╌>

The Secret Service's investigation on the cocaine found in the White House blows

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  55 comments

By:   Miranda Devine (New York Post)

The Secret Service's investigation on the cocaine found in the White House blows
The Secret Service claimed it didn't interview potential suspects in the White House cocaine investigation because they didn't want to infringe on their civil rights.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Of all the excuses offered by the Secret Service to explain why it shut down the White House cocaine investigation last week after just 11 days, one jumped out as particularly ridiculous.

It couldn't conduct interviews of potential cokeheads known to be in the vicinity of where the bag of drugs was found because it didn't want to infringe on their civil rights, Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi told NBC.

"We have no evidence to approach them," he said of 500 possible suspects identified in the area on the holiday weekend before July 4.

Hah! Tell that to the hundreds of people rounded up by the FBI for just being in the vicinity of the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Sorry, nobody believes that the Biden administration cares about safeguarding civil liberties unless it's part of a cover-up.

"They didn't find anyone because they didn't want to find anyone," says former NYPD Commissioner Bernie Kerik after the Secret Service declared that its joint investigation with the FBI had proved fruitless.

Shifting stories about where the cocaine was located add to the public skepticism, and then a flat-out lie about when the president and his son left the White House for Camp David that weekend compounded the problem.

Despite enlisting the help of the FBI, the Secret Service found no fingerprints or DNA evidence on the bag of cocaine.

The Secret Service concluded the investigation into the cocaine found in the White House without identifying a suspect.REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File PhotoAccording to Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi, the agency didn't have enough evidence to interview any of the potential suspects.Getty Images/iStockphoto

"So, whoever had the cocaine, they wore gloves? I doubt it," scoffs Kerik. "And the fact they have changed the location three times makes it evident they are trying to conceal and suppress where it was actually found."

Even more astonishing is that, in a complex bristling with security cameras, the Secret Service said no surveillance video footage exists because the baggie was located in a "blind spot."

"I don't care if it was a six-foot blind spot," says Kerik. "I can tell you who walked into it and who walked out of it. The whole blind spot argument is bogus."

He claims the Secret Service knows exactly whose cocaine it is.

"They don't miss anything. They know their job. They are very systematic, very organized, very thorough," he said, adding, "The whole thing is preposterous. It's really an insult to the men and women in the Secret Service and the FBI for them to say they can't identify where the cocaine came from."

As the mystery dragged on into its second week, White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre refused to rule out that the cocaine belonged to a member of the Biden family and slammed the question as "incredibly irresponsible."

She also falsely claimed that the president and his son were not at the White House two days before the cocaine was found.

"They were not here Friday. They were not here Saturday. They were not here Sunday. They were not even here Monday."

But Hunter and Joe were indeed at the White House on Friday, until 6:34 p.m., when they flew off for a long weekend at Camp David.

President Biden and his son Hunter leaving the White House for a long weekend at Camp David on June 30, 2023.AP Photo/Susan Walsh

Even former Russiagate federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann says the investigation is a joke, while not pointing the finger at either Biden.

"It's such bad law enforcement," he told MSNBC, "and frankly, I would say suspicious.

"You interview people. But you know what you don't do before you interview people? Publicly say that there's no DNA evidence and no fingerprints. Like why would you let the whole world know that if you're then going to interview people? Better for people to think that you might have that," he said.

But according to the Secret Service, there were just too many people to interview.

Anyway, cocaine possession is a misdemeanor in the District of Columbia, so basically who cares, shut up and stop asking questions.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre incorrectly claimed that the Biden family wasn't at the White House at all the weekend the cocaine was found.Photo by JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

This blase attitude is exactly the wrong message to be sending from the White House.

Nancy Reagan would be rolling in her grave.

Even as a misdemeanor, the penalty in DC is up to 180 days in jail.

Cocaine is a serious drug that impairs judgment and discourages secrecy.

When it comes to the important work carried out in the White House, it is a national security problem if the staff are drugged out, and so sloppy that they leave their cocaine lying around.

Get Miranda's latest take


Sign up for Devine Online, the newsletter from Miranda Devine

Enter your email address

Please provide a valid email address.

By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Thanks for signing up!
Want even more news?

Check out more newsletters

Donald Trump, who is more familiar with the White House than most people, told Fox News on Sunday: "You know how many cameras they have opposite the front door of the Situation Room? [It's] where you decide on war, where you decide on nuclear."

Anyone with any knowledge of law enforcement or familiarity with the White House is skeptical about the Secret Service excuses.

A former senior Secret Service agent who has protected past presidents worries that the agency is "closing the investigation to take the Biden administration off the hook … I pray not, but I am suspicious that the Secret Service … took the road that it believed would generate the least criticism in the long term."

He points out that Biden has a history of cozy relationships with the agency.

When the head of his Secret Service detail, Dale Pupillo, suffered a death in the family in 2009, then-VP Biden flew on Air Force Two to Indiana to attend the wake.

After Pupillo retired as assistant director, he continued to work for the Biden family in a private capacity.

Kimberly Cheatle, the current Secret Service director, appointed by Biden last year, also served on his vice presidential security detail.

Hunter Biden has been assisted by Secret Service agents in past mishaps.REUTERS/Julia Nikhinson

Hunter has been rescued from various drug-related scrapes by former and serving Secret Service agents.

From the crack pipe he left inside an Arizona rental car to his gun thrown in a trash can by his ex-lover Hallie Biden, the Secret Service always seemed to arrive to clean up after him.

Hunter once told a friend, in a message left on his laptop, how his father leveraged favors through his Secret Service agents: "guys that he got their daughter into the naval academy that he had to the VP residence and let them use his apartment to stay and cost the White House, guys he paid their health insurance premiums for anonymously."

If your job is to protect the president, how far do you go?

Kerik thinks eventually the truth will leak out because "the men and women in the federal law enforcement arena are sick and tired of having to conceal and suppress [and] basically commit crimes on behalf of the Biden White House."


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    last year

miranda-devine222.png?w=76&h=69&crop=1

Courtesy of Miranda Devine.

Stay right on the case Miranda!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year
 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    last year

The idea that they don’t know is ludicrous or insanely dangerous.

No other reasonable explanations

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.2  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    last year

Is Miranda still funding polls? They're my faves!

Jaysus Miranda, Kerik is a goto guy for quotes!:

Bernard Bailey Kerik  (born September 4, 1955) is an American consultant and former police officer who was the 40th  Commissioner of the New York Police Department  from 2000 to 2001. As a convicted felon, he obtained a presidential pardon from President  Donald Trump  in 2020 for his numerous federal convictions for tax fraud, ethics violations, and criminal false statements.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @1.2    last year

I'm more concerned about your wimpy PM:

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.1    last year

I'm not a fan of foreign owned 'news' sources and especially not by Chatham Asset Management LLC.

What else ya got?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
1.2.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Hallux @1.2.2    last year

How 'bout discussing the comment and not the source????

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @1.2.2    last year

Absolutely nothing, like this.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    last year

“They didn't find anyone because they didn't want to find anyone,"

100 percent 

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1  Nerm_L  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    last year
“They didn't find anyone because they didn't want to find anyone," 100 percent 

Blackmail.  Extortion.  Leverage.  Why would a secret police give up a useful asset that can be controlled?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3  Hal A. Lujah    last year

Jesus Christ you guys are desperate. jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.2  Ronin2  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3    last year

All mighty spaghetti space god you are in denial. jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.2.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Ronin2 @3.2    last year

Denial of what?  How many people visit the White House per day?  It is such in incredibly stupid stretch of the imagination to connect a tiny piece of clearly planted evidence to the Bidens.  How pathetic that this is the best attack that the right can come up with.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.2.1    last year
It is such in incredibly stupid stretch of the imagination to connect a tiny piece of clearly planted evidence to the Bidens.

I'll take stupid shit the left says for $100 Alex.  Planted evidence?  jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif That's as laughable as saying "Biden's doing a good job".  

Here we have the FBI who worked to identify hundreds of protestors on January 6th within a few hours that can't identify the dope fiend who left coke in the WH.  

How pathetic that this is the best attack that the right can come up with.

How pathetic you are to believe the FBI, who worked to identify hundreds of protestors on January 6th within a few hours, can't identify the dope fiend who left coke in the WH. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.2.3  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.2    last year
Here we have the FBI who worked to identify hundreds of protestors on January 6th within a few hours that can't identify the dope fiend who left coke in the WH. 

Gee, I guess the "dope fiend" was smart enough not to take selfies ... @!@

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.2.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.2    last year

And what is your basis for claiming there was fingerprints and dna on the “evidence” but it was covered up?  Your feelings?  [Deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @3.2.3    last year

Or the dope fiend was a relative of Geriatric Joe.  Not the first time somebody had to cover for him.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.2.4    last year

And where did I mention anything about fingerprints or DNA? 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.2.7  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.6    last year

Oh, so it’s not even about possible actual evidence, it’s just purely about your feelings of what has to be true?

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
3.2.8  Jasper2529  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.2.2    last year
Here we have the FBI who worked to identify hundreds of protestors on January 6th within a few hours that can't identify the dope fiend who left coke in the WH. 

The FBI is STILL coming up with more Jan 6 people to haul in/question/arrest BUT they still don't know who planted the 2 pipe bombs.

Wray claimed that he didn't know how many FBI agents were on Capitol grounds or in the building that day and now he can't find fingerprints/DNA on a plastic baggie in the WH. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.9  Tessylo  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.2.1    last year

Clearly planted, BINGO, what I've been saying all along, another nothingberder, all they got!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.10  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @3.2.3    last year

Unreal eh?  The 'tourists' pretty much provided all the evidence needed at their trials via selfies and such - and now they're whining about the planted cocaine in the White House,

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.11  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.2.7    last year

So NOW evidence matters.  Your hypocrisy is showing.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.2.12  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jasper2529 @3.2.8    last year
Wray claimed that he didn't know how many FBI agents were on Capitol grounds or in the building that day and now he can't find fingerprints/DNA on a plastic baggie in the WH. 

Just like a particular laptop that was "lost".  No, they aren't covering for a crackhead.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.2.13  Hallux  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.10    last year

Their 'slavior' Ron DeBatboy is self-imploding and they are desperate for any hint of any fabricated mud-like substance to toss at Biden. It's quite sad to watch, but they have bought into it lock, stock and over the Niagara 'we' go ... wheeee!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.14  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @3.2.13    last year

'Deep state' (never explained, ever, who comprises the deep state) was just mentioned in an article regarding the former 'president' who wants to expand presidential powers (what a shocker!)  if he gets elected in 2024 - and get rid of said 'deep state'.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.15  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.14    last year
Definitions from   Oxford Languages   ·   Learn more
deep state
noun
  1. a body of people, typically influential members of government agencies or the military, believed to be involved in the secret  manipulation  or control of government policy.
 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.16  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.14    last year

As far as who comprises, look no further than the "witch hunt crews" in Congress who dedicated themselves to "get Trump at all costs" from 2015 through practically present day. Also, a prime example would be the J6 committee who was supposed to be trying to find out what went wrong on that day so that they could prevent it from happening again. Instead, like practically everything else, it turned into a "we surely have Trump now" produced for TV one ring circus.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.17  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.15    last year

Who comprises the deep state?  Another question that is never answered.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.2.18  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2.16    last year

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

A credible answer seems to be beyond some.

Those 'witch hunt crews' didn't secretly manipulate anyone despite the former 'president' talking points which you all adopt and repeat like it's gospel truth.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.19  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.18    last year

They tried to manipulate the American citizenry............and it was all about getting him out because he had the audacity to win the election. Wasn't secret I'll give you that. They did it, for the most part, in the wide open spaces. If you think for one minute there wasn't nefarious bullshit going on behind closed doors in offices all over DC, you would be sadly mistaken. Helps to have both eyes and ears open when trying to debate a point. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2.20  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.17    last year
Another question that is never answered.

I guess you missed 3.2.16............

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3    last year

Just about everyone with more than one brain cell knows who left it there.

More bad optics for the Biden's 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.3.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @3.3    last year

Isn’t it crazy that drug dealers somehow still stay in business when the only person in the country using cocaine is Hunter Biden?!

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.3.2  Tessylo  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.3.1    last year

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.3.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.3.1    last year

It's probably a safe assumption that some West Wing staffers and the friends they invite for special after hours tours are users as well.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.3.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.3.1    last year

He does have close ties with the facility.  Hasn't been proven it WASN'T his.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.3.5  JBB  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.3.4    last year

Prove it is not yours. Can't, can you?

It is impossible to prove a negative...

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.3.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @3.3.5    last year
Prove it is not yours. Can't, can you?

Jeremy can't but the WH can if he isn't on a West Wing visitor log.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.3.7  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.3.4    last year
Hasn't been proven it WASN'T his.

What would that take?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.3.8  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @3.3.7    last year

Releasing WH West Wing visitor logs from two or three days prior to finding it.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.3.10  Hallux  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.3.8    last year

At 6,000 visitors per day? Have fun!

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.3.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @3.3.10    last year

6,000 don't visit the West Wing daily.  The number that get a special after hours West wing tour on Fri night or Sat/Sun is rather small.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
3.3.12  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  dennis smith @3.3.9    last year

Sarcasm escapes you.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.3.14  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @3.3.5    last year
Prove it is not yours. Can't,

Take a look at the visitors log and all the CCTV footage.  You know, the same way it would take the Secret Service to identify the person who left it in a matter of an hour or so.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.3.15  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @3.3.7    last year
Prove it is not yours. Can't, can you?

An actual investigation.  you know, the opposite of what the SS did.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
Hunter has been rescued from various drug-related scrapes by former and serving Secret Service agents..

And who is to say that it isn't happening now.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
5  Nerm_L    last year

Who says it has to be Hunter?  This could explain a lot of the word salad intellectualism seen in the Biden administration.

 
 
 
independent Liberal
Freshman Quiet
6  independent Liberal    last year

Evidently the patriarchy in this country can score Cocaine that isn't laced with fentanyl. This is some real bullshit. We want access to clean cocaine!

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
7  Jasper2529    last year
Sorry, nobody believes that the Biden administration cares about safeguarding civil liberties unless it's part of a cover-up.

Team Biden and its colluding FBI would have been more credible if they'd had a quick meeting before issuing so many contradictory statements: 

The cocaine baggie was found:

  • in the East Wing library that only the President, First Lady, and family use. This was the first place Hazmat teams were called in to investigate. The WH was locked down.

OH, WAIT ...

  • The first family wasn't in the WH on Friday. (Yes, they were, KJP, so stop lying)

OH, WAIT ...

  • in the West Wing near the Oval Office.

OH, WAIT ...

  • in the West Wing near the Situation Room.

OH, WAIT ...

  • it was near the Situation Room by a construction worker.

OH, WAIT ...

We don't want to reveal anything the FBI/SS knows, so the investigation is "closed" and we'll go with not "infringing" on people's "civil liberties" by claiming ... 

  • there aren't any cameras (INSIDE, yes, but the entire exterior perimeter has surveillance!)
  • there aren't any fingerprints/DNA on the baggie. REALLY?? 
  • security officers inside and outside didn't "notice" anything.
  • the key for Locker 50 is still missing.
 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
7.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Jasper2529 @7    last year

256

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  1stwarrior @7.1    last year

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
8  Sparty On    last year

Follow the consequences.

Who has the most to lose if discovered?

Follow the consequences…..

 
 

Who is online






squiggy
Freefaller
Igknorantzruls
Tacos!
Jack_TX


648 visitors