An impeachment inquiry
Link to Quote: Kevin McCarthy Is Now Openly Threatening to Impeach Joe Biden (businessinsider.com)
House Speaker Kevin McCarthy is finally talking about an "impeachment inquiry" of president Joe Biden.
The House oversight committee has been interviewing witnesses for the past month and Committee Chairman Commer has been very successful at exposing Biden family LLCs which were used to hide foreign nation payments to the Biden family. It seems that 10 members of the Biden family have received $17 million from foreign nationals. Last week we heard from 2 senior IRS investigators who were pressured to go easy on the Hunter Biden investigation and not charge Hunter with a felony. The previous week we had FBI Director Wray stonewall members of congress. Senator Chuck Grassley recently released an internal FBI document containing unverified allegations President Joe Biden was involved in an illegal foreign bribery scheme. The FBI had steadfastly refused to allow the American people to see it. All of this follows a sweetheart deal given to Hunter Biden.
Speaking of the sweetheart deal, on the very eve of the Judge signing off on it the Biden lawyers, who had been busy trying to intimidate witnesses pulled this stunt:
In a brief order Tuesday afternoon, U.S. District Court Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote that an employee at Latham & Watkins, a law firm representing the president’s son, had called the court clerk’s office and falsely claimed to work for a Republican lawyer in the hopes of persuading the clerk to remove documents that apparently contained Biden’s personal tax information.
Judge says member of Hunter Biden’s legal team ‘misrepresented her identity’ on eve of plea deal hearing - POLITICO
Meanwhile the White House has begun to change their response to the question of Joe Biden's continual claim that he never discussed Hunter's business dealings with him. Now, suddenly the answer is that Joe was never in business with Hunter:
Even that is now in dispute. Hunter Biden put Joe Biden on speaker phone when talking with business partners at least 2 dozen times. And now Hunter Biden's business partners are flipping. Next week Hunter's business partner Devin Archer is scheduled to testify. Archer knows quite a bit about the Biden family influence peddling. He's been through it all. Ne may not be alone. There are reports that Biden family accountant/banker Eric Schwerin is likely to roll as well. Then there is the man who flipped long ago: Tony Bobulinski. And every day we get closer to Joe Biden. It is truly amazing that a House Oversight Committee could do so much more investigating than the FBI or a supposedly independent "investigation" in the Biden machine territory of Delaware.
The house of cards is finally collapsing around Joe Biden and not even a politicized, corrupt DOJ or a corrupt, morally bankrupt, FBI could stop it.
Tags
Who is online
549 visitors
Some democrats will place their hope in the fact that 18 House Republicans were elected from blue precincts, but impeachment is now a possibility. The Biden scandal may be the biggest in US history and the coverup is equally as great.
Also consider that they may have easily gotten away with it:
"If you're sitting in our position today, we would know none of this if Republicans had not taken the majority," McCarthy said. "We have only followed where the information has taken us."
Kevin McCarthy Is Now Openly Threatening to Impeach Joe Biden (businessinsider.com)
I said it before and I'll say it again. If the House does impeach Biden they better have very strong evidence to show to the American people as I really doubt that the Senate would vote to convict him. If they have the strong evidence they need to get it to the American people before the election. If they impeach without the strong evidence (as the Democrats did last term) I believe it will backfire on them in the 24 elections.
There's no way he will be removed. It's impossible to imagine the crime he could commit that would cause Democrats to vote for his removal (assuming he remains in lockstep with the far left loons who run the Party). If he flipped back on abotion for instance, they'd impeach him tomorrow for the DOJ/Hunter Biden mess.
There is a clown named Peter Schweizer who is currently a big cheese at Breitbart (Breitbart is banned as a source at NT by the way). Schweizer was on one of the right wing tv shows the other day (Fox I think) and made the allegation that the Ukrainian president Zelensky is blackmailing Joe Biden into supporting Ukraine in the war with Russia. The idea of this insanity is that Zelensky has the true story of Burisma and would spill it if Biden ever stopped sending him US money and military equipment.
This is the sort of thing that would be part of any impeachment hearing. Why? Because without any actual evidence speculation will run wild. When Trump was impeached for the first time there was smoking gun evidence, the phone call. There was also a human witness who was an officer in the US Air Force. In Trumps second impeachment there was tons of video of Trump trying to incite violence and mayhem.
The Republican Party, which is actually the MAGA Party at this point, is in the process of blowing itself to bits.
Where is that list posted? I want to avoid ever using one.
When do you ever provide a source when you post something???
[deleted]
There is no list. You have to google your source, then use the word bias, and check "Media bias fact check. If the site comes up at either end of the spectrum anywhere in the red arrow, it is not allowed.
Thanks Perrie. While I’ve never used Breitbart, I also didn’t know of BMFC.
No problem. That's what I'm here for.
Bullshit. The Ukrainian president denied being pressured by Trump.
What your "star witness" Vindeman presented was what his TDS driven brain wanted.
Except for the portions where he didn't- that Democrats left out of their impeachment proceedings. They wanted to impeach Trump again; and they did. Period.
Stop following the Democrat BS narrative. How many whistle blowers is it going to take for the left to admit Brandon is a criminal that has been getting paid by foreign powers since he was VP for political influence?
With Devon Archer, a star witness, that was on several conference calls with Hunter and Brandon set to testify- Democrats should just give up and try salvage what little ethics and dignity they have left.
[deleted]
He presented FACTS while you presented nothing except further demonstration of how to misuse and abuse the word fascist..
"Fascist" is the new "racist". Soon to be so over used it will have no meaning at all other than "I don't like what you said".
It is simply inexcusable, deliberate ignorance.
[deleted]
Some excel at it.
Ya!
I thought you didn't watch Fox? At any rate, I suppose you have a link to this interview?
And like all every other smoking gun evidence, it was just that. Smoke.
Oh, you're referring to the altered "evidence" the Democrats put forward as fact. And you bought right into it.
You dont need to watch Fox News to see videos posted on other news sites.
Speaking of those other sites, I watched MSNBC last night to see if they were covering the scam by Hunter's defense team. They were gloating over what Trump might be charged with....NON-STOP.
If you want censorship start with slime ball lawyers like Andrew Weissmann.
So you don't know if the interview you saw was the full interview. You're relying on what somebody else is telling you. Would also explain the lack of a link to the intverview
So you see a snippet from a like minded source without any context and then run with it as fact. Somehow that is not at all surprising
[deleted]
What I am is correct. As expected you don't know if the interview you saw was the full interview. And can't provide a link to the interview.
In a nutshell - You're talking out the side of your head and are now lashing out like a 4 year old because you were called out on it.
And on top of it all, you actually expect to be taken seriously.
[deleted]
No, he is merely pointing out facts to you.
Strange that NOW somehow context doesn't matter to you.
Love is a wonderful thing!
I love the truth, something some folks here aren't familiar with.
That has ZERO to do with the mountains of evidence accumulating which show Joe Biden taking bribes, selling influence and running a coverup. There is also a tom of evidence that the DOJ & FBI are corrupt and totally politicized. BTW there is nothing wrong with Breitbart. NT shouldn't be taking advice from lefties who want censorship.
This is the sort of thing that would be part of any impeachment hearing. Why? Because without any actual evidence speculation will run wild. When Trump was impeached for the first time there was smoking gun evidence, the phone call. There was also a human witness who was an officer in the US Air Force. In Trumps second impeachment there was tons of video of Trump trying to incite violence and mayhem.
The democrats ran two fraudulent impeachments based on their fantasies. Now maybe we'll have a REAL one based on HIGH CRIMES!
[Deleted]
When will the world see this "evidence"?
What they have now is the equivalent of impeaching Trump based on the Steele Dossier, something that did not happen.
[Deleted]
[Deleted]
We have already seen a good deal of it, starting with the document that had to be ripped from the clutches of the corrupt FBI.
Why haven't we been able to look at the contents of the laptop, John?
Just wait until Archer testifies. My God what will the left do then?
The Republicans have seen the laptop.
Seriously:
Why do you think some foreign governments and companies picked Hunter Biden's name out of a hat and said "Let's rain millions on this guy and his family for nothing!"?
"The laptop has been authenticated and several signatories of a now-infamous letter contending the story was dubious have since been outed as Biden campaign donors. Documents released by Congress show the FBI authenticated the laptop long before intelligence experts tried to portray it as disinformation.
Former Acting CIA Director Michael Morell, who solicited signatures for the letter, has admitted that his effort to compile the letter was "triggered" by a phone call from now-Secretary of State Antony Blinken. He has further admitted that the letter was an effort to hand then-candidate Biden a talking point for use in the presidential debate against then-President Donald Trump.
Communications from Morell seeking signatures show explicit references to the letter's purpose of bolstering the Biden campaign. Morell told former CIA Director John Brennan, for example, he was "trying to give the campaign, particularly during the debate on Thursday, a talking point to push back on Trump on this issue."
The Republicans have seen the laptop. If there is something so incriminating on there, what are they waiting for?
They also saw a document that the FBI first denied existed and then wanted censored from the public.
Again: Why hasn't the corrupt FBI realeased the laptop ???
The Steele Dossier was just a small part of the overwhelming evidence.
was roundly disproven.
There, now it is at least accurate.
Only gullible individuals still cling bitterly to the Steele Dossier.
Sensible folk know better.
What alleged high crimes by President Biden as opposed to the actual ones by the former 'president'?
How many years do we have to wait for all of this alleged evidence? Hasn't it already been going on two years now?
Didn't they already get the dick pics that MTG showed in a congressional hearing - of which she had posters made and are on her bedroom wall. Big Hunter - lol!
And how many years now have you been waiting for the mythical pee tapes to appear?
NO, it wasn't even disproven, 'roundly' or otherwise.
Deflection.
Well, here in the real world, it was.
One which you can't answer, I noticed!
I won't answer
[deleted]
Replace "won't" with "can't" and you'll really be onto something there!
[deleted.]
I suppose even the staunchest Biden sycophants are at a complete and utter loss to produce any plausible explanation of why foreigners would rain money on a drug addict.
[deleted]
No, you don't.
Yes, I really, really do.
Every time I have asked the question, leftists never can answer it.
I understand examining facts and making up their own minds based on those facts isn't what the trained sycophants do.
Thus, never an answer.
Oh well. I have hopes in the next few weeks Biden's handlers will lay out the arguments for leftists to use.
Crickets.........
I guess posting memes is all they have.
Quibble about the source all you want, but the evidence is out there for all to see, and growing. The Biden goose is being cooked as we speak
The evidence shows that there is no evidence. Only far right wing fascism.
The biggest nothingburger propaganda smear campaign ever.
Nothing but far right wing lies and innuendo.
They've never had anything and they never will.
Only if you're not paying attention
You really need to look up the definition of "fascism".
In YOUR opinion, why would any foreign company or government choose Hunter Biden (a known drug addict) to rain millions down on for nothing?
This appears to be a question which is completely stumping some folks here.
Is it even possible they know how silly some invented excuse will be?
Y'all got nothin' and you know it!
Why can't you answer a simple question?
In YOUR opinion, why would any foreign company or government choose Hunter Biden (a known drug addict) to rain millions down on for nothing?
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[Deleted]
See 2.1.3 below for clarification
There is no impeachment inquiry. McCarthy walked his tone back yesterday. The House does NOT have the votes to bring impeachment charges. It would be different if there were actual evidence of wrong doing, but so far nothing but speculation and inuendo.
How about we just give the 25th a shot............................
When every government official fails to stop a president from opening the southern border and that president is seriously senile.... it may be time for that.
Good luck with that.
Given the subject, it should be a lot easier than an impeachment at this point. He provides several instances of evidence almost hourly.
Maybe they'll get lucky and Uncle Joe can be pushed out of office. It would be hilariously to watch the Dems scramble for a viable candidate.
[deleted]
Hilarious to you maybe.
Extremely!
See comment 3.1.5
[deleted]
Saw it.
And???????????????????????????????
There is not currently one?
Oh wow...thanks for the update
panem et circenses
They got nothin'!
Time to start them for Biden and garland.
Garland’s failure to appoint a special prosecutor despite the clear necessity ( it’s designed for situations exactly like this) means a Republican president will never appoint another one going forward.
Don't forget the low hanging fruit AKA: Alejandro Mayorkas
To sum up, innuendo=evidence. Thanks for paving the road Rudy et alia!
"Revenge is the naked idol of the worship of a semi-barbarous age."
P.B. Shelly
"innuendo=evidence"
That seems to be the slimy Democrats favorite method.
A method adopted by Post-Republicans whose raison d'être is to slither in the slime.
Blaming democrats for right wing fascist propaganda is disingenuous.
So is claiming the Steele Dossier is valid.
Projection.
PERFECT!
PD&D is pretty much all they have cj.
Business Insider reported that Elizabeth Hirsh Naftali, whom President Biden tapped to serve on the Commission for the Preservation of America's Heritage Abroad, purchased some of Hunter's art at an unspecified time. She gave $13,414 to the Biden campaign and $29,700 to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
Yet more innuendo? [Deleted]
Seems like the misuse and abuse of the word fascism continues unabated.
Joe Biden has repeatedly insisted that he knew nothing about his son's business dealings and never met with Hunter's business partners.
White House visitor logs , however, show that seven of the first son's business associates from Rosemont Seneca Advisors, his now-defunct investment firm, visited the White House over 80 times during his vice presidential tenure.
It is backdoor bribery!
Remember when the lefties on here said let's wait and see what happens when Hunter finally goes to sell the paintings?
Lefties, the facts are in!
Some folks foolishly believe Joe knew nothing about any of his beloved son's business dealings or was unaware of the Biden Family raking in millions from foreigners.
The most amazing set of coincidences never before seen follow the Bidens.
Right now Hunter Biden's plea deal is in serious jeopardy.
If the Jude refuses to sign on to it, Joe Biden's troubles will escalate.
Joe Biden is beyond delusional if he believes thinking people are swallowing his swill.
I don't think any reasonable human being doubts that Joe Biden ran an influence peddling scheme through his son.
As of yet you have provided no evidence of knowing any.
You wouldn't be acquainted with them.
Exactly, I think (no proof yet) that Hunter promised significant influence over dad for large amounts of foreign money. Joe might have done no more than to turn a blind eye to his son's activity like he did to his son's drug/sex addiction issues and financial troubles.
And as evidenced by posts here, we aren't exactly dealing with Mensa members or people who aren't gullible.
Who are these reasonable humans?
LOL!
I think you have that backwards.
Who are those 'thinking' people you're referring to?
I don't see evidence of that from certain folks.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
How is it that Russian bots always make the same spelling mistakes?
How is it that other Russian bots always point out their own comrades' mistakes?
Beats me.
lol
what facts?
"Hunter Biden’s plea agreement with the Justice Department appeared to unexpectedly crumble during an initial hearing on the case on Wednesday.
Biden, 53, made his first federal court appearance in Wilmington, Del., where he was set to plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of willful failure to pay income taxes.
But U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika, who is overseeing the case, expressed concern about the terms of the agreement, according to CNN and the Associated Press.
NBC reported lawyers for both sides were continuing to huddle nearly two hours after the plea hearing began."
DEVELOPING
Biden thought this sweetheart deal protected him in perpetuity across the universe for all possible crimes. When that fell through, he got back in his tax payer Funded motorcade to return to daddy’s house. No deal.
Why would he ever think the proposed plea deal would protect him from foreign agent prosecution?
Looks like that "sweetheart deal" just turned to shit.
Jeopardy indeed:
But I was told this is how all prosecutions are handled
Maybe Hunter got this offer since he is a privileged white wealthy man or maybe because he is the son of POTUS or both.
His dad’s DOJ just conceded in court that hunter’s deal is unprecedented. Merely being a white man ( who’s wealthy by donations from his father’s friends) isn’t enough to explain that.
But somehow “Giuliani lied” is what the media want to talk about.
How long would it take for democrats to have filed impeachment charges if Trump’s DOJ teamed up with lawyers for Eric trump for a plea agreement that protected him from jail on three categories of felonies and so handcuffed the judge that the DOJ was forced to admit the agreement was “unprecedented”?
impeachment charges would have been filed before the ink was dry on the judge’s signature.
They'd by crying for the next decade. Just like they have been crying about losing an election almost a decade ago.
It would be amusing to have visit an alternate universe where President Trump's DOJ was engaged in these sort of shenanigans to protect Trump kid and watch the current "nothing to see here " crowd's heads explode in outrage
Far right wing Russian bots just get crazier every day.
You should report your findings to the site owner.
She will probably be surprised!