Vegan Wackadoodle Mass Shooter Rampages Youtube Headquarters
YouTube shooter self-described as 'vegan bodybuilder,' claimed censorship before rampage
Meat is murder so Vegan Murders the oppression corporation that allegedly censored her videos?
Houston the shuttle has left the mind on this one!
Welcome to the meatless revolution, resistance is futile!
Aghdam was also a prominent animal rights protester.
She was quoted in a 2009 story in the San Diego Union-Tribune about a protest by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals against the use of pigs in military trauma training.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/04/04/nasim-aghdam-everything-know-youtube-hq-shooter/
Tags
Who is online
96 visitors
Her beef with You Tube was over money. She believed that You Tube was in various ways cheating her or preventing her from 'monetizing' her videos.
This woman, a 39 year old loner, had the delusion that she would become some sort of star or celebrity by posting videos on You Tube.
In many of her videos and instagram pages she poses as if she were a model.
She seems to have had 'political' views, but they were not the reason she was on You Tube. She was on You Tube to "be somebody".
The 21st century disease.
She sounds like a libertarian.
Or maybe even a librarian!
Apparently, eating vegan does not put a smile on one's face.
She can rest easy now that she's finally getting that attention she craved.
Can you imagine the last boyfriend she had? Wow, he's likely thinking he got out lucky......she's a whackjob, plain and simple, no need to attribute anything else to her.
Every time I look at her, the phrase "put another dime in the jukebox baby" comes to mind.
That would seem to sum up her attributes pretty well. Although we can't actually see the lack of coherent thought in the pictures, I think that can safely be assumed.
If you have followed what YouTube has been doing to its content providers, this isn't all that surprising. Many people now make their livelihood off the monetization of YouTube videos. But YT decides - seemingly arbitrarily - to remove or demonetize videos. They created something that for all intents and purposes functioned as a public forum, but then decided to control the viewpoints in that forum and it appears they are becoming more greedy, wanting to keep more money for themselves.
Screw with someone's livelihood like that and you are bound to make enemies.
I've eaten red meat at least twice a day my entire life. Technically, I should be dead by now!
I have only one question. Was the gun she used legally purchased? If it was, shouldn't the discussion be about allowing people with serious mental health issues be able to get the guns they use in the shootings? Stop making this political and let's use some common sense. A crazy person alone doesn't shoot people. A gun alone doesn't kill people. A crazy person with a gun kill people.
I have no problems at all with background checks and a waiting period. No one needs crazy with a weapon of any kind. The question of how she came by the gun hasn't been answered publicly, at least as far as I've seen.
From what I heard on the news, she bought the gun a day or two before the shooting, and practiced shooting it only hours before she went to Youtube. Apparently, the only experience she had with that particular gun was the hour or so she spent at a shooting range that morning.
I don't know if she obtained it legally or not
I don't know. I do think she was mentally disturbed.
Certainly her final acts were irrational. On those lines, has anyone seen a pic of her smiling? Every pic seems to have a stern or scowling expression. Just curious.
I swear I thought this lady was that David Hogg kid in drag. This lady was a kook for sure.