╌>

Biden Build Back Better bill: House passes social safety net and climate plan

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  4 years ago  •  55 comments

By:   Christina Wilkie (CNBC)

Biden Build Back Better bill: House passes social safety net and climate plan
The House has passed the largest expansion of the social safety net in decades, a $1.75 trillion bill that funds President Joe Biden's top priorities.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Published Fri, Nov 19 20219:46 AM ESTUpdated 1 Min Ago WATCH LIVE Key Points

  • The House of Representatives has passed the largest expansion of the social safety net in decades, a $1.75 trillion bill that funds many of President Joe Biden's top priorities.
  • The bill is a major victory for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who pulled together a divided caucus to pass the mammoth bill with a thin majority.
  • Now that it has cleared the House, the Build Back Better Act goes to the Senate, where it is likely to be revised in the coming weeks.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) presides over the vote for the Build Back Better Act at the U.S. Capitol on November 19, 2021 in Washington, DC. Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images

WASHINGTON - The House of Representatives on Friday passed the largest expansion of the social safety net in decades, a $1.75 trillion bill that funds universal pre-K, Medicare expansion, renewable energy credits, affordable housing, a year of expanded Child Tax Credits and major Obamacare subsidies.

The final vote was 220-213, and only one Democrat, Jared Golden of Maine, voted against the bill.

Now that it has cleared the House, President Joe Biden's Build Back Better Act goes to the Senate, where it is likely to be revised in the coming weeks. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he aims to have the chamber pass the bill before Christmas. The House will need to vote on it again if the bill is altered.

If the measure is signed into law, the bill will profoundly change how many Americans live, especially families with children, the elderly and low income Americans.

What's in the current version of the bill:

  • Universal preschool for all 3- and 4-year olds. In addition to helping millions of children prepare better for school, the benefit would enable parents of young children to return to the work force earlier.
  • Capping childcare costs at 7% of income for parents earning up to 250% of a state's median income.
  • 4 weeks of federal paid parental, sick or caregiver leave.
  • A year of expanded Child Tax Credits. During the past year, these credits have raised households with more than 3 million children out of poverty, and cut overall child poverty in America by 25%.
  • Extended pandemic-era Affordable Care Act subsidies. So far this year, these subsidies have increased ACA enrollment by more than 2 million.
  • New hearing benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, including coverage for a new hearing aid every five years.
  • A $35 per-month limit on the cost of insulin under Medicare, and a cap on out-of-pocket prescription drug costs at $2,000 per year.
  • $500 billion to combat climate change, largely through clean energy tax credits. This represents the largest ever federal investment in clean energy.
  • Raising the State and Local Tax deduction limit from $10,000 to $80,000.

The bill represents a major victory for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., who pulled together a divided caucus with conflicting interests and united it behind a sprawling, 2,000-plus-page bill, passing it with a thin majority.

"This bill will speak for itself to millions and millions and millions and millions of Americans whose lives will be made more secure and richer in terms of their quality of life, whose educational opportunities will be greater, and whose job opportunities will be greatly enhanced," Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, Md., said Friday at a press conference after the vote.

The long road to a vote


Pelosi and Democratic leaders had initially hoped to pass this bill on Nov. 5, the same day the chamber voted to pass a $1 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill.

But Democratic moderates insisted upon seeing a Congressional Budget Office analysis of the bill's impacts before they voted on it. That analysis wasn't released until Thursday. House Democrats had hoped for a vote Thursday night, but Republican leader Rep. Kevin McCarthy derailed those plans with a rambling, eight-hour-plus speech that lasted through the night and into early Friday morning.

Progressives were reluctant to throw their weight behind the infrastructure bill without an iron-clad assurance that moderates would in turn vote to pass the Build Back Better Act when it came to the floor later on.

CNBC Politics


Read more of CNBC's politics coverage:

  • Biden's social plan is set for a House vote after analysis says it would slightly boost deficit
  • Two men are exonerated in the killing of Malcolm X
  • Biden says the U.S. is considering a diplomatic boycott of the Beijing Olympics

They got that assurance, in the form of a statement from moderates saying in part that they would "commit to voting for the Build Back Better Act, in its current form" as soon as they got the CBO score.

But even after this compromise agreement was reached, six progressives still voted against the infrastructure bill, while 13 Republicans crossed the aisle to join Democrats in passing it.

Absent those 13 Republican votes, however, the bill would not have passed.

Last-minute compromise


The final language of the Build Back Better Act reflects a number of late-stage deals that Democratic leadership reached with small groups of holdouts.

Among them were Democrats who insisted on immigration language in the bill, a group of lawmakers from the Northeast opposed to the lower SALT deduction cap, and a third bloc of moderates who refused to support granting Medicare sweeping powers to negotiate prescription drug prices.

In each case, leaders and members reached a compromise, a testament to the trust that members of Pelosi's caucus still place in the speaker, even after months of sometimes tense negotiations.

For Golden, the only Democratic "no" vote, one of those compromises went too far: The large increase in the maximum that individuals can deduct on their federal tax returns for state and local taxes.

In a statement Thursday explaining his opposition, Golden noted that the long-term cost of lifting the SALT tax cap, around $280 billion over a decade, is greater than the "child care, pre-K, healthcare or senior care provisions in the bill."

Moreover, several analyses of the bill's outcomes have indicated that the majority of the savings to taxpayers in the SALT cap repeal provision will accrue to the benefit of high earners.

A major win for Biden


The Build Back Better Act and the separate bipartisan infrastructure bill together would represent the defining achievement of Biden's first year in office. The president signed the infrastructure bill into law earlier this week.

Together they fulfill his core campaign promise to be a president for the middle class, to tangibly improve the lives of working families and to address climate change.

More broadly, they serve as an example of Biden's argument around the world, that "American democracy can deliver" a better quality of life than autocracies can.

The bills could hardly come at a more important time for the president. As inflation and a global supply chain crisis dominate many Americans' sentiments about the economy, Biden has seen his approval ratings plummet.

Polls also showed that as Democrats in Congress battled over what would be in the bills, voters increasingly came to see the party as ineffective and wrapped up in "Washington problems," not in touch with the daily struggles of their constituents.

Next steps in the Senate


Now that it has cleared the House, the Build Back Better Act goes to the Senate, where it is likely to be revised in the coming weeks.

There, two conservative Democrats have an outsized influence on what happens next: Key swing vote Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona. Manchin has already said he opposes including paid leave in the bill.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has said he opposes raising the SALT cap deduction, arguing that it favors the wealthiest taxpayers and costs the government billions of dollars.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JBB    4 years ago

Go Nancy! Go Nancy! Go Nancy!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @1    4 years ago

I guess half a loaf is better than nothing. I expect Manchin and Sinema to stand firm against the excesses of this pork filled travesty.

sbr111921dAPR20211119034506.jpg

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
1.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    4 years ago

How much gas does Manchin's maserati use?  He's really in touch with the people he represents.  jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.1    4 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
1.1.5  Gazoo  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.2    4 years ago

16 city, 22 highway. Not great but not bad for an suv. How many gallons of gas did dumbshits 85 car motorcade in rome use? How big is the carbon footprint of all the global warming dumbasses and their multiple homes and private jets? Yeah, they are really in touch with the common man. Notice the left never talks about that? Lol.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2  evilone    4 years ago

I did see that it was passed after the minority leader tried the longest floor speech in history.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
2.1  Kavika   replied to  evilone @2    4 years ago

Ah yes, Wannabe Kevin babbled for hours.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2  Snuffy  replied to  evilone @2    4 years ago

Actually he does now hold the record for the longest floor speech in the House of Representatives.  He held the floor for 8 hours 33 minutes, eclipsing Pelosi's speech from Feb 2018 which was a paltry 8 hours 7 minutes...   

(and before anybody has a cow...  the "paltry" was sarcasm.  8 hours 7 minutes is a long time for anybody to speak, much less anybody elderly)

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.2.1  Tessylo  replied to  Snuffy @2.2    4 years ago

Who gives a shit?

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.2.2  Ender  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.1    4 years ago

I say good. Now he will have the record for being an idiot.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2.2.4  1stwarrior  replied to  Snuffy @2.2    4 years ago

Babes - pure Babes.  Pelosi and McCarthy are kids to the "real" politicians below.

The 5 Longest Filibusters in US History

Strom Thurmond -  The record for the longest filibuster goes to U.S. Sen. Strom Thurmond of South Carolina, who spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes against the  Civil Rights Act of 1957 , according to U.S. Senate records.

U.S. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato -The second longest filibuster was conducted by U.S. Sen. Alfonse D'Amato of New York, who spoke for 23 hours and 30 minutes to stall debate on an important military bill in 1986.

U.S. Sen. Wayne Morse - Morse spoke for 22 hours and 26 minutes to stall debate on the Tidelands Oil bill in 1953, according to U.S. Senate archives.

U.S. Sen. Robert La Follette Sr. - The fourth longest filibuster in American political history was conducted by U.S. Sen. Robert La Follette Sr. of Wisconsin, who spoke for 18 hours and 23 minutes to stall debate in 1908.

U.S. Sen. William Proxmire - U.S. Sen. William Proxmire of Wisconsin, who spoke for 16 hours and 12 minutes to stall debate on an increase of the public debt ceiling in 1981.

Nancy should get an award for writing the longest bills in history - ACA - 2,835 pages - BBB - 2,000 + pages - no one ever reads them 'cause they are brought up for vote - EVEN BEFORE BEING PUBLISHED.  Example - ACA - 'You have to vote on it before you get to see it."

  Pelosi began the windup of her healthcare pitch by alluding to the controversies over the healthcare bill and the process by which it has reached its current state. Then, just after saying, "It's going to be very, very exciting," Pelosi gaffed, telling the local elected officials assembled that Congress "[has] to pass the bill so you can find out what's in it ,  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
2.2.5  Dulay  replied to  Ender @2.2.2    4 years ago

The record of McCarthy being an idiot is galactic. Hell, McCarthy rarely forms a coherent sentence. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3  Snuffy    4 years ago

If the Senate even passes their version of the bill, it will be greatly different than what the House just passed. 

IMO a lot of the pieces of the bill are really just partisan politics pieces that will be used for the 2022 and 2024 elections, used by both parties to hammer the other side. If Congress truly wanted a transformational bill they should have not used the reconciliation process but built a normal bill (or several) that enough parties could agree on, but that is not the nature of today's Congress. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    4 years ago

"social safety net" lol...

The  biggest item is a tax break for millionaires:

A five-year repeal would cost roughly $475 billion, with $400 billion of the tax cut going to the top 5 percent of households. That is more than any other part of Build Back Better, including the Child Tax Credit, spending on child care and pre-K, climate-related tax credits, or health care funding. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2  seeder  JBB  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 years ago

original

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @4.2    4 years ago

Where to start? That somehow this meme makes a giant tax giveaway to the rich after Biden already borrowed trillions acceptable?  

Or that he "successfully" ended the war in Afghanistan? Do the Americans he left behind believe that? 

The use of a meme to defend Biden makes sense when you start thinking about what they have to believe to defend him. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.1    4 years ago
Democrats so worked up over giving the rich a massive tax break?

notice he can't even address it. It's so bad he chooses to  draw attention to  the worst American policy blunder since the fall of Saigon.

I guess when your poster boy's approval is in the mid 30s, you don't have many options. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.4  seeder  JBB  replied to  Texan1211 @4.2.1    4 years ago

The rich pay more taxes under Biden's program. Families making less than $450,000 will not see their taxes increase. If you think working people writing off state and local taxes like they always could before Trump benefits the "Rich" you don't know what rich is. A tax break that only benefits families making less than $450,000 is hardly a benefit to the truly wealthy. Your complaint is that this mainly benefits blue states with higher local and state taxes. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @4.2.4    4 years ago
. A tax break that only benefits families making less than $450,000 is hardly a benefit to the truly wealthy.

Do you feel at all constrained by reality when making arguments? 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
4.2.8  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.2    4 years ago
That somehow this meme makes a giant tax giveaway to the rich after Biden already borrowed trillions acceptable?  

Is it your posit that a family making $100,000 are 'rich'?

Almost 20% of those that make $25,000 - $49,999 and over 44% of those that make between $50,000 and $100,000 qualify for SALT deductions. That is a MUCH larger amount of actual families than 'the rich' who claim the deduction. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
4.3  Dulay  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 years ago

That's data from Nov. 2nd. 

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
5  sandy-2021492    4 years ago

Cleanup in aisle 1.  Meta deleted. Play nice.

 
 

Who is online

devangelical
CB
Bob Nelson
Thomas


46 visitors