╌>

Stanley McChrystal Surprises With Kamala Harris Endorsement

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  3 months ago  •  27 comments

By:   Alex Griffing Load Comments (Mediaite)

Stanley McChrystal Surprises With Kamala Harris Endorsement
Kamala Harris received a surprise endorsement on Thursday from the former commander of all U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Vice President Kamala Harris received a surprise endorsement on Thursday from the former commander of all U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

McChrystal became a household name during his time leading U.S. forces overseas and for tendering his resignation to then-President Barak Obama in 2010 after criticizing then-Vice President Joe Biden and other administration officials.

McChrystal backing Harris, who he wrote in a New York Times op-ed he has already voted for, pours cold water all over Harris's critics claiming she is unfit to lead U.S. foreign policy after her administration's much-maligned exit from Afghanistan.

"Some deeply consequential decisions are starkly simple. That is how I view our upcoming presidential election. And that is why I have already cast my ballot for character — and voted for Vice President Kamala Harris," McChrystal wrote to begin his op-ed, adding:

As a citizen, veteran and voter, I was not comfortable with many of the policy recommendations that Democrats offered at their convention in Chicago or those Republicans articulated in Milwaukee. My views tend more toward the center of the political spectrum. And although I have opinions on high-profile issues, like abortion, gun safety and immigration, that's not why I made my decision.

The celebrated general went on to explain that while he does care about tax policy and a myriad of other issues, all of which he has his own opinion on and often votes on, his choice between Harris and Trump was dictated more by knowing that the next president will face challenges that require a statesman.

"Our president, therefore, must be more than a policymaker or a malleable reflection of the public's passions. She or he must lead — and that takes character. Character is the ultimate measure of leadership for those who seek the highest office in our land," McChrystal wrote, making clear he has little appreciation for Trump's character.

While McChrystal never mentions Trump by name, he makes clear he disagrees with his stance on foreign policy issues - particularly his open appeasement of Russia's Vladimir Putin.

"Character will dictate whether we stand by our NATO allies and against Vladimir Putin's continued aggression. Character will dictate whether we have a commander in chief who honors and respects the men and women who serve in uniform,' McChrystal writes, adding:

Fortunately, neither candidate in this pivotal election is unknown to us. We've had years to watch both closely.

Each of us must seriously contemplate our choice and apply the values we hope to find in our president, our nation and ourselves. Uncritically accepting the thinking of others or being swayed by the roar of social media crowds is a mistake. To turn a blind eye toward or make excuses for weak character from someone we propose to confer awesome power and responsibility on is to abrogate our role as citizens. We will get — and deserve — what we elect.

He concludes by noting that he made his choice for president with the best interests of his three granddaughters in mind. " I've concluded that it isn't political slogans or cultural tribalism; it is the best president my vote might help select. So I have cast my vote for character, and that vote is for Vice President Kamala Harris," he wrote.

Read the full op-ed here:   https://dnyuz.com/2024/09/26/stanley-mcchrystal-why-kamala-harris-has-won-me-over/


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Gsquared    3 months ago

This is a very significant endorsement, but really Gen. McChrystal is saying what we all already know.   Donald Trump does not have the character to be President of the United States, and Kamala Harris does.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    3 months ago

I heard trump compared to neville chamberlain yesterday, but I already equate maga republicans to putin russians ...

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Gsquared @1    3 months ago

She is in no way fit, qualified, or have the character to be the Commander-in-Chief.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 months ago

compared to who?

convicted felon vs prosecuting attorney. a clear choice. end of story ...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
1.2.2  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 months ago

Kamala Harris?  You must be thinking of someone else.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 months ago
She is in no way fit, qualified, or have the character to be the Commander-in-Chief.

Say's Trump sycophants and those who aren't a General and former commander of all U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan and the 111 former national security officials from Republican administrations and former Republican members of Congress.

111 Former G.O.P. Officials Back Harris, Calling Trump ‘Unfit to Serve’ - The New York Times (nytimes.com)

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.4  Tacos!  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    3 months ago

Absurd comments like this will not be taken seriously.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
1.3  Split Personality  replied to  Gsquared @1    3 months ago

All one has to do is watch them both and listen.

One is in her prime, the other is in decline.

One is talking about us, the other about himself.

One is for hope and growth and the other is constant grievance and retribution

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.3.1  Tacos!  replied to  Split Personality @1.3    3 months ago
One is talking about us, the other about himself.

This, a thousand times.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
1.4  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Gsquared @1    3 months ago

I bet that if Colin Powell had lived a few more years, he would have voted for her as well.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.5  Tessylo  replied to  Gsquared @1    3 months ago

I'm surprised he is not endorsing the former traitor - I mean - he said we should blow up Iran.  JFC.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2  Hallux    3 months ago

Is there anyone of real importance, depth of character, a basket full of operating synapses and all that stuff supporting the former doofus other than Prima Donnas-4-Donald?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @2    3 months ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Hallux  replied to  devangelical @2.1    3 months ago

[deleted][]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.2  devangelical  replied to  Hallux @2    3 months ago

his support comes from thumpers, racists, xenophobes, and those needing a pardon in the future ...

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3  Kavika     3 months ago

Oh man, Trump is going to shit a brick.

Gotta luv this.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Kavika @3    3 months ago

He is going to heap the insults on McChrystal.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @3.1    3 months ago

trump has no respect for those in uniform.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.2  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @3.1.1    3 months ago

... let alone those that served or died.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4  Tacos!    3 months ago

Cue the personal attacks on the general - how he’s a traitor, he doesn’t understand the issues, he’s been brainwashed, he was an incompetent general, he’s secretly communist, he’s going senile, etc.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @4    3 months ago

traitor, brainwashed, incompetent, totalitarian, going senile ... ... that pretty much describes most current and former service members supporting trump.

 
 
 
Dig
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Dig  replied to  devangelical @4.1    3 months ago

And Trump as well, if brainwashed is changed to brainwasher.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.2  devangelical  replied to  Dig @4.1.1    3 months ago

I'm hoping for a live perp walk on TV at the end of november ...

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  devangelical @4.1.2    3 months ago

That would be fucking awesome.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.3    3 months ago

no mickey d's chicken nuggets or cheeseburgers in the big house ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @4    3 months ago

That would be ironic coming from a draft dodger

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
4.2.1  Tacos!  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2    3 months ago

It should be, but it never has been for him.

 
 

Who is online











439 visitors