╌>

Trump Puts Out An "Enemies List"

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  johnrussell  •  8 years ago  •  55 comments

Trump Puts Out An "Enemies List"

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




"extraordinary breaking news -- Donald Trump today releasing an enemies list -- a list of former national security officials that his White House is targeting for the possible punishment of stripping these officials of their security clearances" -

clap.JPG





















2:05





27.1K views























Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

Every one of those six is more worthy of a security clearance than Trump is. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1    8 years ago

It is personal - they went after Trump hammer & tongs, so now Trump hits back. I do hope Trump does it. Rand Paul had a better idea - EVERYONE loses their security clearance when they leave their gov job.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.1  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    8 years ago
It is personal - they went after Trump hammer & tongs, so now Trump hits back. I do hope Trump does it. Rand Paul had a better idea - EVERYONE loses their security clearance when they leave their gov job.

According to the Trump Administration, ie, Sarah Sanders, they are losing their clearances because they are making a profit off of their clearances, if this is true, shouldn't the Trump family and, Kushner lose theirs as well?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.1    8 years ago

All things being equal the answer would be yes, but the President has the right to be selective and I think he is right to do it. All those Obama appointees politicized government. 

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.3  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.2    8 years ago
All those Obama appointees politicized government. 

So, you see nothing wrong with an enemy's list from the POTUS and, that same POTUS trying to shut people up that might speak out against him by attacking some people who did attack him. If you want that kind of government why not just move to Russia, I'm sure Putin would love to have ya.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.3    8 years ago
So, you see nothing wrong with an enemy's list from the POTUS

Is that the narrative? Let me ask you - were you ok with such a biased, political animal as John Brennan running the CIA?

If so I have to use your words -  "I'm sure Putin would love to have ya."........Obama too

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.5  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.4    8 years ago
Is that the narrative? Let me ask you - were you ok with such a biased, political animal as John Brennan running the CIA?If so I have to use your words -  "I'm sure Putin would love to have ya."........Obama too

Vic, did you watch the Pompeo testimony in front of Congress yesterday? If you didn't then you should, something is wrong in this administration and, it starts at the top.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
1.2.6  It Is ME  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.5    8 years ago
did you watch the Pompeo testimony in front of Congress yesterday?

I did. Big hugs

Pompeo handled the "Gotchya" question tries really well. Loved his attitude towards some of those "Gotchya" questions, especially his attitude when they just wanted to cut his response in total off. Wouldn't have fit what they wanted if they let him continue. Clapping

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.7  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  It Is ME @1.2.6    8 years ago
Pompeo handled the "Gotchya" question tries really well. Loved his attitude towards some of those "Gotchya" questions, especially his attitude when they just wanted to cut his response in total off. Wouldn't have fit what they wanted if they let him continue.

That's where we disagree I guess, I saw that he was trying to use up each Senators time so that they couldn't follow up on any questions, he was repeatedly asked one question by one Senator three times before giving an answer to that question, the other two times he went off on some kind of rant about something totally different from what was asked and, that question came from a Republican.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
1.2.8  It Is ME  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.7    8 years ago
I saw that he was trying to use up each Senators

To get the "REAL STORY" a longer explanation is ALWAYS needed. MSLWM luvs the quicky blurbs. Those in congress should ALWAYS require....and WANT.... more Info.

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.9  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  It Is ME @1.2.8    8 years ago
To get the "REAL STORY" a longer explanation is ALWAYS needed. MSLWM luvs the quicky blurbs. Those in congress should ALWAYS require....and WANT.... more Info.

So, you think Strzok should have been given more time to answer questions as well, instead of being cut off by Republicans and, harassed by the same Republicans for the whole time he was there? Remember, with Pompeo it was Republicans as well as Democrats that were asking questions and, wanting yes or, no answers, not a bunch of White House rhetoric.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
1.2.10  It Is ME  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.9    8 years ago
So, you think Strzok should have been given more time to answer questions as well,

I don't think any of it should have been televised at all. Both were nothing more than a reality TV type trail gone bad. Pompeo did much better than Strzok though. 

Strzok.jpg Pompeo.jpg

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.11  Vic Eldred  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.5    8 years ago

I watched it and was proud of the Secretary of State

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.12  Vic Eldred  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.3    8 years ago
So, you see nothing wrong with an enemy's list from the POTUS and, that same POTUS trying to shut people up that might speak out against him by attacking some people who did attack him.

They are free to speak. Let me ask you - have you ever seen a former CIA directory call the President a "traitor"?

You see nothing wrong there?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.13  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.12    8 years ago
They are free to speak. Let me ask you - have you ever seen a former CIA directory call the President a "traitor"?You see nothing wrong there?

Not if it appears to be true. Tell me, would you have accepted Obama saying that the U.S. intelligence agency's were  all bad actors and, didn't know what they were talking about and, that Putin was a great guy and, should be trusted when he says he isn't trying to hack our elections?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.14  Vic Eldred  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.13    8 years ago
Not if it appears to be true.

And where is it true?????


 Tell me, would you have accepted Obama saying that the U.S. intelligence agency's were  all bad actors and, didn't know what they were talking about and, that Putin was a great guy and, should be trusted when he says he isn't trying to hack our elections?

That is a real bad analogy. Obama is the one who politicized all the federal agencies with these very people. Obama was weak on Putin and did tell his #2 man in a hot mic that he would have more flexibility after the election. Do you remember?

 
 
 
Galen Marvin Ross
Sophomore Quiet
1.2.15  Galen Marvin Ross  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2.14    8 years ago
And where is it true?????

How many times have you heard Trump say anything bad about Putin? Let me help you, never. However, Trump has done everything he can to get rid of the Obama era sanctions on Russia and, to return the Russians who were shipped home back in the country. He also invited Russians to the White House to have a meeting with them and, in the process of that meeting he revealed secrets to them. He had a private meeting with Putin in Helsinki were the only people present were Trump and, Putin and, two interpreters and, the interpreters aren't talking about what was said in that meeting, not even Pompeo knows what was said in that meeting and, you don't find any of this strange? Really?

That is a real bad analogy. Obama is the one who politicized all the federal agencies with these very people.

Link to a credible source please.

Obama was weak on Putin and did tell his man in a hot mic that he would have more flexibility after the election. Do you remember?

I remember, I also remember that it was explained but, the people on the Right, that would be you, don't accept the explanation so, I won't attempt to try to convince you again since it would be beating a dead horse.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.16  Vic Eldred  replied to  Galen Marvin Ross @1.2.15    8 years ago
How many times have you heard Trump say anything bad about Putin?

It's been a long, long time since we had an American President call Russia/the old Soviet Union the "Evil Empire". Most Presidents want to have some type of diplomatic relations with Russia. You want Trump to cuss Putin out. Tell me why?

Trump has done everything he can to get rid of the Obama era sanctions on Russia and, to return the Russians who were shipped home back in the country. 

You do know that Trump signed a sanctions bill last August that places sanctions on Russia. You do know that Trump expelled 60 Russian diplomats for the poisoning of a spy in Britain. You do know that Trump ordered Russia to close three of its diplomatic facilities in the US, including its consulate in San Francisco, and two annexes in Washington, DC, and New York City. You do know that the bombing Trump ordered in Syria killed a few hundred Russians. You do know that Trump authorized a $47 million weapons sale in early March. It included Javelin launchers and anti-tank missiles to the Ukrainian  government in it's fight against Russia.

He also invited Russians to the White House to have a meeting with them and, in the process of that meeting he revealed secrets to them. 

We do share secrets with other governments. We were destroying ISIS

 He had a private meeting with Putin in Helsinki were the only people present were Trump and, Putin and, two interpreters and, the interpreters aren't talking about what was said in that meeting, not even Pompeo knows what was said in that meeting and, you don't find any of this strange? Really?

No I don't. I think world leaders need private talks - believe it or not EVEN TRUMP!!!


Link to a credible source please.

I'm not quoting others, I'm speaking for myself. I happen to think that John Brennan is a total partisan, who never should have been in charge of the CIA. I think that Eric Holder was a black supremacist, who never should have been in charge of the DOJ. I think that James Comey, Loretta Lynch and James Clapper were also ideologues who never should have led those agencies. I'm sure you thought otherwise.

I remember, I also remember that it was explained but, the people on the Right, that would be you, don't accept the explanation so, I won't attempt to try to convince you again since it would be beating a dead horse.

You are right....You can't tell me anything about Obama.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2  MrFrost    8 years ago

Anyone else notice that this list is comprised of ALL Americans? No Putin, that's for damn sure. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  MrFrost @2    8 years ago

At the top op it is a deeply partisan man who once ran the CIA. He has lied to congress and even put a double agent at risk. now he calls the President of the United States a traitor. Yup, HE SHOULD HAVE HIS SECURITY CLEARANCE TAKEN AWAY!

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
3  Kavika     8 years ago

Comey and McCabe should be the first two to have their clearances pulled. Oh wait, they don't have clearances..

Another case of the administration doing their homework.... 

Next thing is that Trump will be asking for a loyalty pledge when you are issued a clearance...Oh wait, sounds familiar.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1  MrFrost  replied to  Kavika @3    8 years ago

giphy3.gif

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4  MrFrost    8 years ago

So I guess the trump team and the Mueller team are negotiating about questioning trump. But team trump wants any and all questions relating to obstruction of justice, banned. Gee whiz, I wonder why????!!! LMAO!!!!!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  seeder  JohnRussell    8 years ago

Michael Hayden only worked in the Obama administration for a couple weeks at the start of the first term in 2009. What is he doing on this enemies list? 

Well, he's gone on tv criticizing Trump, but more than that - 

Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence
In office April 21, 2005 – May 30, 2006
President George W. Bush

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
6  bbl-1    8 years ago

Trump's security clearance 'hit list' is little more than 'chum' thrown out for the base.

Trump enemies list?  Holy crackers!  Wouldn't that include 99.9% of the people that went into financial transactions, businesses or performed actual labor for Trump or his projects?

 
 
 
PJ
Masters Silent
7  PJ    8 years ago

Americans being targeted for speaking out against another American?  

We should all agree this is disturbing.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8  Trout Giggles    8 years ago

The Night of the Long Knives.....

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
9  freepress    8 years ago

The wannabe dictator is more paranoid than Nixon, the same actions didn't work then and they are not working now. The evidence is mounting by the hour and the number of guilty pleas and indictments are just beginning.

 
 

Who is online






120 visitors