╌>

Harris Campaign Slaps Down Right-Wing Activist’s Plagiarism Allegations

  
Via:  John Russell  •  2 days ago  •  47 comments


Harris Campaign Slaps Down Right-Wing Activist’s Plagiarism Allegations
In a statement to the Daily Beast, campaign spokesman James Singer said, “Rightwing operatives are getting desperate as they see the bipartisan coalition of support Vice President Harris is building to win this election, as Trump retreats to a conservative echo chamber refusing to face questions about his lies. This is a book that’s been out for 15 years, and the Vice President clearly cited sources and statistics in footnotes and endnotes throughout.”

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign on Tuesday dismissed as “desperate” a conservative activist’s accusations that she plagiarized passages in a book she co-authored more than a decade ago. Christopher Rufo claimed that five sections of 2009’s  Smart on Crime   were lifted from other sources—extracts that totaled about 500 words across a 66,500-word, 200-page book.  The New York Times   and  The Washington Post   subsequently reported that the allegations concerned statistics or verbatim language from other sources used without quotation marks, but that most of those sources were correctly cited in footnotes or the sources section of the book.

Jonathan Bailey, a plagiarism consultant, told the  Post   that the errors were “sloppy” and “bad” but did not amount to the “malicious plagiarism” that Rufo seemed to be alleging. He added to the  Times   that the allegations amounted “to an error and not an intent to defraud.” In a statement to the Daily Beast, campaign spokesman James Singer said, “Rightwing operatives are getting desperate as they see the bipartisan coalition of support Vice President Harris is building to win this election, as Trump retreats to a conservative echo chamber refusing to face questions about his lies. This is a book that’s been out for 15 years, and the Vice President clearly cited sources and statistics in footnotes and endnotes throughout.”


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 days ago
Harris campaign rejects claims of plagiarism - The Washington Post

Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign Tuesday rejected claims that she and a co-author had plagiarized a handful of passages in a 2009 book on fighting crime, arguing that the allegations amounted to a partisan attempt to weaponize a 15-year-old work.

The claims arose this week when Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist, listed five instances in the book, “Smart on Crime: A Career Prosecutor’s Plan to Make Us Safer,” saying Harris and co-author Joan O’C. Hamilton used language that was nearly identical to outside sources without proper citation. Rufo cited the work of Austrian “plagiarism hunter” Stefan Weber.


“Some of the passages he highlighted appear to contain minor transgressions — reproducing small sections of text; insufficient paraphrasing — but others seem to reflect more serious infractions,” Rufo wrote.
 
The claims involved about 500 words out of a 66,500-word book. The sources and statistics that Harris used are attributed in footnotes, but in some instances she and Hamilton did not use quotation marks even though they took language almost verbatim.

Harris was involved in the book — coming up with the concept, sharing her experiences as a prosecutor and district attorney in San Francisco during long interview sessions, and reviewing drafts, according to a person involved in the book, speaking on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the subject.
But Harris was not involved in the formatting of outside excerpts and citations, which have been the focus of the latest criticisms, the person said, adding that those details would have been handled by her co-author and editors.
 
A Harris campaign spokesman said Rufo’s allegations amounted to a partisan attack on a small sliver of work from 15 years ago.
“Rightwing operatives are getting desperate as they see the bipartisan coalition of support Vice President Harris is building to win this election, as Trump retreats to a conservative echo chamber refusing to face questions about his lies,” campaign spokesman James Singer said in a statement. “This is a book that’s been out for 15 years, and the Vice President clearly cited sources and statistics in footnotes and endnotes throughout.”
But Republican nominee Donald Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), mocked Harris over the allegations, posting on X, “Hi, I’m JD Vance. I wrote my own book, unlike Kamala Harris, who copied hers from Wikipedia.” The Washington Post recently examined many aspects of Vance’s book, which triggered mixed reactions in his hometown and included several accounts that could not be independently verified.
 
Accusations of plagiarism can become politically damaging — they helped derail President Joe Biden’s presidential campaign in 1987 — and potentially invite questions about a candidate’s honesty. But in this instance, according to several experts, the passages appear the result of sloppy work rather than a malicious attempt to steal someone’s ideas.
“It’s nuanced,” said Jonathan Bailey, a copyright and plagiarism consultant who has examined the claims about Harris’s work. “It’s not nearly as serious as accusers want it to be — and it’s not the nothingburger that the Harris campaign wants it to be, either.”
Bailey, the publisher of Plagiarism Today, a website focusing on plagiarism online, said that in most instances, Harris and her co-author provided a citation but did not put the text in quotation marks. “Some of these passages were most likely where one of the authors pasted text in, didn’t clearly mark it, and co-mingled material with their own,” he said.
 
Bailey said such errors are not uncommon in material written from the late-1990s to around 2010, a period when electronic research became more common but plagiarism detection had not yet emerged.
“It’s sloppy. It’s bad. But I don’t think it’s evidence of deliberate and malicious plagiarism,” Bailey said. On a scale of 1 to 10 in terms of egregiousness, he added, “I’m thinking in the 3-to-4 range. Not nothing, but if it were anybody else on the planet, I don’t think we’d have any alarm bells at all right now.”
“Smart on Crime” was published in 2009 at a time when Harris’s career was taking off as she rose from district attorney of San Francisco to attorney general of California. The book features Harris on the cover, but it also lists Hamilton, a California-based writing collaborator and content consultant, as a co-author. Hamilton declined to comment and referred questions to the Harris campaign.
 
In one passage outlining crime-fighting efforts in High Point, N.C., the authors use six sentences that are identical to those in a news release by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The book cites the release as a source in the footnotes a few paragraphs later but does not include quotations around the section that was lifted from it.
Rufo, a prominent right-leaning activist, played a central role in the push by conservatives to highlight critical race theory as emblematic of what he sees as the problems with progressives’ approach to education and race. CRT argues that racism in the United States is systemic and not just rooted in individual bigotry — an idea that some find self-evident and others deeply objectionable.
In part because of such arguments, Rufo has become an in-demand activist who has advised numerous Republican and conservative candidates, from school boards to state legislatures to Congress.
 
He also played a role in pressing Harvard University to oust its former president, Claudine Gay, with accusations that, as a doctoral candidate in the 1990s, she had plagiarized sections of her dissertation. “While her resignation is a victory, it is only the beginning,” Rufo wrote in a Wall Street Journal op-ed after Gay stepped down.
Some analysts dismissed the claims about Harris’s work in part because they are being promoted by Rufo, whom they consider highly biased.
“I’m dismayed that he’s at it again,” said Susan Blum, a professor of linguistic anthropology at the University of Notre Dame and author of “My Word! Plagiarism and College Culture.” “Without also looking at books Trump published or JD Vance published and taking this kind of approach to everyone in public life — then I think we can talk about it.”
Bailey added that the brevity of the passages makes it unlikely that any lack of attribution reflected an intentional effort to improperly take credit.
“Ultimately we’re talking about not very many words in a very long book, which to me means it’s more likely poor writing,” Bailey said. “You’d expect these to be more apparent throughout the book if this was malicious intent to plagiarize.”
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 days ago

More Trump far right wing much ado about nothing. 

The mistakes were minor and almost certainly not Harris' fault.  It sounds like the mistake was made in the editing process and quotation marks were left off of passages that comprised less than 8/10ths of 1% of the book. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    2 days ago

Of course, that must be it, because we know that Harris is as honest as the day is long

Those silly editors were sure a bunch of incompetent ninnies.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.1    2 days ago

Trump tried to say the word "insurrectionists" last night and "inrushes" came out of his mouth, and you want us to reject Harris because of minor attribution mistakes in a 15 year old book ? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.1    2 days ago
In one passage outlining crime-fighting efforts in High Point, N.C., the authors use six sentences that are identical to those in a news release by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The book cites the release as a source in the footnotes a few paragraphs later but does not include quotations around the section that was lifted from it.

Do conservatives really want to continue on with this trivial complaint ? 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.3    2 days ago

All they have is trivial complaints.  Nothing of substance.  They have to dig pretty deep find something from 15 years ago, which proves nothing.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1.5  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.4    2 days ago

The left has reached back decades trying to dig up credible evidence of alleged sexual harassment by Trump. Some lying bitch convinced a jury that Trump allegedly attacked her. Same thing happened to Kavanaugh

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.6  evilone  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.5    yesterday
Some lying bitch convinced a jury that Trump allegedly attacked her.

Careful... the last person to make that claim was sued. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
1.1.7  afrayedknot  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.5    yesterday

“Some lying bitch convinced a jury…”

A jury of his peers, being a cornerstone of our judicial process. So he is indeed a convicted felon.

The ‘lying bitch’ comment seems a more personal problem in its incessant use. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.8  George  replied to  afrayedknot @1.1.7    yesterday
So he is indeed a convicted felon.

Technically he is not. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.9  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.8    yesterday
Technically he is not. 

Technically he as been found guilty of 34 counts of felony fraud. Until he wins an appeal he IS a felon. He is lucky NY allows felons to vote in elections, if they are not currently behind bars.

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.10  George  replied to  evilone @1.1.9    yesterday

Sigh, his appeal has absolutely nothing to do with it. Technically he is not a convicted felon. Period.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.11  Tessylo  replied to  evilone @1.1.9    yesterday

THAT'S NOT FAIR!

lol

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
1.1.12  George  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.11    yesterday

And it's absolutely wrong, LOL

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.13  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1.5    yesterday

No.  Not true.

We know who the lying bitch is.  

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.14  evilone  replied to  George @1.1.10    13 hours ago
Technically he is not a convicted felon. Period.

Hmmm... weird.

Donald Trump became the first former American president to be convicted of felony crimes Thursday as a New York jury found him guilty of all 34 charges...
 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2  George    2 days ago

Absolute bullshit by the Harris campaign, this stupid bitch touts here credentials as a prosecutor 15 years ago but doesn't want her plagiarism from 15 year ago to count. Fuck you Kamala, you stole someone else's ideas because yours died of loneliness. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  George @2    2 days ago

Maybe a glass of warm milk will calm you down. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    2 days ago

[]

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2.1.2  George  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.1    2 days ago

[]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1.1    2 days ago

I could have just deleted his comment as "no value". Would you prefer that? 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.1.4  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.3    2 days ago
I could have just deleted his comment as "no value"

and that would have been very wrong but more like vindictive

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.4    2 days ago

[]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.1.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.5    2 days ago

[]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.7  Tessylo  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @2.1.6    yesterday

[]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
2.1.8  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.7    yesterday

[]

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
2.1.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.5    yesterday
removed for context
 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
2.1.10  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.7    yesterday

[]

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2  afrayedknot  replied to  George @2    2 days ago

“…this stupid bitch…”

“Fuck you Kamala…”

…thus rendering any further comment only pathetic partisan propaganda. Plagiarism has suddenly become an issue? If so, happy to discuss the character of your candidate. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2.2.1  George  replied to  afrayedknot @2.2    2 days ago

Who is my candidate, sure isn't trump. what is your issue with Ms. Stein?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  George @2.2.1    2 days ago

Klan leader David Duke endorsed Stein yesterday. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.3  afrayedknot  replied to  George @2.2.1    2 days ago

“what is your issue with Ms. Stein?”

see 2.2.2

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.4  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  afrayedknot @2.2.3    2 days ago

Duke says Harris and Trump are stooges of the Jews. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2.2.5  George  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.2    2 days ago

David Hasn't been a Klan leader since he left the democrat party.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  George @2.2.5    2 days ago
David Hasn't been a Klan leader

and Trump is not president but people call him Mr.President

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2.8  Hallux  replied to  George @2.2.5    2 days ago
David Hasn't been a Klan leader since he left the democrat party.

The Klan kicked him out for theft. In 1988 he left the democratic party and joined the repubs losing every election but one ... republicans in those days were still real conservatives. However, by all means continue to offer up lame gotcha excuses.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.2.9  evilone  replied to  Hallux @2.2.8    yesterday
In 1988 he left the democratic party and joined the repubs losing every election but one ... republicans in those days were still real conservatives.

And endorsed Trump.

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
2.2.10  afrayedknot  replied to  George @2.2.5    yesterday

“David Hasn't been a Klan leader since he left the democrat party.”

And trump didn’t make a difference until he left the democrat party. Coincidence or confirmation of his appeal to the most base of bases. 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2.2.11  George  replied to  afrayedknot @2.2.10    yesterday

I guess neither one of them were racist enough to be a member of the democrat party ruling elite anymore.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.2.12  Hallux  replied to  George @2.2.11    yesterday
I guess ...

You're not alone in that 'field' of mental gymnastics.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    2 days ago

 She just admitted she did it and simply said "who cares that I stole other people's work and passed it off as my own?"

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    2 days ago
In one passage outlining crime-fighting efforts in High Point, N.C., the authors use six sentences that are identical to those in a news release by the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. The book cites the release as a source in the footnotes a few paragraphs later but does not include quotations around the section that was lifted from it.

Someone who actually wanted to steal others words would not cite the source a few paragraphs later. 

This trivial charge of plagiarism , presented as if it disqualifies her, is out of gas.

And did you notice Rufo made the allegation but "forgot" to mention that the sources were listed a few paragraphs later ? 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
3.1.1  afrayedknot  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    yesterday

“This trivial charge of plagiarism , presented as if it disqualifies her, is out of gas.”

And lest we forget…the kerfuffle of leaving her history of her stint at McDonalds off a resume. Disqualifying? More likely desperation, and most certainly pathetic. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    yesterday

lol.  Now you want to argue that copying , verbatim, six sentences is okay…

I only dealt myself a card from the bottom of the deck one measly time..I did it correctly the next card.   How can anyone be mad?

This is why democrats screaming and needing fainting couches for Trump lying was always such a farce. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    2 days ago

Who's surprised that the Post was more critical of Melania Trump, instead of the actual Vice President running for President?

384

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
5  Dig    yesterday

As evidenced by comments here, some righties apparently live for bad faith misinformation, even when shown why it's bad faith misinformation. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
6  Kavika     yesterday

With this accusation the MAGA’s are aware that Harris can read and write, something that their leader will never be accused of.

 
 

Who is online





Tacos!


480 visitors