╌>

Trump Buddy Macron Describes US Administration's Position On Iran Deal As "Insane"

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  johnrussell  •  8 years ago  •  14 comments

Trump Buddy Macron Describes US Administration's Position On Iran Deal As "Insane"



Emmanuel Macron conceded he had probably failed in his attempt during a three-day trip to Washington to persuade Donald Trump to stay in the Iran nuclear deal, describing US flip-flopping on international agreements as “insane”.

The French president had hoped to convince Trump to continue to waive sanctions on Iran, as agreed by the 2015 nuclear deal, in which Iran agreed to accept strict curbs on its nuclear activities. Macron offered Trump the prospect of negotiations on a new complementary deal that would address Iranian missile development and Tehran’s military intervention in the Middle East.

But speaking to US reporters before leaving Washington, Macron said: “My view – I don’t know what your president will decide – is that he will get rid of this deal on his own, for domestic reasons.”

Noting that Trump had also pulled the US out of the Paris climate change accord – another commitment of the Obama administration – Macron said such frequent changes in the US position on global issues “can work in the short term but it’s very insane in the medium to long term”.

The admissions come after a day of intimate fraternity with Trump, during which Macron made an impassioned speech in Washington advocating many of the things Trump has spent much of his presidency trying to destroy.


Over the course of a 50-minute address to a joint meeting of Congress on Wednesday, the French president said he was “sure” the US would one day return to the Paris climate change accord, and vowed that France would not abandon the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, known as the Joint Comprehensive Programme of Action (JCPOA)

More broadly, Macron presented himself to the US legislature as an unabashed advocate of the liberal world order of global institutions and free trade – the very opposite of the America First nationalism that fuelled Trump’s rise to the White House . The speech – delivered in English – was interrupted by frequent standing ovations, many from both sides of the aisle.

“We will not let the rampaging work of extreme nationalism shake a world full of hopes for greater prosperity,” Macron said. “It is a critical moment. If we do not act with urgency as a global community, I am convinced that the international institutions, including the United Nations and Nato, will no longer be able to exercise a mandate and stabilising influence.”

“Personally, if you ask me, I do not share the fascination for new strong powers, the abandonment of freedom and the illusion of nationalism,” Macron said, in remarks that could easily be seen as a rebuke for Trump’s enthusiasm for some of the world’s most autocratic “strongman” rulers.

Macron also made a full-throated argument for global action to combat climate change, built around the 2015 Paris accord, which Trump announced in June he was walking away from.

“What is the meaning of our life if we [are] destroying the planet while sacrificing the future of our children?” the French president asked. “Let us face it. There is no planet B.”

He said the rift over the Paris accord was but a “short-term disagreement”.

“In the long run, we will have to face the same reality that we are citizens of the same planet,” he added.

“I’m sure one day the United States will come back and join the Paris agreement,” Macron declared, to whoops and cheers from the Democratic ranks.

He had an even more direct rebuke for his host’s resort to tariffs as an instrument of trade policy. Macron said that the right way to correct trade imbalances and overcapacity was to negotiate through the World Trade Organisation.

“We wrote these rules. We should follow them,” the visiting president said.


On the Iran nuclear agreement, Macron repeated an idea he had promoted on Tuesday at a White House meeting with Trump for a “new deal” that would complement the 2015 accord with a broader remit to address Iranian ballistic missile development and its military role across the Middle East.

Iran, Macron said would “never possess any nuclear weapons” but he added: “This policy should never lead us to war in the Middle East.”

He called for respect for the sovereignty of Iran and its ancient civilisation, and urged the west not to “repeat past mistakes”, an apparent reference to the 2003 Iraq invasion.

Both the US and France endorsed the JCPOA, he pointed out, adding: “We should not abandon it without something more substantial in its place.”

In a tweet after his speech to Congress, Macron added: “We decided with President [Trump] to work on a new comprehensive deal” which would address Iranian missiles and its regional role, and make limits on Iranian nuclear activities permanent.

On Tuesday, Trump had stopped short of voicing support for Macron’s idea of a supplemental agreement, or set of agreements, on non-nuclear issues but had suggested he might at least be reconsidering his vow to abrogate the JCPOA by declining to extend sanctions relief when presidential waivers falls due on 12 May.

With their president in an apparent state of flux, US officials gave mixed messages on the US position on the JCPOA on Wednesday.

The head of the state department planning office, Brian Hook, disparaged the nuclear agreement.

“It has no signatures. It has no legal status. It is a political commitment by an administration that is no longer in office,” Hook told National Public Radio, although the JCPOA is enshrined in a UN security council resolution.

In Geneva on the same day, the assistant secretary for international security, Christopher Ford, said: “We are not aiming to renegotiate the JCPOA or reopen it or change its terms,” seemingly in clear contradiction of multiple presidential statements.



Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

It appears Macron did his best to flatter Trump into a reasonable position on the Iran deal but came up short. 

What will "Little Rocket Man's" reaction be in North Korea to Trump reneging on a US nuclear arms negotiation (with Iran)? 

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.1  Skrekk  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

I'm still amused by Trump's profoundly rude (and presumably bogus) comment about Macron's "dandruff".

The world is laughing at the US.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Skrekk @1.1    8 years ago

They've been laughing at us for the past 2 years. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

The only thing that is insane the whole Iran "deal" in the first place. And the previous president paid a bribe to get a deal that can't be verified and can be broken at will by the Supreme Leader and his stooges.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    8 years ago
And the previous president paid a bribe to get a deal

If the US had paid $500 million to China for some missiles and then China had a leadership change and the new leader refused to send us the missiles, then 30 years later we demanded they pay us back the money they owed us before we would negotiate any trade deals, would that be considered a "bribe"? If not, then the same applies for Iran. The only money they got was what a court decided we owed them for goods never delivered that they paid for along with access to their own money and assets we had frozen under sanctions in foreign banks. This whole lie Republicans keep telling of Obama paying them off is just beyond ridiculous, you'd have to be intentionally obtuse or a complete idiot to believe such nonsense.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.2.2  MrFrost  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.2.1    8 years ago
This whole lie Republicans keep telling of Obama paying them off is just beyond ridiculous, you'd have to be intentionally obtuse or a complete idiot to believe such nonsense.

Exactly right. It's sad that these people cannot even do simple math. Those that say it was a ransom payment... The sailors were held for less than 8 hours, but somehow, we flew the money, IN CASH, in a jet from DC to Iran...in less than 8 hours? Um... No. I have flown from L.A. to Dubai, it's MORE than 8 hours by a LONG ways. As I recall, (it was a long time ago), it was closer to 18 hours. But they tell this fantastic story that isn't believable in the first place, but then they have to add to it to make it even MORE stupid. The jet was all black, it was the middle of the night, the bills were all unmarked, the pilots were executed after the flight, there was no flight plan....etc.. And these rightists totally believe it! I would love to say I am shocked, but, "pizzagate", nuf said. 

 
 
 
Skrekk
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.3  Skrekk  replied to  Greg Jones @1.2    8 years ago
And the previous president paid a bribe to get a deal that can't be verified and can be broken at will by the Supreme Leader and his stooges.

I'm beginning to think that right wingers really are as ignorant of historical facts as they appear to be.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

pml.png Associated Press :
Mattis Breaks With Trump, Says Iran Nuclear Deal Includes ‘Robust’ Verification   —  Without giving his opinion about whether the U.S. should stick with the agreement, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said that after reading the deal three times he was struck by how tough it is

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

"FatMan" and "FatBoy"(Formerly "LittleRocketMan")

Pompeo_Page_2-804x1137.jpg

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
5  MrFrost    8 years ago

I saw an interesting statistic today...

- Last year the Trump Admin was turned down on 26 FISA applications in full, and 50 applications in part.

That's just a SINGLE Year!! -

From 1978-2016 (38 Years) only 21 applications were rejected!

Who the hell is trump and his crime syndicate trying to spy on? 

 
 

Who is online





76 visitors