Churches Are an ‘Essential Service’ During Emergencies, According to New South Carolina Law
By: Michael Faust
South Carolina and the many other red states with this law or one like it now on the books are exactly right. Thanks to the Alliance Defending Freedom, a great Christian legal advocacy organization for its fine role in this and other such laws protecting freedom.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Churches Are an ‘Essential Service’ During Emergencies, According to New South Carolina Law
South Carolina’s governor on Tuesday signed a bill into law that labels churches and religious organizations an “essential service” during emergencies and, essentially, prohibits the government from closing them.
The goal of the new law , signed by Gov. Henry McMaster, is to prevent the state from ordering churches to close during an emergency like COVID-19 -- as happened in California and numerous other states.
McMaster never closed churches during the pandemic, according to The State newspaper.
“During a state of emergency, religious services are deemed an essential service and are considered necessary and vital to the health and welfare of the public,” the new law says.
The state is prohibited from limiting the ability of churches and religious organizations to gather during an emergency unless at least two factors are met: 1) “all organizations or businesses providing essential services” are also limited, and, 2) the limit does not “impose a substantial burden on religious services” and the state “demonstrates that the burden is necessary to further a compelling state interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.”
“The State may not take any discriminatory action against a religious organization,” the new law says.
Alliance Defending Freedom, an advocacy group for religious liberty, applauded the new law.
“Houses of worship and religious organizations provide soul-sustaining operations that are essential to our society and protected by the First Amendment,” said ADF legal counsel Greg Chafuen. “While public officials have the authority and responsibility to protect public health and safety, the First Amendment prohibits the government from treating houses of worship and religious organizations worse than shopping centers, restaurants, or gyms.”
The law, Chaufuen said, “takes the modest step of ensuring that officials cannot use a public crisis to discriminate against religious operations in violation of the Constitution.”
The new law passed the House, 102-9, and the Senate, 39-2.
Photo courtesy: ©Getty Images/Jair Ferreira Belafacce
Michael Foust has covered the intersection of faith and news for 20 years. His stories have appeared in Baptist Press, Christianity Today , The Christian Po st , the Leaf-Chronicle , the Toronto Star and the Knoxville News-Sentinel .
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Tags
Who is online
636 visitors
Let's make a deal, y'all can go to church but when y'all die the secularists get to bury y'all upside down.
Can all Canadians freely go to church yet? Why would we give the secularists any say whatsoever as to how we are buried awaiting the 2nd coming?
No deal. We go to church as desired, no conditions no questions asked
Lol yeah, okay. Just stay the fuck out of the way of people and organizations that actually provide an important public service.
we are the people and organizations that provide very important public services.
Playing dungeons and dragons on sundays is not a public service.
The reality is above…
Churches do provide essential services. They can comfort the victims of an emergency situation. They provide shelter and food and warmth and clothing in an organized manner. They do it without charge or expectation of an earthly reward.