╌>

'Lesson fully received': An 18-year-old charged in the Capitol riot says he was 'wrong' and begged a judge to release him

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  3 years ago  •  45 comments

By:   Taylor Ardrey, Insider

'Lesson fully received': An 18-year-old charged in the Capitol riot says he was 'wrong' and begged a judge to release him

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



09e358d0-7b95-11eb-be9f-cc56c439d1d7

'Lesson fully received': An 18-year-old charged in the Capitol riot says he was 'wrong' and begged a judge to release him


Taylor Ardrey Sat, March 6, 2021, 11:15 PM 569ee1bb380a70f84db16433b870f086 Bruno Joseph Cua, 18, faces a number of criminal charges after he boasted on social media about storming the Capitol. Department of Justice/Criminal Complaint

  • The youngest suspect charged in the Capitol riots wrote a letter begging a judge to release him.

  • Bruno Joseph Cua, 18, previously boasted on Instagram of storming the Capitol and fighting inside.

  • "I am completely humbled , deeply remoursefull and regretful! [sic]," Cua wrote.

5ff718ea0da6381b3307b618_o_U_v2.jpg

A Georgia teenager who boasted on Instagram about storming the Capitol in January begged a federal judge to release him ahead of his trial, saying his social media posts were "foolish" and that he had learned a "very painful" lesson.

Bruno Joseph Cua, 18, faces a slew of federal charges related to the January 6 insurrection, including assault on a federal officer, engaging in physical violence, violent entry or disorderly conduct, and civil disorder. He has pleaded not guilty, and a judge refused to release him on bond last month.

In a letter to Judge Randolph Moss filed March 4, Cua pleaded for the judge to show mercy and allow him to return home to his family before he stands trial in the spring. Cua apologized and said his actions didn't reflect the person he is.

"I would like to strongly assure you that I am not a danger to anyone, and I will absolutely never act on what I said. I have yearned to speak with you, to truthfully apoloigize [sic] and show you my forever changed heart," he wrote.

435df5dfd8eb65e92ccff1744e8ff6d7 The criminal complaint cites Instagram and Parler posts from Cua's accounts admitting to storming the Capitol and alluding to violence. Department of Justice/Criminal Complaint

He continued: "I will never be the same person, jail has had its full effect me, I am completely humbled , deeply remoursefull and regretful!. After all, thats what jail is for right? Teaching people a lesson? Lesson fully received, your Honor."

Cua also said he had spent over two weeks in isolation, and noted that he had never been away from his parents for this length of time.

"I have completely lost those aggressive feelings and moved on from the entire politcal idea. I was wrong," Cua wrote.

An 'impressionable eighteen-year-old kid'


Cua is believed to be theyoungest suspectcharged in the Capitol siege. His lawyers have emphasized his age and relative immaturity in their requests for the judge to release him on bond.

"Bruno Cua is an impressionable eighteen-year-old kid," his lawyers wrote in one court filing. "In many ways, he is less of an 'adult' than many other teenagers. He has never lived away from his parents. he has lived his entire life in the area immediately surrounding Atlanta, Georgia."

The lawyers added that Cua was "very scared and very remorseful," and "wholly regrets his action on January 6 and fully recognizes the utmost seriousness of the charges."

839e0be9665be42c9cfb41f99c1811c4 US Capitol siege in Washington DC on January 6, 2021. Samuel Corum/Getty Images

But prosecutors have painted Cua as a violent, active participant in the siege. Thecriminal complaintshows multiple screenshots pointing out Cua's positions in the Capitol building, and even the Senate chamber.

Screengrabs from the complaint show Cua holding what appeared to be a baton, and shoving a US Capitol police officer in plainclothes.

The complaint also accused Cua of bragging about violence that day, posting an Instagram story saying, "Yes, we physically fought our way in." Other posts from Cua's alleged Parler account said, "President Trump is calling us to FIGHT" and that January 6 was when Trump supporters had to "make our stand."

"It's time to take our freedom back the old fashioned way," another Parler post said.

According to anInsider database, Cua is just one of more than 310 people who have been charged in the Capitol siege as of early March.

Read the original article onInsider


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Tessylo    3 years ago

All these bad asses who 'Stormed the Capitol' 'It's a Revolution' are really turning out to be a bunch of whiny little bitches aren't they?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @1    3 years ago

He is only contrite now because he got busted.  Throw the book at him.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @1    3 years ago

He's just an impressionable kid....give him a break

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.2.1  Gordy327  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 years ago

He's 18, which makes him an adult. Therefore he should be charged, tried, and prosecuted as such. Stupidity is no excuse either.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.2  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 years ago

install a hook over the cell door and give him back his belt. buh-bye trumpster.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Hallux  replied to  Gordy327 @1.2.1    3 years ago
He's 18, which makes him an adult

That's questionable ... what is not is he's a dolt.

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
1.2.4  Duck Hawk  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 years ago

He's old enough to join the US military, he's old enough to take part in an insurrection, he's old enough to do the time.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.2.5  Split Personality  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 years ago

Old enough to drive a car, vote or join the military as an adult.

Give US a break, Greg.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
1.2.6  Gordy327  replied to  Hallux @1.2.3    3 years ago

I'd say both are unquestionable. 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
1.3  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Tessylo @1    3 years ago

18 years old......  

I'm thinking a bit differently.  Charge him, but place him on parole for what he could receive a maximum sentence for.  Give him some community service as well, but lets see if he can really get his act together for the long term.  If he is a screws up he ends up behind bars.  I just think that at 18 years old, I'd rather try to turn him into something that is capable of paying taxes and contributing to his community rather than pay for his incarceration for umpteen number of years, and get nothing for it.  At 25 years or older..... Lock em up! 

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
1.3.1  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.3    3 years ago

OH! Maybe the sentence should be joining the Army.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.3.2  evilone  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @1.3.1    3 years ago
Maybe the sentence should be joining the Army.

I worked with a few of people this was their option - it didn't go well for them in the Army either.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
1.3.3  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  evilone @1.3.2    3 years ago

I knew a few that it did them some good.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.3.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @1.3.3    3 years ago

It does straighten some people out. My cousin had the choice of the Marines or prison. He was on the bus to Parris Island the next day.

And some people are just sociopaths and there is no help for them

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
1.3.5  FLYNAVY1  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @1.3.1    3 years ago

Nah... We saw that back in the late 70s- early 80s..... While I'm sure there were a few turnarounds, most were real problems.  I much prefer serving with the all volunteer force!

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
1.3.6  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.3.4    3 years ago

Yes, exactly.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
1.3.7  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1.3.5    3 years ago

So, I'm guessing you weren't stationed with anyone that had been drafted at any point?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Tessylo    3 years ago

Like many of these morons, I bet he thought he wouldn't face any consequences.  

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.1  Gordy327  replied to  Tessylo @2    3 years ago

Or maybe he thought Trump would pardon him. jrSmiley_9_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
2.1.1  Duck Hawk  replied to  Gordy327 @2.1    3 years ago

Trump wasn't going to pardon anyone. Only a fool would assume he would offer pardons to those who carried out his bidding.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Ender  replied to  Duck Hawk @2.1.1    3 years ago

They failed so, no pardon for you...

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
2.1.3  Gordy327  replied to  Duck Hawk @2.1.1    3 years ago

Of course not. Trump ha's a history of screwing people over. He would pardon himself if he could.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3  seeder  Tessylo    3 years ago

"But prosecutors have painted Cua as a violent, active participant in the siege. The      criminal complaint       shows multiple screenshots pointing out Cua's positions in the Capitol building, and even the Senate chamber.

Screengrabs from the complaint show Cua holding what appeared to be a baton, and shoving a US Capitol police officer in plainclothes.

The complaint also accused Cua of bragging about violence that day, posting an Instagram story saying, "Yes, we physically fought our way in." Other posts from Cua's alleged Parler account said, "President Trump is calling us to FIGHT" and that January 6 was when Trump supporters had to "make our stand."

"It's time to take our freedom back the old fashioned way," another Parler post said.

According to an      Insider database   , Cua is just one of more than 310 people who have been charged in the Capitol siege as of early March."

Because he was a VIOLENT, ACTIVE participant in the siege.

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
3.1  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Tessylo @3    3 years ago

Well then, I may be ready to put him behind bars.... Contrary to my 1.3

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4  Trout Giggles    3 years ago

He can be remorseful but that doesn't mean he shouldn't face punishment

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1  Hallux  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    3 years ago

My 'X' agrees with you ...

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
4.2  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    3 years ago

And the question remains... is he only "remorseful" because he was caught and being tried as an adult?

To believe that some think that the voting age should be 16... this is a perfect example as to why the voting age should be bumped up to 21, the same as alcohol and tobacco [I think that joining the military should be the same, 21... but that's for another debate]; not reduced to 16.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @4.2    3 years ago

I disagree about having to be 21 to join the military. Lots of kids straight out of high school join because they live in a depressed area and/or have no desire to go to college. If they had to wait until they were 21 I think our unemployment numbers would be much worse and possibly even our crime numbers

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
4.2.2  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.1    3 years ago

Trout is spot on with 18 being the magic number for joining the military.....  Rather than drifting till they are 21, it gives so many a shot at making something of themselves.  Most do very well.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
4.2.3  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.1    3 years ago

Then I think they need to make alcohol and tobacco for 18 then too. Because if someone can go off to war at 18 [and potentially die], shouldn't they be allowed to have a beer and a cigarette?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @4.2.3    3 years ago

I don't have any problem with that, either. And if they can go off to war and get shot while they're smoking a cig and drinking a beer, they have the right to vote, too

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
4.2.5  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.4    3 years ago

Agreed. jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
lady in black
Professor Quiet
5  lady in black    3 years ago

Throw the book at this scumbag.  He was better off staying in mommy's basement being a keyboard warrior.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
5.1  Gordy327  replied to  lady in black @5    3 years ago

What's the penalty for committing sedition against the government?  Firing squad?

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
5.1.1  Duck Hawk  replied to  Gordy327 @5.1    3 years ago

I think it should be. Additionally ANY member of Congress who voted to decertify State Electoral Ballots should be removed from office and tried with treason and for violating their Oath of Office.

 
 
 
Gordy327
Professor Guide
5.1.2  Gordy327  replied to  Duck Hawk @5.1.1    3 years ago

Agreed.

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)    3 years ago

Do adult crimes, get adult charges.

I have a nearly 18 year old that has never lived away from either of her parents for more than two weeks [class trip] and I can promise you... she would never have thought this as okay or the "cool thing" to do. The "adopted one" is 19 [nearly 20] and I can promise you, he'd never be that stupid either.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka) @6    3 years ago

If my father (USMC DI) were still alive and I tried to pull a stunt like this, I would have been doing push ups until I puked.  

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Participates
6.1.1  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.1    3 years ago

My Naval Academy father wouldn't have been that nice,  he would have told me to go stand out in the middle of the road while he went to get the keys to the car to run me over with.....

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @6.1.1    3 years ago

My non-military father would have beat me with a rubber hose

 
 
 
MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)
Junior Participates
6.1.3  MsAubrey (aka Ahyoka)  replied to  Trout Giggles @6.1.2    3 years ago

It wouldn't have been my father... it would've been my mother beating the hell out of me.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
7  Ender    3 years ago

A bunch of these 'patriots' once caught quickly turned into a bunch of whiney marshmallows.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
8  Kavika     3 years ago

Nothing but a piss ant snowflake.

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
9  Duck Hawk    3 years ago

I thought these militia types were supposed to be tough, they fold at the first sign of opposition. That's one of the reasons I'm not too concerned with their talk of "revolution or a second civil war." When the juices start flowing they will be the first to run.

 
 
 
Transyferous Rex
Freshman Quiet
10  Transyferous Rex    3 years ago
I am completely humbled , deeply remoursefull and regretful! [sic],

Said the kid who failed to carry this out to a logical conclusion beforehand, and apparently in multiple instances afterward. Not feeling much pity on this.

 
 

Who is online





goose is back
Tacos!


412 visitors