╌>

Trump Apologizes to Kavanaugh: 'Under Historic Scrutiny, Proven Innocent'

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  xxjefferson51  •  8 years ago  •  57 comments

Trump Apologizes to Kavanaugh: 'Under Historic Scrutiny, Proven Innocent'
“On behalf of the nation, I'd like to apologize to Brett and the entire Kavanaugh family for the terrible pain and suffering you've been forced to endure,” Trump said. “Those who stepped forward to serve our country deserve a fair and dignified evaluation. Not a campaign of political and personal destruction based on lies and deception. “What happened to the Kavanaugh family violates every notion of fairness, decency and due process. In our country, a man or a woman must always be presumed...

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



President Donald Trump offered an apology “on behalf of the nation” to Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh at his White House swearing-in Monday night — and lashed out at “a campaign of political and personal destruction based on lies and deception.”

At the East Room ceremony, Trump said “we have long been told that the most important decision a president can make is the appointment of a Supreme Court justice,” declaring he would “proudly” swear in the newest member of the nation’s high court.

But he wasted no time in denouncing the chaotic nomination process that included an 11th-hour accusation of sexual assault against Kavanaugh by Christine Blasey Ford.

“On behalf of the nation, I'd like to apologize to Brett and the entire Kavanaugh family for the terrible pain and suffering you've been forced to endure,” Trump said.

“Those who stepped forward to serve our country deserve a fair and dignified evaluation. Not a campaign of political and personal destruction based on lies and deception.

“What happened to the Kavanaugh family violates every notion of fairness, decency and due process. In our country, a man or a woman must always be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. And with that, I must state that you… under historic scrutiny were proven innocent.”

Trump said  that "under historic scrutiny," Kavanaugh was "proven innocent."

The bitter partisan fight over Kavanaugh's nomination became a firestorm after sexual misconduct allegations emerged involving Kavanaugh. He emphatically denied the allegations.

The other eight justices were all in attendance for Monday's swearing-in, which is entirely ceremonial. Kavanaugh officially became a member of the high court Saturday. Kavanaugh already has been at the Supreme Court preparing for his first day on the bench Tuesday.

In his own remarks after taking a cermonial oath, Kavanaugh said the Supreme Court "is not a partisan or political institution," and promised to "always be a team player on a team of nine."

Kavanaugh described the confirmation process as "contentious and emotional" but said he has "no bitterness."

All four of the clerks who will work for him at the high court are women, he added.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu     8 years ago

Trump said  that "under historic scrutiny," Kavanaugh was "proven innocent."

Yep He also basically said Dr Ford lied.

No respect.

Sorry but that sucks !

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.2  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2    8 years ago
Yep He also basically said Dr Ford lied.

Same was said of Kavanaugh !

If ya think about it, seems Ford had Feinstein approved attorneys that, even in the hearing on National TV, were telling her what to say.

Hmmmmmmmm……. kinda interesting don't ya think ? 

Ever wonder why Feinstein's preferred lawyers haven't brought this so-called allegation to an actual court "OF LAW" ?

Reminds me of all of Gloria Allred's Clients. "Where are they now" ?

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
2.2.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  It Is ME @2.2    8 years ago
seems Ford had Feinstein approved attorneys that, even in the hearing on National TV, were telling her what to say.

Yes she did look to the attorneys for advice from time to time. she also ignored those same attorney and answered questions they probably would have not wanted her to answer. Including Who recommended the attorneys.   Ironic eh ? 

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.2.2  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2.2.1    8 years ago

She was coached....period !

She sure didn't claim that she paid for anything. All she said was...…"I don't know".

Same as her testimony. "I don't remember anything, but I'm 100 percent sure it was Brett".

The most stupid question I ever heard was from "Dick Durbin, and the 100% answer. WTF was she going to say, "I am 25% sure what I said was true" ?

Brett was 100% sure too, but was called a liar. 

Double Standard ?

I sure didn't see any "Coaches" next to Brett Kavanaugh's....did you ?

I have more respect for someone that "Goes it ALONE". jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
2.2.3  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  It Is ME @2.2.2    8 years ago

I'm not going to go thru your post one by one.

I understand many people have many doubts about many aspects of all of this. It's not  my job or desire to change minds. 

I have my believes and my reasoning for them. We all do. 

I do not agree with some of your post or reasoning, but I'm ok with that its not mine. 

IMO: None of us will ever know for sure much of the truth.  That's too bad but it is reality. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.2.4  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2.2.3    8 years ago
IMO: None of us will ever know for sure much of the truth.  That's too bad but it is reality. 

We aren't here to change minds, we are here to let other Like minded folks know they aren't alone. jrSmiley_20_smiley_image.gif

That's all there is to blogging. jrSmiley_15_smiley_image.gif

We differ, but I would have a "Beer" with you anytime. jrSmiley_79_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
2.2.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  It Is ME @2.2.4    8 years ago
We differ, but I would have a "Beer" with you anytime.

LOL Yep we differ I dont drink alcohol anymore, I was an alcoholic.

I would be happy to "party" with you though in my way. I like a little marijuana from time to time. It relaxes and enhances my world for me a little for a while.  

My best friend drinks and I smoke my stuff, then we Jam out on the drums and his guitar. we both enjoy it. And we dont have to share...lol 

To each their own !

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.2.6  It Is ME  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2.2.5    8 years ago
I would be happy to "party" with you though in my way.

As long as you don't morph into some kinda "Streaking" ass, No problem. I guarantee you, I won't be an ass in "Real Life".

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
2.2.7  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  It Is ME @2.2.6    8 years ago
As long as you don't morph into some kinda "Streaking" ass, No problem

LOL.. No problem I dont "morph" anymore that someone having their choice of a an alcohol drink.  I used to drink like a fish, unfortunately alcoholism runs deep and strong enough to kill in my family so alcohol could not remain my drug of choice or likely I would not be here. I have two younger siblings already dead from it. But, I chose life. 

I also like to have something to enhance my senses and that's the kind I get. So,  No morphing involved !  

And FYI, I've never streaked so no worries there.  

These days I dont even like the taste of beer, long after I stopped drinking I sat down to have a beer with my brother after not seeing him for a long time and I couldn't even drink it. The taste wasn't there for me anymore.  yuck.. Thankfully.

That makes it so much easier not to want to drink again, maybe ever !!

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
2.2.9  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @2.2.5    8 years ago

Party on Garth. jrSmiley_13_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
2.2.11  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.10    8 years ago
No beer or alcohol for me either.  We can have a healthy party.

Thanks But, I don’t consider the way I still do “party” to actually be healthy. Healthier for Me than I used to party though for damn sure.

Now days my partying days are much less and I stick with only the natural form, no concentrates or manmade crap. And even then very moderately to boot. Age takes its toll and eventually I do learn as well.  LOL

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.12  MrFrost  replied to  It Is ME @2.2    8 years ago

Trump corrupt FBI did the investigation, they didn't even try. 

Don't blame me, trump ha said the FBI is corrupt...many times. 

 
 
 
livefreeordie
Junior Silent
2.2.13  livefreeordie  replied to  MrFrost @2.2.12    8 years ago

The same FBI you leftists demanded do further investigation 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.2.15  MrFrost  replied to  livefreeordie @2.2.13    8 years ago
The same FBI you leftists demanded do further investigation 

Trump said they are corrupt.. Weird that that suddenly aren't when he needs to have them back his BS. Fish on!!!!!!! LOL 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    8 years ago

When will the stupidity we see daily from some on the right end? 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @3    8 years ago

As soon as some on NT quit posting - ya think?

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @3    8 years ago

Most likely when some of the left remove the mile wide blinders they routinely wear.

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
3.2.2  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.1    8 years ago
But those blinders allow them to see the tiniest mote in our eyes 👀 while totally being oblivious to the beams in their own....

Let he without sin throw the first stone .

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
3.2.4  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.3    8 years ago
So, the Kavanaugh accusers are without sin?

How would I know that ?

IMO: Dr Ford did what she believe to be the right thing, I do not agree with how she started it. Wanting to remain anonymous was understandable but not realistic. 

Her request  or insistence that she remain anonymous created many problems with achieving her goal of revealing her story.

I will say this, whoever leaded Dr Ford's name did the whole country a disservice IMO: 

It probably would have died on someones desk if her name had not been leaked because with out any siunbstanication it wouldn't have a life. 

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
3.2.5  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3.2.4    8 years ago
whoever leaded

Opps.. leaked

 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Participates
3.2.7  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.2.6    8 years ago
Schumer probably did it.  

I have NO idea and dont even care to speculate. I have no idea how many people were actually involved where and when or to what degree.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
3.2.8  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu @3.2.2    8 years ago

Can't argue with you there.

 
 
 
Spikegary
Junior Quiet
3.3  Spikegary  replied to  JohnRussell @3    8 years ago

As soon as the left stops their lunatic actions on everything under the sun.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4  MrFrost    8 years ago
And with that, I must state that you… under historic scrutiny were proven innocent.”

Blatant, flat out, LIE. I would expect no less from trumptard the liar. 

Te FBI report is SEALED, no one knows what is in it and you cannot prove someone, "innocent", you can only say they are not guilty and yes, there is a huge difference. 

 
 
 
Cerenkov
Professor Silent
4.1  Cerenkov  replied to  MrFrost @4    8 years ago

No difference. And yes, people have read the report, obviously. Your post is obtuse.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
4.1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Cerenkov @4.1    8 years ago
No difference. And yes, people have read the report, obviously.

So what does it say? Do tell. 

 
 

Who is online






87 visitors