╌>

A Classmate Has Told the FBI That Kavanaugh Lied Under Oath About Knowledge of Yale Assault, Report Says

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  8 years ago  •  24 comments

A Classmate Has Told the FBI That Kavanaugh Lied Under Oath About Knowledge of Yale Assault, Report Says

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




Politics

A Classmate Has Told the FBI That Kavanaugh Lied Under Oath About Knowledge of Yale Assault, Report Says



507bd910-cac5-11e5-8654-758dbb262c4b_f26   Glenn Fleishman   11 hours ago  






63d48f29ae52c0676af03618216658bc

A Yale classmate and friend of Brett Kavanaugh, the embattled Trump nomination for Anthony Kennedy’s former seat on the Supreme Court, has reportedly delivered text messages to the FBI that were exchanged among Kavanaugh’s friends related to an accusation of assault before the details became public.

If the texts were found to be accurate, they contradict sworn testimony by Kavanaugh.

The classmate, Kerry Berchem, prepared a memo about the text messages and attempted to submit them to the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 27 following Kavanaugh’s testimony and that of Christine Blasey   Ford ,   according to NBC News , which obtained a copy of the memo.

The Republican staff of the committee didn’t forward the memo to the FBI and a spokesperson for Charles Grassley, who chairs the committee, said the texts weren’t relevant. A Democratic senator on the committee, Richard Blumenthal, said he worked with Berchem to submit them to the FBI directly.

Berchem knew both Kavanaugh and Deborah Ramirez, who   said that 35 years ago Kavanaugh exposed himself   and thrust his penis into her face in a party at a Yale dorm when both were freshmen.

Kavanaugh told the Senate Judiciary Committee on Sept. 27 that he had not heard of Ramirez’s allegations before they were made public   in a   New Yorker   story published Sept. 23 . However, Berchem said in her memo that she exchanged texts with another classmate, Karen Yarasavage, also a friend of Kavanaugh, ahead of that publication date.

One of the texts reportedly from Yarasavage asked Berchem to go on the record to defend Kavanaugh. Others said that Yarasavage had been in contact with “Brett” and “Brett’s guy,” and that she had sent “Brett’s team” a photo showing Ramirez and Kavanaugh together at a 1997 wedding.

Berchem reportedly text Yarasavage that Ramirez had “clung to me” at the wedding to avoid Kavanaugh and his friends.

Berchem confirmed the memo with NBC News, though provided only a general statement about its contents. She said she’d attempted to provide the texts to the FBI on Sept. 30 and Oct. 1 without confirmation before Blumenthal’s staff got involved.

Yarasavage and other classmates mentioned in Berchem’s memo declined to speak with NBC News.





Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Dulay
Professor Participates
2  Dulay    8 years ago

They DO NOT CARE!

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
3  cobaltblue    8 years ago

From  Benjamin Wittes, editor in chief of  Lawfare  and a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

If I were a senator, I would not vote to confirm Brett Kavanaugh.

These are words I write with no pleasure, but with deep sadness. Unlike many people who will read them with glee—as validating preexisting political, philosophical, or jurisprudential opposition to Kavanaugh’s nomination—I have no hostility to or particular fear of conservative jurisprudence. I have a long relationship with Kavanaugh, and I have always liked him. I have admired his career on the D.C. Circuit. I have spoken warmly of him. I have published him. I have vouched publicly for his character—more than once—and taken a fair bit of heat for doing so. I have also spent a substantial portion of my adult life defending the proposition that judicial nominees are entitled to a measure of decency from the Senate and that there should be norms of civility within a process that showed Kavanaugh none even before the current allegations arose. This is an article I never imagined myself writing, that I never wanted to write, that I wish I could not write.

* * * *

Kavanaugh, needless to say, did not take my advice. He stayed in, and he delivered on Thursday, by way of defense, a howl of rage. He went on the attack not against Ford—for that we can be grateful—but against Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee and beyond. His opening statement was an unprecedentedly partisan outburst of emotion from a would-be justice. I do not begrudge him the emotion, even the anger. He has been through a kind of hell that would leave any person gasping for air. But I cannot condone the partisanship—which was raw, undisguised, naked, and conspiratorial—from someone who asks for public faith as a dispassionate and impartial judicial actor. His performance was wholly inconsistent with the conduct we should expect from a member of the judiciary.

Consider the judicial function as described by Kavanaugh himself at his first hearing. That Brett Kavanaugh described a “good judge [as] an umpire—a neutral and impartial arbiter who favors no litigant or policy.” That Brett Kavanaugh reminded us that “the Supreme Court must never be viewed as a partisan institution. The justices on the Supreme Court do not sit on opposite sides of an aisle. They do not caucus in separate rooms.”

A very different Brett Kavanaugh showed up to Thursday’s hearing. This one accused the Democratic members of the committee of a “grotesque and coordinated character assassination,” saying that they had “replaced advice and consent with search and destroy.” After rightly criticizing “the behavior of several of the Democratic members of this committee at [his] hearing a few weeks ago [as] an embarrassment,” this Brett Kavanaugh veered off into full-throated conspiracy in a fashion that made entirely clear that he knew which room he caucused in. * * * *

As Charlie Sykes, a thoughtful conservative commentator sympathetic to Kavanaugh, put it on The Weekly Standard’s podcast Friday, “Even if you support Brett Kavanaugh … that was breathtaking as an abandonment of any pretense of having a judicial temperament .” Sykes went on: “It’s possible, I think, to have been angry, emotional, and passionate without crossing the lines that he crossed—assuming that there are any lines anymore.” Kavanaugh blew across lines that I believe a justice still needs to hold. The Brett Kavanaugh who showed up to Thursday’s hearing is a man I have never met, whom I have never even caught a glimpse of in 20 years of knowing the person who showed up to the first hearing. [Emphasis mine.]

Cite . 

So what's with 'we', Wally?? Hmmmm? 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
4  cobaltblue    8 years ago

Good article, Tessy. Damn good job. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
5  cobaltblue    8 years ago

Supreme-Court-nominee-Brett-Kavanaugh-800x430.jpg

'So, I was a little drunk and stumbled a bit and I broke my fall on her tits like this...'

 
 
 
Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom
Professor Participates
5.1  Sister Mary Agnes Ample Bottom  replied to  cobaltblue @5    8 years ago

Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!snortHahahahahahahaha!!!!coughsputterHahahahaha!!!!!HahahahahahahahachokesnortHahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!peepantsalittleHahahahahaha!!!!!!!

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    8 years ago

Sad.

Liberals keep taking his testimony out of context to claim he lied. Which makes them liars.

Take a deep breath.

He testified he didn't know the specifics of the  allegation until it was published. He knew beforehand that Ramirez was calling around friends asking for their memories.

Womp Womp

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7  Sean Treacy    8 years ago

Hey I heard he lifted a keg over his head during Beach Week!

That means he lied about drinking too many beers sometimes!. 

 
 
 
cobaltblue
Junior Quiet
7.1  cobaltblue  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    8 years ago

Oh okay. You're right. About everything. Your powerful statements make perfect sense. How could I have been so wrong. 

Pfffft ... thanks for the giggles! Ha!

His temperament, his lack of impulse control, his partisan nonsensical rhetoric is far more concerning than his lies. He's easily rattled. For a drunk. Who can't can't control his emotions. 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.2  MrFrost  replied to  Sean Treacy @7    8 years ago
Hey I heard he lifted a keg over his head during Beach Week!

An empty one, maybe.. A full keg of beer is ~186 pounds. 

 
 

Who is online



CB


57 visitors