Aging population to hit U.S. economy like a 'ton of bricks' - U.S. commerce secretary

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  flynavy1  •  3 weeks ago  •  10 comments

By:   Andrea Shalal (MSN)

Aging population to hit U.S. economy like a 'ton of bricks' - U.S. commerce secretary
But if we don't, we're going stay at it, because ... it's an untenable situation."

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



By Andrea Shalal

© Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden does not yet have enough support from fellow Democrats to secure $400 billion in spending for at-home care for the elderly and disabled that the economy desperately needs, Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told Reuters on Monday.

Raimondo, who is paying for round-the-clock care for her own 90-year-old mother, said America's aging demographics were going to hit the country "like a ton of bricks" without increased federal aid, and warned the current situation was "untenable."

Failure to act, she said in an interview, would harm the U.S. economy by making it difficult for women - who fell out of the workforce by the millions during the COVID-19 pandemic - often to look after out-of-school children or parents - to return to work or remain in the workforce.

As post-World War Two baby boomers become senior citizens, there is a dangerous deficit of caregivers looming, Biden officials and many experts on aging say.

Currently, 16.5% of the U.S. population of 328 million people, or 54 million, are over the age of 65, the latest census shows. By 2030, that number will rise to 74 million. The number of people over the age of 85, who generally need the most care, is growing even faster.

Biden in March proposed boosting Medicaid, the federal medical program for lower-income Americans, by $400 billion over a decade to fund at-home care for elderly and disabled people, and increasing wages for caregivers. He remains committed to that $400 billion figure, Raimondo said.

She said details of the pending reconciliation bill - a Democrats-only budget measure that will include parts of Biden's spending plans not included in a pared-down bipartisan infrastructure bill - were still being worked out.

But not all Democrats are on board for the increased care spending, she said.

"It will be a battle to get enough of it funded in the reconciliation package. We still have to make the case for it ... and that's part of the reason why I'm pounding the drum."

Democrats hold a slim majority in the House of Representatives, while the Senate is split 50-50. That means all Senate Democrats must be on board to pass a budget measure with the tie-breaking vote of Vice President Kamala Harris.

Raimondo said she is continuing to meet with skeptics, including moderate Democratic Senator Joe Manchin. "It's not so much that people are opposed, but $400 billion is a lot of money, and they have questions that deserve good answers."

'IT IS A CRISIS'

She said the pandemic had raised awareness about the lack of affordable care for children, the elderly and disabled, and even some Republicans - who opposed adding such spending to the infrastructure package - saw the need for change.

Raimondo said 1.5 million women still had not returned to the workforce after exiting during the pandemic to care for children whose schools had closed, and elderly and disabled relatives.

"We can't afford for half of our workforce - women - to be held back and held out of the workforce because they can't get excellent and adequate childcare or eldercare," she said.

The current system - relying on women taking care of relatives for free, or paying mostly women of color to provide care at poverty wages - was not sustainable, she said.

"Just giving those women a raise would be a huge boost to our economy ... and a huge drag on the economy if we don't get it done," Raimondo said.

"It is a crisis," she said. "The president's behind it and most Democrats are behind it. We're going to work to get the rest of them behind it. But if we don't, we're going stay at it, because ... it's an untenable situation."

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal; Editing by Peter Cooney)


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Expert
1  seeder  FLYNAVY1    3 weeks ago

Right...... like nobody saw this comming....?

If you don't have at least a million in your retirement planning at 65........  you may have some tough times ahead!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1  Texan1211  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1    3 weeks ago
Right...... like nobody saw this comming....? If you don't have at least a million in your retirement planning at 65........  you may have some tough times ahead!

Can you even imagine how much we will have to borrow to support that--especially if plans like Medicare at 50 get pushed through?

Where is the money tree orchard?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Principal
1.2  Krishna  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @1    3 weeks ago

Right...... like nobody saw this comming....?

If you don't have at least a million in your retirement planning at 65........  you may have some tough times ahead!

There have been numerous articles about this for some time.

About how much people need to have saved for retire when reaching various ages.

And, even more frightening-- the current reality. (How much the average actually has saved-- at various ages.

(As with so many things, the average person is poorly informed...and/or doesn't give a hoot about taking responsibility in their lives).

 
 
 
Snuffy
Junior Quiet
1.2.1  Snuffy  replied to  Krishna @1.2    3 weeks ago

A lot of people are gonna be in trouble.  When the average retirement savings for a 60 yo is only $134k and the mean at $408 that means way too many people do not have sufficient funds to retire.

(granted, those numbers only go thru 2019. I've read stories but have no proof of people who had to tap into their retirement early due to the pandemic so the numbers today could be worse)

I know of one person (my ex-wife) who will have to work until she dies as she has less than $65k in retirement and just turned 65.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2  Ender    3 weeks ago

Time to just go Medicare for all.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     3 weeks ago

2020 saw the highest number of boomer retirements in history. 

Aging care is already a serious situation in the US and it's only going to get worse. Pay me now or pay me later, but one way or another we (US) is going to pay. 

We spent trillions on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (not counting the human cost) for nothing but can't seem to put together a policy that will help a huge number of our aging population.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Principal
4  Buzz of the Orient    3 weeks ago

It is actually starting to become obvious that the USA itself is bound to face the crises it criticizes others for having to deal with. 

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Principal
5  Bob Nelson    3 weeks ago

Gee... maybe if we had universal health care...... 

 
 
 
FLYNAVY1
Professor Expert
5.1  seeder  FLYNAVY1  replied to  Bob Nelson @5    3 weeks ago

That and we need younger workers coming into the workforce to increase the revenue base.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  FLYNAVY1 @5.1    3 weeks ago

I am bewildered by the idea that anyone would imagine that the richest country in the history of the world cannot take care of its elderly.

oh... wait...   ... the ultra-rich don't give a shit about others, and they have all the money...

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online



FLYNAVY1
Krishna
Bob Nelson
Gazoo
epistte


19 visitors