╌>

Word Salad City

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  4 weeks ago  •  163 comments

Word Salad City
The things that would concern me is when she doesn’t want to answer a question, her habit is to kind of go to Word Salad City,” Axelrod told a CNN panel after the event. “She did that on a couple of answers. One was on Israel, Anderson asked a direct question: ‘Would you be stronger on Israel than Trump?’ And there was a seven-minute answer, but none of it related to the question he was asking.”

Yesterday former Obama White House advisor, David Axelrod stated the obvious after Kamala Harris turned in another terrible performance at a CNN town hall event Wednesday night. She was supposed to close the deal at that event but somehow, she made things worse. Dana Bash said it. Unfortunately, her handlers, they will have to rely on entertainers and the likes of Barack Obama to carry on. I think everyone can now admit that letting her do interviews of any kind was a mistake.

Frank Luntz put it this way:



Then In an interview aired on Thursday's edition of 'Morning Joe,' HBO host Bill Maher told MSNBC's Joe Scarborough that Vice President Kamala Harris needs to make voters believe she is not a "stealth version of the worst excesses of the left."

Bill Maher: Kamala Harris Has To Convince Voters She's Not "A Stealth Version Of The Worst Excesses Of The Left" | Video | RealClearPolitics

All of this has the Harris campaign in a frenzy and Harris is closing out her campaign by calling Trump a "fascist."

That on serves to energize the left, nobody else!


In the news:

25themorning-nl-XiPutin-bfgq-jumbo.jpg

There are 3,000 North Korean troops which boarded ships in the port city of Wonsan earlier this month and made the journey up the coast to Vladivostok, in Russia’s southeastern corner. From there, they moved to three military training sites in Russia’s Far East, according to U.S. officials. All of it is part of a new coalition against the west formed by Russia, China, North Korea and Iran during the Biden years.

An Israeli strike supposedly killed three journalists according to Lebanese officials.

Sunnis and Shiites are now waging war in Pakistan.

The far left woke Los Angeles County district attorney plans to ask a judge to resentence the Menendez Brothers. It seems that a documentary highlighted the fact that the father abused the boys. People may recall how vicious those murders were: the brothers shot their father, carefully reloaded and then blew the face off their mother, who still clings to life.

The companies behind the container ship that slammed into the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore agreed to pay around $100 million to settle a government lawsuit.

CBS still refuses to turn over the full transcript of the Kamala Harris interview.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

Good morning

AA1sJQcK.img?w=768&h=431&m=6&x=429&y=66&s=77&d=77


V eteran pollster Nate Silver said his “gut” right now is that former President Trump will  win the election  in less than two weeks, but he cautioned against putting faith in anyone’s gut feeling. 

Nate Silver: ‘My gut says’ Trump will win

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago

Silver is probably the best statistical analyst out there, but it all comes down to how accurate are the polls. They are so close that if they are off by a point either candidate could still win a large majority in the electoral college.  It's a true toss up at this point, and I don't think either side has any reason for confidence.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1    4 weeks ago

I tend to agree.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago

'The things that would concern me is when she doesn’t want to answer a question, her habit is to kind of go to Word Salad City'

What is that thing the former 'president' traitor does when he is asked a question?  Doesn't that concern you?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @1.2    4 weeks ago

"weaving"

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Tessylo @1.2    4 weeks ago
her habit is to kind of go to Word Salad City

The reality is that anything a conservative doesn't understand, or if they get lost after someone on the left uses more than a couple three syllable words, is labeled by them as "word salad". If the response goes over their heads, as most do, it's "word salad". If the response is clear and concise but destroys the rightwing position with logic and reason, it's "word salad". Looking at Trump and many of his supporters, they could use a few salads...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago
Nate Silver: ‘My gut says’ Trump will win

He needs to take an anti-diarrheal medicine.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.4  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    4 weeks ago
but he cautioned against putting faith in anyone’s gut feeling. 

That's his feeling but don't put any faith in it.

Okay!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

GarCpgaXAAACf49?format=jpg&name=small

And only racist if the US does it.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    4 weeks ago

I'm going to vote by mail for the first time.  Mostly for health reasons, but I also have developed a curiosity about it.  After a 10 day wait, the ballot finally came yesterday. In the instructions it says to try and be precise with your signature and that it matches the signature on your registration form. 

They match your signature on the ballot envelope to the signature when you registered to vote. If they dont match your vote is not counted.

That is all that is needed. The rest is bullshit. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2    4 weeks ago
If they dont match your vote is not counted.

Sure. 

Cook County election judges have a long standing history of enforcing the rules and weeding out fraud. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.1    4 weeks ago

Yeah, your recent complaints about a Cook County election almost 50 years ago is so persuasive /s.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.1    4 weeks ago

As far as I know everyone's signature is on their voter registration form. That signature is immediately available on the laptops of the election judges . When you go into the polling place to vote on election day you sign a form. That signature is then compared to the one on your registration form on the screen. 

Easy peasey.    That is how they do it in Illinois and that is more than sufficient to prove voter eligibility in every precinct in the country. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2.4  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2    4 weeks ago
They match your signature on the ballot envelope to the signature when you registered to vote.

Think about that. Millions of ballots having poll workers match signatures. It is really hard to believe anyone is doing all that.

Do you know how many were rejected as not matching?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.6  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.1    4 weeks ago

They must be bleary eyed already!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.2    4 weeks ago
complaints about a Cook County election almost 50 years ago is so persuasive /s.

Yeah, they forged  100,000 votes and only got caught because one of the participants got screwed out of a job and snitched. 

Democrats are much, much more honest now. It's why they fight all attempts at ballot security. They are  just so pure. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.8  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.7    4 weeks ago
and only got caught because one of the participants got screwed out of a job and snitched. 

It is sad but true. They could have had recount after recount and never known.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.9  JohnRussell  replied to  devangelical @2.2.4    4 weeks ago

If some election judge would let a person vote whose signatures dont match, they could just as easily let someone vote whose picture on their drivers liscense or id card doesnt match the person standing before them.  The picture ID is no more fail proof than the signature system. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.5    4 weeks ago
It is really hard to believe anyone is doing all that.

You have to be kidding. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.10    4 weeks ago

[] but reason dictates that compasring signatures on millions of ballots is an enormous task. Comparing a person to a picture is not.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.13  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.11    4 weeks ago

The mail in ballot has a bar code right above the signature box. That bar code contains your name address etc.  The person doing the matching scans the bar code and your registration signature pops up on their screen. A matter of a couple seconds. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.14  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.13    4 weeks ago

Millions of mail in ballots John.

Again: Do you know what percentage get rejected for a bad match?

Did you know that in 2020 when mail in voting was at an all time high the percentage of rejected signatures actually went down?

Election results, 2020: Analysis of rejected ballots - Ballotpedia

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2.2.15  George  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2    4 weeks ago
If they don't match your vote is not counted.

So all the people checking the signatures are certified forensic document examiners? and whose signature hasn't changed since the registered to vote depending on how long they have lived there, My signature has changed in the last 30 years.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.16  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.14    4 weeks ago

Millions of people vote on election day. So what?  I dont see much reason why processing a mail in vote would be slower than processing an in person vote. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.2.17  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  George @2.2.15    4 weeks ago

So has mine..........a couple of times. The sig on my SS card when I was 16 is nowhere near what it is today let alone the change that has occurred just over the last 15 when I moved where I am now............

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.18  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.16    4 weeks ago
I dont see much reason why processing a mail in vote would be slower than processing an in person vote. 

You do remember the 2020 election?

As a result of a large number of mail-in ballots, some  swing states  saw delays in vote counting and reporting; this led to major news outlets delaying their projection of Biden and Harris as the  president-elect  and  vice president-elect  until the morning of November 7

2020 United States presidential election - Wikipedia

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.19  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.18    4 weeks ago

I believe in some cases that is because they dont start counting the mail in votes until after the in person votes are counted. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2.20  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.19    4 weeks ago

You mean like PA. And who was it that pushed for that law?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.21  afrayedknot  replied to  George @2.2.15    4 weeks ago

At least in CO, those tasked with verifying signatures go through a series of training sessions, including on-line testing.

During the course of the election as envelopes are received, should one member question the validity of any signature, the bi-partisan team must all agree before it is bounced back to the clerk’s office. At that point, the voter is contacted and given an opportunity to ‘cure’ any discrepancy. The software also has recorded signatures from previous elections in which a voter has participated, allowing verifiers to see any changes in those signatures. 

In my most recent session, yesterday as a matter of fact, our team of four, two from each party, processed ~ 3500 envelopes with nine sent back to be ‘cured’. A rather typical example. It’s important to know the vote is not thrown out as the voter still has the opportunity to verify their signature. It is also important to know that the only job being done at this stage is matching signatures…no ballot is opened nor counted 

The process, in my experience, works as intended. It would take a conspiracy of dozens of people, from both parties to engage in widespread fraud. 

Hope that helps. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.22  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.20    4 weeks ago

The bottom line is you dont have a good rationale for saying mail in voting is fraudulent. 

The fact is Trump always claims he is being cheated. He has never run in an election where he did not claim he was being cheated, often doing so before the election has even occurred. When it becomes such a pervasive pattern with a person you know they are full of shit. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.2.23  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.11    4 weeks ago

And contrary to commentary, /S is for sarcasm, not satire..................

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.24  afrayedknot  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.22    4 weeks ago

“The bottom line is you dont have a good rationale for saying mail in voting is fraudulent.”

This cannot be said often enough.

To do so in willful ignorance of the procedures in place is to foment fear and condone those who would play on that fear for their own nefarious means. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.25  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.2    4 weeks ago

Most complaints from some folks are from decades and decades ago, they're so relevant today!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.26  JohnRussell  replied to  George @2.2.15    4 weeks ago
So all the people checking the signatures are certified forensic document examiners? and whose signature hasn't changed since the registered to vote depending on how long they have lived there, My signature has changed in the last 30 years.

Someone who wanted to forge your signature on a ballot would be purely guessing and 999 times out of a thousand it would look nothing like yours.  The complaint about signature matching is just an attempt to sow mistrust about fair elections. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.27  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.13    4 weeks ago

I mailed in my ballot about two weeks ago and received notice within about a week that my ballot had been received.

When I was at Giant a week or so ago, picking up my online order, one of the ladies who usually does my order and brings it out, was telling me (completely unsolicited) that someone told her she wasn't voting for Larry Hogan because she doesn't trust him, and I thought the same exact thing but didn't say so.  We've never discussed politics before and we talk more than a minute or two from time to time.  She then said the person she spoke to, a woman, was bothered by the abortion issue, though she said something to the effect of 'that abortion shit' and said something about Howard County (Columbia, MD) is a very highly Democratic area and I agreed with her, being a Democrat myself.  I said maybe you shouldn't be talking to customers about politics when they're picking up their orders - in so many words.  She pretty much walked away then.  There was no argument involved but I was kind of surprised.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.28  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.5    4 weeks ago
Think about that. Millions of ballots having poll workers match signatures.

Which is what happens every election cycle.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.29  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.2.14    4 weeks ago

Which ballots were rejected - mostly republican

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
2.2.30  Right Down the Center  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.2.23    4 weeks ago

That is what I thought

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.2.31  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.29    4 weeks ago

Link?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.32  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.2.31    4 weeks ago

Truth

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
2.2.33  Right Down the Center  replied to  George @2.2.15    4 weeks ago

They need the handwriting experts from Pawnstars,

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
2.2.34  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.32    4 weeks ago

Link that it is truth?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.35  Tessylo  replied to  afrayedknot @2.2.21    4 weeks ago

Hey afk, I know you're an election judge and you were asking about applying to be an election judge - I did - and at first they said they didn't need anyone but that people usually drop off before the election - and about a week later I was selected for two dates of Early Voting and then on Election Day.  I'm looking forward to it.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.36  afrayedknot  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.35    4 weeks ago

Glad you get the chance.

It’s an opportunity to give a little bit of time and gain a deeper appreciation for and play an important part in helping our democracy function as intended  

Please share your experiences if comfortable doing so. The more real information the better. Good on you!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.2.37  Tessylo  replied to  afrayedknot @2.2.36    4 weeks ago

Will do.  I have a question for you right now actually - do you have to bring your own food, snacks, water, etc.?  I intend to bring snacks and water but do they provide lunch, meals, or just the time for you to eat them?  Early voting is from 6 am to 9 pm and of course Election day is from 6 am to 10 pm.  I understand you can't leave the polling place and that makes absolute sense but are you able to go to your car for breaks or what have you?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.38  afrayedknot  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.37    4 weeks ago

“…do you have to bring your own food, snacks, water, etc.?”

Good question. Our county clerk staff hosts a potluck on the Monday before and on Election Day, when those working those long days bring in their favorite things to share. Good stuff! I make my homemade arancini. 

On other days, there are always snacks, water and coffee available. Guessing you will find the same. Enjoy the experience, T.    

Proud of you. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.4  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    4 weeks ago

Canada allows the use of literally dozens of IDs:

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3  Jeremy Retired in NC    4 weeks ago

And let the deflections to the opponent begin.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

Hillary Clinton  said that former President  Donald Trump  will “reenact” a 1939 Nazi event at his Madison Square Garden rally in New York City on Sunday.

OIP.FKR9PjCaQ_NXn20aRJwJIwHaHa?w=176&h=184&c=7&r=0&o=5&pid=1.7

Hillary Clinton says Trump's MSG rally will 'reenact' Nazi event - Washington Examiner

Didn't Bill and Hillary had a giant rally at Madison Square Garden for the Democrats way back in 1992 when Bill accepted the nomination at the Democratic National Convention?

And somebody better warn Pope Francis who had his own event at MSG in 2015.


 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    4 weeks ago

She's stopped claiming the 2016 election was stolen from her long enough to call her opponent a Nazi.

But Trump is too divisive....

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1    4 weeks ago

What did they call George W Bush?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    4 weeks ago

nice doctored photo of hillary. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    4 weeks ago

If we did that to Melania you know he would flag it

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.1    4 weeks ago

Here is a more current photo:

Gar7drQaAAENFYL?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.2.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    4 weeks ago

That's what AI will get you

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
4.2.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    4 weeks ago

I agree, she never looked so good

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.2    4 weeks ago

At least her skin isnt nauseatingly orange. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.1    4 weeks ago

Ya!

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.5    4 weeks ago

Sometimes it's almost a turd brown, a certain someone's face.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
4.2.8  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.2.2    4 weeks ago

That is enough to ruin anyone's threesome fantasy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

  Migrant crisis cost $150 billion in 2023, with crisis zones having to cut police, fire and services to cover costs: report:

Gapg3XQW4AADK61?format=jpg&name=small

Migrant crisis cost $150bn in 2023, local towns cutting costs to cope

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
5.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    4 weeks ago

We just need billionaires to pay there "fair share" and everyone can have a free lunch, and 20,000 dollars, and free college, etc.  S/

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    4 weeks ago

I don't believe it

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.2.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @5.2    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.2.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @5.2    4 weeks ago

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) has done a great job. Studies suggest this cost is upwards of $ 400 billion,  but their cost estimate is $ 150 billion . The lion's share of that cost is borne by state and local governments. State and local governments can't borrow or print money like the federal government, so they have to balance their budgets by either absorbing this cost through raising taxes or they have to cut services to their citizens.”

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5.2.3  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.2.2    4 weeks ago

Still don't believe it.  

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6  Nerm_L    4 weeks ago

Everyone's complaining and warning about what Trump will do.  Tariffs?  Immigration?  Taxes?  Revenge?  Dictator?  We can't elect Trump because of what he'll do (real and imagined) as President.

Does anyone, anywhere, have a clue what Kamala Harris will do as President?  She is an expert on all things Trump.  Kamala Harris can tell us, in granular detail, what Trump will do.  But that expertise has no value if Trump loses the election.  So, what can we expect from Harris in the White House?  No one seems to know and, apparently, no one seems to care.

At this point, the Harris campaign appears to be making the circuits building excuses for losing.  Kamala Harris doesn't strike me as a 'walk in the woods', introspective kind of loser, either.  Everything is going to be Trump's fault.  An excuse that Harris can't use if she wins because Joe Biden really is the incumbent President.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
6.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Nerm_L @6    4 weeks ago
So, what can we expect from Harris in the White House?  No one seems to know and, apparently, no one seems to care.

I find it perplexing that supposed objective folks can vote for someone that can not articulate what they would do as President.  Their whole policy statements is a collection of bumper stickers

And then they wonder why anyone would vote for Trump.  I guess they have never heard of "better the devil you know".

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.1.1  Nerm_L  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.1    4 weeks ago
I find it perplexing that supposed objective folks can vote for someone that can not articulate what they would do as President.  Their whole policy statements is a collection of bumper stickers And then they wonder why anyone would vote for Trump.  I guess they have never heard of "better the devil you know".

Personally, I'd be more worried about a Big Government Democrat who hasn't publicly discussed their agenda.  Democrats have highlighted the need to 'fix' the courts but courts are not democratic institutions.  Democrats have advocated censorship, prosecution of political crimes, lackadaisical fiscal management, and increased reliance on a Deep State bureaucracy to monitor domestic threats.

What we do know about Trump should scare us less than what we don't know about Kamala Harris.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
6.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Nerm_L @6.1.1    4 weeks ago
What we do know about Trump should scare us less than what we don't know about Kamala Harris.

Folks would have to get past the orange man bad broken record syndrome and be able to think clearly for that to happen.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2  Tessylo  replied to  Nerm_L @6    4 weeks ago

WHAT?

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
6.2.1  Nerm_L  replied to  Tessylo @6.2    4 weeks ago
WHAT?

WHY?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

I urge all young men to come out and vote!

GV0hs0OaMAAhQko?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    4 weeks ago

It's fun to stay at the Y.M.C.A.
It's fun to stay at the Y.M.C.A.
They have everything for young men to enjoy
You can hang out with all the boys

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1    4 weeks ago

It's widely known as a gay anthem (not that there's anything wrong with that!)

It does seem to be his go to 'theme' though.  Pretty funny.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
7.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
7.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @7.1.1    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @7.1.2    4 weeks ago

more like making fun of your idiot candidate

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
7.1.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.4    4 weeks ago

Thanks for the clarification.  I never would have guessed.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    4 weeks ago

Those aren't the typical young 'men' voting for him.[]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
7.2.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @7.2    4 weeks ago
Those aren't the typical young 'men' voting for him. removed for context[]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
7.3  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    4 weeks ago

That is not your typical young 'man' voter  - not at all - looks nothing like the typical former 'president' traitor voter - usually pasty white and fat or scrawny

 
 
 
Thomas
Masters Guide
7.4  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @7    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  author  Vic Eldred    4 weeks ago

"The path to my fixed purpose is laid with iron rails, whereon my soul is grooved to run. Over unsounded gorges, through the rifled hearts of mountains, under torrents’ beds, unerringly I rush! Naught’s an obstacle, naught’s an angle to the iron way!"  (Captain Ahab / Moby Dick )

GaqPikaWkAAQZWO?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    4 weeks ago

i made that photo my new avatar because it is so freaking ridiculous. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @8.1    4 weeks ago

It's sickening and if I were a god-fearing Christian I would be screaming BLASPHEMY! trmp is no more of a Christian than I am

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.2  Tessylo  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    4 weeks ago

Excuse me while I vomit profusely.

jrSmiley_80_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tessylo @8.2    4 weeks ago

256

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.2.2  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @8.2.1    4 weeks ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
8.3  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    4 weeks ago

Do you believe that Trump tries to do the work of God or work for the people instead of acting in whatever fashion he believes will benefit him personally?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    4 weeks ago

I dont see Paula White in there. She must be pissed. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.4.1  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @8.4    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
8.5  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    4 weeks ago

And you still don't get Moby Dick.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8.5.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Hallux @8.5    4 weeks ago

Oh, I do. It was blasphemy.  Trump doesn't represent Ahab. His enemies do.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
8.5.2  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.5.1    4 weeks ago
Trump doesn't represent Ahab.

Then why have so many gone down with his 'wailing'? I get the feeling you and he would have hung Ishmael for having the gall to survive.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.5.3  devangelical  replied to  Vic Eldred @8.5.1    4 weeks ago
Trump doesn't represent Ahab

of course not, he's the great white whale ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9  TᵢG    4 weeks ago
All of this has the Harris campaign in a frenzy and Harris is closing out her campaign by calling Trump a "fascist."

You ignore the important news that Trump's longest serving Chief of State, ★★★★ General Mark Kelly has stated in clear terms that he considers Trump a fascist.

Is it now your opinion that Kelly is misrepresenting his considered opinion and just playing politics? 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9    4 weeks ago
General Mark Kelly has stated in clear terms that he considers Trump a fascist.

Why?  Because he won't do what the government tells him?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.1  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1    4 weeks ago

Kelly explained this clearly.   Listen to his explanation ... it is well reported.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.1    4 weeks ago

What's clear is that Kelly is still crying about being fired and it fits right in with the rhetoric we've seen from the left for quite a while now.  It almost looks like he is making pre-emptive excuses for nonsense (up to can including violence) in the event Harris loses.

He's trying to make statements for a candidate who, to date has not answered any interview question of substance.  She's flipped on her own proposed policies, she goes off on these word salad tangents (as the article shows) when pressed about actual issues and when she can't do that, she jumps right into the typical leftist nonsense - "but Trruuummmmppppp".

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.2    4 weeks ago

Kelly is a highly respected, serious individual who has provided specific accounts of Trump and his conclusion on how Trump operates.   Instead of considering that his words (which match well with what we know of Trump) are true, you leap that Kelly has the grit of a child and an intent to violate the principles that he has held throughout his career.

Yet another pathetic attempt to defend Trump.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9.1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.3    4 weeks ago
Kelly is a highly respected

Only for those partisans railing against Trump.  I lost respect for him when he took on the same rhetoric as the partisan hacks claiming "Trump is a fascist".  

Yet another pathetic attempt to defend Trump.

Another wrong opinion.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.3    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.3    4 weeks ago
Kelly is a highly respected, serious individual who has provided specific accounts of Trump

Depends on who you ask. 

I worked in the White House with John Kelly, and I don’t believe a word he says. He was a terrible chief of staff who dishonestly kept information from the President to pursue his own agenda, an unelected former military official substituting his judgment for the duly elected President.
Here are two examples: 1) In 2018, President Trump asked OMB Director Mulvaney to find money in agency accounts to build the wall to secure our southern border. Mulvaney asked OMB Deputy Russ Vought and me as OMB GC to do a deep dive on this project, and with the help of superb career staff, we found a ton of money at the DOD that we could use to build the wall.

But Kelly prevented Mulvaney from presenting this plan to President Trump.

Several months later, in a meeting, Trump said “Mick, I asked you to find me money and you haven’t.” Mulvaney responded “I found the money but I have not been able to brief you.” Kelly would not set up policy time for Mulvaney to discuss the plan with Trump. After this exchange, Mulvaney presented the plan and the President authorized this strategy. John Kelly was insubordinate and duplicitous by refusing to provide the President with lawful options to implement the President’s policies.

2) Because of the manner in which the Election Integrity Commission was set up, I wanted to have the President shut it down and direct the DOJ to investigate election fraud. At the time, I was the Counsel to VP Pence, who was the co-chair of the commission, and I had developed a list of previous presidential directives to DOJ to investigate a specific matter so that when making this recommendation I could show it was well supported by history and tradition. In a meeting with Kelly and others, I made this recommendation and shared the list of examples of Presidents directing DOJ to engage on specific matters. Kelly said he would never show this list to the President because it would be terrible if President Trump knew he could do this, his life was tough enough in dealing with the President, and he did not want him to know this. To my knowledge, President Trump was never made aware of these examples. John Kelly thought he knew better than President Trump and was opposed to many of his policies. As Chief of Staff, Kelly dishonestly tried to thwart President Trump’s policies, and on the wall funding he was totally fine with not doing everything possible to stop illegal aliens flooding into our country and murdering innocent Americans, all in order to protect the bloated bureaucracy of his DOD. John Kelly will say anything to stop President Trump from being re-elected. It won’t work.

When Mick Mulvaney was named his replacement on Dec 14th, it was announced Kelly would stay through rest of year to help with transition. He did no such thing. He maybe came in once more to do any meaningful work. We were getting ready for a shutdown, which happened on Dec 22nd, and Kelly was AWOL to help out during the run up to it. Just checked out. John Kelly’s nightmare scenario isn’t a “fascist” White House - it’s a White House without John Kelly in it. Why else would he think threatening to quit all the time would have any impact on the president? He was a terrible Chief of Staff who whined and sulked because he was no longer a BFD General who everyone obeyed without question. He was just a staff guy to a President, and he hated it. He did a disservice to the nation by being dishonest, insubordinate, and quitting on the job before he resigned.

There's plenty of other testimony from people who worked with him in the same vein. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9.1.7  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.6    4 weeks ago

Here's Fox News calling for Kelly to resign in 2018 over covering up domestic abuse allegations against Rob Porter

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.8  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.6    4 weeks ago

You actually are attempting to discredit Kelly while supporting Trump (of all people).  

What drives people to defend Trump no matter what ... and no matter how feeble the defense?

How many top GOP officials who worked directly with Trump must weigh in on his unfitness before it sinks in?    The idea of many top officials with direct contact with a former PotUS coming out and deeming him unfit to serve is a historical first in our nation.   And that means nothing to you?   You ignore this and all other observable facts about Trump and deem those criticizing Trump to have no credibility??

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.1.9  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.7    4 weeks ago

And then he became a useful idiot for the left and they forgave everything. 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.8    4 weeks ago

You would think they'd take the word of this staunch, died in the wool, conservative to the core, distinguished, honorable, intelligent man over trump.  That's todays' gop.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.1.11  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @9.1.10    4 weeks ago

Always question when someone complains about his employer after he is fired. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.1.12  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.9    4 weeks ago
And then he became a useful idiot for the left and they forgave everything. 

He isn't the first to go to the dark side by speaking ill of Trump, then magically be loved by the left when they were calling him fascist the day before.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.11    4 weeks ago

Fired for telling the traitor NO, YOU CAN'T DO THAT.  IT'S ILLEGAL.  

I WANT WHAT I WANT

THAT'S NOT FAIR

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.1.14  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.6    4 weeks ago

Funny thing is anyone can get a number of people to say a good or bad thing about any candidate.  It is all about who one chooses to believe.  As we get closer to election some are willing to believe any wild ass thing they feel trashes who they want trashed.  Rationality or objectivity is stripped away.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9.1.15  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.8    4 weeks ago
You actually are attempting to discredit Kelly while supporting Trump (of all people).

Sounds like a lot of people are speaking out against him.[]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.1.16  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.15    4 weeks ago

Removed for context

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.17  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @9.1.16    4 weeks ago

lol - as if

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.1.18  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.6    4 weeks ago
There's plenty of other testimony from people who worked with him in the same vein. 

And it will all be ignored since it does not fit the narrative of not only is orange man bad he is a fascist.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.1.19  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.18    4 weeks ago
he is a fascist.

They still don't know the definition of the word.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.1.20  Right Down the Center  replied to  bugsy @9.1.19    4 weeks ago

Some folks just make up new definitions for words

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.1.21  Tessylo  replied to  Sean Treacy @9.1.7    4 weeks ago

Faux 'news' calling for Kelly to resign?

So what?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
9.2  George  replied to  TᵢG @9    4 weeks ago
Is it now your opinion that Kelly is misrepresenting his considered opinion and just playing politics? 

Why not, we have seen Clapper and Brennan lie, we had a whole bunch intelligence professionals lie about hunters laptop and they did that in writing. I have no doubt that Kelly would lie, why do you think he wouldn't?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.2.1  TᵢG  replied to  George @9.2    4 weeks ago

You too would discredit General Kelly with his distinguished career and instead put your faith in the credibility of Trump?

Just amazing ... there seems to be no logic whatsoever applied in Trump circles.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
9.2.2  George  replied to  TᵢG @9.2.1    4 weeks ago

And you are allowing your hate of trump to give credit to someone without evidence, simply because it reinforces your confirmation bias.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.2.3  TᵢG  replied to  George @9.2.2    4 weeks ago

More irrational 'logic' from you.   General Kelly is just the most recent of a string of high-ranking GOP officials who worked in the Trump administration or worked with him who have deemed him unfit to serve.

You are ignoring the consistent assessment of all these Republicans regarding a former PotUS of their own party.

You projecting confirmation bias on me is pathetic.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.2.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  George @9.2.2    4 weeks ago

[]

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
9.2.5  George  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.4    4 weeks ago

And because you don't hate Trump your logic is irrational. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.2.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  George @9.2.5    4 weeks ago

That seems to be the common thought among trump haters. That and unpatriotic,  stupid, racist.....,.............

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.2.7  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.6    4 weeks ago

The hysterical screeching is getting louder and louder from some on the left now that they see the writing on the wall.

Trump will be their next president.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2.8  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @9.2.7    4 weeks ago

The hysterical shrieking is only coming from the 'right' - the desperate and deplorable shriekkking is endless

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.2.9  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @9.2.8    4 weeks ago

Show us where that shrieking is coming from and be specific.

Fellings and emotions not apply.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.2.10  bugsy  replied to  TᵢG @9.2.3    4 weeks ago
General Kelly is just the most recent of a string of high-ranking GOP officials who worked in the Trump administration or worked with him who have deemed him unfit to serve.

So what?

94 percent of Harris staff over the past 4 years have left because of her irrational behavior, he unpreparedness for anything, and her knack for not listening to who is advising her (does that one sound familiar?).

Do you take that into account for voting for her or is "not Trump" your primary reason.

Will you willingly accept Trump as your president if he wins next month?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.2.11  Right Down the Center  replied to  bugsy @9.2.7    4 weeks ago

Not sure he will be but the fear and bullshit is raising every day.  I am waiting for the bombshell saying Trump is anti environment because he uses two sheets of toilet paper instead of one.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.2.12  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tessylo @9.2.8    4 weeks ago

Projection

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
9.2.13  afrayedknot  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.11    4 weeks ago

I am waiting for the bombshell saying Trump is anti environment because he uses two sheets of toilet paper instead of one.”

Go ahead and ply away…for most, wiping right down the center does the trick. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.2.14  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.11    4 weeks ago

That is coming. And that "bombshell" will be impeachable if he is elected and far worse than Watergate. 

I put that last question out there to see if I would get an answer.

I feel that deflection will be the order of the day with it.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.2.15  Right Down the Center  replied to  bugsy @9.2.14    4 weeks ago
And that "bombshell" will be impeachable if he is elected and far worse than Watergate. 

I have seen more than one here stating if he were elected and the dems took the house he would be impeached within 6 weeks.  No reason given but based on past impeachments no reason needed,

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.2.16  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.15    4 weeks ago

And they are the same ones that screech that Trump is a fascist.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
9.2.17  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.11    4 weeks ago

I recently bought a deluxe bidet seat, an awesome gift to myself although the wife likes it as well.  No more TP stockups when bad weather or port strikes are eminent.  Trump might have a gold bidet.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9.2.18  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @9.2.16    4 weeks ago
And they are the same ones that screech that Trump is a fascist.

Aren't those the same ones who were silent when the Biden administration censored the people?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9.2.19  Right Down the Center  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @9.2.17    4 weeks ago
Trump might have a gold bidet.

I hope he doesn't use too much water.

Although a good bidet would explain why Hillary disappears for a few months between Trump is Hitler bashings.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.2.20  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.2.18    4 weeks ago

Why, yes Jeremy, yes they were.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2.21  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @9.2.16    4 weeks ago

the truth

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
9.2.22  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @9.2.20    4 weeks ago

Imagine that.  Imagine their faces if they realized what they were supporting.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
9.2.23  Tessylo  replied to  bugsy @9.2.9    4 weeks ago
Show us where that shrieking is coming from and be specific.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
9.2.24  bugsy  replied to  Tessylo @9.2.23    4 weeks ago

OK so you know how to cut and paste.

Now, answer the request of you.............or can you?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
9.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @9    4 weeks ago
You ignore

I learned from guess who?

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
10  Nerm_L    4 weeks ago

North Korea sent 3,000 troops into Russia to fight in Ukraine?  Really?  That sounds like the type of analysis that Marine General John Kelly would provide.  In true military fashion, that's a boneheaded attempt to fight the war that Marines think they can win.  (Hasn't worked for 80 years but don't mess with the status quo.)  Let's step back and take a look at the bigger picture.

Yes, Russia is mired in Ukraine.  But that's a no win war; Russia knows, NATO knows it, the EU knows it, the US knows it, but Kiev is a slow learner.  At this point Russia only needs to maintain a stalemate to pose a threat to Europe and tie up the west's military.  

Which is to China's advantage.  China recognizes a golden opportunity when it sees one.  China and Russia have been setting aside centuries of conflict to establish a tentative coalition, if not an alliance.  With a little bit of coordination, Russia and China can pursue their own goals without make hard, fast commitments to each other.  A coalition; not an alliance.

So, enter North Korea.  North Korea has been blowing up bridges and roadways that connect to South Korea just so NK troops could fight in Ukraine?  Not likely.  It's far more likely that North Korea has sent troops to Russia to train on coordinating with Russian troops.  Even the US Marines understands that type of training.  North Korea appears to be preparing to threaten Seoul.

Crystal balls are always fun to play with.  Here's one scenario that the crystal ball presents.  Russia continues to threaten Europe in Ukraine.  Iran destabilizes and threatens the Middle East.  China threatens Taiwan.  North Korea threatens South Korea.  And hoards of illegal immigrants could flood and overwhelm the southern US border.  A five front war.

That scenario could come to fruition in the first 100 days of a Kamala Harris administration.  Harris is to plainly unprepared, not adequately informed, and may not possess the abilities to confront a five front war.  Harris relying on the expertise of the Deep State bureaucracy means the US response would be very, very predictable.  

The recent BRICS conference doesn't provide confidence that a five front war couldn't come to pass.  A coalition really is being established to plan for the downfall of the United States.  Missteps by the US could transform that coalition into a bloc very quickly.

At this point, India is sitting in the catbirds seat.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
11  Jeremy Retired in NC    4 weeks ago
CBS still refuses to turn over the full transcript of the Kamala Harris interview.

I think they may still be trying to translate her word salads into something comprehendible.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
11.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @11    4 weeks ago

Too bad alan Turing is dead

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
11.2  cjcold  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @11    4 weeks ago

And far right wing fascists will always lie and twist her words to make her sound bad.

Kamala will be the best president since Obama.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
11.2.1  Gazoo  replied to  cjcold @11.2    4 weeks ago

Lol, she needs no help making herself sound like a dumbass.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
11.2.2  bugsy  replied to  Gazoo @11.2.1    4 weeks ago

Even the talking heads at CNN are seeing it.

That tells you something.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
11.2.3  MrFrost  replied to  Gazoo @11.2.1    4 weeks ago

Lol, she needs no help making herself sound like a dumbass.

800

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
12  Just Jim NC TttH    4 weeks ago

BREAKING........................

The Washington Post will NOT be endorsing anyone for PotUS

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
12.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @12    4 weeks ago

Interesting when a lefty paper won't endorse a far left wing nut

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
12.1.1  cjcold  replied to  Right Down the Center @12.1    4 weeks ago

The pussies are just afraid of far-right wing death threats.

That's how the far right works these days.

Threaten all liberals with far-right wing death squads. 

                

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
12.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @12    4 weeks ago

They won't endorse Harris over Hitler? 

Crazy. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
13  Right Down the Center    4 weeks ago

256

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
14  MrFrost    4 weeks ago

It's not word salad, it's 'weaving'. 

 
 

Who is online


Gazoo


251 visitors