╌>

DeVos to Be Investigated for Potential Violation of Ethics Law

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  sister-mary-agnes-ample-bottom  •  4 years ago  •  48 comments

By:    Hailey Fuchs 2 hrs ago (MSN)

DeVos to Be Investigated for Potential Violation of Ethics Law
WASHINGTON — An independent government agency will investigate whether Education Secretary Betsy DeVos breached a law forbidding federal employees from engaging in political activities on the job after her department distributed a clip of Ms. DeVos criticizing the Democratic presidential nominee, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., through government channels. The U.S. Office of Special Counsel, which has jurisdiction to investigate...

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



DeVos to Be Investigated for Potential Violation of Ethics Law

WASHINGTON — An independent government agency will investigate whether Education Secretary Betsy DeVos breached a law forbidding federal employees from engaging in political activities on the job after her department distributed a clip of Ms. DeVos criticizing the Democratic presidential nominee, former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., through government channels.

The U.S. Office of Special Counsel, which has jurisdiction to investigate violations of the law, known as the Hatch Act, will conduct the inquiry, according to the investigative watchdog blog that filed the complaint.

The revelation is the latest in a string of Trump administration officials to face accusations of breaching the government ethics law. But the power to levy penalties on officials like Ms. DeVos falls to President Trump, and he has shown little inclination to mete out punishment or follow the office's recommendations.

The complaint stems from an appearance by Ms. DeVos on Fox News this month, when the secretary said Mr. Biden's pledge to abandon her school-choice policies was "shameful." She claimed that he had "turned his back on the kids" and "turned his face in favor of the teachers union" and its demands.

Shortly afterward, Education Department staff members distributed a link to the interview in an official email titled, "Important Updates from U.S. Department of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos," via a government list, according to the complaint filed with the Office of Special Counsel. Ms. DeVos's official Twitter account also posted the interview.

The watchdog blog, Checks and Balances Project, claimed that the remarks and dissemination of the video amounted to a "coordinated campaign, political attack" on Mr. Biden. It also constituted a violation of the Hatch Act, the group said.

Scott Peterson, the executive director of Checks and Balances Project, said that Eric Johnson, a lawyer in the Office of Special Counsel Hatch Act Unit, confirmed to him that the agency would investigate the complaint. Mr. Peterson added that, during a phone call, Mr. Johnson said the coronavirus pandemic might slow the investigation, which was reported earlier by Politico.

According to Mr. Peterson, Mr. Johnson told him: "We'll investigate the matters in your complaint. The incident seems very well documented."

In a statement, Angela Morabito, a spokeswoman for the Education Department, said Ms. DeVos' did not violate the Hatch Act and called the complaint "frivolous." But she added that the agency would cooperate with the Office of Special Counsel if it opened an investigation.

"Not every allegation is based in fact; this is a classic example," Ms. Morabito said. "The secretary was asked to respond to oft-repeated criticism of her and her policies, and she defended her policies, including discussing the history of that criticism. The Hatch Act does not prohibit that kind of exchange with a journalist. Case closed."

Mr. Johnson referred comment to an Office of Special Counsel spokesman. The spokesman did not return a request for comment late Monday evening.

Among other provisions, the Hatch Act prevents an official from using "his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election."

But the Depression-era law has been largely ignored and even mocked by Trump administration officials. The Office of Special Counsel recommended in 2019 that Mr. Trump fire Kellyanne Conway, his White House counselor at the time, over repeated violations of the Hatch Act. But Mr. Trump declined to follow the guidance.

More recently, the administration brushed aside claims that Republican National Convention programming filmed at the White House violated the ethics law. Mr. Trump accepted his party's nomination last month from the South Lawn of the White House.

In an interview on Monday evening, Mr. Peterson said Ms. DeVos's actions amounted to a "flagrant" violation of the act. He said the secretary should be held to the same standards as other federal employees who are punished for such violations.

"It's not fair that ordinary folks have to comply with those rules, whereas people at the top who are wealthy or powerful don't," he said. "Aren't we all supposed to play by the same rules?"


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    4 years ago

The complaint stems from an appearance by Ms. DeVos on Fox News this month, when the secretary said Mr. Biden's pledge to abandon her school-choice policies was "shameful." She claimed that he had "turned his back on the kids" and "turned his face in favor of the teachers union" and its demands.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @1    4 years ago

Filthy rich bitch DeVos paid for her position in the trumpturd criminal enterprise administration.  Who in this corrupt criminal enterprise ISN'T GUILTY of ethics violations of some kind?

That whole family is corrupt.  Her brother is Erik Prince, killer thug for hire.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    4 years ago
The revelation is the latest in a string of Trump administration officials to face accusations of breaching the government ethics law.

I doubt though, if anyone needs an investigation to know DeVos is unethical. 

In other , earlier administrations, a story like this would be a major scandal a month before the election. Now it is just a minor diversion from the rest of the days news. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    4 years ago
In other , earlier administrations, a story like this would be a major scandal a month before the election.

Are you sure of that?  Were there not 2 Obama officials found in violation of the Hatch Act?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  Vic Eldred    4 years ago

The climatic point in the Times article would be this:

“Not every allegation is based in fact; this is a classic example,” Ms. Morabito said. “The secretary was asked to respond to oft-repeated criticism of her and her policies, and she defended her policies, including discussing the history of that criticism. The Hatch Act does not prohibit that kind of exchange with a journalist. Case closed.”

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4  Trout Giggles    4 years ago
Shortly afterward, Education Department staff members distributed a link to the interview in an official email titled, "Important Updates from U.S. Department of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos," via a government list, according to the complaint filed with the Office of Special Counsel. Ms. DeVos's official Twitter account also posted the interview.

Her interview with Fox News was about politics. This should never have been sent in an email on gov't computers or phones. I know that we are cautioned about engaging in political activity every election year

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
4.1  Sparty On  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    4 years ago

(deleted)

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @4.1    4 years ago

When people comment on Newstalkers, they are not identified or expected to be spokespeople for a government agency. 

DeVos is a member of trump's cabinet. 

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Principal
4.1.24  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.1    4 years ago

Thread 4.1 down has been deleted for total derail. Knock it off. Next time there will be points.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.25  Trout Giggles  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @4.1.24    4 years ago

jrSmiley_124_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.26  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.25    4 years ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.27  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.26    4 years ago

I just follow orders

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4.1.28  Ender  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @4.1.24    4 years ago

I thought I had a comment below all that that had nothing to do with it.

Maybe not. I can't remember anymore.  Haha

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.29  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ender @4.1.28    4 years ago
Scott Peterson, the executive director of Checks and Balances Project, said that Eric Johnson, a lawyer in the Office of Special Counsel Hatch Act Unit, confirmed to him that the agency would investigate the complaint. Mr. Peterson added that, during a phone call, Mr. Johnson said the coronavirus pandemic might slow the investigation, which was reported earlier by Politico.

To quote Jack McCoy: "How convenient!"

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.30  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.29    4 years ago

I love Jack McCoy (Sam Waterston), I'm watching Law and Order as we speak.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5  Trout Giggles    4 years ago
The revelation is the latest in a string of Trump administration officials to face accusations of breaching the government ethics law. But the power to levy penalties on officials like Ms. DeVos falls to President Trump, and he has shown little inclination to mete out punishment or follow the office's recommendations.

Ok....I'm taking bets on this will acutally happen

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @5    4 years ago

Unfreakingbelievable that it falls on trumpturd to say if there is a violation of ethics.  Unfreakingbelievable!  

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6  Ender    4 years ago

Nothing will happen to her. Business as usual.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1  Tessylo  replied to  Ender @6    4 years ago

Of course not!  No rules apply to this criminal enterprise of an 'administration'.  

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Ender  replied to  Tessylo @6.1    4 years ago

The only time something will be said is when the republicans are no longer in the majority. Then they will scream about what they perceive as every little infraction.

Conveniently forgetting everything they let donald get away with.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ender @6.1.1    4 years ago

Oh no doubt!

Then we will have to listen to the gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair

 
 

Who is online

zuksam


104 visitors