╌>

The Americans Who Yearn for Anti-American Propaganda

  

Category:  Op/Ed

Via:  hallux  •  one month ago  •  8 comments

By:   Anne Applebaum - The Atlantic

The Americans Who Yearn for Anti-American Propaganda

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Over the past decade, China has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in its international media network. The Xinhua News Agency, China Global Television Network, China Radio International, and the  China Daily   web portal produce material in multiple languages and use multiple social-media accounts to amplify it. This huge investment produces plenty of positive coverage of China and benign depictions of the authoritarian world more broadly. Nevertheless, Beijing is also aware that news marked “made in China” doesn’t have anything like the influence that local people, using local media, would have if they were uttering the same messages.

That, in the regime’s thinking, is the ultimate form of propaganda: Get the natives to say it for you. Train them, persuade them, pay them—it doesn’t matter; whatever their motives, they’ll be more convincing. Chinese leaders call this tactic “borrowing boats to reach the sea.”

When a handful of employees at RT, the Russian state television network formerly known as Russia Today, allegedly offered to   provide lucrative payments to the talking heads of Tenet Media , a Tennessee-based far-right influencer team ,   borrowing boats to reach the sea was exactly what they had in mind. According to a federal indictment released last week, RT employees spent nearly $10 million over the course of a year—money “laundered through a network of foreign shell entities,” including companies in Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, the Czech Republic, and Hungary—with the aim of supporting Tenet Media’s work and shaping the messages in its videos.

The indictment makes clear that the influencers—propagandists, in fact—must have had a pretty good idea where the money was coming from. They were told that their benefactor was “Eduard Grigoriann,” a vaguely Euro-Armenian “investor.” They tried to Google him and found nothing; they asked for information and were shown a résumé that included a photograph of a man gazing through the window of a private jet. Sometimes, the messages from Grigoriann’s team were time-stamped in a way that indicated they were written in Moscow. Sometimes the alleged employees of Grigoriann’s alleged company misspelled Grigoriann’s name. Unsurprisingly, in their private conversations, the Tenet Media team occasionally referred to its mysterious backers as “the Russians.”

But the real question is not whether the talking heads of Tenet Media—the founders, Lauren Chen and Liam Donovan, who were the main interlocutors with the Russians, but also Tim Pool, Lauren Southern, Dave Rubin, and Benny Johnson—had guessed the true identity of their “investor.” Nor does it matter whether they knew who was really paying them to make videos that backed up absurd pro-Moscow narratives (that a terrorist attack at a Moscow shopping mall, loudly claimed by the Islamic State, was really carried out by Ukrainians, for example). More important is whether the   audience   knew, and I think we can safely say that it did not. And now that Tenet Media fans do know who funds their favorite influencers, it’s entirely possible that they won’t care.

This is because the messages formed part of a larger stream of authoritarian ideas that are now ubiquitous on the far right, and that make coherent sense as a package. They denounce U.S. institutions as broken, irreparable:  If Donald Trump doesn’t win, it’s because the election is rigged.   They imply American society is degenerate : White people are discriminated against in America . They suggest immigrants are part of a coordinated invasion, designed to destroy what remains of the culture:  Illegal immigrants are eating household pets , a trope featured during this week’s presidential debate. For the Russians, the amplification of this narrative matters more than specific arguments about Ukraine. As the indictment delicately explains, many of the Russian-sponsored videos produced by Tenet Media were more relevant to American politics than to the Ukraine war: “While the views expressed in the videos are not uniform, the subject matter and content of the videos are often consistent with the Government of Russia’s interest in amplifying U.S. domestic divisions.”

But these themes are also consistent with the Trump campaign’s interest in amplifying U.S. domestic divisions. People who have come to distrust the basic institutions of American democracy, who feel aggrieved and rejected, who believe that immigrants are invaders who have been deliberately sent to replace them—these are not people who will necessarily be bothered that their favorite YouTubers, according to prosecutors, were being sponsored by a violent, lawless foreign dictator who repeatedly threatens the U.S. and its allies with nuclear armageddon. On the contrary, many of them now despise their own country so much that they might be pleased to hear there are foreigners who, like the ex-president, want to burn it all down. If you truly hate modern America—its diversity, its immense energy, its raucous debate—then you won’t mind hearing it denounced by other people who hate it and wish it ill. On X earlier this year, Chen  referred to the U.S.  as a “tyranny,” for example, a phrase that could easily have been produced by one of the Russian propagandists who regularly decry the U.S. on the evening news.

These pundits and their audience are not manipulated by Russian, Chinese, and other autocrats who sometimes fill their social-media feeds. The relationship goes the other way around; Russian, Chinese, and other influence operations are designed to spread the views of Americans who actively and enthusiastically support the autocratic narrative. You may have laughed at Trump’s rant on Tuesday night: “The people that came in. They’re eating the cats. They’re eating—they’re eating the pets of the people that live there. And this is what’s happening in our country. And it’s a shame.” But that language is meant to reach an audience already primed to believe that Kamala Harris, as Trump himself said, is “destroying this country. And if she becomes president, this country doesn’t have a chance of success. Not only success. We’ll end up being Venezuela on steroids.”

Plenty of other people are trying to reach that audience too. Indeed, the Grigoriann scheme was not the only one revealed in the past few days. In a separate case that has received less attention, the FBI last week  filed an affidavit  in a Pennsylvania courthouse supporting the seizure of 32 internet domains. The document describes another team of Russian operatives who have engaged in typosquatting—setting up fake news websites whose URLs resemble real ones. The affidavit mentions, for example, washingtonpost.pm, washingtonpost.ltd, fox-news.in, fox-news.top, and forward.pw, but we know there are others. This same propaganda group, known to European investigators as Doppelganger, has also set up similar sites in multiple European languages. Typosquatters do not necessarily seek to drive people to the fake sites. Instead, the fake URLs they provide make posts on Facebook, X, and other social media appear credible. When someone is quickly scrolling, they might not check whether a sensational headline purporting to be from  The Washington Post  is in fact linked to washingtonpost.pm, the fake site, as opposed to washingtonpost.com, the real one.

But this deception, too, would not work without people who are prepared to believe it. Just as the Grigoriann scam assumed the existence of pundits and viewers who don’t really care who is paying for the videos that make them angry, typosquatting—like all information laundering—assumes the existence of a credulous audience that is already willing to accept outrageous headlines and not ask too many questions. Again, although Russian teams seek to cultivate, influence, and amplify this audience—especially in Pennsylvania, apparently, because in Moscow, they know which swing states matter too—the Russians didn’t create it. Rather, it was created by Trump and the pundits who support him, and merely amplified by foreigners who want our democracy to fail.

These influencers and audiences are cynical, even nihilistic. They have deep distrust in American institutions, especially those connected to elections. We talk a lot about how authoritarianism might arrive in America someday, but in this sense, it’s already here: The United States has a very large population of people who look for, absorb, and believe anti-American messages wherever they are found, whether on the real Fox News or the fake fox-news.in. Trump was speaking directly to them on Tuesday. What happens next is up to other Americans, the ones who don’t believe that their country is cratering into chaos and don’t want a leader who will  burn it all down . In the meantime, there are plenty of boats available to borrow for Russians who want to reach the sea.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    one month ago

Reality at most times is unsettling and I expect an unhealthy half of NT to be on full grumble mode.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @1    one month ago

25% of republican voters think trump should seize power if he loses the election. let that sink in ...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    one month ago
This is because the messages formed part of a larger stream of authoritarian ideas that are now ubiquitous on the far right, and that make coherent sense as a package. They denounce U.S. institutions as broken, irreparable:  If Donald Trump doesn’t win, it’s because the election is rigged.   They imply American society is degenerate : White people are discriminated against in America . They suggest immigrants are part of a coordinated invasion, designed to destroy what remains of the culture:  Illegal immigrants are eating household pets , a trope featured during this week’s presidential debate. For the Russians, the amplification of this narrative matters more than specific arguments about Ukraine. As the indictment delicately explains, many of the Russian-sponsored videos produced by Tenet Media were more relevant to American politics than to the Ukraine war: “While the views expressed in the videos are not uniform, the subject matter and content of the videos are often consistent with the Government of Russia’s interest in amplifying U.S. domestic divisions.”

This all traces back to the second half of 2008 when it appeared to be a reality that Obama would become the first black president.  That reality more or less coincided with the first predictions by social scientists that America would "soon" become a majority minority country (whites would become the minority). It freaked people out and led directly to the belief that whites would lose "their" country.  This culture shock led to birtherism and in fairly short order Donald Trump as politician.  The rest is , ahem, history. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    one month ago

Why does the far right love Russia so much?

  1. th?id=ODLS.20132dfe-1bd6-4063-ad59-6786aa37a4ab&w=32&h=32&qlt=98&pcl=fffffa&r=0&o=6&pid=1.2
    NPR

    A growing number of white nationalists identify with Vladimir Putin

    WEB May 9, 2022  · FLORIDO: In the third month of   Russia 's attack on Ukraine, international observers braced for what   Russian   President Vladimir   Putin   might say in his big speech.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3    one month ago
Why does the far right love Russia so much?

Beats me, 180 degrees from the 30’s-70’s.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @3    one month ago

OMG! I spent 9 years in the military defending this country against the Soviet Union and IMO it's no better today than before it broke up.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    one month ago

Horseshoe theory.. Far left and far right both go down this rabbit hole.  Christian Nationalists are under your pillow!  Cops kills thousands of unarmed blacks every year!

Though it's interesting the article doesn't specify that Lauren Chen, who was actually dealing with Russians, pushed anti-trump propaganda and urged her followers not to vote for him.   

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5  Buzz of the Orient    one month ago

(Self-deleted by Buzz)

 
 

Who is online


Igknorantzruls
Thomas
jw


63 visitors