Flake Threatens to Stop Trump Judicial Nominees
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/57309463/Jeff_Flake_2017.0.jpg)
President Donald Trump’s revamping the federal court system with dozens of new conservative judges will come to an abrupt stop if Sen. Jeff Flake follows through on his threat to put holds on the chief executive’s judicial nominees.
Noting a recent column by George Will, Flake told ABC News “This Week” host George Stephanopoulos that he “and a number of senators, at least a few of us, will stand up and say, ‘Let’s not move any more judges until we get a vote, for example, on tariffs.'”
Flake did not say which other senators might join him in putting holds on Trump nominees.
Under Senate rules, any senator can anonymously put a hold on a presidential nomination and no confirmation vote will be taken until the holding senator agrees to remove it.
Flake's threat is a result of his anger over Trump's moving forward with billions of dollars in tariffs against dozens of products from China, Canada and the European union. Those countries impose high tariffs and other trade barriers on U.S. products, so Trump is seeking to force a new negotiating process to redress the imbalances.
Flake is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has a tenuous 11-10 Republican majority that mirrors the GOP's razor-thin 51-48-1 majority on the Senate floor. Democrats have used every available parliamentary maneuver to stall Trump's judicial nominees, making it extremely difficult for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) to move them forward to confirmation.
As a result, in addition to putting a hold on a nominee, due to the close partisan makeup of the judicial panel, Flake can also join with the 10 Democrats to bar any Trump nominee from being reported to the full Senate for a confirmation vote.
Judiciary panel chairman Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) said Thursday that Flake was responsible for holding up the committee's consideration of Britt Grant, a Georgia state supreme court member Trump nominated for a federal appellate judgeship.
Flake also said on ABC Sunday he believes "on something like tariffs, for example, the Senate ought to bring legislation to the floor that says, 'hey, we're going push back here. I'm sorry, you're misusing 232, Canada, Mexico, are not national security threats. The European Union exporting cars to the U.S. does not represent the national security threat, and ought to push back. And if we don't, why are we there?'"
Section 232 of current trade law allows the president to impose tariffs on imported goods from countries said to be practicing unfair trade policies that harm the U.S.
Senior editor Mark Tapscott can be reached at mark.tapscott@lifezette.com.Follow him on Twitter.
Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
Who is online
99 visitors
So this "Senator" who dosen't feel he can win another term is willing to hurt Conservatism and make no mistake, holding up Conservative judicial appointments is doing just that, for the purpose of having a voice on trade policy?
Obviously this senator is serving the interests of entities concerned about tariffs.
The other senators who may join him?
I think we know who they might be. Number one would be the revenge driven individual representing the same state as Flake.
It may be time for the Senate leader to change the Senate rules.
The Senate WILL B Chaqnging...
but NOT soon enuff for thinkin Inn Dye villages hold in Dye in Di visual in a separate vigil, replicating
the same vigual, but cast indifferently fore those who could not C , but died a separate collection of colorful Black N Whites in colorforms brite lite frite cheery picBked from home
ohzzz is the range
eye cant sea B Sides
the A sides
opposite the Z sides
like A Zanax on the annex, X men N X Women
suffering a panic , from the Heart on
attack king the Queen
4 B inn sew mean, about XXOO for genders in between
the likes of the linnes disliked, buy all kinds, as bout all founds,
unusually knot aft der visous
B nevolence N knumb to the
Top
still spinning
Truth
to those not so aloof
of the spin
spun
in a whirled lof dervishes
best served
Cold
I'd read your comment, but the amount of childishness that goes into your supposed 'ignorant' responses is not worth the time to bother. If you want to be taken seriously, write seriously.
seriously
Don't forget, we still have that bet
It's amazing how the left keeps saying its Trump and his Republicans that are the problem. Not sure I see a massive amount of support for either side of the aisle for President Trump's nominees.
How many people here think that it's okay for other countries goods to freely flow into America, while at the same time charging massive tariffs on American goods coming into their countries? My local border crossings, I can bring pretty much anything in, built on North America with no duty, but a Canadian going the other direction cannot without paying Duties on those same goods. Is the presdient approaching this right? I don't know. Is it fair the way it is? Hell no.
Good question. It was a campaign promise