╌>

Mexican leader says Biden offers $4B for Central America

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  4 years ago  •  21 comments

By:   MARK STEVENSON, ROB GILLIES and AAMER MADHANI J (AP NEWS)

Mexican leader says Biden offers $4B for Central America
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden's first calls to foreign leaders went to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador at a strained moment for the...

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People


Well I'll be damned. That $4B could have built one hell of a lot of the rest of the wall. 

And of course we need to  throw the pipeline thing in there.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden's first calls to foreign leaders went to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador at a strained moment for the U.S. relationship with its North American neighbors.

Mexico's president said Saturday that Biden told him the U.S. would send $4 billion to help development in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala — nations whose hardships have spawned tides of migration through Mexico toward the United States.

Lopez Obrador, who spoke Friday with Biden by phone, said the two discussed immigration and the need to address the root causes of why people migrate.

Mexico has stopped recent attempts by caravans of Central American migrants to cross Mexico.

Biden's call to Trudeau, also on Friday, came after the Canadian prime minister this week publicly expressed disappointment over Biden's decision to issue an executive order halting construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline. The long-disputed project was projected to carry some 800,000 barrels of oil a day from the tar sands of Alberta to the Texas Gulf Coast, passing through Montana, South Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma.

Biden told Trudeau that by issuing the order he was following through on a campaign pledge to stop construction of the pipeline, a senior Canadian government official told The Associated Press. The official spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the private conversation.

The White House said in a statement that Biden acknowledged Trudeau's disappointment with his Keystone decision.

Biden's call with Lopez Obrador also came at a tense moment — days after the Mexican president accused the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration of fabricating drug trafficking charges against the country's former defense secretary.

While Mexico continues to pledge to block mass movements of Central American migrants toward the U.S. border, there has been no shortage of potential flashpoints between the two countries.

Mexico demanded the return of former Defense Secretary Gen. Salvador Cienfuegos after he was arrested in Los Angeles in October, threatening to restrict U.S. agents in Mexico if he wasn't returned. U.S. prosecutors agreed to drop charges and return Cienfuegos to Mexico.

But Mexico passed a law restricting foreign agents and removing their immunity anyway, and went on to publish the U.S. case file against Cienfuegos, whom Mexican prosecutors quickly cleared of any charges.

Lopez Obrador said in a statement Friday that the conversation with Biden was "friendly and respectful."

The White House said Biden mentioned "reversing the previous administration's draconian immigration policies."

Trudeau told reporters before the call on Friday that he wouldn't allow his differences with Biden over the project to become a source of tension in the U.S.-Canada relationship.

"It's not always going to be perfect alignment with the United States," Trudeau said. "That's the case with any given president, but we're in a situation where we are much more aligned on values and focus. I am very much looking forward to working with President Biden."

Biden signed the executive order to halt construction of the pipeline just hours after he was sworn in.

"Leaving the Keystone XL pipeline permit in place would not be consistent with my Administration's economic and climate imperatives," Biden's executive order said.

Critics say the growing operations increase greenhouse gas emissions and threaten Alberta's rivers and forests. On the U.S. side, environmentalists expressed concerns about the pipeline— it would cross the Ogallala Aquifer, one of the world'

But proponents of the project say it would create thousands of jobs on both sides of the border.

The project was proposed in 2008, and the pipeline has become emblematic of the tensions between economic development and curbing the fossil fuel emissions that are causing climate change. The Obama administration rejected it, but President Donald Trump revived it and was a strong supporter. Construction already started.

Biden and Trudeau also discussed the prospects of Canada being supplied with the COVID-19 vaccine from pharmaceutical giant Pfizer's facility in Kalamazoo, Michigan, according to a second senior Canadian government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe a private conversation.

Canada has been getting all its Pfizer doses from a Pfizer facility in Puurs, Belgium, but Pfizer has informed Canada it won't get any doses next week and will get 50% less than expected over the next three weeks. Ontario Premier Doug Ford has publicly asked Biden to share a million doses made at Pfizer's Michigan facility.

The U.S. federal government has an agreement with Pfizer in which the first 100 million doses of the vaccine produced in the U.S. will be owned by the U.S. government and will be distributed in the U.S. Anita Anand, the Canadian federal procurement minister, has said the doses that are emerging from the Michigan plant are for distribution in the United States.

The two leaders also spoke broadly about trade, defense and climate issues. Trudeau also raised the cases of two Canadians imprisoned in China in apparent retaliation for the arrest of a top Huawei executive, who was apprehended in Canada on a U.S. extradition request, according to the prime minister's office.

___

Gillies reported from Toronto and Stevenson from Mexico City.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    4 years ago

256

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    4 years ago

The nation's more than 2.6 million miles of pipelines safely deliver trillions of cubic feet of natural gas and hundreds of billions of ton/miles of liquid petroleum products each year.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2  Tacos!    4 years ago
The White House said in a statement that Biden acknowledged Trudeau's disappointment with his Keystone decision. Biden's call with Lopez Obrador also came at a tense moment — days after the Mexican president accused the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration of fabricating drug trafficking charges against the country's former defense secretary.

That didn't take long, did it? As much as Trump was accused of damaging relations with our allies, it hasn't even been a week and Biden is doing everything he can to piss off our nextdoor neighbors.

Critics say the growing operations increase greenhouse gas emissions and threaten Alberta's rivers and forests.

Isn't that Canada's problem to worry about? And considering the prime minister being pissed about Biden canceling the pipeline, he doesn't seem too concerned about the rivers and forests. And he's as liberal as they come.

On the U.S. side, environmentalists expressed concerns about the pipeline— it would cross the Ogallala Aquifer

So what? A veritable shitload of other pipelines already do.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1  evilone  replied to  Tacos! @2    4 years ago
So what? A veritable shitload of other pipelines already do.

Cancelling the XL pipeline forces the oil to go by train which is less safe than pipeline.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  evilone @2.1    4 years ago

Right you are.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.2  Split Personality  replied to  evilone @2.1    4 years ago

Which Is Safer For Transporting Crude Oil: Rail, Truck, Pipeline Or Boat?

In the U.S., 100% of our natural gas is shipped by pipeline.

70% of crude oil and petroleum products are shipped by pipeline.

23% of oil shipments are on tankers and barges over water.

Trucking only accounts for 4% of shipments,

and rail for a mere 3%.

In Canada, it’s even more lopsided. Almost all (97%) of natural gas and petroleum products are transported by pipelines ( Canadian Energy Pipeline Association ).

But as pipeline projects fail, Canada is investing in more rail transport. Canada’s energy regulator announced in June that 200,000 barrels per day is being exported by rail, an all-time high, and estimates that the amount will double in less than two years. The government is trying to be pro-active, fast-tracking the phasing out of older rail cars that are prone to accidents with crude oil and flammable liquids.

So which mode is safer?

 For the amount of oil spilled per billion-ton-miles, it’s truck worse than pipeline worse than rail worse than boat ( Congressional Research Service ).

Even more different is for environmental impact (dominated by impact to aquatic habitat), where it’s boat worse than pipeline worse than truck worse than rail.

It depends upon what your definition is for worse . Is it deaths and destruction? Is it amount of oil released? Is it land area or water volume contaminated? Is it habitat destroyed? Is it CO2 emitted?
 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3  Tacos!    4 years ago
the U.S. would send $4 billion to help development in Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala — nations whose hardships have spawned tides of migration through Mexico toward the United States.

I think it's actually smart to look at improving countries to the South so that people are less inclined to leave. I'm just not sure throwing money at corrupt regimes is the answer, though.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1  evilone  replied to  Tacos! @3    4 years ago
I think it's actually smart to look at improving countries to the South so that people are less inclined to leave.

I agree.

I'm just not sure throwing money at corrupt regimes is the answer, though.

Trying to overthrow them didn't work. Maybe buying them off will. (kinda sarcasm) 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  evilone @3.1    4 years ago

We could always just annex them and bring them the joys of American justice.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.2  evilone  replied to  Tacos! @3.1.1    4 years ago

Hahaha! Setup a McD's on every corner for tourist season.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.2  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tacos! @3    4 years ago
I'm just not sure throwing money at corrupt regimes is the answer, though.

That was one of my thoughts too. Wonder how much will actually get put toward "the cause".

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @3.2    4 years ago

Well I guess this means Pakistan will get their big bucks for gender assignment studies after all, cause we can forget about further stimulus help...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.2.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.2    4 years ago

One of many such wastes of tax payer $ the deep states spends....

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.4  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.2    4 years ago

Just a taste of more to come from the new administration.

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5  bbl-1    4 years ago

[removed]

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5.1  bbl-1  replied to  bbl-1 @5    4 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  bbl-1  replied to  bbl-1 @5.1    4 years ago

To quote a line from the movie 'The Outlaw Josey Wales,'  "We whupped them again Josey.  Another glorious victory."

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
7  Paula Bartholomew    4 years ago

Banana oil.

 
 

Who is online




Drakkonis


61 visitors