╌>

Biden Randomly Bolts Out Of Room In The Middle of Medal Of Honor Ceremony (Video) - Rare

  
Via:  Just Jim NC TttH  •  last year  •  88 comments

By:   Rare

Biden Randomly Bolts Out Of Room In The Middle of Medal Of Honor Ceremony (Video) - Rare
President Joe Biden held a Medal of Honor ceremony at the White House this afternoon. The ceremony was held to present Captain Larry L. Taylor with the prestigious medal. The presentation ceremony came to an abrupt end when President Joe Biden unexplainably bolted from the room, racing towards the door and making his exit in

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

Is this normal to all you Biden voters?


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


President Joe Biden held a Medal of Honor ceremony at the White House this afternoon. The ceremony was held to present Captain Larry L. Taylor with the prestigious medal.

Videos by Rare


The presentation ceremony came to an abrupt end when President Joe Biden unexplainably bolted from the room, racing towards the door and making his exit in the middle of the ceremony. See a clip of Joe Biden running out of the room below…


Biden abruptly walks out of the Medal of Honor ceremony, even before the closing benediction pic.twitter.com/Ck0i8EIf8Q
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 5, 2023

What happened? Why did Biden run out of the room? Why would he be so incredibly disrespectful to our Military?

During a prayer reading at the Medal of Honor ceremony today, President Joe Biden could be seen struggling to remove his mask. See a clip of that moment below…


Biden removes his mask during the prayer at the Medal of Honor ceremony pic.twitter.com/TyxxLEsgik
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) September 5, 2023

This President appears to be completely lost! Biden barely makes appearances in public anymore, and when he does, America seems to always be subjected to total embarrassment.

Why does Congress refuse to address Biden's health? This has reached a point of absurdity.


Red Box Rules

No personal insults
No death wishes of any individual
All of NT's rules apply

Stay on topic, which is Biden's incompetence

No Trump

No fascist bullshit until you learn what it means

On topic relevant memes only if you find it necessary due to the fact you don't have any original thoughts


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH    last year

A lot of this is videos. Watch them and be embarrassed.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1  Hallux  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @1    last year

To tell you the truth Jim, seeding anything from RARE should be embarrassing. The entire site is a joke.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
1.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Hallux @1.1    last year

Truth?    

An unobtainable characteristic for many of our friends on the left.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @1.1    last year

So instead of discussing the Embarrassment in Chief, you decide to whine and cry about the source.  

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.1.3  Texan1211  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.2    last year
So instead of discussing the Embarrassment in Chief, you decide to whine and cry about the source.  

I wonder why they just don't dispute the source--prove it is wrong?

Is that impossible?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
1.1.4  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Hallux @1.1    last year

So the videos didn't convince you. Frankly my friend, I don't give a shit the source when one can see it with their own eyes. Sorry.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    last year

To dispute the actual article would require critical thinking and actually doing research.  So, yes, it would be impossible.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.6  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.2    last year
Embarrassment in Chief

Who you consider to be the "embarrassment in chief" is not my problem, and I am sure the opposite holds. However, it is 'entertaining' watching the right's continuous attempts to soil the current president with the sins of the former and their kabuki whataboutism.    

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
1.1.7  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Hallux @1.1.6    last year

How cute.  You actually think things like this is an "attempt" to soil the Embarrassment in the WH.  There is no "attempt".  He's doing all this on his own accord.  

Now if you don't like the criticism, I recommend you find a way to deal with it. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.8  Hallux  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.7    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.9  Tessylo  replied to  Hallux @1.1.6    last year

All some have is projection, deflection, and denial + whataboutism.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
1.1.10  GregTx  replied to  Tessylo @1.1.9    last year

Yeah, there's alot of that going around.... 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
2  George    last year

Seriously? This doddering old fool doesn’t bolt or race anywhere. Maybe he saw his invisible old friend corn pop and was “racing” to shake his hand? 

 
 
 
George
Junior Expert
3  George    last year

256

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    last year

[You need to pay attention to the Red Box Rules]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year

You [cannot both delete John's comment in its entirety and respond to it.]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.1  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1    last year

Bullshit sandy. 
Perrie told me some time back that you can tell someone to stay on topic (which the flag an deletion did) and then flag them. Suggest you brush up.

[That's not what you did.  You deleted the entirety of a comment, then responded with a personal comment about John, rather than a directive to stay on topic.]

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.2  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.1    last year

Meant reply to them. Can't edit. Wonder why................../s

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.3  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.1    last year

I suggest you look again at the time stamps. I responded THEN deleted if I recall right. I could be wrong but I'm not

[Irrelevant.  You responded with a taunting comment aimed at John, which was NOT an instruction to stay on topic, then deleted his comment.  Basically, whichever order it happened, you are using your ability to moderate to jab at John while silencing him, which is poor form, then complaining about getting ticketed for it, which is also poor form.]

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
4.1.4  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.3    last year

When moderating, there is to be nothing more than a removal of the part or whole comment and the word "deleted" in its place. In addition, no commentary can be added to the deletion. 

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
4.1.5  seeder  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @4.1.4    last year

That is really funny. sandy adds commentary a lot. Oh well. 
Thanks for the clarification. speaks volumes.

On a side note, you say we group mods help to take some of the heat off of site mods but yet they jump right in as if to "help". 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.5    last year
"That is really funny. sandy adds commentary a lot. Oh well."

Yes she does. Wonder what Perrie thinks of that?

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Expert
4.1.7  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.5    last year

Jim,

Sandy tends to explain, instead of giving points, which is her trying to be nice. I just delete, since I found the less I say, the better off I am, and as this shows that I am pretty much right.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
4.1.8  GregTx  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @4.1.5    last year

You should probably just throw one of those "Boom" posts out there on its own..../s

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year

Joe Biden had to pee. He humbly apologizes to you for causing you to lose your mind over this. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year

That's what Depends are for.

It's puzzling that you're not concerned that your beloved dear leader has become THE national embarrassment

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2.2  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @4.2.1    last year

MAGA is THE national embarrassment. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
4.2.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year

Was that the official White House excuse or are you just starting your  covering for Joe early today?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
4.2.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year
Joe Biden had to pee.

Pathetic excuse (allbeit not surprising).  We all know he has no idea where the restroom is.  

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
4.2.5  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    last year

What is he a child?

He should have gone before the ceremony started!

Leftists are willing to excuse any Brandon action- no matter how degrading, criminal, or out of the norm.

If any Republican POTUS had done this the left would have leapt all over it.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
5  Right Down the Center    last year

It is getting harder and harder to cover for Joe.  Soon it will be back to the basement Biden

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
5.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @5    last year
It is getting harder and harder to cover for Joe.

But you know the Bidenites will try nonetheless.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6  TᵢG    last year

Such chickenshit criticism.   Our national politics have degraded to vindictive childishness.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @6    last year

It’s not chickenshit.    It’s bullshit.   [deleted]

The fact that this man can’t control himself for a brief and important honor ceremony just illustrates even further how incapable he is of properly discharging his duties.

Shameful, absolutely shameful.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @6.1    last year

[Again]

You should delete your comment. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.1    last year

He can if he wants.    You’ve got nothing to say about it

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @6.1.2    last year
Red Box Rules

No personal insults
No death wishes of any individual
All of NT's rules apply

Stay on topic, which is Biden's incompetence

No Trump

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
6.1.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sparty On @6.1    last year
The fact that this man can’t control himself for a brief and important honor ceremony just illustrates even further how incapable he is of properly discharging his duties.

Rather than look at the countless times Joe has shown he can't handle the job due to physical and mental limitations(not even including shitty policies) it is easier to dismiss each individual instance as a "one off" or unfair criticism.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.5  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.3    last year

See 6.1.2, apply liberally, lather, rinse and repeat as necessary.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.1.6  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @6.1    last year
If {redacted} had done something like this the triggered would be on him like stink on shit and you know it.

And it would be chickenshit, right?   It does not matter what letter is next to the name.

This petty nonsense that partisans pursue illustrates how low our politics has degraded in the USA.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.1.7  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @6.1.3    last year

[Deleted

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
6.1.8  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.6    last year
It does not matter what letter is next to the name.

No it doesn’t.    I would feel the same way no matter who did it.    Even if was {redacted} or {redacted} or even {redacted.}.  Biden’s actions were disrespectful.

Disrespect is disrespect and Biden  paid that ceremony the minimum amount of effort possible.   He clearly didn’t give a shit, was just going through the motions and our warriors deserve better.    

To think otherwise is just obtuse.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.1.9  Ronin2  replied to  TᵢG @6.1.6    last year

No Republican would have gotten a reprieve for pulling this crap.

Why should Brandon?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @6    last year
Such chickenshit criticism. 

Even the New York Times has begun to admit to the obvious.


"The inflation ordinary people experience in everyday life is not the one the government prefers to highlight," he wrote. 

Stephens also pointed to "the collapse of public order," the border crisis, concerns about his age and "a humiliating Afghanistan withdrawal." 

"Easy to see is that the president is not young for his age. The stiff gait and the occasional falls. The apparent dozing off. The times he draws a blank or struggles to complete a thought. Yet the same people yelling #ResignFeinstein or #ResignMcConnell don’t appear to be especially vocal when it comes to the president’s fitness, as if noting the obvious risks repeating a Republican talking point," he wrote. 

"But people notice, and they vote," he added.


NY Times columnist gives readers surprising reality check on why Americans are 'down on Biden' | Fox News

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2    last year

You know it must be true then if the vaunted New York Times says so!

Hell, even the liberals will have to admit to it or say the Times is full of shit.

Hmmmm.....wonder which way they'll go on it?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Texan1211 @6.2.1    last year
wonder which way they'll go on it?

They'll point to it being an editorial.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2.3  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2    last year

You missed my point.   My point was that partisans have reduced the level of political criticism to a childish chickenshit level.

It is one thing to criticize Biden for the Afghanistan withdrawal, border, his age, choice of running mate, student loan forgiveness, etc.   But this petty nonsense is pathetic.   All it does is appeal to juvenile emotions in those who are already Biden opponents and encourage others to dismiss criticism of Biden as just "more of the same".   Actual, legitimate criticism is diluted with this chickenshit.

And the exact same criticism from me holds true regardless of party.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
6.2.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.3    last year
You missed my point. 

You missed mine as well:


But this petty nonsense is pathetic.   All it does is appeal to juvenile emotions in those who are already Biden opponents and encourage others to dismiss criticism of Biden as just "more of the same". 

That Times editorial indicates that democrats are worried about Biden's apparent lack of mental capability.

For the rest of us it highlights what "80 million" voted for.  I guess we'll all have to live with it.


 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
6.2.5  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2    last year
Even the New York Times has begun to admit to the obvious.

All because of one conservative columnist?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
6.2.6  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.3    last year

Yeah, yeah, yeah - just like no one ever criticized Eisenhower, Johnson, Kennedy, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Nixon, Ford, [deleted] - right - never any "childish chickenshit level" criticisms - yeah, right.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.2.7  Greg Jones  replied to  Hallux @6.2.5    last year
Nope. Because of many columnists of all opinions and party preferences, not to mention millions of voters.
But people notice, and they vote," he added.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2.8  TᵢG  replied to  1stwarrior @6.2.6    last year

So your ‘argument’ is that this is good because it has been done before?

I consider this kind of crap to be counterproductive, do you?

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.2.9  Ronin2  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.8    last year

I hold every president to the same standards. 

No other president would be cut any slack for bolting on any ceremony at the White House. (Unless the US was attacked, nuclear war, or one of our allies was invaded). 

Brandon had to pee.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.2.10  TᵢG  replied to  Ronin2 @6.2.9    last year
I hold every president to the same standards. 

Give us all a break.   Good grief, man.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
6.2.11  Ronin2  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.10    last year

Please spare us the musing of a constant Brandon apologist.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.12  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @6.2.2    last year

Bret Stephens is a conservative. If you knew anything about the NYT you would know that. 

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.2.13  GregTx  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.12    last year

Does that negate his opinion?

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.2.14  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @6.2.10    last year

What do you mean?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
6.2.15  JohnRussell  replied to  GregTx @6.2.13    last year

No, but some of you are surprised a NYT columnist would criticize Biden. 

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.2.16  GregTx  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.15    last year

I'm not... criticism earned

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
6.2.17  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @6.2.15    last year

Yeah, we are shocked to see such honesty from The Fishwrap of Record.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
6.2.18  Right Down the Center  replied to  1stwarrior @6.2.6    last year

It has been going on in the US forever.  Anything that can question someones ability to be in office is fair game to point out.  Partisans on one side will say "see, there is an example of why he should not be voted  in".  Partisans on the other side will say it is "chicken shit criticism".  And the non partisans will just take it all in and either decide to ignore it or not as they see fit.  Or they won't watch cable news and never even know it happened.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
6.3  Greg Jones  replied to  TᵢG @6    last year

The Dems degraded it long, long, ago. 

And persist to this day in doing so.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.1  TᵢG  replied to  Greg Jones @6.3    last year

Again with the ‘they did it too so it is good’ nonsense.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
6.3.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.1    last year
 

Where in comment 6.3 did he say it was good.  It looks like he said it has been going on for a long time and the dems have been doing it also.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.3  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.3.2    last year

Let's see if Greg comes back and agrees with me that this is chickenshit criticism and an example of how our national politics have degraded to vindictive childishness.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.3.4  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.3    last year

And if he did, how much weight would you give his opinion?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
6.3.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.3    last year

Do you see the degradation as a recent phenomenon?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.6  TᵢG  replied to  GregTx @6.3.4    last year

Probably 23.7

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.7  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @6.3.5    last year

Degradation, no, the level, yes.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.3.8  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.6    last year

I appreciate the honesty. Why would he respond?....

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.9  TᵢG  replied to  GregTx @6.3.8    last year

That is a question to ask Greg.   He is the best authority on what motivates him to reply to comments.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.3.10  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.9    last year

I don't think so.  My question was why would he respond to someone that obviously isn't going to give that response any consideration.  Carry on Tig....

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6.3.11  TᵢG  replied to  GregTx @6.3.10    last year
My question was why would he respond to someone that obviously isn't going to give that response any consideration. 

My consideration of a comment depends on the content of the comment.

Let's see the reply.

Further, I reply to people who I am confident will not objectively consider my reply.   I think I am not alone in that.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.3.12  GregTx  replied to  TᵢG @6.3.11    last year

Well then as I said, carry on TiG. [deleted]

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Guide
6.3.13  GregTx  replied to  GregTx @6.3.12    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7  Sean Treacy    last year

Unbelievable.

how do people pretend this is normal?

although now I guess it is. Just an old man wandering around aimlessly until  his handlers get him under control.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Masters Guide
7.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    last year
how do people pretend this is normal?

Rather than admit Joe is showing he is mentally compromised on a daily basis some people complain about the complaints not being fair or justifying his actions.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Principal
7.2  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    last year

Where’s the Easter bunny when you need him?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  Vic Eldred    last year

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
8.1  Ronin2  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    last year

That was a fast pace for Brandon; I would say it was sped up- but everyone else is moving normally.

Poor Medal of Honor recipient was left standing there looking self conscious, confused, and maybe a little put off. He did nothing wrong- I hope Brandon has the common curtesy to tell him that in person; or at least call him.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
8.1.1  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Ronin2 @8.1    last year

Don't count on it. Biden's minions will do their best to deflect or out and out sweep it under a convenient carpet like usual.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
8.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @8.1.1    last year
Biden's minions will do their best to deflect or out and out sweep it under a convenient carpet like usual.

There is at least one "non partisan" here that is calling the criticism petty, but we all know what this "non partisan" would do if it were [delete] that ran away from a MoH recipient.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
8.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @8.1.2    last year

Well I am an independent and if an 80 year old Republican (let's say Ronald Reagan although he was at most 77 in office) walked out of a ceremony and we had no other information than that, I would consider the criticism chickenshit.   Just like I considered criticism of Trump cheating at Golf to be chickenshit.

People need to grow up instead of engaging at a high-school (and below) level.   This is the president of the USA, not the president of the Student Council.   Criticize that which matters rather than leap at every petty item (and even inventing bullshit to criticize).

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
8.1.4  arkpdx  replied to  TᵢG @8.1.3    last year

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
9  Ed-NavDoc    last year

Biden must have suddenly realized he needed his daily ice cream cone!

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
9.1  arkpdx  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @9    last year

Either that or he felt the need to get his "DEPENDS" changed. 

 
 

Who is online

JBB
Right Down the Center
Hallux
Sparty On


669 visitors