╌>

At Ohio rally, Trump knocks Biden on border, hints at 2024 plans

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hallux  •  3 years ago  •  64 comments

By:   Nathan Layne - Reuters

At Ohio rally, Trump knocks Biden on border, hints at 2024 plans
"JO and the HO HAVE TO GO"

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



WELLINGTON, Ohio, June 26 (Reuters) - Former U.S. President Donald Trump will hold a rally on Saturday in Ohio, his first since his supporters' deadly attack on the Capitol, as he aims to bolster allies, berate his enemies and cement his influence over the Republican Party.

While Trump has made speeches at Republican events since his election defeat by Democratic President Joe Biden, the rally in a state he carried in the 2020 election marks a return to the kind of freewheeling mass gatherings that have been critical to retaining the support of his base.

It also marks the start of his public events lashing out at elected Republicans who he views as having crossed him. He will campaign for former White House aide Max Miller, who has launched a primary challenge against Representative Anthony Gonzalez, one of the   10 House Republicans   who voted to impeach Trump on a charge of inciting the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol that left five dead including a Capitol Police officer.

Trump has vowed to campaign against all 10. He has also endorsed a challenger to Senator Lisa Murkowski, the only one of the   seven Senate Republicans   who voted to convict him in his January impeachment trial who is up for re-election in 2022.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    3 years ago

Yay ... back to the old normal of rabid ranting and raving at the rebel rabble ... @!@

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Hallux @1    3 years ago

Trump actually has even more motivation to go on a rally tour, now that his company is about to be indicted for financial crimes and he needs a big distraction. Hell, he might start having a rally every few days if he can find some morons to pay for them. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1.1.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    3 years ago
if he can find some morons to pay for them. 

Morons are plentiful. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2  XXJefferson51  replied to  Hallux @1    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    3 years ago

By the way, even if the turnout is , oh less than "huge" , Trump will portray it as as big as the local authorities would permit due to "zoning", "fire codes" or whatever.  In his mind everything he does is perfect and those who disgaree are losers or haters. That is why he is a diagnosed malignant narcissist. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     3 years ago

A more fitting name would be ''The Whiney Bitch Tour''.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  devangelical  replied to  Kavika @3    3 years ago

gee, that kind of looks like the van I removed the receiver pin from his hover-round carrier on my roadtrip thru texas a few weeks ago.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3.2  Ender  replied to  Kavika @3    3 years ago

Complete morons fall in line tour.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Ender @3.2    3 years ago

... when voluntary goose stepping turns into involuntary ass-kicking.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4  Greg Jones    3 years ago

Joe and the ho'   How fitting and true. jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

Now why oh why did I know you would like that ... and why I put it in as a quote. @!@

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Hallux @4.1    3 years ago

In other words it’s what you put in advance”your content” and not as a highlighted quote from the seeded article.  

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.2  Kavika   replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

Since they are not on tour, most people with half a brain know that. ''The Whiney Bitch Tour'' is all Trump. 

Here are a few more suggestions, Gregg. 

''The Biggest Loser Tour'' or in honor of you, ''The Snowflake Tour''.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
4.2.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Kavika @4.2    3 years ago

The Sour Grapes Tour.  Maybe he can unload all those steaks he could not sell and they would all come down with the runs.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago
How fitting and true.

On what objective and non-partisan grounds do you deem Harris a 'ho'?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @4.3    3 years ago

There was a right wing rumor a while back that she slept her way to the top of California politics.  Judging by their past performance with rumors , the chances that it is true are slim. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.2  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @4.3.1    3 years ago

I am aware of the Willie Brown allegation.   Brown (who had been separated from his wife for a decade at the time) was her boyfriend for about a year approximately 25 years ago.   Because he opened a career door for his girlfriend, certain partisans call her a 'ho'.

That is pure misogyny.   Just because a women gets help in her career from her boyfriend there is no cause whatsoever, from those facts alone, to label her a whore (or equivalent).  

 
 
 
Dragon
Freshman Silent
4.3.3  Dragon  replied to  TᵢG @4.3.2    3 years ago

According to GOP "logic" Melania must be the biggest ho to ever be first lady...and GOP loves Melania...go figure. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4.3.4  Kavika   replied to  TᵢG @4.3.2    3 years ago

You only have to look at who is calling her a ''ho''. Stupid is as stupid says.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.5  TᵢG  replied to  Dragon @4.3.3    3 years ago

Thing is, when someone deems a woman a whore simply because her boyfriend opened a career door they ipso facto deem all women whores who received favors from their boyfriends.

It is misogyny.

Given Harris' 25 year professional record after Brown, she obviously is an intelligent, competent individual.   While I do not like her politics, that does not automatically make her a stupid whore as deemed by partisans.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.3.6  JohnRussell  replied to  TᵢG @4.3.5    3 years ago

Being the Attorney General of California is obviously a major major political position. California is bigger and more populous than many countries. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.3.7  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @4.3    3 years ago

Oh please! They called Melania and Ivanka all sorts of comparable or worse terms and where were you and your standards then that you want to hold us to now with the new first “lady”? 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.3.8  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.3.7    3 years ago

The gender gap is wider every post you make.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.9  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.3.7    3 years ago

My position is that this is never proper.   I have explained this to you in detail, multiple times in the past and of course nothing sinks in.

Here you are again engaging in misogynistic, bigoted language and justifying it with:   ' but, but, they did it too!'

That is the reasoning of a child.

256

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Quiet
4.3.10  igknorantzrulz  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.3.7    3 years ago
Oh please! They called Melania and Ivanka all sorts of comparable or worse terms and where were you and your standards then that you want to hold us to now with the new first “lady”?

i was watching melania's' oh so prim and proper photo spread, then i grabbed a Playboy so i could check out Trump's $130,000 toy instead, all while Pornstar Stormy Daniels got stabbed from a few sides, but B, also for a mere nother $130,000.00 minimal fee, but it's Carmela that's the 'ho' as Donald just hits while married and or with child, cause we don't want no First Ladies gone Wild, [deleted] but shucks, Trump can flux any and all, but a differnt standard i see, as sights are lowered...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.11  TᵢG  replied to  igknorantzrulz @4.3.10    3 years ago

The hypocrisy is disgusting.   First of all, it is wrong to label any woman a 'ho' (by any label) simply because her boyfriend / husband gave her something of value.   That is pure misogyny and would ipso facto deem most every woman a 'ho'.  

It is as irrational as Trump supporters labeling Biden (or, really, anyone on the planet) a liar.   One can only shake one's head at the blind, brain-dead partisanship at play to sycophantically cling to Trump — the poster-child for lying — while attacking others as liars.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.3.12  XXJefferson51  replied to  TᵢG @4.3.11    3 years ago

All that your side did and said to Trump and his family will be visited upon BiDen and his tit fit tat. The arguement that it was ok to bash the Trumps not now not ok to do the same to the Bidens will be ignored.  Don’t like your President and family treated a certain way, don’t mistreat ours.  It really is that simple.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.13  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.3.12    3 years ago

I do not have a side.

The arguement that it was ok to bash the Trumps not now not ok to do the same to the Bidens will be ignored.

That is not my argument.   Read what people write;  don't just invent strawman arguments when you fail to muster a decent rebuttal.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.3.14  Bob Nelson  replied to  TᵢG @4.3.13    3 years ago
Read what people write

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.4  JBB  replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

Before helping Joe Biden whoop Trump's fat ass Vice President Harris was elected California's Secretary of State and United States Senator...

The way the gop dismisses her turns off the voters.

So, please keep it up. That, and the racism. Thanks.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.4.1  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @4.4    3 years ago
Before helping Joe Biden whoop Trump's fat ass Vice President Harris was elected California's Secretary of State

No, she just wasn't.

Prove it by listing what mythical years you feel she held the office.

This might actually be good to read!!!!!

jrSmiley_4_smiley_image.png

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.4.2  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @4.4    3 years ago

Secretary of State of California - Wikipedia

You should revise Wiki with your "corrections"!

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.4.3  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.4.2    3 years ago

Okay, I misspoke. She was California Attorney General instead. She has been exceptionally successful as an elected public servant. She is Vice President of the United States FFS!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.4.4  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @4.4.3    3 years ago

Hell, Dan Quayle was VP, too.

BFD

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.4.5  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.4.4    3 years ago

Do you know who are not President and Vice President? Donald Trump and Mike Pence...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.4.6  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @4.4.4    3 years ago

Perfect comparison.  Both were senators before being VP.  We really should treat her like they treated him.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.4.7  TᵢG  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.4.6    3 years ago
We really should treat her like they treated him.  

Childish.

You should treat people individually based on their own actions.   This childish reciprocity by partisans is a key reason our nation is in such a fucked up state.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.4.8  Bob Nelson  replied to  TᵢG @4.4.7    3 years ago

Amalgamations, regardless of how appropriate or inappropriate, are intellectually easy.

Analysis of particular cases is hard.

... gee...  ... 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.4.9  Bob Nelson  replied to  TᵢG @4.4.7    3 years ago

As so often, Krugman nails it:

What Underlies the G.O.P. Commitment to Ignorance?

512

As everyone knows, leftists hate America’s military. Recently, a prominent left-wing media figure attacked Gen. Mark Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, declaring, “He’s not just a pig, he’s stupid.”

Oh, wait. That was no leftist, that was Fox News’s   Tucker Carlson . What set Carlson off was testimony in which Milley told a congressional hearing that he considered it important “for those of us in uniform to be open-minded and widely read.”

The problem is obvious. Closed-mindedness and ignorance have become core conservative values, and those who reject these values are the enemy, no matter what they may have done to serve the country.

The Milley hearing was part of the orchestrated furor over “critical race theory,” which has dominated right-wing media for the past few months, getting close to   2,000 mentions   on Fox so far this year. One often sees assertions that those attacking critical race theory have no idea what it’s about, but I disagree; they understand that it has something to do with assertions that America has a history of racism and of policies that explicitly or implicitly widened racial disparities.

And such assertions are unmistakably true. The   Tulsa race massacre   really happened, and it was only one of many such incidents. The 1938   underwriting manual   for the Federal Housing Administration really did   declare   that “incompatible racial groups should not be permitted to live in the same communities.”

We can argue about the relevance of this history to current policy, but who would argue against acknowledging simple facts?

The modern right, that’s who. The current obsession with critical race theory is a cynical attempt to change the subject away from the Biden administration’s highly popular policy initiatives, while pandering to the white rage that Republicans deny exists. But it’s only one of multiple subjects on which willful ignorance has become a litmus test for anyone hoping to succeed in Republican politics.

Thus, to be a Republican in good standing one must deny the reality of man-made climate change, or at least oppose any meaningful action to limit greenhouse gas emissions. One must reject or at least express skepticism about the   theory of evolution . And don’t even get me started on things like the efficacy of tax cuts.

What underlies this cross-disciplinary commitment to ignorance? On each subject, refusing to acknowledge reality serves special interests. Climate denial caters to the fossil fuel industry; evolution denial caters to religious fundamentalists; tax-cut mysticism caters to billionaire donors.

But there’s also, I’d argue, a spillover effect: Accepting evidence and logic is a sort of universal value, and you can’t take it away in one area of inquiry without degrading it across the board. That is, you can’t declare that honesty about America’s racial history is unacceptable and expect to maintain intellectual standards everywhere else. In the modern right-wing universe of ideas, everything is political; there are no safe subjects.

This politicization of everything inevitably creates huge tension between conservatives and institutions that try to respect reality.

There have been many studies documenting the strong   Democratic lean   of college professors, which is often treated as prima facie evidence of political bias in hiring. A   new law   in Florida requires that each state university conduct an annual survey “which considers the extent to which competing ideas and perspectives are presented,” which doesn’t specifically mandate the hiring of more Republicans but clearly gestures in that direction.

An obvious counterargument to claims of biased hiring is self-selection: How many conservatives choose to pursue careers in, say, sociology? Is hiring bias the reason police officers seem to have   disproportionately supported Donald Trump   in the 2016 election, or is this simply a reflection of the kind of people who choose careers in law enforcement?

But beyond that, the modern G.O.P. is no home for people who believe in objectivity. One striking feature of surveys of academic partisanship is the overwhelming Democratic lean in hard sciences like biology and chemistry; but is that really hard to understand when Republicans reject science on so many fronts?

One recent study   marvels   that even finance departments are mainly Democratic. Indeed, you might expect finance professors, some of whom do lucrative consulting for Wall Street, to be pretty conservative. But even they are repelled by a party committed to zombie economics.

Which brings me back to General Milley. The U.S. military has traditionally leaned Republican, but the modern officer corps is highly educated, open-minded and, dare I say it, even a bit intellectual — because those are attributes that help win wars.

Unfortunately, they are also attributes the modern G.O.P. finds intolerable.

So something like the attack on Milley was inevitable. Right-wingers have gone all in on ignorance, so they were bound to come into conflict with every institution — including the U.S. military — that is trying to cultivate knowledge.
 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
4.4.10  Dig  replied to  Bob Nelson @4.4.9    3 years ago

That's it in a nutshell: A cult of anti-intellectualism.

You should post that as its own seed.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.4.11  Bob Nelson  replied to  Dig @4.4.10    3 years ago

I've ceased most seeding. It seems to me that seeding on NT gives cover to the fascists who post here several times every day.

I only seed clearly anti-fascist articles. I post Replies to anything that interests me

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.4.12  Tessylo  replied to  Bob Nelson @4.4.11    3 years ago

Yeah, the anti-intellectual would be fascists seem to be taking over.  

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
4.4.13  Bob Nelson  replied to  Tessylo @4.4.12    3 years ago

Most of NT's seeds nowadays... 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
4.5  Gazoo  replied to  Greg Jones @4    3 years ago

She may very well be but we don’t know her motive for being with a fat, bald, out of shape man old enough to be her father. And if her motive was for professional gain she will never admit that.

we do know she thinks dementia boy biden is a racist yet that didn’t stop her from teaming up with him. Why? To further her political career, of course.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.5.1  TᵢG  replied to  Gazoo @4.5    3 years ago
fat, bald, out of shape man old enough to be her father …

If someone derided Melania Trump using your terms, would you consider the implication that she was a ‘ho’ (by any name) to be fair and warranted?

A little test of objective analysis.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.5.2  Tessylo  replied to  Gazoo @4.5    3 years ago
"She may very well be but we don’t know her motive for being with a fat, bald, out of shape man old enough to be her father. And if her motive was for professional gain she will never admit that."

We could say the very same thing about Melania, although I know it was for his alleged billions.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
5  pat wilson    3 years ago

Who's paying for this.

I looked on Fox to see the big headlines but there was nadda, odd.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1  devangelical  replied to  pat wilson @5    3 years ago

definitely not that POS. he doesn't pay for anything.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2  Tessylo  replied to  pat wilson @5    3 years ago

The legitimate networks are ceasing to cover this turd's rantings and ravings.  Stephen Colbert had a nice bit on the trumpturds' 'rally.'

Colbert Burns Trump With Actual Clips From His Rambling, Incoherent Speech

Ed Mazza
Tue, June 29, 2021, 1:44 AM
Stephen Colbert  wasn’t impressed by  Donald Trump ’s weekend rally given that the former president didn’t show up with any new material. 

Instead, it was the   same old gripes and grievances , with lines lifted straight out of his previous rallies.  

At one point, the “Late Show” host held up a lighter, like a fan at a concert ― except he did it for a very different reason .

“Let me be clear: this lighter does not indicate that I’m excited,” Colbert said. “You’re just so boring I’d rather set myself on fire!” 

But the wildest lines on the show weren’t his quips. They were Trump’s actual comments as Colbert played a series of clips of flubs and misspeaks from the speech, including a claim that astronaut Neil Armstrong was sent “to a plant.” 

This article originally appeared on HuffPost  and has been updated.
 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6  JBB    3 years ago

Professional Wrestling, Monster Trucks and Trump!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6.1  devangelical  replied to  JBB @6    3 years ago

peas, peas, peas, peas, grifting goober peas. goodness how delightful, grifting goober peas.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7  MrFrost    3 years ago

The start of the, "I won second place" tour. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
7.1  devangelical  replied to  MrFrost @7    3 years ago

"I spiked the ball before crossing the goal line and went cheap on buying off all the officials beforehand" tour.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  MrFrost @7    3 years ago
The start of the, "I won second place" tour. 

He was the #1 Loser in the 2020 election...

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
8  Ender    3 years ago

I checked the news stations and haven't heard a word about this.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
8.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Ender @8    3 years ago

Live at 7p.m. on Newsmaxtv.com ... make sure your anti-virus is running and do not check off any boxes!

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
8.1.1  Ender  replied to  Hallux @8.1    3 years ago

I will have to give a pass. It has been a nice couple of months not having to listen to his awful voice.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Ender @8.1.1    3 years ago

5 years of listening to that lying asshole is enough for any 1 sane lifetime...

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
9  Perrie Halpern R.A.    3 years ago

hallux, the title of the article can not be different than the seeded source. The adjustment has been made. 

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
9.1  Dig  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @9    3 years ago

The title Hallux used was the original title. You can still see it in the seeded URL. Reuters must have changed it.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
9.1.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Dig @9.1    3 years ago

Thanx

 
 

Who is online



Thomas
Dig
George
GregTx
evilone


402 visitors