during Democratic National Convention meetings. 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
1.1.1  Gazoo  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1    4 years ago

Maybe he didn’t see the large “mostly false” at the top of his page?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Gazoo @1.1.1    4 years ago

I don't believe it was read by the seeder prior to posting based on past history

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1    4 years ago

Based on that, I'd will be willing to concede that it's half-true, but it's still something worth talking about. The "mostly false" rating makes it seem like it never happened at all.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
1.1.4  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Tacos! @1.1.3    4 years ago
The "mostly false" rating makes it seem like it never happened at all.

Not at all. It means that the story is mostly false, with an exception that makes it not a total lie. When it is totally false, it looks like this:

320

And when the story lying is just beyond the pale, they say this:

320

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @1.1.4    4 years ago

The exception being that some Caucuses did omit "under God." To call the story reporting those omissions mostly false is thus "mostly false"

Poltifact is simply a liberal Soros funded pundit offering an opinion.  To pretend there's some objectivity behind the rankings is silly.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2  Texan1211    4 years ago

the other article posted on this did not claim the DNC did that.

It pointed out some Democrats who did omit it, however.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @2    4 years ago

I stand by the article I seeded about the two occasions it was in fact left out during their debacle.  

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
2.1.1  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    4 years ago

Your article said: 

The DNC dropped 'under God' from the Pledge of Allegiance.
In fact, the DNC did not as the writer claimed. Two Muslim members did.
The omission of the phrase by two delegates cannot be equated with the DNC intentionally skipping the words 'under God' in the Pledge of Allegiance, and hence the claim is misleading.
 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
3  sandy-2021492    4 years ago

More importantly, IMO - why does it matter?  Why are some folks so determined to be offended by a lack of a dishonest paying of lip service to a deity whose existence cannot be proven real?

Getting offended because somebody else won't say they believe in your (generic "your") god seems to me to be religious bigotry.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  sandy-2021492 @3    4 years ago
More importantly, IMO - why does it matter? 

Umm. Because its the pledge of allegiance. Last time I looked, those are the words.  It's not the pledge of  allegiance to whatever suits the Democrats prejudices of the day.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
3.2.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2    4 years ago

The original Pledge did not contain those words.  And the Pledge is to the flag, whether it contains those words or not, whether they are uttered by a Republican or a Democrat.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
3.2.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2    4 years ago

Or to counter, one could argue that the pledge "Under god" was a recent addition, and since we don't have an "official state religion", last time I checked, 2 Muslims don't have to say those words. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @3.2.2    4 years ago

Sure, but under the American system the most recent statute is the law.  No one claims that blacks should be counted as 3/5 of a person because the change to full citizenship  was a "recent addition."

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  sandy-2021492 @3.2.1    4 years ago
The original Pledge did not contain those words. 

The actual Pledge does.  

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
3.2.6  sandy-2021492  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2.4    4 years ago

After being edited to suit conservative prejudices.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
3.2.8  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to    4 years ago

That is an amendment to the Constitution. The other has been argued in Constitutional law that it does not has to be said. Apples and pears. And for the record, I say "under god". 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
3.2.9  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2.3    4 years ago

I will refer you to my post

 
 

Who is online

CB


127 visitors