╌>

Restaurant owner raided by Sheriff Joe Arpaio gets $5 million settlement

  
Via:  Split Personality  •  3 years ago  •  27 comments

By:   Joseph Wilkinson (MSN)

Restaurant owner raided by Sheriff Joe Arpaio gets $5 million settlement
He won't need to cook his books.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



He won't need to cook his books.

A Phoenix restaurant owner received a $5 million settlement Wednesday because of questionable raids on his business by ex-Sheriff Joe Arpaio.

Bret Frimmel sued Maricopa County shortly after his 2014 arrest under one of Arpaio's controversial anti-immigration laws. Frimmel had been charged with hiring workers who applied for jobs using fake IDs.

e151e5.gif© Ross D. Franklin In this Aug. 26, 2019, photo, former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio poses for a portrait at his private office in Fountain Hills, Arizona.

In this Aug. 26, 2019, photo, former Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio poses for a portrait at his private office in Fountain Hills, Arizona. (Ross D. Franklin/)

But those charges were quickly tossed when a judge determined Arpaio's deputies had lied to obtain search warrants for Frimmel's restaurant, Uncle Sam's. The judge ruled there was no probable cause to search the business.

Frimmel sued the county for illegal search and seizure and defamation. He also accused Arpaio of malicious arrest and abuse of process, but a judge tossed those parts of the lawsuit in 2019.

Maricopa County taxpayers will cover $3.1 million of the settlement, with insurance providing the other $1.9 million.

Between 2008 and 2014, the Arpaio-led Maricopa County Sheriff's Office raided 80 businesses under the fake ID law. They arrested hundreds of immigrants, including nine at Frimmel's restaurant.

The lawsuit was one of the final civil rights claims against Arpaio, who cost the county more than $150 million during his 24-year tenure as sheriff because of lawsuits like Frimmel's.

Arpaio was voted out of office in 2016 and lost his comeback bid in 2020. He said Wednesday that he wished the county had taken the case to trial and believed he would have won.


Article is LOCKED by moderator [Split Personality]
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Split Personality    3 years ago

Thanks Sheriff Joe.

The lawsuit was one of the final civil rights claims against Arpaio, who cost the county more than $150 million during his 24-year tenure as sheriff because of lawsuits like Frimmel's.
 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @1    3 years ago

I do think it's more egregious that Arpaio cost the county that much money than somebody hiring employees with fake IDs

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    3 years ago

Don't those settlements ultimately come out of the taxpayers' pockets?

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
1.1.2  Duck Hawk  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.1    3 years ago

Yes

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.1    3 years ago

They certainly do.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    3 years ago

That does not even include the costs he incurred at his tent city summer camp Maricopa County Jail. Turns out Sherriff Joe's family owned the contractor business that supplied the baloney sandwich bag lunches supplied to the inmates. Joe Arpaio's family and cronies skimmed million off of that using using expired meat and bread.  My late son spent two months as a guest of Sherriff Joe's tent city back in 2008 and he had a lot of interesting stories he garnered from other inmates and the guards themselves.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1.3    3 years ago

If you consider taxes going toward the insurance payments, yes indirectly completely. From the article...........

Maricopa County taxpayers will cover $3.1 million of the settlement, with insurance providing the other $1.9 million.
 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.6  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1.1.5    3 years ago

Yep.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1.4    3 years ago

Isn't that illegal?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.8  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.7    3 years ago

It wasn't if you were Sherriff Joe! At least until he got ratted out on by somebody in the MCSD.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.1.9  seeder  Split Personality  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.7    3 years ago

Moral people would at least consider the contract itself a conflict of interest;

using old bread and meat is probably better than throwing it in a dumpster for the crows & ravens of AZ.

Inmates are guaranteed living out their sentence, not 5 star food or Subway sandwiches, 

but more than enough bread and water.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.10  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @1.1.9    3 years ago
using old bread and meat is probably better than throwing it in a dumpster for the crows & ravens of AZ.

Still...the health of the inmates is the responsibility of the sheriff. If he's got dozens of inmates falling ill from food poisoning he may have 'splaining to do

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.11  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Split Personality @1.1.9    3 years ago

Normally, I would agree with you but according to my son there seemed to be a abnormal number of food poising cases popping up during his 60 day stay. All were attributed to the sack lunches give to the inmates. In addition, Arpaio was jacking up the prices on the books on what he payed the food purveyors for said expired food and skimming the difference into his and family's bank accounts to the tune of millions over the years his family had the contract.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.1.12  seeder  Split Personality  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1.11    3 years ago

My time in AZ was in Santa Cruz county at least a few years before Arpiao  started his reign of terror.

You are much better situated to state the facts than I am.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.1.13  seeder  Split Personality  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.1.11    3 years ago

Also no one ever accused me of being "normal",lol

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
1.1.14  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Split Personality @1.1.13    3 years ago

Especially if your first name is Abbe!

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
1.2  Ender  replied to  Split Personality @1    3 years ago

So he cost the county 150 million yet people still cheer for him?

I guess fiscal conservatism is out the window when they can have a bigoted asshole running the county...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.3  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @1    3 years ago

just another instance of some POS GOPer writing wedge issue checks the taxpayers have to make good. too bad there isn't a law on the books that would hold them financially accountable.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
2  al Jizzerror    3 years ago

This Is How Trump Relies on Undocumented Labor for His Resorts

“If you’re a good worker, papers don’t matter,” one former employee said

By
PETER WADE

On Friday, the Washington Post published a report about how President Donald Trump relies on an itinerant construction crew that includes undocumented immigrants to work on many of his resort properties.

The Post spoke with two former employees of the construction crew that operates under Trump’s company, Mobile Payroll Construction LLC, and performs repairs and small construction jobs on Trump properties.

“If you’re a good worker, papers don’t matter,” said Jorge Castro, an Ecuadoran immigrant who works at the Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Va., said.

Castro also said that Trump “doesn’t want undocumented people in the country … But at his properties, he still has them.

Edmundo Morocho, another former employee, spoke with the Post as well, saying that he was once told by a supervisor to purchase false papers on the streets of New York City and was instructed to hide in the woods near a Trump golf course to evade being spotted by labor officials visiting the property.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1  Ender  replied to  al Jizzerror @2    3 years ago

Is that like republicans secretly giving their mistress an abortion...

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Ender @2.1    3 years ago

Is that like republicans secretly giving their mistress an abortion...

Mistresses, wives, daughters.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3  Ender    3 years ago

Posing for a portrait.

Really sick that he actually thinks he is all that and some kind of hero.

Delusional.

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Expert
3.1  al Jizzerror  replied to  Ender @3    3 years ago
Posing for a portrait.

I wonder why he wasn't wearing his hoodie?

512

 
 
 
Moose Knuckle
Freshman Quiet
3.1.1  Moose Knuckle  replied to  al Jizzerror @3.1    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
4  Ed-NavDoc    3 years ago

In my younger days I actually supported Sherriff Joe as somebody I thought was willing to stand up to the status quo in Arizona and Washington, DC. I was only years later that I came to realize that Arpaio was a outdated anachronism of a bygone era and he and his methods became far more part of the problem than the solution. I believe Arpaio once tried to compare himself and his method to "Texas John" Slaughter, a legendary American lawman, cowboy, poker player, rancher, and sheriff of Cochise County, Arizona on the Mexican border in the late 1800's.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
5  Tacos!    3 years ago

This guy wasn’t a public servant. He was a public menace.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @5    3 years ago

He should run for Congress. He's got the graft and other corruption down pat

 
 

Who is online



432 visitors