Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a sexually explicit memo 'in a fog of sleep deprivation' during the Starr investigation

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  sister-mary-agnes-ample-bottom  •  one month ago  •  46 comments

By:   YahooNews

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a sexually explicit memo 'in a fog of sleep deprivation' during the Starr investigation
The memo, resurfaced during Kavanaugh's confirmation hearings, had a list of racy, graphic suggested questions for former President Bill Clinton.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



  • Kavanaugh wrote a sexually graphic memo while sleep deprived during the Starr probe, according to The Atlantic.

  • A former colleague of Kavanaugh's told The Atlantic that the judge later "regretted" its tone.

  • The memo had a list of explicit questions for former President Clinton about Monica Lewinsky.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote a memo with a list of sexually explicit questions for former President Bill Clinton during "a fog of sleep deprivation" and later regretted how it came across, a former colleague of Kavanaugh's told The Atlantic.

Kavanaugh cut his teeth in the conservative legal world on special prosecutor Ken Starr's investigation into the Clinton investigation after a series of clerkships. The wide-ranging probe scrutinized the Clintons' business dealings in Arkansas and Clinton's lies about his relationship with former intern Monica Lewinsky that eventually led to his impeachment.

The August 15, 1998 memo, which resurfaced during Kavanaugh's 2018 confirmation hearings, was titled "Slack for the president?"

In it, Kavanaugh expressed outrage about Clinton's behavior in office, writing, "the president has disgraced his office, the legal system, and the American people by having sex with a 22-year-old intern and turning her life into shambles," calling it "callous and disgusting behavior."

The memo included a suggested list of sexually graphic questions for Clinton like "If Monica Lewinsky said you inserted a cigar into her vagina, while you were in the Oval Office area, would she be lying?" and, "If Monica Lewinsky says that you had phone sex with her on approximately 15 occasions, would she be lying?"

The former coworker, Robert Bittman, told The Atlantic's McKay Coppins for a profile of the justice published Thursday that Kavanaugh later "expressed regret" for the memo's "tone." Bittman also told McKay the memo was written while Kavanaugh was sleep deprived.

Kavanaugh's work on the hard-charging investigation cemented his status as a respected conservative lawyer and a team player.

Colleen Covell, a woman who went on a date with Kavanaugh while he was working on the Starr probe, told The Atlantic that at the date, Kavanaugh got drunk and began ranting about the Clintons, including saying, "they're total crooks!" and "I can't believe you voted for them!"

Kavanaugh's work on the Starr investigation landed him a stint in the White House counsel's office and then, 12 years on the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals.

Read the original article on Business Insider


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
2  seeder  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    one month ago

Who is he to point fingers and sit in judgment?

Here's the memo.  Send the kids out of the room before you read page 2.

kavanaugh8.15.98.pdf (archives.gov)

My point?  Once a freak, always a freak. 

 
 
 
devangelical
PhD Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2    one month ago

I wonder if anyone has thought to put the original memo under a black light?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @2.1    one month ago

I bet he really got off on those questions.  Probably beat off as he read them.  

Why are all alleged conservatives such whiny rapey gropey little bitches?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  devangelical @2.1    one month ago

Why, do you think some Democrats got excited and whacked off on it?

They do seem pretty worked up over this 20 years later!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
2.2  Tacos!  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2    one month ago
Who is he to point fingers and sit in judgment?

He was acting as a prosecutor at the time. It was literally his job to point fingers.

 
 
 
gooseisgone
Senior Quiet
2.3  gooseisgone  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @2    one month ago
My point?  Once a freak, always a freak.

You are talking about Bill Clinton....right.  What the hell kind of questions do you think they were going to ask if he has perjured himself. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
PhD Principal
2.3.1  MrFrost  replied to  gooseisgone @2.3    one month ago
You are talking about Bill Clinton....right. 

I literally saw no mention of him in the article at all. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
2.3.2  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @2.3.1    one month ago

then you should reread it slowly.

might want to start at the top.

look carefully under the photo of Kavanaugh.

BTW. what do you think the article was referring to when it mentioned the Starr investigation.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Masters Expert
3  Greg Jones    one month ago

This earthshaking revelation has about as much relevance as Christine Blasey Ford's tortured 'credible' drunken memories. Clinton, and his multiple trips on the 'Lolita Express' with his fellow deviant Jeffrey Epstein, is the real freak

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @3    one month ago

c10b42d7e75ccf5689ccf6b80887d580.jpg

 
 
 
MrFrost
PhD Principal
3.2  MrFrost  replied to  Greg Jones @3    one month ago

512512512

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @3.2    one month ago

wait a minute, wasn't it you who just posted that you could find no mention of Clinton in the article(there was. if course) but you think Trump WAS???

LMAO

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @3.2    one month ago

isn't there something you can take for TDS?

 
 
 
MrFrost
PhD Principal
3.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.1    one month ago
Clinton

Isn't there something you can take for your CDS?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.2.4  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @3.2.3    one month ago

I am truly sorry you don't have a clue.

maybe next time.

after all, it is you who couldn't figure out that Clinton was in the article. 

and it was you complaining that he wasn't

 
 
 
Snuffy
Junior Quiet
4  Snuffy    one month ago

So a memo from 1998 that was discovered a couple of years ago during his confirmation hearing  (which means they knew about it then and it didn't prevent him from being confirmed to SCOTUS) is news again?  The only reason I can see is to be used as ammunition for a push to add more justices to SCOTUS in an effort to pack the court.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Guide
4.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Snuffy @4    one month ago

hat was discovered a couple of years ago during his confirmation hearing

Yes, given their hysterics yesterday, it's pretty funny that this thread isn't overrun with our progressive members calling it old news.  But that's not surprising at all. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
5  Tacos!    one month ago

Wait a sec. So Bill Clinton does something wildly inappropriate and Kavanaugh is the “bad guy” for thinking up specific questions about the behavior? He was working for the Special Prosecutor at the time. It was literally his job to do that.

And this is controversial 20+ years later? Unbelievable. People have their priorities way out of wack.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tacos! @5    one month ago

And to think that some of the fine folks on this article were bitching about something about AOC that happened only TWO years ago!!

LMMFAO at the hypocrites!

They couldn't stop Kavanaugh from being confirmed with their dirty little tricks, and it still sticks in their craw!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6  Tessylo    one month ago

I don't know why, to this day, why so many alleged conservatives and republikans are so obsessed with Bill Clinton's penis

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
6.1  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @6    one month ago
I don't know why, to this day, why so many alleged conservatives and republikans are so obsessed with Bill Clinton's penis

Funny thing about that: You’re the first person to mention it. 

And the article isn’t even about Conservatives or Republicans bringing it up. But you’d have to read it to know that, I guess.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Tacos! @6.1    one month ago
[removed]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Tacos! @6.1    one month ago

[removed]

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
6.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.1    one month ago
hence the obsession with Bill Clinton's penis.

Again you are the first person to mention his body part. The only one. Obsession? Projection for sure. From you.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Guide
6.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.2    one month ago

Do you understand that Bill Clinton is not just a penis? You realize you can mention Bill Clinton without talking about his penis?  You don't seem to believe there's any difference between Bill Clinton and his penis.

Weird. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Sean Treacy @6.1.4    one month ago

Ken Starr - Monica Lewinsky - BJ - how is this whole Kavanaugh/Starr thing not about Bill Clinton's penis and the 'conservative's' fascination with said penis?

 
 
 
gooseisgone
Senior Quiet
6.1.6  gooseisgone  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.1    one month ago
hence the obsession with Bill Clinton's penis. 

Why do you want to talk about Bill's penis ?

Do you understand how these forum thingies work?

Obviously,  you don't know how the forum works, because my comment "thingie" wasn't directed to you in the first place, so go bother someone who wants to respond to you. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  gooseisgone @6.1.6    one month ago

How dumb.  You obviously don't know how this kind of forum works either.  

 
 
 
gooseisgone
Senior Quiet
6.1.8  gooseisgone  replied to  Tessylo @6.1.7    one month ago
How dumb.

Maybe we should do a poll. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  gooseisgone @6.1.8    one month ago

we could do a poll, and if any members here don't respond, then we brand them whatever we want.

that's how it works here. right?

jrSmiley_7_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
r.t..b...
Masters Participates
6.1.10  r.t..b...  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.9    one month ago

Then those opposed could, should and would determine the poll immaterial.

Such is the state in which we find ourselves...when relying on polls and trolls forms one’s opinion. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  r.t..b... @6.1.10    one month ago

spectacular way to miss the point. but whatever

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
6.1.12  Tacos!  replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.9    one month ago

That's right. Even if you don't know about it, failure to respond is "moral cowardice."

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  Tacos! @6.1.12    one month ago

yep!!!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.1.14  Texan1211  replied to  Tacos! @6.1.12    one month ago

I cracked up when I read that 

I didnt bother to take the poll because it didn't interest me.

just like almost all other polls.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Masters Expert
6.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @6    one month ago

You're the only one obsessed with it.

Bubba Billy Clinton was a serial sexual abuser, accused of rape, and a likely pedophile.

No wonder Hillary screwed other men...and women.

Chelsea sure bears a strong resemblance to Webb Hubbell.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @6.2    one month ago

jrSmiley_44_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_46_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gifjrSmiley_25_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Masters Expert
6.2.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @6.2.1    one month ago

Denier!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @6.2.2    one month ago

6ac9624917d7fa15e4c3ecdb102f4c48.jpg

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
7  Texan1211    one month ago

I wonder if Democrats will ever get over the fact that Kavanaugh is sitting on SCOTUS, and that they couldn't stop it, despite their efforts to malign him.

Maybe they should get used to seeing him on SCOTUS for a LONG, LONG time, as he is only 56 years old!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8  Texan1211    one month ago

Two years ago and this"news" might have been current news.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Masters Expert
8.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Texan1211 @8    one month ago

They're desperately trying to distance themselves from their "Dear Leader's" failing administration,

by posting pointless shit

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9  Tessylo    one month ago

"And the article isn’t even about Conservatives or Republicans bringing it up. But you’d have to read it to know that, I guess."

BreakableDeliciousCapybara-size_restricted.gif

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Junior Expert
9.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @9    one month ago

What the hell is that supposed to signify?

 
 
 
gooseisgone
Senior Quiet
9.1.1  gooseisgone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @9.1    one month ago
What the hell is that supposed to signify?

Come on Jim, you don't know how forum works. ( 6.1.1 )

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Expert
9.1.2  Tacos!  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @9.1    one month ago

You see, the way this works is a member attacks you for saying something you didn't say. And when you point out that you didn't say it, you're the one "moving the goalposts." 

Or they say some random shit that has nothing to do with - or even contradicts - the contents of the seed. And when you point that out? You guessed it. You're "moving the goalposts" again. When someone gets obsessed with a certain meme, everything is "moving the goalposts."

Irrational? Insane? Maybe. But "that's how it works."

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

XXJefferson51
Dulay
pat wilson
zuksam
JohnRussell


53 visitors