╌>

Bannon to defy subpoena from January 6 committee, citing Trump's 'direction' - CNNPolitics

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  3 years ago  •  68 comments

By:   Sara Murray, Katelyn Polantz and Ryan Nobles (CNN)

Bannon to defy subpoena from January 6 committee, citing Trump's 'direction'  - CNNPolitics
Steve Bannon will not cooperate with the House select committee investigating January 6, his lawyer said in an email obtained by CNN that cites former President Donald Trump's claim of executive privilege.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



(CNN)Steve Bannon will not cooperate with the House select committee investigating January 6, his lawyer said in an email obtained by CNN that cites former President Donald Trump's claim of executive privilege.

Bannon's attorney told the committee that "the executive privileges belong to President Trump" and "we must accept his direction and honor his invocation of executive privilege." The letter from Bannon's legal team goes on to say it may be up to the courts to decide whether he is ultimately forced to cooperate -- essentially daring the House to sue or hold him in criminal contempt. "As such, until these issues are resolved, we are unable to respond to your request for documents and testimony," wrote the lawyer, Robert Costello. The letter, sent to the committee Thursday, came after a lawyer for former President Donald Trump told subpoena targets, including Bannon, not to comply with congressional requests for testimony and documents that could concern privileged material. Read More Here's what happens if a congressional subpoena is ignored (and what it means for the January 6 committee) The claim that Bannon could be covered by the former President's privilege is unusual because Bannon was not working for the federal government during the period surrounding the January 6 insurrection. Privilege claims normally apply to close officials around the president and deliberations between government employees, and Bannon was fired from his role as a White House adviser in 2017. Many legal experts say Bannon, as a private citizen, would have no standing to block a subpoena by claiming executive privilege. Bannon's legal team also indicated Bannon would comply with court rulings on the matter. "We will comply with the directions of the courts, when and if they rule on these claims of both executive and attorney client privileges," according to the letter. "Since these privileges belong to President Trump and not to Mr. Bannon, until these issues are resolved, Mr. Bannon is legally unable to comply with your subpoena requests for documents and testimony."

Committee says Meadows and Patel are 'engaging'


Bannon and other Trump associates were sent subpoenas by the House select committee late last month for private depositions and records. All document requests were due Thursday and the former Trump staffers were asked to appear before the committee next week. Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, and Vice Chair Liz Cheney, a Wyoming Republican, said that former Trump officials Mark Meadows and Kash Patel are "so far engaging" with the panel. Patel told CNN in a statement Friday that "I can confirm that I have responded to the subpoena in a timely manner." "Beyond that, I will not comment on my confidential dealings with the Committee. But I can assure you that I will continue to tell the truth and remain focused on Fight With Kash to help any American who has been censored and misrepresented online," he continued. It is not clear if former deputy chief of staff Dan Scavino has responded. Takeaways from the Senate Judiciary Committee report on Trump's attempted coup All four were also sent letters from Trump's attorney this week advising them he intended to defend what he viewed as an infringement of executive privilege. In the letter viewed by CNN, an attorney for Trump advised them to "where appropriate, invoke any immunities and privileges" and not provide documents or testimony. A spokesman for the committee declined to comment. A legal fight could take quite a bit of time, and Democrats could be facing a deadline of the 2022 midterm elections. "While Mr. Meadows and Mr. Patel are, so far, engaging with the Select Committee, Mr. Bannon has indicated that he will try to hide behind vague references to privileges of the former President. The Select Committee fully expects all of these witnesses to comply with our demands for both documents and deposition testimony," Thompson and Cheney said. In their statement, Thompson and Cheney make clear that the committee will act "swiftly" against those who refuse to comply with a lawful subpoena, including by seeking to hold them in criminal contempt, as they try to squash concerns that the committee will not act forcefully enough. "Though the Select Committee welcomes good-faith engagement with witnesses seeking to cooperate with our investigation, we will not allow any witness to defy a lawful subpoena or attempt to run out the clock, and we will swiftly consider advancing a criminal contempt of Congress referral," they said.

Bannon's relationship with Trump


Bannon, who was Trump's former White House chief strategist, spoke with Trump in December, urging him to focus on January 6 -- the date of the official certification on the Electoral College vote by Congress, according to authors Bob Woodward and Robert Costa in their book "Peril." "'We're going to bury Biden on January 6th,'" Bannon is quoted as saying. Steve Bannon was knee-deep in January 6 Woodward and Costa also reported that Trump called Bannon following his contentious January 5 meeting with then-Vice President Mike Pence, in which the vice president said he does not have the authority to block certification of Joe Biden's win. In its letter to Bannon, the select committee cited communications he had with Trump in December "and potentially other occasions" in which Bannon reportedly urged Trump "to plan for and focus his efforts on January 6." To Meadows, the committee wrote that investigation has revealed "credible evidence of your involvement in events within the scope of the Select Committee's inquiry," citing his close proximity to Trump on the day of the attack. The committee also wants to learn more about Meadows' efforts to aid overturning the 2020 election results. When the subpoenas were first issued, House Select Chairman Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, had told CNN's Manu Raju that criminal contempt is "on the table" if the individuals the committee has sent subpoenas to do not cooperate. This story has been updated with additional details Friday.

CNN's Annie Grayer, Zachary Cohen, Whitney Wild and Veronica Stracqualursi contributed to this report.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    3 years ago

Trump and Bannon need to do a perp walk together!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  JBB @1    3 years ago

Trump and Bannon need to do a perp walk together!

Bannon will deny the subpoena citing Trump,  Bannon will be arrested.  Bannon will sue Trump because he caused Bannon to be arrested.

Just follow the money$$$.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    3 years ago
Bannon will deny the subpoena citing Trump,  Bannon will be arrested.  Bannon will sue Trump because he caused Bannon to be arrested. Just follow the money$$$.

Quite imaginative.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.1.2  MrFrost  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    3 years ago
Bannon will deny the subpoena citing Trump,  Bannon will be arrested. 

He may try, but he can't as he was never tied to the trump administration, (he was never employed by the US Government). He doesn't have a leg to stand on. 

Also, it's a legal subpoena and like trump, he is nothing more than a private citizen that cannot claim executive privilege. If he declines the subpoena, he's screwed, if he testifies, he's screwed... 

Something something...those who lie down with dogs.. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.1.3  MrFrost  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.1    3 years ago

Quite imaginative.

Just a polite reminder.

512

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
1.1.4  Veronica  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.3    3 years ago

Yeah, but that's different..... you know....

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.3    3 years ago

Um, I was referring to your fantasy scenario where he sues Trump.

LOL

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @1.1.3    3 years ago

Please cite which specific Republicans held her in prison.

I know you must have some names after making that claim.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @1    3 years ago
Trump and Bannon need to do a perp walk together!

Will you be bothering to actually charge them with any offenses?

Or just going to be judge, jury, and executioner?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2    3 years ago

Since you asked, Steve Bannon has now been charged with criminal contempt of Congress...

He can't expect Trump's pardon this time round.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  JBB @1.2.1    3 years ago
Since you asked, Steve Bannon has now been charged with criminal contempt of Congress...

And Trump is still listed as an unindicted co-conspirator.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @1.2.1    3 years ago

Well, one day we'll see if people go to prison JUST because they are indicted or charged.

Last I checked, shit don't work like that.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.2.4  seeder  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.3    3 years ago

At least for Bannon the perp walk comes next...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.5  Ozzwald  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.3    3 years ago
Well, one day we'll see if people go to prison JUST because they are indicted or charged.

You have now moved the goalpost across the field, down the street, and thrown it off the cliff.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.2.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JBB @1.2.1    3 years ago
Since you asked, Steve Bannon has now been charged with criminal contempt of Congress...

Not till Tuesday when they meet if then. Might I suggest you read what you cite?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.7  Texan1211  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.5    3 years ago
You have now moved the goalpost across the field, down the street, and thrown it off the cliff.

No , it is merely my attempt to add a little sanity and common sense and facts to your posts.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.2.8  Dulay  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.5    3 years ago

The irony is that we don't have to wait for 'one day' since right NOW, thousands of people go to prison after being indicted and charged. Ask Paul Manafort, some of the Capitol insurrectionists, and the many thousands who are in prison because they can't afford bail. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.9  Ozzwald  replied to  Dulay @1.2.8    3 years ago
The irony is that thousands of people go to prison after being indicted and charged.

The irony is that ONLY people who have been charged, go to jail.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @1    3 years ago
Trump and Bannon need to do a perp walk together!

What exactly would they be doing a perp walk for?  Didn't the FBI already investigate this and find nothing?  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.3    3 years ago

No, but Congress is investigating January 6th...

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.3.2  bugsy  replied to  JBB @1.3.1    3 years ago

That's right, and the FBI had already investigated this and found Trump not responsible.

What do you think the yahoo activist liberals in Congress will find that the FBI did not?

[Deleted]

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.3  seeder  JBB  replied to  bugsy @1.3.2    3 years ago

When did the FBI clear Trump for January 6th?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @1.3.1    3 years ago

So it's just another unfounded partisan thing again.  Just like Meuller's "investigation".

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.5  seeder  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.3.4    3 years ago

No, all of America saw it with their own eyes!

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.6  seeder  JBB  replied to  bugsy @1.3.2    3 years ago

No, that was false news spread by the gop...

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.3.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  bugsy @1.3.2    3 years ago

Well the Senate cleared him in the second impeachment

The United States Senate on Saturday formally cleared former President Donald Trump of inciting an insurrection at the US Capitol last month.

Trump was the first former president to face trial after leaving office and the only president to be impeached twice.

The US Senate voted 57-43 on the impeachment charge, which means that seven Republican senators voted to convict the former president.

A conviction in Trump's unprecedented second impeachment trial was seen as highly unlikely as it required a two-thirds majority, and the 100-member Senate is evenly split between Democrats and Republicans.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.8  seeder  JBB  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.7    3 years ago

Nobody is falling for that lousy dodge now...

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.3.9  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JBB @1.3.8    3 years ago

What lousy dodge? Facts and the truth are now a lousy dodge? You have a strange way of looking at things. Oh wait. I know why. Buuuuut Trump Carry on LOL

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.3.10  Split Personality  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.9    3 years ago

Give us all a break JJ. 

The Senate trial was dead on arrival due to tribal BS. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Expert
1.3.11  MrFrost  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.9    3 years ago
What lousy dodge?

The Senate trial allowed, no evidence, no testimony no nothing. It was a complete joke. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.12  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.7    3 years ago

Jesus Jim, you can't be introducing FACTS like that into a conversation and destroy their weak-ass narrative so quickly!

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.13  seeder  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @1.3.12    3 years ago

Then why is Congress investigating Jan 9th? 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.3.14  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Split Personality @1.3.10    3 years ago
The Senate trial was dead on arrival due to tribal BS. 

The whole proceeding was dead due to tribal BS.  Going as far back as the 2016 election.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.3.15  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JBB @1.3.13    3 years ago

What happened on Jan 9th?

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.16  Texan1211  replied to  Split Personality @1.3.10    3 years ago

The senate trial was brought on by the tribal bs of the democratic house.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.17  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @1.3.13    3 years ago

Link to the investigation of Jan 9???

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.3.18  Texan1211  replied to  MrFrost @1.3.11    3 years ago

Bitch about that to the clowns trying the case.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Expert
1.3.19  Dulay  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.3.7    3 years ago

WTF does the Senate impeachment trial have to do with an FBI investigation Jim? Please be specific. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.20  seeder  JBB  replied to  Dulay @1.3.19    3 years ago

Don't you love how the gop shows their ugly mean obnoxious bigoted asses to the voters?

original

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.3.21  seeder  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @1.3.18    3 years ago

What about the clown refusing to cooperate?

original

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    3 years ago

Bannon reportedly told Trump that they would "bury" Joe Biden on Jan 6.

Lock him up. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3  evilone    3 years ago

I hope they do find Bannon in contempt of congress and then prosecute him. The fucking troll deserves a little prison time.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
3.1  Veronica  replied to  evilone @3    3 years ago

The pic reminds me of a hobo Santa.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Veronica @3.1    3 years ago

He's a walking talking pile of garbage.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
3.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.1    3 years ago

At least he would be safe in prison.  Not even the most desperate of Bubba's would tap that.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Veronica @3.1    3 years ago

If you take away the hair and multiple shirts, he kind of looks like Homer Simpson.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
3.1.4  Veronica  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.3    3 years ago

OMG - DONUTS......

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.1.5  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Veronica @3.1.4    3 years ago

384

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
3.1.6  Veronica  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.5    3 years ago

Exactly.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Guide
4  Veronica    3 years ago
On the other hand, the chief justice held that in circumstances of a demonstrated need, the executive privilege would fail. So, it’s a qualified privilege, not an absolute privilege. And as we all know, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that President Nixon could not protect his communications under executive privilege.

So now the problem lies in the current SC and if they use precedent or bow down to the ass that is Trump.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5  Ronin2    3 years ago

He just has to hold out until mid terms. After that the Jan 6th commission will be in the dumpster where it belongs. Along with the careers of Pelosi's two TDS driven Republican lap dogs. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.1  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @5    3 years ago

245747559_4551566548223412_3792967191097856820_n.jpg?_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-5&_nc_sid=730e14&_nc_ohc=Z6a73lm2QOIAX_JDrRf&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=fd038bba079602268be93958e43acc7f&oe=616DE99B

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
5.1.1  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @5.1    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @5    3 years ago

That's where trumpturd and Bannon belong - in a dumpster.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
5.3  seeder  JBB  replied to  Ronin2 @5    3 years ago

original

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.3.1  Texan1211  replied to  JBB @5.3    3 years ago

I have noticed some progressive liberals posting this picture.

Do they all have an abnormal fascination with Trump's ass?

Isn't him living in the penthouse of their minds rent-free enough any more?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.3.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Texan1211 @5.3.1    3 years ago

Sad thing is it has NOTHING to do with the topic and was flagged as such and allowed to stand. The topic is Bannon

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.3.3  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.3.2    3 years ago

Under the rules here, if I understand correctly, a word used in an article makes it on topic.

I fully expect to have a debate one day with one of the wordsmiths here when they have no other logical argument and decide to argue what "is" means.

I learned to identify subjects over 50 years ago.

SMH, sadly

[As the seeder, JBB is free to expand the topic to include whatever he likes.  Now, if he were posting Trump memes while simultaneously declaring Trump to be off topic, his flags would be dismissed.  The flags of those attempting to limit the topic when it is not their place to do so will also be dismissed.]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.3.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Texan1211 @5.3.3    3 years ago

Lindell was not mentioned in the article but as you say, just another reason to exhibit TDS riddled memes

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
5.3.5  Texan1211  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.3.4    3 years ago

What else do they really have to offer besides silly memes?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
5.3.6  seeder  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @5.3.5    3 years ago

original

 
 
 
Hallux
PhD Principal
5.4  Hallux  replied to  Ronin2 @5    3 years ago

So that's the plan, stack the proceedings with Donald's capos and soldiers? Part III?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
6  Paula Bartholomew    3 years ago

LOCK HIM UP!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
7  Kavika     3 years ago

Perhaps he can get another pardon from the not chief executive of the US. 

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
8  bbl-1    3 years ago

Perhaps I mis-read.  Was it 'direction' or 'erection'?  None the less, according to some it would fall into the category of 'semi flaccid'.

As far as Bannon, he was once a US Naval Officer.  How did that happen? 

Does he still have his passport?  Claim political asylum in Hungary, Bannon.  Be off with you. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
8.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  bbl-1 @8    3 years ago

He is probably hiding under Trump's bed at Mar A Largo like that other ahole they tracked down there with a subpoena.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
8.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @8.1    3 years ago

The bed was Melania's.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Participates
8.1.2  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  bbl-1 @8.1.1    3 years ago

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 

Who is online





89 visitors