╌>

"...Trump’s criminal conduct on one or more levels will be apparent."

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  johnrussell  •  8 years ago  •  10 comments

"...Trump’s criminal conduct on one or more levels will be apparent."

Opinion is almost unanimous that there are more bombshells to come. That could be very bad news for the president and those close to him.

Mueller’s team is “digging deep into [every] element of a very complicated story,” said Harry Litman, a former deputy assistant attorney general. 

“When they meet in the middle and complete the puzzle, it’s likely that a number of additional people will be going to jail and that Trump’s criminal conduct on one or more levels will be apparent."















The waters of Robert Mueller ’s investigation are rising higher by the day, putting President Trump and his inner circle in increasing legal and political danger.

A series of recent revelations “have, at least, indicated that there is fire amid all that smoke,” said Frank Montoya Jr., a retired FBI special agent who was also detailed to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence from 2012 to 2014.

New disclosures have come at a dizzying speed in recent days.

The Washington Post  reported  on Wednesday that Mueller had gathered evidence suggesting a meeting in the Seychelles shortly before Trump’s inauguration was an attempt to create a back channel between his team and the Kremlin.

The special counsel is also said to be investigating  whether   Jared Kushner ’s family business dealings influenced U.S. foreign policy. 

In addition, Mueller’s team has  reportedly  secured the cooperation of a hitherto-marginal figure, Lebanese-American businessman George Nader, who was stopped and questioned by the FBI at Washington’s Dulles Airport in January. 

And Nader’s emails are purported to  reveal  a push by a Republican fundraiser with links to the United Arab Emirates to get Secretary of State Rex Tillerson fired.

There have also been a number of other intriguing, if more marginal, developments. 

A New Yorker  profile  of Christopher Steele, the former British spy who authored a contentious dossier alleging Russia had compromising material on Trump, included the detail that British intelligence services had intercepted “a stream of illicit communications between Trump’s team and Moscow” during the 2016 campaign. “The content of these intercepts has not become public,” the author, Jane Mayer, added.

Put it all together and experts agree the perils for Team Trump are multiplying.

Mueller’s team is “digging deep into [every] element of a very complicated story,” said Harry Litman, a former deputy assistant attorney general. 

“When they meet in the middle and complete the puzzle, it’s likely that a number of additional people will be going to jail and that Trump’s criminal conduct on one or more levels will be apparent."

Trump and his allies vigorously insist that he has done nothing wrong. 

The president has said again and again that the Mueller probe is a “witchhunt,” confected by Democrats and other anti-Trump forces to assuage their embarrassment about Hillary Clinton ’s shock loss in the 2016 election.

The president’s most fervent backers, in both politics and the media, have suggested that Mueller’s probe might be derailed by allegations of political bias. 

Those hopes reached their peak with the publication of the so-called “Nunes memo,” in early February. The memo, written by members of staff for Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) alleged misdeeds by the FBI and the Department of Justice (DOJ).

But with every new revelation, it has become harder to undercut the investigation in any fundamental way. In mid-February, Mueller indicted 13 Russians over alleged cyber efforts to influence the 2016 election.

“Despite President Trump’s continuing claim that there is ‘no collusion, no collusion,’ ironically it could be the case that, even if there is no collusion, Trump would still be exposed to criminal jeopardy based upon these other investigations,” said Jimmy Gurulé, a former assistant attorney general who served in senior positions under two Republican presidents, and who is now a law professor at Notre Dame Law School. 

“The broader investigation is fanning out into greater jeopardy and greater potential liability.”

Some law enforcement veterans warn that Trump’s critics are in danger of getting ahead of the evidence. 

James Gagliano, who spent more than two decades in the FBI, said that he had yet to see anything that proved there was “an underlying scheme” to collude with Russia to influence the election. 

But he nonetheless acknowledged that the probe was now spreading beyond that specific question.

“To say that [Mueller] is not going to bring more charges, I think would be folly,” Gagliano said. “I think there will be more charges.”

Former DOJ veterans say that the recent revelations simply underline what some experts have pointed out repeatedly: that Mueller’s team knows far more than is in the public arena, and can reveal it at a time of their choosing.

“It’s not Mueller who is discovering new things all the time, as much as it is that we are learning about areas Mueller has been investigating all along,” said Joyce White Vance, who served as the U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Alabama throughout the Obama administration.

“The system is not designed for us to know everything prosecutors are investigating and the tip of the iceberg we are seeing is far from the whole picture,” Vance added. “But we do seem to be seeing more of the tip over time.”

Opinion is almost unanimous that there are more bombshells to come. That could be very bad news for the president and those close to him.








Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

In other somewhat related news

So Much for the Uranium One Story

Posted: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 14:10:01 GMT

If I had to identify my greatest shortcoming as a blogger and an analyst, I’d say it was my refusal to consume right-wing media. By keeping myself walled off from their obsessions, I don’t always sufficiently understand the power of their narratives. When something comes on my radar, like the Fast & Furious controversy or Benghazi!, I will look into it and often quickly determine that it is the rankest horseshit. Sometimes I am surprised to see these stories have such lasting power. I’d put the Uranium One story in this category. I saw that it was being discussed. I investigated it. It was a bunch of foolishness. I moved on.

But Attorney General Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III is under pressure to assign a special counsel to investigate the issue, so it has to be taken seriously. At the  Washington Post , Paul Waldman explains that the whole conspiracy theory has collapsed. The key problem has been described in a memo released by Democrats on the House committees on Oversight, the Judiciary, and Intelligence. It turns out that a confidential FBI informant named William Campbell, who was supposed to have proof of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s corruption, doesn’t even claim to have that proof and is also some kind of crook. Here’s what the House committees learned from testimony the Republicans were not eager to release to the public:

Here are some of the key facts the memo lays out about Campbell:

  • The Justice Department had planned to use Campbell as an informant in building a separate case against a man named Vadim Mikerin, who was implicated in a bribery scheme  involving contracts to transport uranium from Russia to the United States for use in power plants. But as Justice officials told the committees, they determined it was likely that Campbell had engaged in illegal activity he had concealed from them, and Justice decided not to rely on his testimony.
  • Justice Department officials told the committees that they do not plan to use Campbell’s testimony in any future prosecutions.
  • Justice Department officials explained to the committees that Campbell “never provided any evidence or made allegations regarding Secretary Clinton or the Clinton Foundation,” as the memo puts it, adding that he never made “any allegation of corruption, illegality, or impropriety on Clinton, the Clinton Foundation, President Clinton, the Uranium One deal, or CFIUS.”
  • During his interviews with the committees, Campbell did not offer any evidence of Hillary Clinton or anyone in the Obama administration taking actions as a result of Russian influence.
  • Campbell told the committees that none of the Russians he dealt with ever mentioned anything about the $500,000 Bill Clinton was paid for the speech in Moscow.
  • Campbell said that he heard officials of the Russian energy company Tenex bragging about “influence from Moscow” over the Clintons, but he said he “did not take seriously” those comments.

On the one hand, this justifies my inclination not to w

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

In other words the "bombshell" FBI informant who was supposed to blow open the Uranium One scandal and incriminate the Clintons, Obama, Mueller, Comey and the janitor in the FBI building has proven to be a dud. What a surprise. s. 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.1.1  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    8 years ago

One more bit of news to add to your story John, I heard this in the news last night.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/businessman-with-ties-to-united-arab-emirates-is-cooperating-with-mueller-probe/2018/03/07/8163fce2-21c6-11e8-86f6-54bfff693d2b_story.html?utm_term=.bc3c1593a05c

Nader wasn't just questioned by Mueller's team, he has agreed to cooperate with it.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2  Hal A. Lujah    8 years ago

It's no mystery why Trump jumped out of his seat for a chance to engage North Korea.  He will do anything he can do at this point to create his own news that might overshadow the Mueller investigation and the fact that he has been a serial cheater on his wife.  Kim Jong-UN knows this, and he is playing Trump like the tool he is.  Like every other situation, Trump will show up totally unprepared, and with no useful plan.  He'll probably come back from the meeting glowing like a white Dennis Rodman.

 
 
 
96WS6
Junior Silent
3  96WS6    8 years ago

I can't wait to see what new evidence emerges to implicate the Clinton cartel and Russia.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  96WS6 @3    8 years ago

Sessions should have a Special Prosecutor to look into the prior administration's illegal actions up and running and revealing inconvenient truths right in time for the midterms. thumbs up

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1    8 years ago

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  96WS6 @3    8 years ago

What happened to the Uranium One scandal you were all hyperventilating about? 

The key witness turned out to be a nothingburger. Benghazi Benghazi Benghazi

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.3  Ozzwald  replied to  96WS6 @3    8 years ago
I can't wait to see what new evidence emerges to implicate the Clinton cartel and Russia.

New evidence?  We're still waiting for ANY evidence.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    8 years ago

Wishcasting

 
 

Who is online