Study Confirms 100% of Abortions Still None of Your F**king Business
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Several red states are in various stages of implementing sweeping abortion bans aimed squarely at eventually toppling the 1973 landmark Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision that affirmed the right of all women in the country to terminate their pregnancy before the point of medical viability for the fetus, or fetuses.
Laws in Alabama, Missouri, Ohio, and Georgia all set the line of legal demarcation back as far as they can, with Alabama's criminalizing abortion at all stages of pregnancy without an exception for rape or incest. All of the laws are likely unconstitutional by the standard of Roe. However, it's no secret that socially conservative activists have been waiting for a time when the ideological makeup of the high court is presumed to be strongly enough in their favor that they could challenge that precedent with laws such as the new ones being drafted and signed into law.
With so much attention and focus on abortion and abortion rights these days, it's no surprise that a scientific research institute would take up the subject, and a team at the Western University of North Montana did exactly that. The researchers did what they called a "deep dive" on abortion, and focused their study of it on one key element — how many of the abortions performed in this country are none of your fucking business.
As it turns out, WUNM researchers found the answer to that question to be, "Literally all of them." According to Dr. Willamina S. Maychee, the scientist who led the study, a full 100% of the abortions performed in America are none of anyone's business except the woman who chose to have the abortion and her doctor. The results, Dr. Maychee says, are "conclusive as fuck."
"In every abortion procedure we researched, we found they don't impact you, your mother, your priest, your brother, your husband, your congressional representative, your senator, and indeed, even your president, unless you happen to be the one having the abortion, and is therefore by the longstanding definition of the term,'None of your fucking business,'" Dr. Maychee told reporters a press conference announcing the results of the study.
Maychee says that her study is actually just reconfirming the results of studies conducted years ago.
"The thing is, we've known for at least 50 years that abortions are private choices made between a woman and her doctor, but some people in this country get really confused with what's a fact and what's a feeling," Dr. Maychee said. "And of course they're usually the ones screaming, 'Fuck your feelings' at everyone, so that only causes more confusion. I'm glad we could end some of that confusion."
Dr. Maychee says she's "astounded" by the results because so few things she researches ever get proven quite so conclusively.
"We're talking conclusive results with 0% margin of error. That literally never happens except in the instance of how many abortions are of any concern to you," Dr. Maychee said. "Unless, again to reiterate, you're the one electing to have an abortion. Then, that is the only abortion you're allowed to have a say in. You can't force someone to have or not have an abortion if they want. I know that sounds crazy, but we also confirmed that constitutional precedent and the right to privacy are still things in this country for now, so it all checks out."
Reporters asked Dr. Maychee if there are ever any scenarios where an abortion would be someone's business.
"Is the person in question also the pregnant woman having an abortion," Maychee asked rhetorically, "then, no. It's never any of your fucking business. Not now, not 15 years from now, not 50 years ago. Never. Ever. It's none of your fucking business."
WUNM's research also conducted a couple of other studies and Maychee spoke about those results as well.
"We also confirmed that where a transgender person takes a shit is none of your goddamned business," Maychee said, "and it's never, ever, ever your business when two adults marry each other, no matter what genitals each of them possess. Oh, also, water is wet, the sky is blue, and Laura Ingraham is a literal diarrhea gollum. But there I go confirming the obvious for you again."
By the time you finish reading this, it still won't be any of your fucking business who gets an abortion.
Writer/comedian James Schlarmann is the founder of The Political Garbage Chute and his work has been featured on The Huffington Post. You can follow James on Facebook and Instagram, but not Twitter because he has a potty mouth.
Article is LOCKED by moderator [Split Personality]
Who is online
459 visitors
Yep! I just checked and it's still none of your business!
I don't see much difference between the abortion protestors above and these folk outside a Wendy's...
If I want to eat a burger that's my choice regardless of what some PETA protestor thinks about the supposed rights of a cow.
If they don't want to eat meat, or get an abortion, that's their right and no one is forcing them to violate their conscience. The law says it's legal to raise and kill cows for meat. The law also says women are legally allowed to terminate a pregnancy up until viability. Just because it offends someone else's conscience doesn't give them the right to try and ban the rest of us from eating meat. Even if the PETA members believe deeply in their hearts that cows are sacred or have invisible immortal souls, that still doesn't give anyone else the right to slap the burger out of someone else's hands. Even if it's proven that eating burgers isn't good for your health and can be detrimental to your arteries and waistline, they still don't have the right to force their veganism on the rest of society. Anti-abortion activists are really no different than some vegan extremists.
Making abortion illegal doesn't stop abortion!
But, three things do though. They are:
1. Require comprehensive sex education for all children prior to puberty.
2. Make all forms of birth control easily attainable.
3. Provide all women with family planning services such as are provided by Planned Parenthood.
Love the analogy
You also need to add access to affordable housing, healthcare, education and a living wage. All of these things are known to reduce the need for abortion.
nothing is free....
local taxes pay for education through the 12th grade
I'm betting you knew that already
What the hell is wrong with that list?
Regarding fucking like an animal in heat, did you never have sex before you were married?
Suddenly, I'm in the mood for a burger. Or a steak.
Not the first time. In fact, I was a virgin for a week after I got married...
Got married a month before I turned 21 but my wife started her cycle the day of the wedding so I had to wait a week before being intimate. The marriage was a huge mistake from day one and ended in divorce 7 miserable years later.
With my second marriage I was able to do it right. Was celibate for 2 years after the divorce then met a wonderful gal in California, lived together for 5 years before getting married. I would highly recommend living together for at least 5 years to anyone thinking of getting married, going in blind is a crap shoot and recipe for disaster.
I'm pretty sure his comment applies to women only, men like himself get to bang anything that doesn't move fast enough (I believe he's actually bragged about doing so in the past).
Marriage has little bearing on abortion statistics, while those JBB mentioned and those I posted do. Also those that I posted also lower crime rates and in the long run increase the middle class wealth rates.
I totally agree. I only lived with one guy, my hubby, but we had almost 2 years before the wedding to know if would work out. We've now been married for 30 years. The test drive always helps.
btw ladies, always have them move into your abode. That way if it doesn't work out, they are the homeless ones, LOL!
That's the best kind of f***ing!
But just because a woman may be married doesn't mean she won't have an abortion if she becomes pregnant. Married women get abortions too. And waiting until marriage to have sex is quite antiquated and probably a bad idea. After all, one shouldn't buy the car on the lot without test driving it first. Maybe put it through its paces first. See how much the engine can rev up, right?
But of course!
the more freedom less government fucktards are still at it ...
screaming at the sky for the last 50 years.
I want more freedom and less trumpsters, especially the really ignorant ones.
Touché!
Seems like the study is also 100% correct.
What I find interesting about the photo is that NONE of the people photographed there holding signs can have babies!!! Men can't have them and the women have gone through menopause!!!
I would just like some consistency in the discussion.
If it is murder for a women to get an abortion because she does not have the financial means to support a child; isn't it also murder to force a child to go to school, where they will probably contract Covid and may get sick enough to die, just to help the economy?
Argument - abortion leads to 100% death, returning to school only leads to - what .00001 chance of death - maybe 500 children die.
If you are sincerely against abortion, you must also be against returning children to school just so their parents have free child care when they go to work.
So if you are are against murder, you must oppose people driving in cars because there is a chance of death by accident too?
Deflection.
If you give your child a loaded handgun as a toy and they shoot themselves - would that be an accident?
Would you blame the parent for being irresponsible?
Are you anti murder?
so, to be consistent, you must oppose people driving in cars, because you know riding in cars will kill tens of thousands of people each year.
Deflection.
An accident is different from a murder.
Glad you get the point. Now apply that reasoning to the original post and you’ll see how bogus the logic is.
Trying to an accident with murder is illogical to begin with.
Again, that’s the point. The original post is illogical so I presented an equally illogical argument using the same logical premise but with different actions.
I’ll make this as simple as a I can . Equating an action where the known outcome is certain (Death) with an action where the possibility of an outcome is exceedingly rare (get in a car you could die, or catch covid in a school) is entirely illogical.
I can’t believe I need to spell this out, but I will. Opposing the intentional killing of others does not require anyone to oppose any behavior which brings with it the risk of death, because all do.
Deflection.
Try presenting a logical argument then. Otherwise, you do not help your argument.
Try presenting a logical argument then
I just a made textbook one by demonstrating the absurdity of the original premise. I can't help if that sort of argument is too advanced for some.
Now that's what I call a bunch of cowardly bullies. Do they really expect a woman or a young girl to carry to term the product of a violent act? That's beyond the pale.
They probably don't allow abortions under any conditions including a woman who will die if she attempts to carry to term....but I'm speculating. Some people automatically think the fetus is more important than the woman
I wonder how Alabama feels about babies conceived under incest rape?
I'm going to hell.
it's a crime that taxpayers are left to foot the states legal fees of fringe religious cult theatrics with the inevitable judicial reversals that will follow.
Abortions are legal.
Have as many as you want and can afford.
My niece has had 4 abortions she never paid for any of them, the married men she fucked paid for them.
Well, as long as the parties involved are paying, I really don't care which one it is.
I just don't want any tax money going to pay for them.
She also blackmailed the fathers threating to tell their wife's if they didn't give her $ 2500 in addition to paying for the abortion. It's a wonder one of them didn't kill her.
does she work for a church or the RNC?
They're married. Their fault for getting into that mess to begin with... they wouldn't have been blackmailed if they'd just kept it in their pants! Just sayin.
That's true, they should have known it wasn't a good idea to fuck a meth whore.
This is who you think should be having babies?
Nope, she should have given them up for adoption.
No, she's a volunteer for the Biden campaighn.
I'm talking having babies, not raising them. You think it's a good idea for a drug addict to carry a pregnancy to term?
I think it's a good idea for a drug addict to use birth control instead of using abortion to get rid of the kids she never wanted in the first place.
Of course she should have used birth control. But she didn't.
So, is it advisable for her to carry a pregnancy to term?
It's a better choice than snuffing out a potential life. If you feel the need to carry on this conversation do so in a private message. I don't think anyone is interested in what we have to say to each other.
Not necessarily. Pregnancy and drug addiction can be deadly to a woman, you know. Not to mention the potential damage to the fetus, and the fact that it can be hard to place a child with special needs.
If you feel you can't discuss the topic, you are free to stop doing so. I am confident that any NTer reading this is able to scroll past, if they're not interested.
That's a matter of opinion and circumstance. But at least you recognize it's a "potential" life and not an actual "life."
I'd say it's a good idea for everyone to use birth control. But a drug addict may not be in the frame of mind to consider or care about using BC.
That's her choice. But a woman shouldn't be required to continue a pregnancy if she doesn't want to just to provide for an adoption.
I can discuss the topic, but I'm aware of the game your playing. You're more interested in getting your comments upvoted than in having a discussion. I'm not that vain, either continue in private or move on. your choice. I will no longer discuss this further in a public forum.
Upvotes, yeah, sure. Weak sauce. If you find yourself unable to discuss, just admit it and move on.
You remind me of the schoolyard bully in grade school that was afraid to fight without an audience cause he knew none of his friends would be available to come to his defense while he was getting his ass whipped.
No one to defend you and/or cast a vote for your comments you're afraid to discuss a subject. It's OK, I get it, I accept your surrender.
You're the one who started this subthread, then didn't want to talk about it. I think we can all see who surrendered - the one too scared to carry on a discussion he started.
I told you I was willing to continue the conversation in private notes, but you only want to talk in a public forum so you can get noticed in order to receive upvotes. again, I'm not that vain.
[deleted]
Don't like abortions? Don't get one.
Problem solved.
If you can’t see how shallow and silly that argument is, Extend that “logic” to other situations.
.
are these arguments for legalizing murder and slavery?: if you Don’t like murder, don’t kill anyone. If you Don’t like slavery, don’t enslave someone.
Or, if you don't like the article don't comment!
Deflection.
I thought the right wing was all about more personal freedoms? Oh, just not for women, got it..
Women get aborted.
Wow when did a fully grown "women" get aborted?
Your post made it worth taking him off of ignore just for the belly laugh.
If abortion is a sin then let it be dealt with if there is a judgement day
Thank you for this. It is perfect.
LMAO direct and to the point, I love it
100% of abortions are none of your f*cking business.
This is a false statement. When a woman decides to abort the baby it certainly is the father business especially if he wants to keep and raise the child without the mother being involved in the care and financial support.
When he gets his own uterus, he will have that option.
That's like saying when a woman can get pregnant without a man's sperm she'll have the option of aborting the baby or keeping it.
If she were to get pregnant in such a way, she would still have that option. How a woman gets pregnant is irrelevant. Once she is pregnant, she has the option to abort or not.
[deleted]
Is the father the one getting pregnant? No? Then he has no say! Even if the father wants to raise the child, the woman must still agree to carry the pregnancy to term and give birth. She is not required to do so if she chooses not to. And the law protects that choice!
That's pretty selfish; NO, You can't have the baby I want to kill it.
My niece has had four abortions, her reasoning for not opting for adoption was she couldn't bare to let someone she didn't know raise her own child, she rather kill the kid, that's fucked up.
It's still her choice.
Congratulations.
See first statement!
WOW ! You're congratulating my niece for killing four babies, [deleted]
There are no babies killed in an abortion. But making things personal rather than rationally addressing the post speaks volumes about you as well.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Are these pictures of just cell clumps?
Her body, her choice
A concept not really hard to grasp.
I thought you people followed the science, No?
Some people think that the unborn (the human embryo or fetus) is a mere part of the woman's body. But SCIENCE, of course, has established that the unborn—though physically dependent on and inside of the mother—is a distinct, self-developing individual with his or her own DNA, brain, arms and legs, etc. Abortion attacks and kills the body of someone else.
May a pregnant woman ingest drugs that she knows will cause her child to be deformed or disabled? Clearly not. And if knowingly harming the child is wrong, killing her/him (through abortion) is even worse. Bodily autonomy is important, but there are obvious limits to that autonomy when someone else's body is also involved.
Point is, it doesn't matter whether one thinks it should be allowed or not.
It is not our choice, period.
What a woman does with an unplanned pregnancy is not your business.
fake thumper news, debunked........ next?
Right... until viable outside the mother's body, a FETUS is a parasite.
Late term terminations are actually rare, generally illegal and highly regulated. Nearly all abortions are performed in the first trimester.
Absolutely understand that and agree 100%. Most late-term abortions are because of severe issues.
I'm sorry if that concept is too difficult for you to grasp.
That doesn't happen, but yes, they should! Fetal tissue should go to medical research, especially towards stem cell therapies.
Why not? It just ends up in the trash anyway. But like I said, "baby parts" are not sold anyway.
Of course they are.
That's nice. Prove it!
How stupid. There are no 'baby parts' to sell.
Exactly! Neither was it demonstrated that any "parts" were sold. And even if they were sold, who cares? Or better yet, why would anyone care?
This reminded me of the story of Henrietta Lacks, an African-American woman whose cells were essentially stolen back in 1951 and then reproduced for scientific experiment and are still used today.
"Lacks was the unwitting source of these cells from a tumor biopsied during treatment for cervical cancer at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore, Maryland, U.S., in 1951. These cells were then cultured by George Otto Gey who created the cell line known as HeLa, which is still used for medical research."
"The ability to rapidly reproduce HeLa cells in a laboratory setting has led to many important breakthroughs in biomedical research. For example, by 1954, Jonas Salk was using HeLa cells in his research to develop the polio vaccine. To test his new vaccine, the cells were mass-produced in the first-ever cell production factory. Additionally, Chester M. Southam, a leading virologist, injected HeLa cells into cancer patients, prison inmates, and healthy individuals in order to observe whether cancer could be transmitted as well as to examine if one could become immune to cancer by developing an acquired immune response"
While I do believe this woman, and all donors, should be informed about what the cells/tissue donated will be used for, I don't know why anyone would object to fetal tissue being donated (with receiving labs paying for the shipping and handling obviously) for research which can help save millions of lives like the polio vaccine did.
The bullshit narrative of PP "selling baby parts" is just such a tired moronic claim which really only exposes the person making the claim as a whacko nut job anti-abortionist who doesn't care about facts or the millions of actual born living humans the tissues could potentially help save.
h y would anyone care?
Why does anyone care about anything? You have no right to impose your morals on anyone else. Some people with a conscious might find the idea of harvesting human parts for profit repugnant. You really need to learn tolerance. .
Informed consent is important.
Neither do I. It makes no sense. Fetal tissue would just be disposed of anyway. So why not use it for something beneficial?
Exactly! But some sure cling to that debunked claim like they feel it validates their position somehow. Why would anyone care if tissue is sold, donated, or whatever?
Where am I imposing morals on anyone exactly? Morality is subjective anyway.
So I take it you're against organ donation?
You really need to learn how to make a valid point without making things personal.
The fact that you left out context just makes you an idiot.
recycling is a good thing
Yes it is. A very good thing.
That's conscience, and no one is harvesting 'human parts' for profit.
https://www.instagram.com/p/CFsf5QhBUvu/?igshid=cn12ld4xtjog
She doesn't even have to tell the "father" to begin with really.
"The world may never know..."
and never needs to know
Exactly
This seed marked satire is locked due to the seeders absence for 2 days and the personal nature of many of the comments and threads.