╌>

Ashley Babbitt Family's Lawyer Terry Roberts Threatens to Sue Capitol Police

  
Via:  Devangelical  •  4 years ago  •  65 comments

By:   Jerry Lambe (Law Crime)

Ashley Babbitt Family's Lawyer Terry Roberts Threatens to Sue Capitol Police
An attorney representing the family of Ashli Babbitt, the Air Force veteran who was shot and killed during the Jan. 6 siege at the U.S. Capitol, said this week that he plans on filing a $10 million lawsuit against the U.S. Capitol Police and the lieutenant who fired the fatal shot.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show

...and if that doesn't work, all her "Q" paraphernalia will be auctioned off at the next maga rally


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



An attorney representing the family of Ashli Babbitt, the Air Force veteran who was shot and killed during the Jan. 6 siege at the U.S. Capitol, said this week that he plans on filing a $10 million lawsuit against the U.S. Capitol Police and the lieutenant who fired the fatal shot.

Multiple videos from inside the Capitol Building show Babbitt amid a group of people crowded around a doorway in the lobby which separated a stair well from a hallway. Several law enforcement officers appeared to be guarding the hallway beyond the doors; others dressed as officers appeared to be among the mob in the stair well. The doorway windows were smashed, and the doors themselves were barricaded. Babbitt, wearing a red, white, and blue backpack and draped in a Trump flag, attempted to climb through one of the busted windows when a single shot was fired, killing her.

The Department of Justice two weeks ago declined to charge the officer, whose name has not been released to the public, finding that he may have believed self-defense was reasonably necessary to protect members of Congress inside the Speaker's Lobby.

But attorney Terrell N. Roberts, III has maintained that the footage from inside the building made it clear that Babbitt "did not pose a danger to the officer, or any other person when she was shot."

"A rookie police officer would not have shot this woman. If she committed any crime by going through the window and into the Speaker's Lobby, it would have been trespassing. Some misdemeanor crime. All a rookie cop would have done is arrest her," Roberts said in an interview with Zenger News.

"And he has plenty of other officers there to assist with arrest," he said of the shooter. "You had officers on Ashli's side of the door in riot gear and holding submachine guns. And on the other side of the door you have another uniformed officer 6 or 8 feet away. Whose life is he saving by shooting her? She's not brandishing a weapon. She's on the window ledge. And there's no reason to think she's armed."

Roberts also said that the lieutenant should be denied qualified immunity in any civil litigation. Qualified immunity is a controversial doctrine that prevents government officials from being personally liable for monetary damages without showing the official violated a statutory or constitutional right that was "clearly established" at the time.

"I don't know how on earth he could. This is a clear case of excessive force," Roberts said. "What it looks like is this guy shot this lady for no legitimate law enforcement purpose. And you know, they ought to be pretty ashamed of that. I mean, [it's] pretty, pretty bad, that you don't hear any member of Congress speaking out about this thing. In a free country like ours, it's very strange and odd that they wouldn't identify the officer, or even provide some details, explaining why he had to kill her."

But even if the courts were to agree that the officer used excessive force, the far harder task in overcoming qualified immunity would be showing that the officer's conduct violated Babbitt's "clearly established" right, which seems like a steep hill to climb given the historically unique circumstances of rioters invading the Capitol Building while lawmakers were inside.

A few weeks after the insurrection, the head of the Capitol Police officers' union said that approximately 140 officers were injured trying to protect members of Congress from rioters. Federal prosecutors have charged more than 400 people with an array of crimes varying from simple trespassing to assaulting a police officer with a deadly weapon. The FBI is also still seeking help in identifying hundreds of more participants in the insurrection.

Law&Crime reached out to Roberts for more details on the lawsuit, which he told Zenger News he plans to file within the next 10 days.

[image via Ashli Babbitt/Twitter]

 


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1  seeder  devangelical    4 years ago

bfd

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    4 years ago

Blood money for a damned traitor? Get outta here!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    4 years ago

Was she still active duty?

I think the CP officer did what he felt he had to do

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    4 years ago

the CP officer read what was written on her maga hat and took the initiative.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.2  Tacos!  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4  Paula Bartholomew    4 years ago

Screw that bitch.  Once she became a seditious traitor, she got just what she deserved.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
5  Kavika     4 years ago

The Capital Police should counter sue. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
6  Thrawn 31    4 years ago

Go for it, they will lose hard.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7  MrFrost    4 years ago
An attorney representing the family of Ashli Babbitt, the Air Force veteran who was shot and killed during the Jan. 6 siege at the U.S. Capitol, said this week that he plans on filing a $10 million lawsuit against the U.S. Capitol Police and the lieutenant who fired the fatal shot.

Actions have consequences. She would be alive today had she not taken part in trying to overthrow the US government because her messiah lied to her. 

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
7.1  Split Personality  replied to  MrFrost @7    4 years ago

Terrell should watch the video.  If there were three officers with submachineguns the outcome might have been very different.

Instead there were three officers, in varying degrees of disarray who were being beseech-ed to step aside,

that they were not the targets. 

When the room beyond was pretty much empty of members of Congress, the three officers slid to one side, surrendering the door to the mob at 1:37 of the tape.  Babbit is shot and goes down at 2:12 of the tape.

Two of the three officers try to render aid immediately.

Meanwhile coming up the nearby steps are 7 or 8 officers to rescue the first three officers and at least one has an AR style rifle

pointed at the crowd while another officer shouts at the crowd to disburse.

The tape ends...

Reminds me of a Philly shooting that was ruled "justified" in another breakin...

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Split Personality @7.1    4 years ago
Reminds me of a Philly shooting that was ruled "justified" in another breakin...

Reminds me of Rittenhouse who drove across state lines to, "defend himself". Might have been a lot easier had he just stayed home. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8  JohnRussell    4 years ago

She broke through a locked door and tried to enter a protected area which was protecting the members of the  US House of Representatives. 

What is her case? 

 
 
 
Wishful_thinkin
Freshman Silent
8.2  Wishful_thinkin  replied to  JohnRussell @8    4 years ago

And if she had gotten through those doors, so would the mob that was behind her.   

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
8.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  JohnRussell @8    4 years ago

They don’t have one. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.4  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @8    4 years ago
She broke through a locked door and tried to enter a protected area which was protecting the members of the  US House of Representatives.  What is her case? 

I can just imagine what the comments from conservatives would be if she had been a BLM supporter who had broken through a locked door and tried to enter a protected area which was protecting Donald Trump at the time. Every one of these comments defending her would be "F'ing bitch deserved what she got!" and "She should have obeyed the law if she didn't want to get shot!" and they'd be calling her family "disgusting leftists trying to cash in!".

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8.5  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @8    4 years ago
She broke through a locked door and tried to enter a protected area which was protecting the members of the  US House of Representatives.  What is her case? 

[deleted]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
8.5.1  Gsquared  replied to  Tacos! @8.5    4 years ago

You're kidding, right?  You're seriously comparing a participant in a violent insurrectionary mob with someone who may have (possibly unknowingly) passed a counterfeit $20 bill at a local corner store?  Please.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.5.2  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @8.5.1    4 years ago

false equivalency is the tie that binds the right

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
8.5.3  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @8.5.2    4 years ago

False equivalency with a strong dose of hypocrisy is their stock in trade.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8.5.4  Tacos!  replied to  Gsquared @8.5.1    4 years ago
You're seriously comparing

Are you afraid of considering the comparison? That’s pretty telling.

a participant in a violent insurrectionary mob

What evidence do you have that this woman was violent?

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8.5.5  Tacos!  replied to  devangelical @8.5.2    4 years ago
false equivalency is the tie that binds the right

I’m not on the right, so your attempt at political bigotry is misplaced and irrelevant.

You don’t need to be on the Right to be willing to question any police shooting. Why do you fear an open inquiry?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8.5.6  Tacos!  replied to  Gsquared @8.5.3    4 years ago
False equivalency with a strong dose of hypocrisy is their stock in trade.

Feel free to actually support your accusation of hypocrisy with evidence.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
9  JohnRussell    4 years ago

Ashley Babbit and the rest of them did not stumble into an area where there was a locked door with an armed guard on the other side. They were looking for that door as they marched through the building. In the videos of the scene you can see them asking where the doors were leading to the House and the Senate. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1  Tacos!  replied to  JohnRussell @9    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
10  bugsy    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
10.1  Gazoo  replied to  bugsy @10    4 years ago

(deleted)

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
10.2  seeder  devangelical  replied to  bugsy @10    4 years ago

(deleted)

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
10.2.6  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  devangelical @10.2    4 years ago
meta will be deleted

Do these jeans make me look fat?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
10.2.7  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @10.2.6    4 years ago

I can think of soooo many wrong answers.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
10.2.8  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  devangelical @10.2.7    4 years ago

off topic ?

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
10.2.10  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  devangelical @10.2    4 years ago

Thread cleaned up. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
10.2.11  seeder  devangelical  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @10.2.10    4 years ago

oh ... you ... why ... me ...

they still count!

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Guide
11  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom    4 years ago

This woman's family will never get one freaking dime.  I love what Trae Crowder had to say about Ashley Babbitt (and others) on January 7th:

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
11.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @11    4 years ago

OIP.0kqE_j7J6tunWlxqZ7sCmQHaE7?pid=ImgDet&rs=1

 
 
 
sandy-2021492
Professor Expert
11.2  sandy-2021492  replied to  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom @11    4 years ago

Aw, you posted a video of my crush.  Thanks!

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
12  Tacos!    4 years ago
The Department of Justice two weeks ago declined to charge the officer, whose name has not been released to the public

Amazing. A black person dies by cop and the name and history of that cop   [deleted]   is the best kept secret in the history of this country.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Guide
12.1  Dulay  replied to  Tacos! @12    4 years ago

Still making the same bullshit comment about the CP officer I see. The 'best kept secret' is WHY you think his name should be made public. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
12.1.2  Tacos!  replied to  Dulay @12.1    4 years ago
The 'best kept secret' is WHY you think his name should be made public. 

It’s not a secret at all.  [deleted]

 
 

Who is online



Freefaller
JohnRussell


97 visitors