╌>

An impeachment inquiry

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  2 years ago  •  133 comments

An impeachment inquiry
"Hannity, this is rising to the level of impeachment inquiry, which provides Congress the strongest power to get the rest of the knowledge and information needed," McCarthy told Fox News' Sean Hannity during a Monday night interview. "

Link to Quote: Kevin McCarthy Is Now Openly Threatening to Impeach Joe Biden (businessinsider.com)



House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is finally talking about an "impeachment inquiry" of president Joe Biden.


The House oversight committee has been interviewing witnesses for the past month and Committee Chairman Commer has been very successful at exposing Biden family LLCs which were used to hide foreign nation payments to the Biden family. It seems that 10 members of the Biden family have received $17 million from foreign nationals. Last week we heard from 2 senior IRS investigators who were pressured to go easy on the Hunter Biden investigation and not charge Hunter with a felony. The previous week we had FBI Director Wray stonewall members of congress. Senator Chuck Grassley recently released an internal FBI document containing unverified allegations President Joe Biden was involved in an illegal foreign bribery scheme. The FBI had steadfastly refused to allow the American people to see it. All of this follows a sweetheart deal given to Hunter Biden.

Speaking of the sweetheart deal, on the very eve of the Judge signing off on it the Biden lawyers, who had been busy trying to intimidate witnesses pulled this stunt:

In a  brief order  Tuesday afternoon, U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote that an employee at Latham & Watkins, a law firm representing the president’s son, had called the court clerk’s office and falsely claimed to work for a Republican lawyer in the hopes of persuading the clerk to remove documents that apparently contained Biden’s personal tax information.

Judge says member of Hunter Biden’s legal team ‘misrepresented her identity’ on eve of plea deal hearing - POLITICO

Meanwhile the White House has begun to change their response to the question of Joe Biden's continual claim that he never discussed Hunter's business dealings with him. Now, suddenly the answer is that Joe was never in business with Hunter:



Even that is now in dispute. Hunter Biden put Joe Biden on speaker phone when talking with business partners at least 2 dozen times. And now Hunter Biden's business partners are flipping. Next week Hunter's business partner Devin Archer is scheduled to testify. Archer knows quite a bit about the Biden family influence peddling. He's been through it all. Ne may not be alone. There are reports that Biden family accountant/banker Eric Schwerin is likely to roll as well. Then there is the man who flipped long ago: Tony Bobulinski. And every day we get closer to Joe Biden. It is truly amazing that a House Oversight Committee could do so much more investigating than the FBI or a supposedly independent "investigation" in the Biden machine territory of Delaware.


The house of cards is finally collapsing around Joe Biden and not even a politicized, corrupt DOJ or a corrupt, morally bankrupt, FBI could stop it.




 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

Some democrats will place their hope in the fact that 18 House Republicans were elected from blue precincts, but impeachment is now a possibility. The Biden scandal may be the biggest in US history and the coverup is equally as great. 

Also consider that they may have easily gotten away with it:

"If you're sitting in our position today, we would know none of this if Republicans had not taken the majority," McCarthy said. "We have only followed where the information has taken us."

Kevin McCarthy Is Now Openly Threatening to Impeach Joe Biden (businessinsider.com)

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1  Snuffy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    2 years ago

I said it before and I'll say it again.  If the House does impeach Biden they better have very strong evidence to show to the American people as I really doubt that the Senate would vote to convict him.  If they have the strong evidence they need to get it to the American people before the election.  If they impeach without the strong evidence (as the Democrats did last term) I believe it will backfire on them in the 24 elections.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Snuffy @1.1    2 years ago

There's no way he will be removed. It's impossible to imagine the crime he could commit that would cause Democrats to vote for his removal (assuming he remains in lockstep with the far left loons who run the Party). If he flipped back on abotion for instance, they'd impeach him tomorrow for the DOJ/Hunter Biden mess.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    2 years ago

There is a clown named Peter Schweizer who is currently a big cheese at Breitbart (Breitbart is banned as a source at NT by the way). Schweizer was on one of the right wing tv shows the other day (Fox I think) and made the allegation that the Ukrainian president Zelensky is blackmailing Joe Biden into supporting Ukraine in the war with Russia. The idea of this insanity is that Zelensky has the true story of Burisma and would spill it if Biden ever stopped sending him US money and military equipment. 

This is the sort of thing that would be part of any impeachment hearing. Why? Because without any actual evidence speculation will run wild. When Trump was impeached for the first time there was smoking gun evidence, the phone call. There was also a human witness who was an officer in the US Air Force. In Trumps second impeachment there was tons of video of Trump trying to incite violence and mayhem. 

The Republican Party, which is actually the MAGA Party at this point, is in the process of blowing itself to bits. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago
Breitbart is banned as a source at NT by the way

Where is that list posted?  I want to avoid ever using one.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.1    2 years ago

When do you ever provide a source when you post something???

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
2.1.3  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.1    2 years ago

There is no list. You have to google your source, then use the word bias, and check "Media bias fact check. If the site comes up at either end of the spectrum anywhere in the red arrow, it is not allowed.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.1.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.1.3    2 years ago

Thanks Perrie.  While I’ve never used Breitbart, I also didn’t know of BMFC.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
2.1.5  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.1.4    2 years ago

No problem. That's what I'm here for.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago
Peter Schweizer has nothing to do with the article. Nice deflection. When Trump was impeached for the first time there was smoking gun evidence, the phone call. There was also a human witness who was an officer in the US Air Force.

Bullshit. The Ukrainian president denied being pressured by Trump. 

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Zelensky declared that he had not been pressured during the July phone call, and insisted that he does not want to interfere in a foreign election. Earlier on Wednesday, the White House released a summary of the phone call, which is comprised of “notes and recollections” from staff assigned to listen to the call and is not a transcript of the call.

What your "star witness" Vindeman presented was what his TDS driven brain wanted. 

In Trumps second impeachment there was tons of video of Trump trying to incite violence and mayhem. 

Except for the portions where he didn't- that Democrats left out of their impeachment proceedings. They wanted to impeach Trump again; and they did. Period.

The Republican Party, which is actually the MAGA Party at this point, is in the process of blowing itself to bits.

Stop following the Democrat BS narrative. How many whistle blowers is it going to take for the left to admit Brandon is a criminal that has been getting paid by foreign powers since he was VP for political influence?

With Devon Archer, a star witness, that was on several conference calls with Hunter and Brandon set to testify- Democrats should just give up and try salvage what little ethics and dignity they have left.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.2.1  cjcold  replied to  Ronin2 @2.2    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
2.2.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.2    2 years ago

"Fascist" is the new "racist".  Soon to be so over used it will have no meaning at all other than "I don't like what you said".

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.2.5  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.2    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
2.2.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Texan1211 @2.2.4    2 years ago

Some excel at it.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Right Down the Center @2.2.6    2 years ago

Ya!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago
Schweizer was on one of the right wing tv shows the other day (Fox I think) and made the allegation that the Ukrainian president Zelensky is blackmailing Joe Biden into supporting Ukraine in the war with Russia.

I thought you didn't watch Fox?  At any rate, I suppose you have a link to this interview?

When Trump was impeached for the first time there was smoking gun evidence, the phone call.

And like all every other smoking gun evidence, it was just that.  Smoke. 

In Trumps second impeachment there was tons of video of Trump trying to incite violence and mayhem. 

Oh, you're referring to the altered "evidence" the Democrats put forward as fact.  And you bought right into it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.3    2 years ago
I thought you didn't watch Fox?  At any rate, I suppose you have a link to this interview?

You dont need to watch Fox News to see videos posted on other news sites. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.3.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.1    2 years ago
You dont need to watch Fox News to see videos posted on other news sites

Speaking of those other sites, I watched MSNBC last night to see if they were covering the scam by Hunter's defense team. They were gloating over what Trump might be charged with....NON-STOP.

If you want censorship start with slime ball lawyers like Andrew Weissmann.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.3.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.1    2 years ago

So you don't know if the interview you saw was the full interview.  You're relying on what somebody else is telling you.  Would also explain the lack of a link to the intverview

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
2.3.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.1    2 years ago
You dont need to watch Fox News to see videos posted on other news sites. 

So you see a snippet from a like minded source without any context and then run with it as fact.  Somehow that is not at all surprising 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.3.3    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.3.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.5    2 years ago

What I am is correct.  As expected you don't know if the interview you saw was the full interview.  And can't provide a link to the interview.

In a nutshell - You're talking out the side of your head and are now lashing out like a 4 year old because you were called out on it.

And on top of it all, you actually expect to be taken seriously.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.3.7  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.5    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.3.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @2.3.7    2 years ago

Love is a wonderful thing!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.3.10  Tessylo  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.3.9    2 years ago

I love the truth, something some folks here aren't familiar with.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago
There is a clown named Peter Schweizer who is currently a big cheese at Breitbart (Breitbart is banned as a source at NT by the way). Schweizer was on one of the right wing tv shows the other day (Fox I think) and made the allegation that the Ukrainian president Zelensky is blackmailing Joe Biden into supporting Ukraine in the war with Russia. The idea of this insanity is that Zelensky has the true story of Burisma and would spill it if Biden ever stopped sending him US money and military equipment. 

That has ZERO to do with the mountains of evidence accumulating which show Joe Biden taking bribes, selling influence and running a coverup. There is also a tom of evidence that the DOJ & FBI are corrupt and totally politicized.  BTW there is nothing wrong with Breitbart. NT shouldn't be taking advice from lefties who want censorship.


This is the sort of thing that would be part of any impeachment hearing. Why? Because without any actual evidence speculation will run wild. When Trump was impeached for the first time there was smoking gun evidence, the phone call. There was also a human witness who was an officer in the US Air Force. In Trumps second impeachment there was tons of video of Trump trying to incite violence and mayhem. 

The democrats ran two fraudulent impeachments based on their fantasies. Now maybe we'll have a REAL one based on HIGH CRIMES!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.4.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.4.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4    2 years ago
That has ZERO to do with the mountains of evidence accumulating which show Joe Biden taking bribes, seelling influence and running a coverup. There is also a tom of evidence that the DOJ & FBI are corrupt and totally politicized.  BTW there is nothing wrong with Breitbart. NT shouldn't be taking advice from lefties who want censorship.

When will the world see this "evidence"?

What they have now is the equivalent of impeaching Trump based on the Steele Dossier, something that did not happen. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.4.1    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.4.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4.3    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.4.2    2 years ago
When will the world see this "evidence"?

We have already seen a good deal of it, starting with the document that had to be ripped from the clutches of the corrupt FBI.

Why haven't we been able to look at the contents of the laptop, John?

Just wait until Archer testifies. My God what will the left do then?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.4.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4.5    2 years ago

The Republicans have seen the laptop. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.4.6    2 years ago

"The laptop has been authenticated and several signatories of a now-infamous letter contending the story was dubious have since been   outed   as Biden campaign donors. Documents released by Congress show the FBI authenticated the laptop long before intelligence experts tried to portray it as disinformation.

Former Acting CIA Director Michael Morell, who   solicited signatures   for the letter, has admitted that his effort to compile the letter was "triggered" by a phone call from now-Secretary of State Antony Blinken. He has further admitted that the letter was an effort to hand then-candidate Biden a talking point for use in the presidential debate against then-President Donald Trump.

Communications from Morell seeking signatures show explicit references to the letter's purpose of bolstering the Biden campaign. Morell told former CIA Director John Brennan, for example, he was "trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue."

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.4.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4.8    2 years ago

The Republicans have seen the laptop. If there is something so incriminating on there, what are they waiting for? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.10  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.4.9    2 years ago

They also saw a document that the FBI first denied existed and then wanted censored from the public.

Again: Why hasn't the corrupt FBI realeased the laptop ???

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.4.11  cjcold  replied to  JohnRussell @2.4.2    2 years ago

The Steele Dossier was just a small part of the overwhelming evidence.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.13  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.4    2 years ago

What alleged high crimes by President Biden as opposed to the actual ones by the former 'president'?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.14  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @2.4.2    2 years ago

How many years do we have to wait for all of this alleged evidence?  Hasn't it already been going on two years now?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.15  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @2.4.9    2 years ago

Didn't they already get the dick pics that MTG showed in a congressional hearing - of which she had posters made and are on her bedroom wall.  Big Hunter - lol!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.17  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.4.12    2 years ago

NO, it wasn't even disproven, 'roundly' or otherwise.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.18  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.4.16    2 years ago

Deflection.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.21  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.4.20    2 years ago

I won't answer

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.4.22  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @2.4.21    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.24  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.4.23    2 years ago

[deleted.]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.4.26  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.4.25    2 years ago

No, you don't.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.4.28  goose is back  replied to  Texan1211 @2.4.27    2 years ago
Every time I have asked the question, leftists never can answer it

Crickets.........

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.4.29  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  goose is back @2.4.28    2 years ago

I guess posting memes is all they have.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.5  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago

Quibble about the source all you want, but the evidence is out there for all to see, and growing. The Biden goose is being cooked as we speak

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.5.1  cjcold  replied to  Greg Jones @2.5    2 years ago

The evidence shows that there is no evidence. Only far right wing fascism.

The biggest nothingburger propaganda smear campaign ever.

Nothing but far right wing lies and innuendo.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.5.3  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @2.5.1    2 years ago

They've never had anything and they never will.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.5.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  cjcold @2.5.1    2 years ago
The evidence shows that there is no evidence.

Only if you're not paying attention

Only far right wing fascism.

You really need to look up the definition of "fascism".

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.5.7  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.5.5    2 years ago

Y'all got nothin' and you know it!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
2.5.9  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @2.5.8    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.5.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @2.5.9    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.6  Jasper2529  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.7  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 years ago
(Breitbart is banned as a source at NT by the way).

See 2.1.3 below for clarification

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3  evilone    2 years ago

There is no impeachment inquiry. McCarthy walked his tone back yesterday. The House does NOT have the votes to bring impeachment charges. It would be different if there were actual evidence of wrong doing, but so far nothing but speculation and inuendo.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  evilone @3    2 years ago

How about we just give the 25th a shot............................

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1    2 years ago

When every government official fails to stop a president from opening the southern border and that president is seriously senile.... it may be time for that.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.2  evilone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1    2 years ago
How about we just give the 25th a shot............................

Good luck with that. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  evilone @3.1.2    2 years ago

Given the subject, it should be a lot easier than an impeachment at this point. He provides several instances of evidence almost hourly.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.4  evilone  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1.3    2 years ago
He provides several instances of evidence almost hourly.

Maybe they'll get lucky and Uncle Joe can be pushed out of office. It would be hilariously to watch the Dems scramble for a viable candidate.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.5  cjcold  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.1    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
3.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  evilone @3.1.4    2 years ago

Hilarious to you maybe.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
3.1.8  Tessylo  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.7    2 years ago

See comment 3.1.5

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
3.1.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.8    2 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  evilone @3    2 years ago
There is no impeachment inquiry.

There is not currently one?

Oh wow...thanks for the update

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.2.1  evilone  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2    2 years ago
There is not currently one?

panem et circenses

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
3.3  Tessylo  replied to  evilone @3    2 years ago

They got nothin'!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

Time to start them for Biden and garland.

Garland’s  failure to appoint a special prosecutor despite the clear necessity ( it’s designed for situations exactly like this) means a Republican president will never appoint another one going  forward.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    2 years ago

Don't forget the low hanging fruit AKA: Alejandro Mayorkas

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5  Hallux    2 years ago

To sum up, innuendo=evidence. Thanks for paving the road Rudy et alia!

"Revenge is the naked idol of the worship of a semi-barbarous age."

P.B. Shelly

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Hallux @5    2 years ago

"innuendo=evidence"

That seems to be the slimy Democrats favorite method.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.1.1  Hallux  replied to  Greg Jones @5.1    2 years ago

A method adopted by Post-Republicans whose raison d'être is to slither in the slime.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
5.1.2  cjcold  replied to  Greg Jones @5.1    2 years ago

Blaming democrats for right wing fascist propaganda is disingenuous.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
5.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @5.1    2 years ago

Projection.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
5.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @5.1.1    2 years ago

PERFECT!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
5.1.6  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @5.1.2    2 years ago

PD&D is pretty much all they have cj.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6  author  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

Business Insider reported that Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali, whom President Biden tapped to serve on the Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad, purchased some of Hunter's art at an unspecified time. She gave $13,414 to the Biden campaign and $29,700 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
6.1  cjcold  replied to  Vic Eldred @6    2 years ago

Yet more innuendo? [Deleted]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7  author  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

Joe Biden has repeatedly insisted that he knew nothing about his son's business dealings and never met with Hunter's business partners.

White House  visitor logs , however, show that seven of the first son's business associates from Rosemont Seneca Advisors, his now-defunct investment firm, visited the White House over 80 times during his vice presidential tenure.



It is backdoor bribery!

Remember when the lefties on here said let's wait and see what happens when Hunter finally goes to sell the paintings?

Lefties, the facts are in!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
7.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    2 years ago

lol

what facts?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  author  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

F195dQHXwAkqVbo?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9  author  Vic Eldred    2 years ago

"Hunter Biden’s  plea agreement with the Justice Department appeared to unexpectedly crumble during an initial hearing on the case on Wednesday.

Biden, 53, made his first federal court appearance in Wilmington, Del., where he was set to plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of willful failure to pay income taxes.

But U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika, who is overseeing the case, expressed concern about the terms of the agreement, according to CNN and the Associated Press.

NBC reported lawyers for both sides were continuing to huddle nearly two hours after the plea hearing began."

DEVELOPING




bidenhunter_072623_ap_juliocortez.jpg?w=2000&ssl=1

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @9    2 years ago

Biden thought this sweetheart deal protected him in perpetuity across the universe for all possible crimes.  When that fell through, he got back in his tax payer Funded motorcade to return to daddy’s house.   No deal.

Why would he ever  think the proposed plea deal would protect him from foreign agent prosecution?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1    2 years ago

Looks like that "sweetheart deal" just turned to shit.

Hunter Biden's plea deal with the Justice Department on two tax misdemeanor tax charges fell apart Wednesday after the federal judge overseeing the case said she had "concerns" about the parties seemingly linking the deal on the tax charges with the agreement on the felony firearm possession charge.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
9.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Vic Eldred @9    2 years ago

Jeopardy indeed:

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
10  Sean Treacy    2 years ago
From the start, the judge seemed highly skeptical of the unusual deal — which offered Hunter Biden broad immunity from prosecution in perpetuity, questioning why it had been filed under a provision that gave her no legal authority to reject it. When she asked Leo Wise, a prosecutor, if there was any precedent for the kind of deal being proposed, he replied, “No, your honor”

But I was told this is how all prosecutions are handled

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
10.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Sean Treacy @10    2 years ago

Maybe Hunter got this offer since he is a privileged white wealthy man or maybe because he is the son of POTUS or both.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
10.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @10.1    2 years ago

His dad’s  DOJ just conceded in court that hunter’s deal is unprecedented.  Merely  being a white man ( who’s wealthy by donations from his father’s friends) isn’t  enough to explain that.

But somehow “Giuliani lied” is what the media want to talk about. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
11  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

How long would it take for democrats to have filed impeachment charges if Trump’s DOJ teamed up with lawyers for Eric trump for a plea agreement that protected him from jail on three categories of felonies and so handcuffed the judge that the DOJ was forced to admit the agreement was “unprecedented”?

impeachment charges would have been filed  before the ink was dry on the judge’s signature. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
11.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @11    2 years ago
How long would it take for democrats to have filed impeachment charges if Trump’s DOJ teamed up with lawyers for Eric trump for a plea agreement that protected him from jail on three categories of felonies and so handcuffed the judge that the DOJ was forced to admit the agreement was “unprecedented”?

They'd by crying for the next decade.  Just like they have been crying about losing an election almost a decade ago. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
11.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @11.1    2 years ago

It would be amusing to have visit an alternate universe where President Trump's DOJ was engaged in these sort of shenanigans to protect  Trump kid and watch the current "nothing to see here " crowd's heads explode in outrage

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12  cjcold    2 years ago

Far right wing Russian bots just get crazier every day.

 
 

Who is online





334 visitors