Texas Requires Schools to Teach the Truth: ‘Arab Rejection of Israel Has Led to Ongoing Conflict'
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Texas Requires Schools to Teach the Truth: ‘Arab Rejection of Israel Has Led to Ongoing Conflict'
Palestinians burn an Israeli flag. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90)
Texas schools will teach the historical truth that “Arab rejection of the State of Israel has led to ongoing conflict” in the Mideast.
By JNS, United With Israel, September 26 2018
The state of Texas will require schools to teach that “Arab rejection of the State of Israel has led to ongoing conflict” in the Mideast.
The Texas Board of Education voted during a curriculum review earlier this month to keep the sentence in high school textbooks, used by approximately 5.4 million public school children. The board is comprised of five Democratic members and 10 Republican members, implying that the decision was likely demonstrative of a shift towards a more right-wing educational program.
After a period of public input, this decision, among other ones by the board, will be subject to a final vote in November, according to The Independent .
“Last week was a perfect demonstration of why it’s a really bad idea for politicians to write curriculum standards that guide what public schools teach,” Dan Quinn, communications director of Texas Freedom Network, a religious liberty advocacy group, told The Guardian . “Because then you end up with history that’s decided by a majority vote instead of by facts and historical accuracy.”
However, Charles Jacobs, the president of Americans for Peace and Tolerance, which supported a lawsuit in Newton, Mass. last month over public schools’ use of anti-Israel materials , told JNS that both the Israeli and Palestinian narrative should be taught, with the perspective that Texas is looking to institute as the truth.
“They should teach the truth and the truth is Arab rejection,” said Jacobs. “At the same time, they should explain to students what the Arab narrative is and how it’s wrong.”
The same board also voted to eliminate historical references to Helen Keller, Barry Goldwater and Hilary Clinton.
Tags
Who is online
77 visitors
APT describes itself as having been at the forefront of criticizing Islamist extremism in the Boston area and nationally; however, it has been labeled a hate group by American Muslim and Jewish organizations, which allege that it has consistently targeted the Boston Muslim community through smear campaigns and guilt-by-association tactics. US Attorney for Massachusetts Carmen Ortiz has labeled the group and its claims "incredibly racist and unfair."
Has the SPLC named APT as at hate group? Notwithstanding, even if it has and it seems to be very effective at it, is it a lie that APT said there should be fairness in that the narrative of BOTH sides of the conflict should be taught, rather than just one? Telling both sides of a story doesn't seem to be wrong, IMO. Is it wrong in yours?