╌>

Mass-murder enlisted to ease disappointing lack of civil war

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  bob-nelson  •  9 years ago  •  17 comments

Mass-murder enlisted to ease disappointing lack of civil war

The horrible murder of 26 people in a small Texas church on Sunday was quickly seized on by the fantasists of the resentful right. Those folks were angry this weekend because they’d spent the previous week getting all excited about a supposed Antifa conspiracy to start a civil war on Saturday. There was, they said, going to be large-scale violence, rioting, cities in flames and public beheadings by leftist Millennial terrorists.

Two years ago I’d have ignored that fevered rumor as the inconsequential ravings of lunatic fringe figures like Alex Jones. But these days, Alex Jones is buddies with the president of the United States, and the ravings of the lunatic fringe have proven hugely significant.

This civil war, you may have noticed, did not happen. No violence, no riots, not a single public beheading.

The resentful right noticed this too, and it ticked them off. Their pleasant fantasy was proven false and that left them horribly disappointed, frustrated, and unsure of where their next jolt of feigned excitement was going to come from.

A civil war with riots, flames, and beheadings may not sound like a pleasant fantasy to you, but you have to understand that these folks found it delightful . They didn’t “believe” in this rumored civil war because they really thought it was true. They “believed” in the rumor because they desperately wanted it to be true. They thought it would be exciting . It would, they hoped, supply their lives with meaning and purpose and righteous vindication. If their imagined enemies were shown to be brutal terrorists, then by some transitive property of relative morality, they would be shown to be virtuous.

But, again, Saturday’s scheduled civil war never happened. It was never going to happen. And when Saturday came and went without the thrill of a lovely civil war, these folks were pissed off. They were looking for the next fantasy outrage to restore the anticipatory arousal they had felt in the days leading up to the civil war of November 4.

So these folks were happy — yes, happy — when news broke early Sunday afternoon of a mass-shooting in a rural Texas church. Here, at last, was the violence they had been eagerly awaiting. Here was the news they’d been hoping for all week.

It didn’t matter that this horrific incident had nothing to do with any delirious dream involving black-clad Millennial socialists running wild in the streets. People were dead, and death is always exciting.

And in any case, the breaking news could easily be twisted into a narrative that would reinforce their preferred fantasy about the world and about themselves and their place in that world. And that is what set about doing, almost immediately, as Dana Liebelson and Paul Blumenthal report — “The Texas Shooter Was Called A Liberal, Antifa Communist Working With ISIS — Before Anyone Knew Anything.”

The first news reports of the murders came at 1:24 p.m. Sunday. The first viral tweet from the resentful right suggesting the killings were linked to their bogus “civil war” came a half-hour later. By 6 p.m., they had latched onto a detailed story — none of it based on fact — that ricocheted around social media, getting shared on Facebook more than 264,000 times:


The website YourNewsWire tweeted out an article making wild claims about the shooter’s connections to antifa. The story cobbled together photos from the Facebook page allegedly belonging to the shooter with a photograph of a different person holding an anti-fascist flag.

The article claimed that the shooter “vowed to start a civil war by ‘targeting white conservative churches’ and causing anarchy in the United States.” The story also included screenshots from a new guy: “Brian (cousin).” This person, Brian, supposedly “talked to some people who were inside.” That’s how Brian learned that two shooters entered the church, threw an antifa flag over the pulpit and then killed people who failed to properly recite verses from Karl Marx’s three-volume foundational critique of capitalism, Das Kapital .


A quibble there: It’s not that “ the story cobbled together photos,” but that a person did that cobbling. A person chose to do that, just as people chose to invent all of those off-the-wall details like reciting “verses” from Das Kapital .

And just as people chose to pretend to believe such things, eagerly clicking “share” — 264,000 times — to invite their friends and relatives to join them in pretending to believe it too.

They want to believe it. They want it to happen again, soon, so that they can enjoy pretending it again. And again and again. They want more death to feed their fantasies, to fend off the depressing disappointment of so many Saturdays without a civil war.

This is, I recognize, an extremely harsh assessment of these people — the quarter of a million who “shared” this ridiculously impossible story and the millions more who were happy to join in pretending to believe it. But keep in mind it is not my assessment of them, but their own assessment of themselves.

Because they admit that this fantasy is what they wanted. They are openly, unashamedly angry to be told their story is not true. They are openly, unashamedly disappointed to learn that there isn’t an army of young Marxists murdering people at worship, and that this was only a single massive crime and not part of a wave of such crimes.

They make no attempt to hide that anger and that disappointment. They make no attempt to hide what it is they wish was true.

-------------------------------

Original article

by fred clark

slacktivist

There may be links in the Original Article that have not been reproduced here.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Bob Nelson    9 years ago

This is a pretty accurate portrait of NT...

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2  Hal A. Lujah    9 years ago

That’s how Brian learned that two shooters entered the church, threw an antifa flag over the pulpit and then killed people who failed to properly recite verses from Karl Marx’s three-volume foundational critique of capitalism, Das Kapital.

That's no different than the time Daily Kos reported that Adam Lanza forced the children of Sandy Hook to pledge allegiance to trickle down economics before he shot them.  Oh, wait - that didn't happen, nor would it ever happen, despite the NT pleas that left and right 'news' sources are all equivalent.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.1  arkpdx  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2    9 years ago

Sort of like how the left went all apeshit over how ut was the Republicans fault and more specifically Sarah Palin's fault fir the Gifford shootungs. They kepp making this claim still tiday even thiugh it gas benn sgiwn that tge shooter was a) non political, b) that according to his close associates never seen Palin's website, c) barely knew who palin even was and d) had a standing beef with the Congresswoman for some time previous to the shooting. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  arkpdx @2.1    9 years ago

Sort of like how the left went all apeshit over how ut was the Republicans fault and more specifically Sarah Palin's fault fir the Gifford shootungs. They kepp making this claim still tiday even thiugh it gas benn sgiwn that tge shooter

I'd like to take your seriously, but ...........  F

I won't even get into grammar and punctuation.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.1.4  arkpdx  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.1    9 years ago

And just what did she do? It has been shown that shooter was apolitical and most likely never saw Palins website. 

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.1.5  arkpdx  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.3    9 years ago

Aah Herr Hauptsturmführer you are still hard at work I see. And using you position to avoud saying you are wrong again. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Tessylo @2.1.1    9 years ago

it was Palin's fault for the Gifford shootings

What's it like to lie so brazenly? Do,you enjoy looking foolish? 

Whats next? Declaring the earth flat?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.1.7  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  arkpdx @2.1.5    9 years ago

And using you position to avoud saying you are wrong again. 

I typically "avoud" you out of sympathy, but that quote deserved showcasing.

 
 
 
arkpdx
Professor Quiet
2.1.8  arkpdx  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2.1.7    9 years ago

Jahwol Herr Hauptsturmfuhrer!

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2  seeder  Bob Nelson  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2    9 years ago

You had me puzzled for a moment, Hal! 

   thumbs up

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @2    9 years ago
despite the NT pleas that left and right 'news' sources are all equivalent.
followed by a leftwinger posting
it was Palin's fault for the Gifford shootings.  

It's too perfect. Hal's argument unintentionally  destroyed  by a ignorant left wing post parroting left wing fake news.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    9 years ago

"Antifa" as a national political theme was created almost instantaneously after Charlottesville. A white supremacist had plowed his car into a group of peaceful protesters and the right needed to change the conversation. 

There are a small handful of "antifa" demonstrations that resulted in violence, mostly against property (but a few people have been hurt as well), the bulk of it in the northwest , particularly at Berkeley. Listening to the right you would think they are an all pervasive remake of Hitler's brownshirts. 

Right wing media and social media has done more to ruin and destroy America as we have known it than any other "institution" in the country. Until the poison of "conservative media" is thrown in the garbage heap of history we will all have nothing but trouble. 

 
 

Who is online





92 visitors