Thoughts and Prayers for Anti-Gun Freaks Grieving Over Death of Their Narrative
The synchronized leftist response to this latest attack on normal Christians was pre-planned, and it didn’t matter that this time it was another militant atheist weirdo instead of an ISIS-loving foreigner. The memes and the lies were all prepped and ready, and the villain was already chosen. No surprise – once again, it was you, the normal American who keeps and bears arms to protect yourself, your family, your community and your Constitution.
But this time it didn’t go the way they wanted. Sure, they were giddy at first – the liberals got to trash people of faith for praying, they got to tell NRA members that there was blood on their hands, and they got to demand some sort of unspecified action. But then their lying narrative took a bunch of rounds and bled out just like that useless little creep.
That’s what they are really mourning – the loss of what they saw as an opportunity to spread their poisonous lies in support of their effort to disarm Americans and change us once and for all from citizens into subjects.
Some still found something to cheer about. One Twitter low-life pointed out, “Sutherland Springs is in rural Texas, these were all likely 45 voters. This is karma in action. Good riddance.” Yes, that’s the kind of person who wants you disarmed, the kind that thinks it’s A-OK to murder little kids because their parents might like a different candidate.
SEE ALSO
Show of hands. Who is up to give up your ability to protect yourself because the same people who celebrate us being murdered demand it? Anyone? Hello? Bueller?
Once the news hit, the ghouls rubbed their hands and started with their coordinated demands that we “do something.” But did you notice how no one said exactly what we were supposed to do? That’s their new thing – no specifics, just some sort of ambiguous, amorphous demand that we wave a magic wand and dispel evil from our midst. They’ve been burned before, hard. They always start babbling about background checks and it always turns out that the scumbag got his guns legally or passed the check when he shouldn’t have. This pudgy meat sack was barred from buying a weapon, but he passed the background check because the government – you know, the same entity the gun-grabbers want to be the only people with guns – again screwed up and failed to put his domestic violence conviction into the database. BTW, want to know how many attempted illegal gun buyers Obama’s DoJ prosecuted out of 48,000? 44.
I don’t know about you, but I’m feeling pretty confident. I’m sure eventually the government will figure out how to tell if a nut or a felon is a nut or a felon. In the meantime, I don’t need the ability to protect myself or my family. Here, take my guns. Government, you got this.
Then, of course, the killing spree got stopped by the very thing that liberals insist doesn’t exist except for all the times it has existed – a good guy with a gun. A Texan exhibiting something liberals are unfamiliar with – manhood – took his rifle and went one-on-one with that walking chamber pot and put a round in him. The tubby terrorist, confronted with an armed American citizen instead of little kids, dropped his rifle and ran, gut shot. Let’s hope he suffered good and hard before he checked himself out like the coward he was.
It gets better, though it’s hard to imagine anything better than him with a bullet in his ample belly. The hero who plugged him was not only one of the normal Americans our fern-fertilizing betters in the coastal cities are so fond of looking down upon, but he was an NRA shooting instructor. You know, the focus of evil in the world – except he actually confronted evil and defeated it.
Bullseye, right between the eyes of the lying liberal narrative.
And as their narrative twitched, they still had to display their ignorance for the world. Professional anti-gun liar Shannon Watts really knows her audience – drooling idiots. She claimed, “That means he’s prohibited purchaser, but there’s absolutely no regulation of long guns (AR15s) in Texas. No background check required.” Um, no. And leave it to Alyssa Milano to parrot her pal’s lies: “There are no background checks on long guns (AR15s) in Texas. Thanks for the info @shannonrwatts.” Alyssa, time for some real talk. You need a better firearms advisor, just like you need a better tax advisor.
Oh, and the social media rando platoon piped up with their useful input. One suggested, “No one should have semiautomatics and large ammo rounds.” Time for some commonsense large ammo round control, I guess. That’s the kind of smart take by a trained pro worth listening to, says Chet, who is my unicorn.
These events are an opportunity for clarity. They bring out exactly what is in the hearts of our elite would-be masters. And what is in there is hate and contempt for normal Americans. From Hollywood, we got Michael McKean weighing in with, “They were in church. They had the prayers shot right out of them. Maybe try something else.” You know, I was thinking about no longer watching Better Call Saul because it turned Saul into a boring whiner, but now Mikey’s made my decision easy!
And then Wil Wheaton, who you might know if you watched some Star Trek show where he was a Spock or a Jedi knight or something three decades ago, tweeted, “The murdered victims were in a church. If prayers did anything, they'd still be alive, you worthless sack of [liberalism].” You know, I was thinking about no longer watching whatever he’s in, but Wil’s total lack of a career made my decision easy!
And what’s a tragedy without anti-Christian hack Stephen King weighing in? “Enough with the prayin'. Time to start legislatin'.” Well, I reckon someone’s drinkin’ again.
So, let’s review. We’re supposed to demand laws that make it illegal for human suppositories like this to have guns, even though it was already illegal for him to have guns. We’re supposed to rely on government background checks to protect us even though the government keeps failing at that. We’re also supposed to disarm at the behest of people who know literally nothing about guns or existing gun laws. And we’re supposed to not believe that we have the ability to defend ourselves, even though normal Americans do so every day – here, an instructor from the NRA literally ended this bloodbath. But we should ignore that for reasons and because.
But wait, there’s more. We’re supposed to disarm in the face of people who celebrate when we are murdered. The Hollywood types, taking a break from molesting each other, didn’t exactly celebrate our deaths, but they couldn’t help spewing their hatred for our faith. I bet if we were disarmed, and a government controlled by liberals had a total monopoly on force, they’d be totally cool and respect our religious rights. I checked with Chet and he thinks so – it’s not like right now they want to bankrupt people for not baking cakes.
Here’s the sad fact – the people who want us disarmed don’t care if we get murdered. Not at all. Chicago has a slow motion Sutherland Springs every two weeks and the smarmy Democrats who run that hellhole don’t care. If they did, they would unleash the cops, who know exactly who the crooks are. Remember how liberals howled about “stop and frisk?” That took illegal guns off the streets, but progressive politics always take precedence. Our lives don’t matter except as a tool to be exploited when they want to take normals’ rights.
Our elite doesn’t want gun control. It wants us control.
It’s no coincidence that the “common sense” measures they used to demand would never stop any of these killers. Killers are killers – they don’t care about the law. Only we do. And the gun fascists don’t care if we are at the killers’ mercy – that’s a risk they’re happy to take.
They lie when they tell you, “No one want to ban your guns.” They think you are too stupid to believe your ears when they advocate just that. Let’s be absolutely clear – if they had their way, that NRA instructor hero would not have had a gun, because he is a law-abiding citizen. But the killer would, because he was a criminal and criminals don’t obey laws. If you think we can ban guns and get them out of the hands of criminals, you’re a moron or a liar. If they don’t smuggle them in – gee, isn’t there a drug crisis? - they’ll just make them.
Of course, that assumes that liberals win the civil war they would spark and somehow manage to confiscate all 300 million of our guns. I’m not betting on Kaden or Ashleigh taking time off from coffee-slinging or their Feminist Mime masters studies to suit up in Kevlar and kick in doors in Red America.
Liberals so desperately want us disarmed because they hate that we hold a veto over their Venezuelan dreams. But they also want us disarmed because they hate us, and they yearn to break us and humiliate us and make us give in. When you own a weapon and can defend yourself and your rights, you are a citizen. When you do not, you are a subject. Your dignity gnaws at them.
They want to convince you to submit, but that only happens if you allow it. Their tool is the narrative, but a proud American with courage and a rifle just shot their narrative dead. And that’s the real reason the gun grabbers are grieving. https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2017/11/09/thoughts-and-prayers-for-antigun-freaks-grieving-over-death-of-their-narrative-n2406128
Tags
Who is online
73 visitors
Excellent article. Great find CH.
C4P never fails to disappoint. The first line of this piece of shit article is so warped from reality that only a RWNJ could continue reading it.
and it didn’t matter that this time it was another militant atheist weirdo instead of an ISIS-loving foreigner.
The murderer also taught Sunday school.
The LA Times is reporting similar Hal.
Texas Gunman Devin Kelley Was Atheist Who Taught Vacation Bible School
The guy obviously wasn't right in the head, but some religious zealots only want to mention the part about atheism.
Do you think it has anything to do with the fact that it, usually, is the first thing that is mentioned by some that a bad person is Christian?
How much of a mention was there for the little fact that the WalMart shooter lived a spartan existence with almost zero furniture but he did have a literal stack of bibles. When you play the victim card make sure it isn't printed on both sides.
the first thing that is mentioned by some that a bad person is Christian?
And what is the typical Christian first response to that? "He's wasn't a real Christian" - which is bullshit. Christians love to make the claim that the vast majority of Americans are Christians, and yet they are quick to point out the ones that aren't real Christians.
Let's see here - if you call yourself an atheist, then what would be one thing that you could do that someone could justify saying that you are not a real atheist? Teach vacation Bible school perhaps?
I have only heard about the "real Christian thing" on NT from non Christians. And, have often asked the question what in their opinion is a "real Christian".
And, I have always said that I don't care what religion you are or if you don't have one. My faith is personal.
What I said in the post you responded to is how I see it.
I have no idea.
I have only heard about the "real Christian thing" on NT from non Christians.
Lol, okay. You must be agoraphobic and not have a tv, radio, or any Christian friends.
My friends (not all Christians) and I don't get into those things. I watch a little TV, usually, not the news and no radio as a rule. Yep, I am pretty much different.
No, the Times quoted one person's claim about Kelley's FB page. Have you seen that page?
He was an atheist.
Because you say so? Comment removed for skirting the CoC [ph]
"Ex-friends say...."
Is there any BS or hearsay you won't swallow whole to make a desperate and ugly point, aus?
Well, they guy's dead, so.....ex friends...
Oh, that's sooo cute.
People who know him better than you do say he is atheist.
Want to start a slap fight? Keep making it personal!
And, who are people you know nothing about. These could be your fellow "christians" lying in order to smear atheists.
They are people who know the shooter better than you!
You don't know that, either. You'll grasp at any straw at this point to try to muddy up the water and find a scapegoat.
News articles say they are people who knew him. Is the media lying? Would you be accepting of people's accounts if it were about a Christian?
All quoting the original piece. It's the same story. And it's both hearsay and anecdotal. I can't remember we on the left ever going to one of these mass murderer's religious beliefs as the main motive for the crime. But that's what you've done. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
You have no problem with condemning Moore on just the word of a 14 year old's memory of an even that might have happened 30+years ago. You have never attacked the religion of the killer of Tiller? Since the terrorist attacks by Muslims are done by Muslims I have to agree with you on that. The left will never attack Muslims, only Christians.
You have no problem doing it with much less than that to smear any dem. Don't know how many times I have to tell you that you will not get to have it both ways. Until otherwise proven, we believe all these women no matter whom they accuse or we believe none of them. No cherry picking by political party or religion or profession....nothing.
Guilty until proven innocent?
Nice to know that now you believe Bill's accusers.
I'll give up my guns when the last religious nut job on earth takes their last breath.
I guess you and your guns are safe!
I draw little crosses on all the bullets just to make sure.
Creative for sure!
Wouldn't the mark of the devil be more chilling to them? That's what General Pershing would have done.
Either a crescent moon and star, or perhaps an upside-down cross so that the "shaft" of the cross hits first. Otherwise a True Christian will rise again after 3 days and roam the earth thirsting for brains.
Playing the victim again I see!........Grabbing your bibles and guns!
If devangelical can have bullets with crosses on them we can have bibles and guns! Only fair.
But what you cant do is try to play the victim and savior for this heinous act that involved neither prayer or religion!
Oh, but the first "law" of rightwingism is that they get to have it both or any number of ways as long as it excuses everything they do and say.
So we're to believe that everyone "knew" Kelley was an atheist and yet some church gave him a bible study class and no one complained about this terrible atheist? Wow, right-wingers, you are just oozing desperation on this one.
What I find funny is even after a motive has been established that it was due to a dispute he had with in laws......they are still trying to make it all about them!
Q: Where did you read that a church ever gave Kelley a Bible study class ?
A: You didn't, and here's proof .......
You're welcome.
Well none of that makes the slightest sense.
Read it again slowly. If at first you don't succeed, try try again!
Well, I've heard that when someone uses the word "faith" in a sentence, understanding goes out the window for most atheists....
So your confusion is understandable....
Nothing hard to understand about that...makes perfect sense to me.
Would you mind translating it for me then? Let's start with explaining what this phrase means:
"Who is up to give up"
and:
"people who celebrate us being murdered"
Who's "celebrating" and who's "us"
and
"my faith requires I stand in the way of the wicked, it does not require I need to be bare handed while doing it."
does he mean he'll be wearing gloves when he "stands in the way of the wicked."
You hear some weird things, apparently.
Skirting the CoC [ph]
So you don't know what it means, either.
This must have been meant for Mr. Surfs_up. If you really want to play teacher why haven't you addressed my specific questions? Oh, and although I ordinarily avoid correcting people's grammar here, in your case I'm going to make an exception. That sentence of yours is missing a verb. I learned that before I was in second grade.
Skiring the CoC [ph]
It's hilarious that you think that and can lecture someone else on grammar. It was just one of several grammatically incorrect things you wrote even as you were pontificating about grammar and now you've got to go into full CYA mode.
I knew you'd fall flat on your face and you spectacularly didn't disappoint.
This thread has nothing to do with your seed* and if you're mad that it drew attention away from it you should be thanking me (although it was a joint effort). And if you want to blame someone anyway it begins with Surfs_Up unintelligible blather at the top of this thread. So, back off.
* which is you usual ugly religious/personal/political attack piece using a national tragedy as cover.
Reading the words wasn't the problem. The problem was the whole sentence was a kind of word salad of crazy. I now realize that it was a mushing together of a bit of the BS from the seed and Surfs_Up's personal BS. Still, it was a grammarian's nightmare and a psychologist's dream.
"Who is up to give up your ability to protect yourself because the same people who celebrate us being murdered demand it?"
No one is taking all your guns away, that's not even a debate. There are 300 million + guns in America and that's a fact we'll all have to live with.
"not a chance in heaven or hell."
Of course there's no chance in imaginary places.
"but, they will keep trying anyway... count on that."
No, they won't, because they're not. Again, no one is trying to take all your guns away.
"my faith requires I stand in the way of the wicked, it does not require I need to be bare handed while doing it."
Stand in the way of the wicked all you want, but only ignoramuses refuse to even have a civil discussion about gun safety and ways to keep guns out of the hands of the wicked (i.e. felons, criminals, mentally disturbed).
“like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.” It is “not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.” Justice Antonin Scalia
Having a reasonable debate and vote on universal background checks, limits on magazine capacity, bans on bump stocks and the sale of smart gun technology has NOTHING to do with taking all your guns away or preventing you from protecting yourself. No one is even suggesting taking all your guns away. It's a straw man argument because gun nuts have manufactured their own boogey man to fight, the fantasy of the total gun ban liberal that simply doesn't exist in any actual numbers. Can you cherry pick a fringe nut liberal who believes such? Probably, but I've never heard their rhetoric being repeated by any majority. I'm sure I can find a fringe gun nut who thinks all military weapons should be legal including tanks and missile launchers, but they aren't anywhere close to the majority of gun owners.
So let's keep the debate on the things that are actually possible, reasonable, sensible gun safety laws and the like. If you have an argument against universal background checks, make that argument, but stop with the nonsense where you keep claiming the imaginary liberals are coming to take all your guns away.
Ooops , I just realized that part of that garbled mess we were talking about came from the idiot at Clown Hall and that would make perfect sense to people who write there and people who read the crap that's there.
This was Surfs_Up part, which is still hilarious to read, I must say.
So apologies C4P...those weren't your ridiculous words. You just dumped them here.
Cool. Then the nut or felon will just buy it in Texas from a private seller since no background check is required. The great news is that our supply of guns for nuts and felons will never run out. And if we ever get low the US arms manufacturers will simply pump out more.....after all they're the arms dealer to the rest of the world.
The whole sordid story of christianity is nicely summed up in C4P's seed. What started out as a faith that people would be willing to die for became and remains for a lot of its adherents a religion that those people can't wait to kill for.
pfft...you got nothing and put it on display for everyone...thanks!