╌>

Members Of Congress Explain They Need Pay Raises To Keep Up With The Inflation They Caused

  

Category:  Satire

Via:  gregtx  •  one month ago  •  21 comments

Members Of Congress Explain They Need Pay Raises To Keep Up With The Inflation They Caused
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Though Americans were up in arms when news broke that lawmakers were pushing to give themselves an increase in salary, members of Congress insisted that they needed the pay increase to keep up with the inflation they caused.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


WASHINGTON, D.C. — Though Americans were up in arms when news broke that lawmakers were pushing to give themselves an increase in salary, members of Congress insisted that they needed the pay increase to keep up with the inflation they caused.

Representatives were quick to defend the proposed pay increase in the face of heavy criticism, citing the need to keep up with the rising cost of living due to the economic difficulties caused by Congress' failure to address rampant inflation.

"The last pay increase we voted to give ourselves just isn't cutting it," explained House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. "We need more money to make ends meet after we've spent the last several years making sure everything is more expensive and making sure nobody's money goes as far as it used to. Not only do we deserve this raise, but quite frankly, we need it to pay our bills. And that's what taxpayer dollars are for — paying for someone else's expenses."

Sources from within closed-door congressional meetings warned that legislators may be forced to find ways to solve inflation if they are unable to obtain raises. "How else do taxpayers expect us to keep affording things they can't afford themselves?" one congressman asked under the condition of anonymity. "We've worked hard to make sure living in the United States isn't cheap, and we think we deserve a little reward for that hard work. Is that so wrong?"

At publishing time, members of Congress had grown concerned that failure to secure a pay increase may require them to learn to become fiscally responsible.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1  seeder  GregTx    one month ago

512

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    one month ago

This is more sad than funny.

The dumb fucks that caused this sustained inflation want pay raises; and the Establishment Republican enablers are all on board to screw the tax payers over.

Funny, I don't remember Democrats ever negotiating with Republicans when they held the reins of power.

As Obama so eloquently put it.

"They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back.”

There should be no negotiating with the Democrat economic terrorists that wrecked the economy.

Republicans were elected to end the Democrat bullshit; not enable it.

The enablers need to be replaced at midterm primaries.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1  Split Personality  replied to  Ronin2 @2    one month ago
Democrat economic terrorists that wrecked the economy.

That comment is hilarious, but then this article is satire....

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Ronin2 @2    one month ago
screw the tax payers over.

Let me guess, you think Trump lowered taxes for the middle class too? LOL 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  MrFrost @2.2    one month ago

you think Trump lowered taxes for the middle class too? LOL 

Of course he did. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.2.1    one month ago

The middle class needs a tax cut: Trump didn’t give it to them

Read the article carefully.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2.3  Snuffy  replied to  MrFrost @2.2.2    4 weeks ago

Read the article carefully.

Perhaps you should as well. The article doesn't claim the middle class did not get a tax cut in 2017, it claims they are in need of help now and that the tax cuts expire next year. The headline is false as all taxpayers did indeed get a tax cut in 2017 but it's not a permanent cut.
To be sure, the middle class gets help temporarily, but over the longer run, the middle class will be worse off.
 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3  Split Personality    one month ago

Interesting topic since the House is still "controlled" by the GOP.

By law, Congress is entitled to to a COLA based on inflation, not be less than zero (clever lawmakers) or greater than 5% in any given year,

The as yet, anonymously proposed 3.8%, may or might not be in the agreed to CR passed today.

There were stupid rumors repeated by stupid people like Elon Musk that Congress voted itself a 40% pay raise when in fact the opposite is quite true.

Congress has been shamed or cock blocked into forgoing their annual raise since 2006 meaning that today's Congress is making 40% less than lawmakers did in 2006.

Former Representative Adam Kinzinger, an Illinois Republican, on X:   "It's in law that in lieu of members making outside pay (they banned this in the 90s) it was agreed that pay would increase yearly by inflation. In 2006, congress REJECTED the increase, and now have done so every year because it's bad politics. In the meantime congress went from making 174k in 2006, to 174k in 2024. Basically a 40 percent cut (adj for inflation.). As a result more millionaires joined congress as those not wealthy couldn't justify it. Regardless of your opinion we need more regular people in congress." Congress Wants to Give Itself a Raise. Is That Such a Bad Idea? - Newsweek

This comment is not satire.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Split Personality @3    one month ago
Interesting topic since the House is still "controlled" by the GOP.

Yup. It's funny how they are trying to put words in the mouth of the "House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries" not the House Majority Leader who actually has some legislative power.

today's Congress is making 40% less than lawmakers did in 2006

While that may be true, the complainers are comparing the salaries against their own, not against legislative salaries from 18 years ago. So, no matter what increase they suggest some won't be happy since its way more than they make bagging groceries.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
3.1.1  seeder  GregTx  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1    one month ago

Mmmmm, yeah, no doubt it about those lower classes that don't make as much being upset.....

Couldn't have anything to do with a majority of Americans that think you should earn it before you cry about it...

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
3.2  seeder  GregTx  replied to  Split Personality @3    one month ago
Regardless of your opinion we need more regular people in congress.

Like him?...

Are you sure that's not satire?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.3  Ronin2  replied to  Split Personality @3    one month ago
Congress has been shamed or cock blocked into forgoing their annual raise since 2006 meaning that today's Congress is making 40% less than lawmakers did in 2006.

And yet they all find a way to be much richer leaving Congress than when they entered.

For the first time in history, the majority of America's elected officials in Washington, D.C. are millionaires. [1] [2]   At the same time, 50 percent of Americans cannot afford to spend $5,000 in an emergency. [3] The median American citizen [4]   saw his or her   household net worth   decrease   from 2004 to 2012 by an annual rate of -0.94 percent, while   members of Congress   experienced a median annual   increase   of 1.55 percent. Congress saw a total increase of $316.5 million in assets held by all members in the study. [5]

Bet most Americans would love to increase their net worth as much as elected officials in Congress have.

My heart bleeds for them really. I am sure they are all close to declaring bankruptcy. Why would anyone ever want to serve in the House or Senate when the pay is so damn bad. AOC would have been better off sticking with bartending./S

https://www.aol.com/much-alexandria-ocasio-cortez-worth-153111807.html#!

After the job they have done running this country into a ditch- none of them deserve a damn raise. They are making more than enough money with insider trading; kickbacks; and cushy jobs on boards, think tanks, or as media pundits once they leave office.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3.3.1  Split Personality  replied to  Ronin2 @3.3    4 weeks ago
And yet they all find a way to be much richer leaving Congress than when they entered.

You are quoting from a source dated 2014?

Bet most Americans would love to increase their net worth as much as elected officials in Congress have.

Sure, let's all step up and ask the Powers/government to return our income to 2005 levels /S

What kind of donkey piss are you serving up?

After the job they have done running this country into a ditch- none of them deserve a damn raise.

More crazy talk?  Best economy and standard of living in the world, bar none.

If your life isn't meeting your expectations, look no further than the nearest mirror.

They are making more than enough money with insider trading; kickbacks; and cushy jobs on boards, think tanks, or as media pundits once they leave office.

What they do once they leave Congress isn't your fucking business if it's legal.

And maybe the job would meet your ideals if they had the annual raises required by law and the job attracted more qualified people.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3.3.2  Ronin2  replied to  Split Personality @3.3.1    4 weeks ago

Really, is that the best you have? Can't dispute anything in the comment so attack the source.

Here is something more recent if you thinks things have change- outside of getting worse.

It isn't just a handful of Congress members that have seen an astronomical jump in wealth. Almost all members have seen some financial acceleration during their tenure. 

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has experienced a substantial increase in wealth since 2004, with her net worth soaring from a bountiful $41 million to nearly $115 million. Similarly, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has seen his net worth climb from $3 million to over $34 million during the same period, mainly due to the financial success of his spouse. Rep. Paul Mitchell (R-Mich.) witnessed the most significant surge in wealth between 2017 and 2018, with his average net worth skyrocketing from $101 million to nearly $180 million. 

Several long-serving members of Congress also experienced remarkable wealth growth in 2018. Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.), who was worth an estimated $123,500 in 2008, now boasts average net assets of $4.2 million. Similarly, Rep. Judy Chu (D-Calif.) has seen her estimated net worth rise from less than six figures in 2008 to $7.1 million a decade later. Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) has also significantly increased his wealth from $602,000 to $10.7 million over the past ten years (Evers-Hillstrom, 2020). What are the key drivers contributing to the increase in wealth among Congressmembers in recent years?

As we delve deeper into this issue, further questions emerge about the ethical considerations surrounding congress members' financial interests and potential conflicts of interest in policy making. How can transparency measures be strengthened to ensure accountability and prevent undue influence? What reforms are needed to address the widening gap between congressional salaries and the wealth of elected officials? By confronting these questions head-on, we can strive toward a more equitable and transparent political system that upholds public trust.

More crazy talk?  Best economy and standard of living in the world, bar none. If your life isn't meeting your expectations, look no further than the nearest mirror.

As for life not meeting expectations- why don't you go take a real life poll of everyday Americans; and tell them that BS. I am sure you will learn to bite your tongue really damn quick. "Best economy and standard of living in the world"- do you really believe your own BS? 

Find where the US ranks on this chart for standard of living. #22- isn't that great?

Better not look at this one either.

Or this one.

Or this one.

Kind of getting ridiculous isn't it?

The US is a great country- but best quality of life- not even damn close.  Maybe if we stop letting in millions of illegal immigrants- and having to pay to care for them; give billions for other countries to fight their meaningless wars; and actually start caring for our own people for a change- the quality of life here will improve.

What they do once they leave Congress isn't your fucking business if it's legal. And maybe the job would meet your ideals if they had the annual raises required by law and the job attracted more qualified people.

So just ignore the insider trading, free plane rides and vacations, and kickbacks. Concentrate on only the last part. If you think an increase in pay will make politicians one damn iota more honest- you are delusional. The real money isn't serving the US government- the real money is in the off the book perks that come with it. And yes, that damn well includes the cushy jobs that overpay after they are finished serving.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3.3.3  Split Personality  replied to  Ronin2 @3.3.2    4 weeks ago
Find where the US ranks on this chart for standard of living. #22- isn't that great?

Ranked lists are always wrong, just like polls according to you, so why waste my time.

Where else would you like to live?  How would you support yourself?

 but best quality of life- not even damn close.

Cry me a river.

Maybe if we stop letting in millions of illegal immigrants- and having to pay to care for them;

Still blaming others?

give billions for other countries to fight their meaningless wars;

Which language would you prefer to learn, Chinese or Russian?

So just ignore the insider trading, free plane rides and vacations, and kickbacks. Concentrate on only the last part.

I said legal...

If you think an increase in pay will make politicians one damn iota more honest- you are delusional.

If you think freezing someone's pay for 18 years is somehow motivational - you are equally delusional,

probably jealous as well.

 
 
 
jw
Freshman Silent
4  jw    one month ago

In my humble opinion congressional pay should be tied to the median wage of the district from which the congress critter is representing.  They want a pay raise, then enact legislation that will increase the median wage fo the people you represent.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
4.1  seeder  GregTx  replied to  jw @4    one month ago

I'm not sure how that could work exactly, but I certainly think it should be up to their constituents to decide if they get a raise or not.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Snuffy  replied to  GregTx @4.1    one month ago

I'm not so sure about that. I think that would increase the race to load up the pork in order to bring more money home to their states and districts. 

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
4.1.2  seeder  GregTx  replied to  Snuffy @4.1.1    one month ago

Isn't that what DoGE is for?

 
 
 
jw
Freshman Silent
4.1.3  jw  replied to  Snuffy @4.1.1    one month ago

It may but their pay should be based, in some way, on performance, not just because they show up.  If they worked for me and performed with this level of mediocrity, they would not be working long.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1.4  Snuffy  replied to  GregTx @4.1.2    one month ago

Except all DoGE will do is make recommendations, they won't have the power to create budgets and bills. As most congressmen tend to look at what they need to do to get re-elected I'm concerned such a change would first and foremost cause the increase of pork being attached to any and all bills that would come out of the House.

 
 

Who is online


Snuffy


34 visitors