╌>

Exclusive: Secret Commandos with Shoot-to-Kill Authority Were at the Capitol

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  3 years ago  •  28 comments

By:   William M. Arkin

Exclusive: Secret Commandos with Shoot-to-Kill Authority Were at the Capitol
The meeting, and the subsequent deployment of these shadowy commandos on January 6, has never before been revealed.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

Where were they when the shit hit the fan??


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




On Sunday,   January 3 , the heads of a half-dozen elite government special operations teams met in Quantico, Virginia, to go over potential threats, contingencies, and plans for the upcoming Joint Session of   Congress . The meeting, and the subsequent deployment of these shadowy commandos on January 6, has never before been revealed.

Right after the New Year, Jeffrey A. Rosen, the acting Attorney General on January 6, approved implementation of long-standing contingency plans dealing with the most extreme possibilities: an attack on President   Donald Trump   or Vice President   Mike Pence , a terrorist attack involving a weapon of mass destruction, and a declaration of measures to implement continuity of government, requiring protection and movement of presidential successors.

Rosen made a unilateral decision to take the preparatory steps to deploy Justice Department and so-called "national" forces. There was no formal request from the U.S. Capitol   Police , the Secret Service, or the Metropolitan Police Department—in fact, no external request from any agency. The leadership in Justice and the   FBI   anticipated the worst and decided to act independently, the special operations forces lurking behind the scenes.

"I believe that DOJ [Department of Justice] reasonably prepared for contingencies ahead of January 6, understanding that there was considerable uncertainty as to how many people would arrive, who those people would be, and precisely what purposes they would pursue," Rosen later told Congress. He stressed that his department "no frontline role with respect to crowd control," that they were focused on "high-risk" operations.

The contingency units meeting on January 3 included the FBI's Hostage Rescue Team, the FBI's national "Render Safe" team, an FBI SWAT team from the Baltimore Field Office, Special Response Teams from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and the U.S. Marshals Service Special Operations Group.

All of these assets were "pre-deployed" and ready to go over the weekend of January 2-3, staging out of the FBI Academy complex in Quantico, 30 miles south of the Capitol building. If a WMD or terrorist attack occurred, the units were to move via helicopter to the site of the incident. The activation of the catastrophic response units, operating under plans already approved by President Trump, entailed an automatic green light allowing federal responders to take the initiative and spare no resources, including shoot-to-kill authority, to deal with this most extraordinary condition.

The 350-strong Hostage Rescue Team was established in 1983 to be a national level counterterrorist unit, offering a "tactical" option—a military option—for the most extraordinary law enforcement situations within the United States. Prior to 9/11, HRT was primarily a domestic counter-terrorism unit; after the attack, the team took on additional missions, including working with the Joint Special Operations Command overseas in high-profile raids and the targeting of high-value targets.


The FBI is the lead agency for what insiders call the "no-fail, 24-hour, 7-day-a-week, 365-day-per-year response capability." In 1999, the Bureau was assigned the responsibility for the render safe mission, a euphemism for extraordinary and highly classified actions that are slated to take place in cases of a lost, stolen, or hidden nuclear or radiological weapon. The FBI had already been given primary responsibility for domestic counterterrorism, including quasi-military action against armed groups inside the United States. President   Bill Clinton   approved new rules that assigned "national response" to the FBI (it had previously resided in the Defense Department). The FBI would form the dedicated rapid response force, and technical response assets from various departments would be seconded to this so-called National Mission Force, operating under a National Asset Commander, an FBI officer appointed by and reporting to the Attorney General and ultimately the White House.

In April 2005, the FBI consolidated its various extraordinary response teams under the National Asset Response Unit (NARU), responsible for the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. The dedicated rapid response force, ready to deploy anywhere in the United States within two hours of notification, reached operational readiness during the Obama administration, with dedicated national response elements from the Department of Energy and augmentation from the military's Joint Special Operations Command.

The overlap of counterterrorism and WMD forged this extraordinary force, operating under Top Secret and compartmentalized presidential directives. The National Mission Force, however, also had to plan for other crisis response contingencies, such as hostage rescue and continuity of government. Those latter functions could also fall under the operational control of the Secret Service (an element of the   Department of Homeland Security ) or to military commanders who were operating in response to immediate emergencies.

Most of the literature mistakenly says that the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)—including, famously, the units formerly known as Delta Force and SEAL Team 6—is the primary national mission force. Although overseas, the National Mission Force often operates as a Joint Special Operations Task Force (with FBI augmentation), made up of dedicated teams assigned to JSOC, inside the United States, the FBI is in charge.

On the morning of January 6, most of these forces staged closer to downtown Washington, particularly after intelligence was received indicating a possible threat to FBI headquarters building or the FBI's Washington Field Office. FBI tactical teams arrived on Capitol Hill early in the day to assist in the collection of evidence at sites—including the Republican and Democrat party national headquarters—where explosive devices were found. FBI SWAT teams and snipers were deployed to secure nearby congressional office buildings. Other FBI agents provided selective security around the U.S. Capitol and protection to congressional members and staff.

A tactical team of the Hostage Rescue Team was one of the first external federal agencies to actually enter the Capitol after protestors breached the building. In addition to augmentation of emergency security assets, one team coordinated with the U.S. Capitol Police and Secret Service to provide additional safeguarding of Vice President Pence, who had been moved to the underground parking structure beneath the Capitol, from where he was supposed to evacuate. But Pence refused to leave the building and stayed underground instead.

The presence of these extraordinary forces under the control of the Attorney General—and mostly operating under contingency plans that Congress and the U.S. Capitol Police were not privy to—added an additional layer of highly armed responders. The role that the military played in this highly classified operation is still unknown, though FBI sources tell   Newsweek   that military operators seconded to the FBI, and those on alert as part of the National Mission Force, were present in the metropolitan area. The lingering question is: What was it that the Justice Department saw that provoked it to see January 6 as an extraordinary event, something that the other agencies evidently missed.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    3 years ago

Hmmmm

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.1  JBB  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    3 years ago

Yeah, this looks really bad for Barr and for Trump...

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  JBB @1.1    3 years ago

Barr was not acting AG- you would know that if you had bothered to read the damn article!

Rosen was acting AG and made the authorization- you will notice no where does it state he ever informed Trump or anyone else of his decisions.

Again- try reading the damn article before posting!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1.1    3 years ago

He just wants to say that.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.3  XXJefferson51  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1.1    3 years ago

You ask way too much considering the ideology you are asking it of….

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
1.1.4  Tessylo  replied to  JBB @1.1    3 years ago

Barr was whatshisnames' consigliere

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.1.5  Jasper2529  replied to  JBB @1.1    3 years ago
Yeah, this looks really bad for Barr

I truly hate to burst your bubble, but Barr resigned from his AG position in December, 2020.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    3 years ago

This is another nail in Trump and Co's political coffin!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2    3 years ago

I think it's just another nail in the democrats coffin.

How long are they in session this year before campaigning begins?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3  Ronin2    3 years ago
Right after the New Year, Jeffrey A. Rosen, the acting Attorney General on January 6, approved implementation of long-standing contingency plans dealing with the most extreme possibilities: an attack on President Donald Trump or Vice President Mike Pence , a terrorist attack involving a weapon of mass destruction, and a declaration of measures to implement continuity of government, requiring protection and movement of presidential successors.

Rosen made a unilateral decision to take the preparatory steps to deploy Justice Department and so-called "national" forces. There was no formal request from the U.S. Capitol Police , the Secret Service, or the Metropolitan Police Department—in fact, no external request from any agency. The leadership in Justice and the FBI anticipated the worst and decided to act independently, the special operations forces lurking behind the scenes.

"I believe that DOJ [Department of Justice] reasonably prepared for contingencies ahead of January 6, understanding that there was considerable uncertainty as to how many people would arrive, who those people would be, and precisely what purposes they would pursue," Rosen later told Congress. He stressed that his department "no frontline role with respect to crowd control," that they were focused on "high-risk" operations.

Nothing to see here, just move along. The Jan 6th commission should be raking Rosen over the coals to find out what the DOJ knew; when they knew it; and why they didn't share the information with DC law enforcement.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

Biden, Harris to speak on anniversary of Capitol insurrection http:// hill.cm/WsbOiJg

They are going to play if for all it's worth, but it isn't going to save any of them!

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    3 years ago

And the push back against their spin on the events of that day will be strong, calling them out for their divisiveness, calling them out for their role, and exposure of their treatment of trespassers. We will tell them to talk to the hand and chant let’s go Brandon to their faces in public.  There will be no healing or coming together on their terms over that day.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
4.1.1  Tessylo  replied to  XXJefferson51 @4.1    3 years ago
"And the push back against their spin on the events of that day will be strong, calling them out for their divisiveness, calling them out for their role, and exposure of their treatment of trespassers. We will tell them to talk to the hand and chant let’s go Brandon to their faces in public.  There will be no healing or coming together on their terms over that day."

Typical deflection, projection, and denial.

So immature also.  

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
5  Sparty On    3 years ago

Cool .... our very own federal gestapo.

Would you like a cigarette old man?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Sparty On @5    3 years ago

Sign zee papers old man...................LOL

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
5.1.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.1    3 years ago

Exactly!  Our federal Jack boot thugs….

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Expert
5.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @5.1    3 years ago

They have ways of making you talk ......

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
5.1.3  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Sparty On @5.1.2    3 years ago

LOL

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
6  Dismayed Patriot    3 years ago
"The activation of the catastrophic response units, operating under plans already approved by President Trump, entailed an automatic green light allowing federal responders to take the initiative and spare no resources, including shoot-to-kill authority, to deal with this most extraordinary condition."

"(Rosen) stressed that his department had "no frontline role with respect to crowd control," that they were focused on "high-risk" operations."

"All of these assets were "pre-deployed" and ready to go over the weekend of January 2-3, staging out of the FBI Academy complex in Quantico, 30 miles south of the Capitol building. If a WMD or terrorist attack occurred, the units were to move via helicopter to the site of the incident."

I think the real problem here was the hesitancy of those in charge of the special operations teams to consider those who attacked the capital "terrorists". If they had been dressed as and looked Islamic or foreign there is no question these units would have been immediately deployed. But because they were white conservative Christian domestic terrorists instead of foreign terrorists those in charge just let the situation play out. We need to respond to domestic terror threats in the same manner we respond to foreign terror threats.

Also, the headline made it seem like these teams were "at the capital" at the time of the attack when in reality they were stations dozens of miles away, so it's not like they sat there watching what was happening while doing nothing. And even if some saw what was happening on the news as they waited 30 miles away it's not like they could just charge in without orders, so it was Rosen and ultimately Trump who sat on their hands watching it happen without giving the orders to intervene.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
6.1  Tessylo  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6    3 years ago

Yup, whatshisname sat on his big fat ass watching what he incited for several months and spurred them on to at his 'rally' before hand - while his domestic terrorist mob did whatever they pleased for over two and a half hours.   For 187 minutes big fat ass watched it all unfold - 'they're doing this for me!'

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.2  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6    3 years ago
Also, the headline made it seem like these teams were "at the capital" at the time of the attack

Were they not in DC proper? Last I knew DC is the capital of the US. So in the attitude and nit picking of a couple of word smiths around these parts, they were "at the capital".

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
6.3  Tessylo  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @6    3 years ago

They were only to protect and enable whatshisname's domestic terrorist mob.  

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
6.3.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tessylo @6.3    3 years ago

That is NOT what they were there for. Try reading. It helps one understand things.

"I believe that DOJ [Department of Justice] reasonably prepared for contingencies ahead of January 6, understanding that there was considerable uncertainty as to how many people would arrive, who those people would be, and precisely what purposes they would pursue," Rosen later told Congress. He stressed that his department "no frontline role with respect to crowd control," that they were focused on "high-risk" operations.

Talk about spreading mis-dis-information 

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
6.3.2  Tessylo  replied to  Tessylo @6.3    3 years ago
They were only to protect and enable whatshisname's domestic terrorist mob.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Expert
7  Tessylo    3 years ago

I don't spread mis-dis-information - I leave that up to the 'right'

Like putting words in other people's mouths.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @7    3 years ago

Please don't put words in Jim's mouth.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @7    3 years ago
I don't spread mis-dis-information

I can't find that word in the dictionary. What does it mean?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

This story has been up quite a while. Why would it be reposted?

 
 

Who is online



RU4Real
Mark in Wyoming
Sean Treacy
Dismayed Patriot
fineline


70 visitors