╌>

Drudge Report: Is Trump Burned Out?

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  4 years ago  •  15 comments

By:   John Amato (Crooks and Liars)

Drudge Report: Is Trump Burned Out?
The Drudge Report has been not toeing the Fox News company line for Trump at all.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The Drudge Report's homepage is filled with negative Trump stories after Thursday nights competing town halls between presidential campaigns.

Drudge has been not toeing the Fox News company line for Trump at all.

Stories highlighted:

Joe wins demo Biden ABC tops Trump on NBC in early ratings Donald defends conspiracy that may be sealed didn't kill bin Laden

Others included:

Anxious Republicans wonder how big problem is Trump job on resume...

LEAKED CALL: Sen. Sasse says 'kisses dictators' butts'...

Mocks evangelicals...

'He's flirted with white supremacists'...

'Spends like a drunken sailor'... MORE... Wondering

White House warned Giuliani was target of Russian intelligence operation...

Rudy Changes Story on Laptop...

Daughter voting for Biden...

FOX & FRIENDS Grow Increasingly Uncomfortable With His Conspiracies.....

This is terrible for Trump. One of the biggest aggregators of conservative news is doing the right thing and highlighting all of Donald's serious flaws and narcissistic tendencies, three weeks before the election.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    4 years ago

The rats are getting ready to jump off the sinking ship. 

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.1  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 years ago

Trump_Rats-Sinking-Ship.PNG?1475750772

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    4 years ago

AMERICA IS BURNED OUT...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JBB @2    4 years ago

There is such an avalanche of factual negative material about Trump that I wonder how he could go forward with any credibility at all as the national leader should he somehow miraculously get re-elected. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4  Hal A. Lujah    4 years ago

What is it about capitalizing on the death of a SC justice by hypocritically jamming in a replacement at warp speed to improve your chances of stealing an election that rubs people the wrong way?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4    4 years ago

No one is stealing the election.

ACB had  a hearing. and the vote will happen next week, I believe.

Democrats had the chance to speak out about her and question her.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1    4 years ago

And why would she deserve a hearing when Merrick Garland was denied?  Another point flies over your head.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.1    4 years ago

revenge looks pretty ugly.

Goodness, however, she is only 48, so there is a pretty good chance she'll be there for 30 to 40 years!

Enjoy!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.1    4 years ago

you might want to stop trying to live in the past and join the rest of the world

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
4.1.4  Thrawn 31  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1.2    4 years ago

Yep. Hence my position that, should the democrats win the presidency and the senate, they should take those appointments back. Expand the court. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Thrawn 31 @4.1.4    4 years ago

There simply are no appointments 
to" take back", must be a leftwing myth.

it is called PACKING the court, btw.

It's what Democrats want to do because they just can't ever get over Garland.

Will they ever get over it, or will they continue to whine for decades?

 
 
 
The Magic 8 Ball
Masters Quiet
4.1.6  The Magic 8 Ball  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.1    4 years ago
why would she deserve a hearing when Merrick Garland was denied?

"with advice and consent of the senate"     look it up.

nothing says the senate "must advise or consent.

in short, obama did not have the senate's support, and trump does. 


perhaps instead of making sure they took the house to impeach trump the left should have thought about the courts and taking the senate.

bad strategy by the left and nothing more.

regardless what happens to trump, the "courts" will serve us well for decades to come.

so now, the left wants to pack the court..  why?

because they are losers who need to change the rules to win.

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
4.1.7  SteevieGee  replied to  Texan1211 @4.1    4 years ago
No one is stealing the election.

I'm gonna quote you on that after the election.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  SteevieGee @4.1.7    4 years ago
I'm gonna quote you on that after the election.

Please at least make sure you do so accurately.

Thanks in advance.

 
 

Who is online

Tessylo
GregTx
Sean Treacy
Thomas


434 visitors