Biden tries to address rising crime and voting laws
Joe Biden’s most recent speeches were a national embarrassment. Did Joe Biden even read the speeches he was given before he went out there?
"And we've talked--you and I have talked about this, mayor, before. And it includes cracking down on holding rogue gun dealers accountable for violating the federal law. It include the Justice Department creating five new strike forces to crack down on illegal gun trafficking in the corridors supplying weapons of--to cities of New York from New York to the Bay Area."
Really? In addition to the many laws we already have on guns?
Five new strike forces to control guns?
Supporting local police? Sorry, Joe it's a bit late for that.
We did learn that when people are released from prison they get $25 and a bus ticket! Sniff, sniff.
Then we had the big lie on voting.
Where are the people who are being denied a vote? Where are the camera crews or the reporters interviewing the people who didn't get to vote?
“The 21st-century Jim Crow assault is real,” President Biden claimed Tuesday. “We’re facing the most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War—that’s not hyperbole"
We finally have someone ready to take on, as he calls it the Klu Klux Clams.
He told us "the world is wondering what America is going to do?
He said Merrck Garland is challenging Georgia's "vicious" anti-voting law." Of course, Joe can't tell us why it's vicious or anti-voting?
He did mention the Texas law requiring partisan poll watchers. We certainly don't want that, do we? We don't want anyone seeing what's going on. That would be voter suppression don't ya know! He called it "intimidating." We wouldn't want to intimidate poll workers.
Then there is the matter of having to drive a long way to vote. That would stop a civic minded citizen every time. He said that "this year alone 17 states enacted laws to make it harder to vote."
Who would believe such blatant bull shit?
He told us it's also "about who gets to count the vote." That was the most frightening part of the speech.
In about 16 months the left's puppet will be defanged.
It's going to be about what can be done to stop them in the meantime.
Tags
Who is online
97 visitors
To the non-partisans:
Would you vote for him again?
Between Trump, or one of his bigoted sycophant's? Yes, I would vote for Biden again. I was hoping I wouldn't have to, but it looks like the Republican Party is doubling down on Q Populist stupid.
"To the non-partisans:"
I don't think he was addressing you judging by whom he directed the question to.
Obviously he can speak for himself. Or can't he?
Seems weird that a bunch of wordsmiths would miss such a key part of the question---"TO THE NON-PARTISANS"
At the moment he is away from the site so no.
I'll remember that you speak for him.
Got it.
He asked me to watch the store while he was gone. Problem?
I got it!
I didn't vote for either person we were given to choose from... I'm sorry... I didn't vote for either elected of the two-party system.
If it came down to Harris and DeSantis in 2024, who would you vote for?
(BTW, I'm certain that a Harris campaign would face primary challengers)
Democrats will have a tough decision to make--especially if Trump isn't the GOP nominee.
Go with Joe--who will be way too old, or go with Harris--unproven, untested, volatile, unable to handle things effectively.
Win, win for the GOP.
I don't like either... so I would have to think long and hard on that.
But then again, this is assuming that Biden doesn't run again.
It's kind of a reasonable assumption. Based on the policies he's put in place, it doesn't look like he's worried about re-election.
I wouldn't.
You'd stay home?
Yep
Slow Joe is, as usual, a day late and a dollar short on the uptake. Did not vote for him the first time and it will be a cold day in Hell before I even think about a second term!
States have plenary powers concerning elections.
The feds have no powers over state elections
Simple.
Merrick Garland is going to learn it the hard way.
He is not the only one.
We would all vote for President Biden again in a heartbeat!
So you're a non-partisan?
The question was for non-partisans
And I wonder who "we" is? If the poster is a spokesperson for some group known as we, "we" certainly isn't non-partisans
I'm not the topic of this 'article'.
I ANSWERED IT ANYWAY.
Which made no sense.
We're even.
I doubt that.
You're correct, it's more like me 100%
But it's not about you, right?
You and others should stop making it about me.
It seems like some on here have nothing better to do than throw little snippets or insults out there. Must suck to not have any other life.
thanks for being an NT example.
Says the guy that is the epitome of one that hurls insults.
Aren't the progressive liberals cute when they start talking law and order?
LMAO!
Networks shouldn't have covered that speech. It was just dishonest propaganda.
Projection.
David Harsayni had an interesting reaction:
You still see progressives here claiming the 2016 election was stolen. This is fertile ground for Biden to till.
That & Jan 6th is all they have. It won't save them from the red wave in 2022.
1/6/21 won't be forgotten in 2022. THANKS GQP!
Especially the part about holding people prisoner without a trial for, thus far, 6 months!
Which isn't happening.
That will be fun to watch, because many progressives are convinced the midterms will result in Dems holding their razor-thin majorities.
I think we will probably see some more screeching at the sky ala Clinton's loss after the elections.
I'm not so sure of that. They'd rather rerun 2020 but they don't have the pandemic to help them this time.
They are trying to change the country in two years.
No Trump on the midterm tickets will hurt them, too.
Yep, rushing to "change" before the midterms.
Got a feeling we'll see what Harris is made of--she can't exactly stop campaigning for Dems like she quit her race, can she?
the only people that care about those domestic terrorists that showed up in DC are the ones that didn't. let them rot in the gray bar hotel like the other violent criminals waiting trial. fuck'em.
As I say, If she runs for president, there will most likely be other democrats who will toss their hats into the ring. I don't know if she could win a primary?
I am not sure she can, based on her rather stunningly poor showing during her own previous campaign, which was an abject failure.
Plus, she isn't the most popular Democrat, and has made a few enemies within her party who won't mind taking her out.
And fuck the constitution & the rule of law?
Sadly I think Merrick Garland, Nancy Pelosi and the FBI share your feelings.
We aren't standing at the precipice and we're looking into the abyss, we are in the abyss and it's going to take a lot to undue what the Biden puppet masters have done.
She was only selected for VP for two reasons. Obviously neither had anything to do with fitness.
it still won't be as comedic as the popularity contest for the upcoming autocrat coronation.
... and both of those reasons are why you consider her unfit to serve.
Too true, sadly for the Democratic Party.
Elections have consequences, and the Democrats will feel them in 2022 and 2024.
Her incompetence is why she isn't the right person for the job.
Even a few Democrats are slowly recognizing that fact.
Well said!
No.
How's that 'not Trump' thing workin' for ya'?
Democrats have lost the power of the protest. Attacking civil society might have worked against Trump but Trump ain't in charge any longer. Biden's on the hot seat now. Resistance won't create unity any longer.
The writing is on the wall. Democrats have embraced a lot of anti-Trump positions that just aren't very popular without Trump in charge. So, Democrats are desperately searching for a new scapegoat. Democrats can't do anything when they're not in charge and can't do anything when they are in charge. The bottom line is that Democrats can't do anything at any time -- except make excuses for why they can't do anything.
Biden is preemptively making excuses for what is beginning to look like another Obama shellacking in the midterms next year. Amazingly Biden is already blaming a rigged election. (sound familiar?) Biden's Big Malarkey is just that, malarkey.
What's that nonsense?
Haven't you noticed that the news media has shifted attention onto attacks on cops? BLM isn't newsworthy any longer. Even Biden has thrown BLM under the bus.
Who are Democrats going to resist and protest now? Trump is yesterday's news.
"shifted" ? The news media has been focused on 6/2021 since it happened, you know, those attacks on cops.
See. 7.1
Yes, shifted. Since Jan. 6 cops are the victims. The 'insurrection' succeeded in changing the narrative that BLM created. BLM protesting cops has lost traction in the news cycle.
Democrats have used the 'insurrection' to portray cops as protectors. Democrats have complained that cops didn't take adequate measures to protect the Capitol; cops should have gotten tough. Democrats deployed the military to protect the Capitol because cops weren't tough enough. Democrats have adopted a much more militant stance for the role of cops.
The 'insurrection' was the perfect counter to BLM protests. If Trump had planned the protest and 'insurrection' as a counter to BLM then the plan worked beautifully. Democrats oppose anything Trump. So, if Trump supports violent protest then Democrats will automatically oppose violent protests. Planned or not, BLM is under the bus.
It seems to be the rest of us.
Democrats strategy is to throw everything against the wall and see what sticks. Now Democrats are losing the news cycle because they've lost the power of resistance and protest.
Whining like Trump isn't newsworthy any longer. Trump is yesterday's news. Until the midterms.
It's their policies. The country got a good taste.
Remember when they had dreams of turning Texas blue? Take a look at what democrat representatives from those southernmost Texas precincts are now saying. Open borders did that! Look at what they've done to the cities. Did we really think that NYC democrats would nominate a strict law & order candidate?
The hand writing is on the wall for democrats.
My only question is why the electorate has to subject itself to so much damage to relive what we experienced the last time they held power?
See 7.1
There are choices that our leader can make for himself
And our courageous media isn't afraid to ask him about
but when it comes to voting or crime Biden listens to his handlers.
It looks like this one might just be a wrap so:
In conclusion:
The rising crime problem is one that was unnecessary and self created by democrats during the violent George Floyd riots, when democrats proposed defunding the police. This one cannot be easily fixed. The police were demonized, emasculated and in some precincts defunded and or held more liable. We have lost a lot of brave courageous police officers. Many have taken early retirement or quit. Few now want such a job.
When it comes to voting laws, I defy anyone to tell us the recent changes significantly, or even moderately, different from what they were before 2020. Voting was best when it was a civic duty, accomplished within a single 18 hour day with the necessary ID. Voting can be easy, but it should also be secure.
How about removing voting areas from places that they now have to wait hours to vote, like they did in Texas?
How long has there been rural voters in Texas?
Which voting places were removed by law in Texas?
Do you mean the provision that was removed before it passed the House?
Can you show me a link to that, because I can't find any.
It is in the link you gave me.
When you have to claim that, there's an excellent chance that what you're saying actually is hyperbole. And you know it.