╌>

OPINION: Donald Trump cannot be the sole medical source on the ear injury

  
Via:  John Russell  •  4 months ago  •  120 comments

By:   Austin Linfante (Heartland Signal)

OPINION: Donald Trump cannot be the sole medical source on the ear injury
Jennifer Schulze writes, "Let's be honest: Trusting Donald Trump about anything, even his own injury, is not a smart move."

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


By Jennifer Schulze - 7/18/24 Share

Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump points to his ear as he talks to Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, during the Republican National Convention Tuesday, July 16, 2024, in Milwaukee. (AP Photo/Julia Nikhinson)

Let's be honest: Trusting Donald Trump about anything, even his own injury, is not a smart move. Trump — who infamously told over 30,473 documented lies during his presidency — should not be the sole medical source on his ear injury.

Yes, his ear was clearly injured. But how? How was it treated? What are the resulting health issues, if any? Will there be medical follow-ups? Voters deserve answers to these questions so where are the briefings, official statements and medical reports?

Contrast the lack of information about Trump's injury with how the Biden White House handled news on Wednesday that the president had just tested positive for COVID. Biden's press secretary released a statement about the situation that included detailed information from the president's doctor about the diagnosis, Biden's symptoms and treatment plan. We now know more about Biden's just-diagnosed COVID case than we do about the injury to Trump during an assassination attempt five days ago.

In the six days since the shooting incident, there has not been any official information about the injury to Trump's ear. Nothing from the hospital that treated Trump. Nothing from law enforcement that were at the scene or are now investigating the incident. The Trump campaign is refusing to answer any questions. So far, the primary source of information about Trump's wound is Trump himself. That seems not just odd but concerning, given what we all know about Trump's credibility problems.

Trump has long lied and misled the public about his health. His estranged niece, Mary Trump, says he equates sickness with weakness. Recall that in 2020, he misled the country about testing positive for COVID just before his first debate with Joe Biden and then withheld how dangerously sick the virus made him. We learned months later that "officials believed he would need to be put on a ventilator." And of course, during his first campaign, he provided a completely laughable letter claiming that he would be the healthiest person ever to serve as president.

An attempted assassination is clearly very serious and concerning for the entire country so it's crucial to get updated, accurate information. But with a glaring lack of official statements about Trump's injury, the news media is coming up empty. Instead, we have a few stories like this one from AP about the lack of available information.

So far, the only doctor on record about Trump's injury is former White House physician and current Republican congressman Ronny Jackson. He says "the bullet took a little bit off the top of his ear." But Jackson cannot be the only doctor we hear from on Trump's injury. He's just not a credible enough source.

Meanwhile, while as the nation reels from the assassination attempt, the Trump myth-making has begun. Some Trump supporters and at least one newspaper columnist are saying God intervened to save Trump from death by gunshot. Convention delegates are wearing bandages on their ears in tribute to Trump. Trump himself made a dramatic first appearance at the convention where that bandage was first revealed. He's also talking about his lucky close call.

But more transparency is still required as former RNC Chair Michael Steele and many others are saying. Columnist Rex Huppke has an excellent list of questions that still need to be answered:

  • "What, specifically, was his injury, and how was it treated?
  • What is his current medical condition in the wake of the injury, and has he been prescribed medication? If so, what kind?
  • Will additional medical procedures be required?
  • Has the former president had a psychological evaluation in the wake of the shooting?
  • How is his medical team planning to address the possibility of PTSD or other psychological after-effects?
  • Is he planning ongoing mental health counseling?"

And still another unanswered question is what actually caused the injury? So far, Trump is the only one on record saying he was a hit by a bullet. Poynter columnist Tom Jones writes "there is no proof behind the conspiracy theories that Trump was injured by anything other than a bullet." But we still need an official report from doctors and investigators to confirm that.

This is a complicated time for the country and official details about the former president's injuries are certainly not among the most pressing matters. Still, journalists must not shy away from doing a thorough and complete job of trying to answer all of the unanswered questions about that awful day in Pennsylvania.

Jennifer Schulze is a Chicago journalist reporting on journalism. Follow Jennifer on Threads @newsjennifer_schulze or Twitter/X @NewsJennifer.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    4 months ago

I dont doubt that Trump was hit by a bullet. Having said that it is mysterious that there never was a statement by a hospital or doctor that treated him.

AP24199112046462-1024x685.jpg

the piece of his ear that appeared damaged appeared to be about 1/20th the size of that bandage. 

The issue is not whether his ear was damaged and was bleeding a little (or moderately if you prefer) but rather whether he is milking the cut for everything it was worth and more. 

And how long is he going to wear such a large bandage?  It is a week now. No doubt the wound is healing, probably enough to not need a bandage at all anymore, but certainly enough to suggest a much smaller bandage. That does not appear to be a bandage out of a box or a nurses supply drawer. It appears to be a custom bandage made perhaps to Trump's specifications. 

I had a catheterization through my neck last year. Afterwards the incision wouldnt stop bleeding . For almost 6 hours a team of nurses , and even the heart surgeon took turns applying bandages and pressure to my neck, and still couldnt get it to stop bleeding .  Eventually the surgeon put four stitches in it. 

None of the bandages they used on my neck that day were as big as the one on Trumps ear. 

He doesnt need it, he wants it. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 months ago

but rather whether he is milking the cut for everything it was worth and more. 

Of course he is, he took the shot so his followers don’t have to.

He doesnt need it, he wants it. 

Duh.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    4 months ago

And we are talking about his exaggerated bandage in a negative way. 

Duh. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.2  CB  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 months ago
Still, journalists must not shy away from doing a thorough and complete job of trying to answer all of the unanswered questions about that awful day in Pennsylvania.

And there is the double-standard. We do not see for a week, thereabouts, any reporters "crowding" the ambulatory and clearly 'able to speak (gab)'  Donald calling for a detail listing of what ails him facially. This is typical media cuddling bull . . . .

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.3  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 months ago

He isn't wearing it today at his Michigan Rally.

Tell us why Biden is still in bed?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.3    4 months ago
He isn't wearing it today at his Michigan Rally.

good for him

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 months ago

I think the bandage is fine. Today he’s got a couple bandaids on there. Do we really need to get upset about ordinary things?

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.4.1  JBB  replied to  Tacos! @1.4    4 months ago

I agree. Bandaidgate is least of my worries!

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.4.2  GregTx  replied to  JBB @1.4.1    4 months ago

No doubt...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.4.3  Tessylo  replied to  Tacos! @1.4    4 months ago

Who's upset?  I's ludicrous.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4.4  Tacos!  replied to  Tessylo @1.4.3    4 months ago

I think it’s ludicrous anyone is talking about it and trying to ascribe some significance to it. He injured his ear - barely a week ago - so he has a bandage. What is there to talk about? Nothing as far as I’m concerned, but there are comments here, in media, all over. 

Probably 99% of the commentary I have seen since this shooting is people focusing on the wrong things: Trump’s reactions, who is to blame, conspiracy theories. We are a fucked up people sometimes.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.5  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @1.4    4 months ago

Trump is a pathological liar. He has no credibility even on the rare occasions when he is telling the truth. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.5    4 months ago

Discovery learning?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4.7  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.5    4 months ago
Trump is a pathological liar.

You think he’s lying about his ear? You’re seriously thinking about that?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.8  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @1.4.7    4 months ago

I never said that . Dont get hysterical.  Should we depend on Donald Trump's word for things, that is what I am saying. No , we shouldnt. 

At his rally today he claimed he has an IQ of 210 while Biden's is, according to Trump, 70. 

Why have such an asshole leading our country? What kind of fools are happy with that?

At least half of this country will never accept Trump as president. 

The future is grim. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4.9  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.8    4 months ago
I never said that

We’re discussing a band-aid and you felt it necessary to point out that he’s a pathological liar. So if you don’t think he’s lying about his band-aid, why even bring it up?

Dont get hysterical.

Look in the mirror. Seriously.

Should we depend on Donald Trump's word for things

You think someone is depending on the facts about his ear or his bandage? Who? Why?

At his rally today he claimed he has an IQ of 210 while Biden's is, according to Trump, 70

Yeah, that’s called Rhetorical Hyperbole and every politician does it. He’s making the point that he thinks he’s smarter than Biden. That’s all. No one thinks the numbers are some kind of objective factual data.

Why have such an asshole leading our country?

I don’t want him to be president either, but treating 100% of the things he says or does as dangerous or scary is a paranoid delusion. Sometimes a bandage is just a bandage.

At least half of this country will never accept Trump as president.

Well, then that makes them no better than the nutbags who think Trump is supposed to be president right now. To paraphrase Trump, there are crazy people on both sides.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.10  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @1.4.7    4 months ago

If Trump said it was 75 degrees and raining at Maralago I would assume it was not 75 degrees and not raining.  That is what I think of his honesty. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.10    4 months ago

I don’t care what the weather is in Mar -A-Lago.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4.12  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.10    4 months ago

What’s more concerning is that you might care what Trump says about the weather.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.13  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @1.4.9    4 months ago
Yeah, that’s called Rhetorical Hyperbole and every politician does it.

LOL.  No one in the history of politics in modern America ( I would say ever but we dont really have complete transcripts of what they were saying in the 1800's)  has talked like a complete asshole as much as Trump does, SERIOUSLY. 

You sound like you are not aware of that. 

Hyperbole??  Youve got to be kidding. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.14  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.4.11    4 months ago

Exactly, and you dont care if trumps a pathological liar or not. You have made that abundantly clear in most of your comments. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.15  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @1.4.9    4 months ago
Well, then that makes them no better than the nutbags who think Trump is supposed to be president right now. To paraphrase Trump, there are crazy people on both sides.

Now you're saying people who will never accept trump are nutbags.  Get a grip for fucks sake. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4.16  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.14    4 months ago
you dont care if trumps a pathological liar or not

I feel like people have forgotten Biden’s long and distinguished history of being full of shit. I’m not saying Trump isn’t worse, but Biden shouldn’t be winning any honesty prizes.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.17  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @1.4.16    4 months ago

I'm done with this bullshit bothsidesism. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4.18  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.15    4 months ago
Now you're saying people who will never accept trump are nutbags.

Yes, they are. Whoever wins a fair and legal election is the president. He’s my president and yours. That doesn’t mean I approve of him. It just means I respect our Constitution, our system, and our traditions.

But we have a problem. We have people who think it would be cool to settle the election by putting a bullet into one of the candidates. That is not ok and it should never be ok. Compared to that, I truly do not give a shit about Trump’s band-aid or his assessment of Biden’s IQ.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.4.19  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.17    4 months ago

There is a reason a majority of American would prefer someone other than the two candidates. And there are good reasons. Denying that truth is a failing whether you are on the Left or the Right.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.20  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.17    4 months ago

If only that were true.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.21  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.14    4 months ago
Exactly, and you dont care if trumps a pathological liar or not.

Of course I care and I also understand that no matter what I write here, he won’t change.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.22  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @1.4.18    4 months ago

I think you are creating self-justifying arguments. 

Saying you dont accept Trump as president is not the same thing as denying that he is the legitimate president in terms of him being in office. We arent birthers after all or the kind of weirdos we have now who tell interviewers 2 or 3 years after he left office that Trump is still REALLY the president and secretly controls the US military. 

Trump will never represent the values that I have for my country because by every appearance his values are the opposite of what I was taught and believed were American values growing up. Trump is chronically dishonest. He cheats. He bullys. He thinks everyone is beneath him. He disrespects women. The American values I grew up with do not culminate with someone being a humongous asshole. They just dont. 

Your second paragraph is over the top. Sure there are some people who would have been happy if Trump was killed. Just like there are people who hope Taylor Swift's plane crashes or that Al Sharpton gets killed in a street robbery. 

The issue some of us have been talking about is not whether the shooting of Trump should have taken place, but how it is being used in the presidential campaign. It should not have provoked your intense criticism. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.4.23  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.17    4 months ago

People unwilling to admit that both sides are often guilty of the same things often have a problem with credibility

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.4.24  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.4.23    4 months ago

And a grip on reality 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.26  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.4.23    4 months ago

The Democrats and Biden are hardly perfect.  But it is a choice and Trump is the most unfit for office candidate in US history. He is a traitor and a looming authoritarian. 

Is America really going to elect a traitor president? 

We would never live it down. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
1.4.27  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.26    4 months ago
But it is a choice and Trump is the most unfit for office candidate in US history. He is a traitor and a looming authoritarian.  Is America really going to elect a traitor president? 

They may very well elect a president that they feel is best for the country, irregardless of the constant hyperbole (you forgot destroying democracy) promoted buy the left.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.28  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.4.27    4 months ago

Calling Trump a traitor is not hyperbole, it is based on known facts.  Trump approved of a plan to have the vice president throw out the votes of many millions of people and essentially declare Trump president again. He stayed with that plan up until the moment the Congress certified the election on the evening of Jan 6. 

In addition he sat on his hands while the Capitol riot was taking place and did absolutely nothing to try and stop it. This is a disgrace for all eternity. 

Trump has been asked (although not enough) specifically about this and he has changed the subject  every time. This is extreme consciousness of guilt. 

Trump said this to his supporters as the riot/insurrection wound down. After dozens of police had been injured. 

These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long. Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!

He is a traitor. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4.29  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.28    4 months ago
These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots

He was justifying the insurrection. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
1.4.30  CB  replied to  JohnRussell @1.4.29    4 months ago

It's worse, Donald is using high-soaring rhetoric to support a delusion that 'might ought to make right' against the Rule of Law!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.4.31  Krishna  replied to  Tacos! @1.4.4    4 months ago
I think it’s ludicrous anyone is talking about it and trying to ascribe some significance to it. He injured his ear - barely a week ago - so he has a bandage. What is there to talk about? Nothing as far as I’m concerned, but there are comments here, in media, all over.  Probably 99% of the commentary I have seen since this shooting is people focusing on the wrong things: Trump’s reactions, who is to blame, conspiracy theories.

I am shocked!

Shocked to find that great stupidity is going on in here!

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
1.4.32  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Krishna @1.4.31    4 months ago

You and me both.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
1.4.33  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @1.4.31    4 months ago
Shocked to find that great stupidity is going on in here!

Jus' kiddin'--- actually I'm not surprised at all!!!! 

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.5  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    4 months ago

So much attention to such a trivial issue. jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2  Mark in Wyoming     4 months ago

So , are you advocating for open medical records open to all and any that wish to look for any reason they deem fit ?

 If so , i would say interesting stance to take .

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2    4 months ago

I dont think all of trumps medical records should be disclosed because he got a cut on his ear, I think the treatment of the injury and what it entailed should be disclosed. He is running for president and is one of the two or three most newsworthy people in the country right now. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
2.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    4 months ago
He is running for president

You aren’t changing your vote based on the medical description of his wound.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.1.2  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    4 months ago

still , an interesting stance to take , even if now limited .

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2.1.3  George  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2.1.2    4 months ago

Strange that they now want open medical records, I vote both candidates do a live unedited cognitive tests, broadcast on all news channels. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1.4  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    4 months ago
I think the treatment of the injury and what it entailed should be disclosed

Why?? He got nicked in the ear. It’s not like he had a stroke.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.1.5  Krishna  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.1.1    4 months ago
You aren’t changing your vote based on the medical description of his wound.

Don't be too sure...

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.1.6  Krishna  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.4    4 months ago
I think the treatment of the injury and what it entailed should be disclosed
Why?? He got nicked in the ear. It’s not like he had a stroke.

Related video:

GENERAL HOSPITAL SPOILERS VIDEO: BIG QUESTIONS AND BIGGER EMOTIONS

Questions and Heartbreak

For Friday, July 19 on   General Hospital , spoilers tease that the adults may think they are doing a good job of hiding the tension, but out of the mouths of one child, they get a wake-up call that they are failing. “Something weird’s going on that nobody’s saying,” James says to Maxie, Spinelli and Georgie.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2    4 months ago

How about just taking off the bandage so that his bloodless injury is visible?  Maybe he’ll unveil that when he unveils his tax returns.  He probably can’t show us the ear because it is under a medical audit.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2.2.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.2    4 months ago

jrSmiley_91_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.2.2  Tacos!  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.2    4 months ago
How about just taking off the bandage so that his bloodless injury is visible?

Yes. So all the wannabe doctors on TV and the internet can make a proper evaluation of his boo-boo ear. Only then can we make an informed voting decision. jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

Wait. Bloodless?

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
2.2.3  Krishna  replied to  Tacos! @2.2.2    4 months ago
Wait. Bloodless?

It was fake blood-- actually a few Tablespoons of Heinz Ketchup!

(Obviously the evil Ultra-Woke   "Neo-Libs" put it there! jrSmiley_5_smiley_image.png )

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
2.2.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Krishna @2.2.3    4 months ago

 Terisa Heinz wouldn’t use her dead republican catsup that made her rich to help Trump.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3  Hallux    4 months ago

Enough with the ear bandage (teabag?) and the inanity of copycats, martyrdom is getting a bad name.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @3    4 months ago

Here, here!

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Hallux  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1    4 months ago

Going a tad nazi on you, the phrase is actually Hear, Hear!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.1.2  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Hallux @3.1.1    4 months ago

least he didnt say Ear, ear .

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hallux @3.1.1    4 months ago

Right you are.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
3.1.4  Krishna  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1    4 months ago
Here, here!

There, there!

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Krishna @3.1.4    4 months ago

Exactly.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    4 months ago

Blueanon is a bizarre place. 

this obsession with a bandage seems to some sort of coping mechanism To deal with their partys conspiracy to hide the mental capacity of the president blowing up and leading to a coup  attempt on the verge of their convention, something no one alive has seen.  

but sure obsess about whether a band aid was really medically necessary

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4.1  George  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 months ago

Isn’t it strange that the same people who demanded cloth masks at all times, now think a bandage for a bullet wound isn’t necessary?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  George @4.1    4 months ago

Where you stand depends on what side of the aisle you sit.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  George @4.1    4 months ago

Give the mask hysterics, you’d think the party would be more upset with a Covid positive  Biden not wearing a mask while interacting with people than the possibility a band aid was superfluous.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
4.1.3  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.1    4 months ago

i have found , upwind or upstream  is generally more desirable .

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.4  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  George @4.1    4 months ago

I've seen the pictures. It looked to me like a small (tiny)  chunk of the outer rim of his upper ear was removed by the bullet. I didnt see any wound to the inside of the ear and if there was one it would have been much more serious and he likely would have been hospitalized. This was a superficial tear of the edge of his ear. Be happy he was so lucky. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.1.3    4 months ago

Good point.  As Ootah said:

Enemies all around. The Bashkari are the worst. Whole town comes out, and pisses downstream when we go bathing.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.6  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.4    4 months ago

The hair over his ear wasn’t even mussed.  It supposedly bled a lot yet not a drop of spatter on the hair covering his ear.  The blood didn’t even appear until he rose up from the ground.  Then secret service just raises him up into the open as if the possibility of more shooters is impossible.  Of course it is suspicious.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.7  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.6    4 months ago

A .223 can do a number on skin and bone but is no match for Trump’s hairspray.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.8  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.7    4 months ago

The more you talk the more you appear to be at peace with the idea that Trump would leverage an event that took lives and caused grievous injuries in his ongoing campaign of fraud.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.8    4 months ago
The more you talk the more you appear to be at peace

At peace? No, but ranting about it here effects nothing.

Trump would leverage an event that took lives and caused grievous injuries

Few here have said anything about those three victims, perhaps because they are just “trash”.

in his ongoing campaign of fraud.

It’s been his MO for decades.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.10  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.9    4 months ago
It’s been his MO for decades.

Therefore why bother mentioning it. Yeah we've heard that from you, a lot. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.11  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.10    4 months ago
Therefore why bother mentioning it.

You would have to ask Hal.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4.1.12  George  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.8    4 months ago

You mean like the left leveraged the deaths of millions to win the presidency?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.13  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  George @4.1.12    4 months ago

Spoken like true Trump sycophant.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4.1.14  George  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.13    4 months ago

So you deny the left leveraged how Trump handled Covid to win an election?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.1.15  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  George @4.1.14    4 months ago

So you deny that Trump grossly mismanaged Covid?  Tell that to Herman Cain when you see him down south of heaven.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.16  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.15    4 months ago

I think that our COVID per capita mortality was around the same as Italy, Belgium, UK, Spain, Chile, etc.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
4.1.17  George  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.15    4 months ago

Deflection fail, I didn’t say that. Shall we try again? Are you claiming that democrats didn’t use the death of Americans to win an election?

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
4.1.18  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.7    4 months ago

you opened this door .

 .223  and 5.56 though similar are not the same .

 the shooters rifle is verified as being chambered in 5.56 nato . it stands to reason thats the ammo he would have used because people are taught to only shoot ammo that the firearm is marked  and chambered for .

 the really big differece between the two rounds is chamber pressure , the 5.56 is much higher than a .223. that means a rifle chambered 5.56 , can shoot both rounds safely , where as on chambered 223 , if firing 5.56 will eventually fail . it has to do with metal tempering .

 at about 100 meters , velocity starts to drop  and both rounds are vastly different in that drop in velocity , there are many different factors that affect this .

 as a reloader , here are some facts ,  @ 100 m  5.56 is going roughly2700 FPS ( yes im rounding ) a .223 round @ 100m is going roughly 2900 fps.

 the faster a round is going , the less drop it will have because the forces that effect it have less time to create that effect .

 my point here is , that difference of 200 fps also had an effect on the outcome of the incident . if the bullet had been going that much faster it would have reached the aim point sooner , with a much different result .

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.19  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.1.18    4 months ago

Thanks, I should have listened better looked it up first.  Appreciate the reloading and ballistic info.  Reminded of helping my father who reloaded both rifle and handgun rounds.  I’m on my to see him and my sister now.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
4.1.20  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.19    4 months ago

those are basically factory load velocities ,  for off the shelf ammo , one just has to look at ballistic tables with velocities at distance for the round

, now a reloader can tweak some things , i do it all the time .

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.1.21  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1.4    4 months ago
"Be happy he was so lucky."

But we are, and so should you.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.1.22  Ronin2  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.15    4 months ago

More people died from Covid under Biden's watch than Trump's. That is with Biden having access to the vaccines that Trump rushed through; and the therapeutics.

What is Biden's excuse?

Also, name one country that handled Covid well?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.23  Tacos!  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.6    4 months ago
The hair over his ear wasn’t even mussed.

I mean, he can afford to use really strong product on that hair. It’s probably a secret formula left over from the 80s. If it’s bulletproof, that wouldn’t surprise me.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.24  Tacos!  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.1.15    4 months ago

To be fair, a lot of people mismanaged Covid. But you know, different strategies were tried all over the world and lots of people still died. For example, there was a lot of political debate over the contrasting strategies employed by California and Florida, but their death rates are actually pretty similar.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.25  Tacos!  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @4.1.18    4 months ago

Thanks for that. That’s actually helpful, interesting information.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.26  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.24    4 months ago

Don’t harsh Hal’s buzz.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.27  Tacos!  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.26    4 months ago

I’m enjoying a nice scotch, so don’t give me too much credit.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.1.28  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tacos! @4.1.27    4 months ago

I love the ‘The Queen of the Hebrides’, Islay scotch.  When I drink it, I smell the ocean and taste the iodine in the peat.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.1.29  Tacos!  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.1.28    4 months ago

Tonight, we were having Laphroaig Lore. I like picking something from Islay when we’re having fish.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
4.1.30  Krishna  replied to  Ronin2 @4.1.22    4 months ago
Also, name one country that handled Covid well?

Sure-- no problem!

(Remember, GIYF! jrSmiley_2_smiley_image.png )

What countries handled COVID best?

Their economies were not as devastated as those of countries with laxer policies, according to Sridhar: “[T]hose countries that responded effectively and controlled the virus, like   Taiwan, South Korea, Denmark and Norway , had faster economic recovery compared with countries like Britain, Spain and Sweden.”
 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 months ago

It is clear that you have a new favorite word.  “Hypocrisy” must be so disappointed.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2    4 months ago

I never heard of Blueanon until a few days ago, although it is probably a thing on far right talk radio. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.2.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.1    4 months ago

There are Blueanon folks here.  Last weekend they claimed the blood on Trump’s ear was from a theatrical gel pack; that the shooting was a “false flag,” that the scene of a bloodied Trump raising his fist under an American flag was “#staged.”

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
4.2.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.1    4 months ago

Almost like it was prepared in advance, to address a hidden bloodless wound that would obviously be questioned.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
4.2.4  Gsquared  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2    4 months ago

"Lawfare" didn't last too long, did it?

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.2.5  Hallux  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.1    4 months ago
I never heard of Blueanon until a few days ago

It's a construct from conservatives back in 2021 to dampen their association with Q-anon. It's taken them several years to fully adopt it as a slight. Get used to it, the term is overtaking 'woke' at lightspeed.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.2.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2    4 months ago
t is clear that you have a new favorite word.  “Hypocrisy” must be so disappointed.

It's easier than continuously  typing out "the reality averse, fanatical partisans who only get their news from far left blogs and who mindlessly regurgitate whatever talking points they are told to believe."  

I am not without sympathy for blue anon.  I get the need to lash out. It must be tough for those who came on sites like this and dutifully regurgitated the talking points that  Biden's perfectly fine, that every single one of the countless videos showing otherwise were deepfakes, that behind closed doors he was a dynamic leader etc.. They have to, at this date, realize they were played like a violin by their party, again. The same people who told them to ignore their senses are now admitting Biden's anything but competent and that they have known he hasn't been fine for a long time. 

 The part of the brain of the BlueAnon cult member that remains rational must be embarrassed beyond belief. To  continuously believe and stand behind their party's dogma  only to end up looking foolish time after time must cause some major psychological trauma when those lies get exposed. Sadly, rather than coming to terms with the manipulation (it's a form of abuse really) they remain in denial and pivot to the next batshit crazy theory, that allows them to believe, for a little while anyway, that they are on the side of good saving humanity from NAzis, racists etc..Anything to avoid coming to terms with the reality of how they've used. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.2.6    4 months ago

Do you wish to make Biden/Harris unelectable, or do you wish to make Trump unelectable?  Since one of them is going to win you cant have it both ways. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
4.2.8  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.7    4 months ago
Do you wish to make Biden/Harris unelectable,

The Dems are playing Game of Thrones.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.2.9  Vic Eldred  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.8    4 months ago

And they are doing it against the clock.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2.10  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.7    4 months ago

Biden and Harris have made themselves unelectable.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.11  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @4.2.8    4 months ago

Then consider this, what is the difference between the Lannisters and the Trumps?

The Lannisters always paid their debts!

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.2.12  Ronin2  replied to  JBB @4.2.11    4 months ago
The Lannisters always paid their debts!

Have you even read the books or watched by tv series?

If not then I suggest you do so before making that type of statement.

Lannisters always repay their debts in other people's blood.

Nothing like a veiled death threat.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.13  JBB  replied to  Ronin2 @4.2.12    4 months ago

Yes, paying $ debts is the only difference!

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
4.2.14  Right Down the Center  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @4.2.3    4 months ago

Another great blue anon example.

Thanks

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Expert
4.2.15  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2.7    4 months ago
Do you wish to make Biden/Harris unelectable, or do you wish to make Trump unelectable?  Since one of them is going to win you cant have it both ways. 

And it ain't Biden!

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
4.3  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    4 months ago
this obsession with a bandage seems to some sort of coping mechanism

... or some me2 sympathy tripe that 100s sported?

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
5  George    4 months ago

So how long before Woodward and Bernstein tell us bandage gate is worse than watergate?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6  Tacos!    4 months ago

I don’t understand why this is controversial. It’s just an ear, and clearly only a small piece of it. I could not care less about the state of his ear. It’s not like he was using it anyway.

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
6.1  sandy-2021492  replied to  Tacos! @6    4 months ago
It’s not like he was using it anyway.

jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
7  squiggy    4 months ago

"We now know more about Biden's just-diagnosed COVID case..."

Well, we know he doesn't really give a shit about the military who must be near him because he didn't care to follow the recommendation of wearing a mask.

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
7.1  squiggy  replied to  squiggy @7    4 months ago

240720-biden-ch-1231-fe1421.jpg

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
8  squiggy    4 months ago

Now, another picture for the NT Medical Corps240720-trump-rally-wm-232p-935df8.jpg

   ... that we can contrast with President No-Mask Joe.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
9  Right Down the Center    4 months ago

But more transparency is still required as former RNC Chair Michael Steele and many others are saying. 

Um, no

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Guide
10.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Right Down the Center @10    4 months ago

ROFL - a report from Ronny Johnson-Jackson, the same sycophantic “doctor” that claims Trump can live to be 200.  Why would anyone question his photo-free findings?

 
 
 
CB
Professor Principal
10.1.1  CB  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @10.1    4 months ago

This is what we can expect from a(nother) "Donald" administration. Tightly controlled narratives. Then, of course, it will be the whole of the federal system reset to the conservative (hive/) mind of Donald as its CEO/OWNER. 

Wake up, America and vote for democracy.

This is your second chance, but 'third' strike ball!

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
10.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @10.1    4 months ago

Read the whole thing. Or don't 

 
 

Who is online




481 visitors