╌>

Trump notes Andrew Jackson 'continues to be on the $20 bill'

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  8 years ago  •  9 comments

Trump notes Andrew Jackson 'continues to be on the $20 bill'

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T




Politics

Trump notes Andrew Jackson 'continues to be on the $20 bill'



9197dca0-94e1-11e6-9718-4d4a4a2e45f0_US-   David Knowles   12 hours ago

 




8312f12efd0c25162abe66be3d38eb3a President Trump at a rally in Johnson City, Tenn., Oct. 1, 2018. (Photo illustration: Yahoo News; photos: Susan Walsh/AP, AP (2)).

Harriet Tubman will have to wait a bit longer.

As   President Trump   boasted of his administration’s accomplishments at a campaign rally Monday in Johnson City, Tenn., he also touted something he hasn’t done: replace Andrew Jackson’s portrait on the $20 bill with a likeness of Tubman, the African-American icon who ran the Underground Railroad that helped Southern slaves escape to freedom in the North.

After noting that Jackson’s historical connection with Tennessee, Trump seemed to revel in the fact that the former president was still represented on U.S. currency.

“Andrew Jackson, who continues to be on the $20 bill, you know that,” Trump said. “I’m a big Andrew Jackson fan.”

In 2016, before he left office, then President Barack Obama and his Treasury Secretary Jack Lew floated the idea of replacing Jackson with Tubman, a plan that would have made her the first African-American to be represented on U.S. currency.

As he campaigned for president, Trump dismissed the idea to remove Jackson as “political correctness.”

“I would love to leave Andrew Jackson and see if we could maybe come up with another denomination. Maybe we do the $2 bill or do another bill. I don’t like seeing it. Yes, I think it is pure political correctness. Been on the bill for many, many years,” Trump said on the “ Today ” show.

When he took over for Lew, Trump Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin proceeded to slow walk that idea.

“Ultimately we will be looking at this issue,” Mnuchin said in a 2017 interview with   CNBC . “It’s not something I’m focused on at the moment.”

Trump has often spoken glowingly of Jackson, and has a portrait of the seventh president in the Oval Office.





Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    8 years ago

Andrew Jackson had his good points and his bad points. On the whole I guess you could say he was a powerful person of his time and place. He fought to remove Indians from their tribal homelands and displace across the country, causing many deaths and much sorrow among those peoples. Trump, of course, is completely ignorant on the topic, as he is on most topics. 

Andrew Jackson engineered a genocide. He shouldn’t be on our currency.

Symbols matter. Many people, for example, are inspired by the symbolic implications of Jackson’s path to the presidency: He was born two weeks after his father’s death to a widowed immigrant mother and, despite his poverty and lack of education, reached the highest office in the land. That’s a powerful story.

So is the more precise telling of how Jackson climbed the American socioeconomic ladder. Jackson was the only president who worked as a slave trader, and he accumulated much of his fortune that way. In fact, Jackson later pursued his “Indian removal” policies specifically so that the stolen lands could be used to expand cotton farming and slavery.

Even in historical context, our seventh president falls short. His racist policies were controversial even in his own time. After the Indian Removal Act narrowly passed Congress, an 1832 Supreme Court ruling declared it unconstitutional. Jackson ignored the decision. In 1838, Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote a passionate letter calling Jackson’s policies “a crime that really deprives us as well as the Cherokees of a country, for how could we call the conspiracy that should crush these poor Indians our government, or the land that was cursed by their parting and dying imprecations our country any more?”
 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @2    8 years ago

I wouldn't think it would be extremely difficult for a poor man to work his way up to the presidency in the 1830s. I'm not impressed by Jackson. He's just an earlier version of trmp. But Jackson did not have the opportunities that trmp did, I will say that

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3  luther28    8 years ago

“Ultimately we will be looking at this issue,” Mnuchin said in a 2017 interview with   CNBC . “It’s not something I’m focused on at the moment.”

With all of the other irons in the fire at the present moment, I would think this would be somewhat low on the to do list. What I find a bit more surprising is that Mr. Trump did not suggest His own likeness, perhaps a three dollar bill might be in order in that case.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  luther28 @3    8 years ago
three dollar bill might be in order in that case.

jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif

Oh...the things I could say....

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3.2.1  luther28  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2    8 years ago

Be nice, I believe I know where you might be going:) Looks like I was not quite sub rosa enough with my little quip.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  luther28 @3.2.1    8 years ago

Why do you think I stopped myself?

 
 
 
luther28
Sophomore Silent
3.2.3  luther28  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.2    8 years ago

I would suppose for the same reason I went sub rosa, the suggestion would not have been fair to some of my acquaintances, but they would most likely smile or shudder at the thought. :)

 
 

Who is online



CB


57 visitors